2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTown Hall TONIGHT on CNN @ 8pm - Sanders vs Clinton
Sorry if this is known. I just read it on CNN now. Didnt see this town hall mentioned on the 2016 Primary Debates listings
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)and not giving details.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Jackilope
(819 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Jackilope
(819 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Hillary will never have that problem.
tazkcmo
(7,419 posts)You are too cute, by far!
cal04
(41,505 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)this is a drag. doesn't work unless you're a paid subscriber to one of the companies carrying the stream.
I got to watch about 3 minutes of it before it told my preview had timed out Is C-Span broadcasting I wonder?
cal04
(41,505 posts)Response to 2banon (Reply #6)
Motown_Johnny This message was self-deleted by its author.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)Thank you for posting. I was watching it on CNN via computer because I don't have cable. It just clicked off and told me my preview was over. It offends me deeply that corporations not only try to buy elections but that they can also prevent the American people from even watching debates or townhalls to decide who will be president unless we pay for their product. How messed up is that!
2banon
(7,321 posts)white_wolf
(6,257 posts)me b zola
(19,053 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)Will try to subscribe to the provider.. thank you again!
DLnyc
(2,479 posts)DU is a great resource this way!
Thanks for all the responses!
2banon
(7,321 posts)cyberpj
(10,794 posts)DLnyc
(2,479 posts)Yes, it's crazy that CNN makes you pay a toll in order to participate in the political process!
What an eff'd up place we've gotten to in this country!
Anybody know how to get to see this debate for non-TV subscribers? Will a video be made available later?
What a fucked up system!
cyberpj
(10,794 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Let's not overhype this.
cyberpj
(10,794 posts)Whether a "vs" format or not -- the people get to see and hear the candidates and ask questions.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)You didn't say, "Sunday, Sunday, SUNDAY!!!!!"
cyberpj
(10,794 posts)TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)Wonder if he is just tired, or maybe has a bit of a cold or something.
His answers sound good, though.
I'm a lot younger than him, but I don't think I could keep up with the grueling schedule of campaigning.
bklyncowgirl
(7,960 posts)Let's face it, he's got one of those 'get off my lawn faces' at the best of times. He seems natural, relaxed and he's having fun. I was saying to my husband that he and Trump seem to be the ones having fun, one positive one extremely negative.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)some other guy pulls on going twenty-five miles an hour. You get nervous because people who unaware of their surroundings often also puts extra responsibility on those cognizant of the situation. I am also pretty sure you wouldn't want somebody crashing into the back of the auto you are traveling in because of some unaware driver in front of you.
Guess it just goes back to what level you are at
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)cyberpj
(10,794 posts)cyberpj
(10,794 posts)cyberpj
(10,794 posts)little hand wave and broad smile from HIllary.
Almost like it's a pre-appearance requirement.
Am I the only one who's picked up on this.
Enter.
Locate.
Wave and Smile.
Start.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)cyberpj
(10,794 posts)BlueStateLib
(937 posts)roland martin left when the audience started asking questions to both candidates
Ino
(3,366 posts)
cyberpj
(10,794 posts)bklyncowgirl
(7,960 posts)
I know I shouldn't say this. God knows that it's hard for a woman to get good professional wear that looks great on her but I don't think this look does anything for her.
Actually the captain's outfit was red but otherwise it's a pretty close match.
Looking closer this jacket lacks the white piping around the collar but the white around the pockets looks the same.
riversedge
(81,537 posts)gemit2000
(1 post)If not I apologize for such base instincts (btw, I was always very fond of him and Mr.Green Jeans as well)
bklyncowgirl
(7,960 posts)If you're a guy your outfit is predetermined. Nice fitting Dark blue or charcoal suite. Pastel or white button down shirt and of course the tie. It's hard to mess that up but Bernie at times rises to the occasion with poor fitting suits and 'gasp" sporting a brown suit at a debate. (confession, I really liked that brown suit.)
Women have more choices but with choice comes responsibility and a bigger chance to screw it up.
dinkytron
(568 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)Whoever dresses her has zero taste.
Not sure whether Bernie is much better.
Neither one are going to get on a Vogue cover.
bklyncowgirl
(7,960 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)I like the Dr. Evil suits.
The only thing I'd ever bother to mention is that she wore the gold suit a) for a Goldman speech, the one with the picture everyone sees and b) for the debate immediately after the speeches became an issue. Feels like a message, maybe, maybe not.
brentspeak
(18,290 posts)to the question of what happens to already-skilled workers who lose their jobs to foreign competition.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)So obviously sincere.
The rest of it was not so interesting, compared to recent debates.
Maybe I have a bit of campaign fatigue too, lol.
cannabis_flower
(3,937 posts)Where I can watch from the beginning and not live since I missed the beginning?
cyberpj
(10,794 posts)Ino
(3,366 posts)Last edited Sun Mar 13, 2016, 10:03 PM - Edit history (1)
Edited to add: Yep, there it is! So spontaneous!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)She needs to answer for her support of it.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)but federal juries can?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Kittycat
(10,493 posts)I can't even imagine. 39 years a lifetime stolen, and his life almost taken. There is nothing anyone can say to take that pain away.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)And how many innocent were executed that we'll never know about?
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)I'm not condoning the crime. I think competency/comprehension is a concern, too. But concern aside - I just don't support the death penalty. If someone dies during war, escaping arrest, etc - totally different than being convicted and housed in jail. They are in jail. It's making the choice to then take a life. I'd rather the person live alone in a cell with their reality, than to just be excused from it.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Bill Clinton gave the go ahead to execute a child in a man's body, no matter how heinous his crimes were that man didn't deserve to be murdered by the state.
He didn't know what would happen to him, he saved his pie for later.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)I just can't. I don't understand how they were okay with that.
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)it might not seem like that big of a deal, but Ricky Rector was also tortured before he died. Arkansas used guards with paramedic training to set the IV's used to inject the lethal drugs. During Ricky's execution, they couldn't find a vein so they took a scalpel and carved a bunch of 1/4-1/3 inch deep trenches in his thigh (might have been arm) to expose the veins.
All the time, Bill sat there, undoubtedly pleased with how he had shown present-day Trump supporters how a Clinton deals with "predators."
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Since the drugs that are normally used in executions are now hard to come by Tennessee is trying to decide whether or not to bring back the firing squad and are still willing to use the electric chair if necessary.
They are actually debating about the most HUMANE way to kill a person.
It's unconscionable.
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)Tennessee is worse than a joke.
They had their old drug supply seized by the FDA because they and Georgia illegally bought it from some potentially rat-infested lab in India and tried to sneak it across the border. They brought back the electric chair after TWO deep-Red state had found that it was torture.
Now the firing squad?
Perhaps they forgot what happened to Robespierre?
beedle
(1,235 posts)Last month she thought it was okay for the states as long as they met stringent standards, and that the Feds should 'rethink' it.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)noamnety
(20,234 posts)We were typing at the same time. It wasn't just me that picked up on it then.
beedle
(1,235 posts)Kittycat
(10,493 posts)cyberpj
(10,794 posts)She says she wants it for terrorists.
Broward
(1,976 posts)noamnety
(20,234 posts)with a deer in headlights look as she was trying to put together an answer.
What I understood was that she will "breathe a sigh of relief" if states come to the decision on their own to do away with the death penalty. Did I miss something in her history? Has she been speaking out against it at all?
Broward
(1,976 posts)Btw, I like your characterization. She was evolving in the moment.
beedle
(1,235 posts)She was okay with it last month as long as the states met rigid standards.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)It is her new evolved position after the crime bill during Bill's administration jumped up death row sentences.
So her essential position is the federal govt should take a life only if they deem the act is egregious enough.
I disagree with that. The act of "vengeance" of taking a life for a life doesn't fix anything. It's simply vengeance.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Broward
(1,976 posts)She can't come out against it because she thinks she'll lose voters on the right. She can't come out completely for it because she fears that she'll lose voters on the left. She is unwilling to take a stand.
oregonjen
(3,647 posts)Broward
(1,976 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Tough on crime, tough on terrorism but she cares.
femmedem
(8,566 posts)but did not say she would pressure them or lead on the issue.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Ino
(3,366 posts)cyberpj
(10,794 posts)Ino
(3,366 posts)It worked for me... sorta. I have insurance for $10/month, but I can't afford the deductible... and it seems everything is a deductible item.
Doctor prescribed me 10mg dose of some medicine, but insurance would cover only a 5mg dose. I would have to satisfy a $7000 deductible before they would cover a 10mg dose! We're not talking about an expensive med... it was only like $36/month full price. So screw it... I don't take anything at all as the 5mg didn't do the trick.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Horrible for middle class families.
bklyncowgirl
(7,960 posts)My daughter's one of the winners. She doesn't make a great deal and she got a good policy at very low cost. This woman probably makes too much to qualify for a subsidy. She could very well have ended up on the losing end.
Ino
(3,366 posts)bklyncowgirl
(7,960 posts)Inevitably, the levels at which the subsidies peter out are way too for some parts of the country.
tom_kelly
(1,051 posts)And appears drained.
cyberpj
(10,794 posts)cyberpj
(10,794 posts)Foreseeing a long and costly political battle, many labor unions chose to campaign for employer-sponsored coverage, which they saw as a less desirable but more achievable goal, and as coverage expanded the national insurance system lost political momentum and ultimately failed to pass. Using health care and other fringe benefits to attract the best employees, private sector, white-collar employers nationwide expanded the U.S. health care system. Public sector employers followed suit in an effort to compete. Between 1940 and 1960, the total number of people enrolled in health insurance plans grew seven-fold, from 20,662,000 to 142,334,000,[28] and by 1958, 75% of Americans had some form of health coverage.[29]
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)$400 a month for her whole family? Only with a $10,000 deductible and a ridiculously low cap on benefits.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Why didn't she mention it?
None of this works without the public option.
2banon
(7,321 posts)Her relationships with Health Insurance Industry seemed to be on par with each other, so it surprises me to read here that she is in favor of the Public Option. And certainly couldn't tell that tonight from Hillary's comments in response to the woman whose story is all too common, but wouldn't be a problem at all if if if if if if if only, Single Payer was the path chosen instead of the massive windfall to a very corrupt industry, the health INSURANCE industry.
Thanks to the Turd Wayers we couldn't even manage to get the Public OPTION on the table, despite DEMS holding MAJORITY in BOTH HOUSES.
FFS remembering that fight leaves a very bitter taste in my mouth right now. arrgggh.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)I guess she has "evolved" away already.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/hillary-clinton-health-care-bernie-sanders-219643
2banon
(7,321 posts)Hillary handled it OK though. can't call the woman a dipshit or a liar, advising to keep shopping was probably the best she could say.
cyberpj
(10,794 posts)noamnety
(20,234 posts)elleng
(141,926 posts)enable kochs etc to spend a few more billions on communities in 50 states.
beedle
(1,235 posts)Strange fact .... contaminated water tables don't always respect community borders. Go figure.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)Yes to what you said, absolutely. And also there is the problem of who in the community gets a voice - the landowner who sign a contract? 51% of the voters? a dozen people on a town council who are looking for campaign donations? The children?
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Here's how she dealt with local communities not wanting fracking in Bulgaria.
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron
Clinton urged Bulgarian officials to give fracking another chance.
SamKnause
(14,945 posts)Is this true ???
DiehardLiberal
(580 posts)Look forward to more informed comments on this.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Shocking, I know.
beedle
(1,235 posts)She promised to stop doing so in Oct.
But there are PACs that are "not under her control' (wink, wink, nudge nudge, say no more) that might still be accepting such monies.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)Clinton's Ready for Hillary PAC received $133,246 from lobbying firms linked to GEO and CCA. Rubio's PACs and campaign have taken a total of $133,450 from private prison companies or groups that lobby on their behalf. Bush's campaign and his Right to Rise Super PAC have received $21,700 from lobbying groups affiliated with GEO and CCA.
Snip...
As for the reaction from Latino and African American civil rights organizations, these groups pressured Clinton to stop taking the prison lobby's money, as illustrated in a Huffington Post article titled Hillary Clinton Says She'll End Private Prisons, Stop Accepting Their Money:Lobbying firms that work for two major private prison giants, GEO Group and Corrections Corporation of America, gave $133,246 to the Ready for Hillary PAC,according to Vice. Those companies operate a number of criminal and immigrant detention facilities, some of which have been plagued by allegations of abuse and poor treatment of detainees.
Immigrant and civil rights groups have urged Clinton to stop accepting contributions from donors with ties to GEO and CCA. Earlier Thursday, in announcing its co-founder Cesar Vargas was moving to the campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the advocacy group Dream Action Coalition singled out Clinton for accepting those contributions.
Sanders recently introduced a bill to ban government contracts for private prisons, including immigrant detention centers.
It's unknown if Clinton would have still accepted prison lobbyist contributions had these groups not pressured the former Secretary of State. What's also surprising is that Jeb Bush actually received less money ($21,700) than Clinton, from the same interests that target a key voter base among Democrats.
In contrast to Clinton, Rubio, and Bush, Senator Bernie Sanders has been outspoken in his desire to ban private prisons, as stated in a USA Today piece titled Bernie Sanders seeks to ban private prisons
SamKnause
(14,945 posts)TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)Kittycat
(10,493 posts)Or have support withdrawn. Pretty clear to me.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)Broward
(1,976 posts)She uses this line to withhold taking clear positions on many issues. It's not about making promises that she can't keep, it's about the fear that she'll piss off her campaign donors. Also, it's about not making statements that she fears will be used against her in a general election.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Tell us your GOALS and WE'll decide whether to support you or not.
appalachiablue
(44,178 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)appalachiablue
(44,178 posts)beedle
(1,235 posts).... makes sense, she's just at the end of her firewall, early in a two person Dem race, and the Repubs had up to 17 candidates in their race ... if she didn't have the most votes at this point that would be embarrassing .... but that hardly gives her bragging rights. I guess it's a 'point', but not a very good one.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Would've been nice if the "moderators" had done their job and pointed this out.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)All said in a heartbreaking tone. Where's my kleenex?
elleng
(141,926 posts)SUCH a difficult issue!
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)DiehardLiberal
(580 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)DiehardLiberal
(580 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)And that town hall didn't help.
Zzzzzzz.
DiehardLiberal
(580 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)But I could not keep watching the 2nd half it became too painful I amy have missed some of her best stuff
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)And she's going to "put coal miners out of work", but feels really bad about it.
Strange responses allowed to let stand given zero participation by the moderators.
awake
(3,226 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)And completely unnecessary given the softball suggestion by Roland that she "pitch herself" to poor white voters in OH, WV and KY.
awake
(3,226 posts)Thanks
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)No way will they believe that she will take care of them, no one trusts her. I can not understand how she got this far she has no ability to think on her feet I am very afraid of her as our candidate.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Only thing she can do to make this easier is to pay for the attack ad with her SuperPAC.
awake
(3,226 posts)Hillary could takes us all down she is such a bad candidate.
cyberpj
(10,794 posts)Most times it's obvious, other times not so much.
I want some people with real problems and issues with each person to be allowed to confront them and ask for answers.
Every question in these set up meetings seems fairly mild and within the candidates' stated platforms.
We keep hearing about how angry everyone is, why aren't those people there?
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Doesn't serve the voters well. Even as Clinton said at one point when she was tired of the same canned answer - just go to my website for how we deal with that.
bklyncowgirl
(7,960 posts)TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)She's promising to work very hard within the existing system to produce small improvements around the edges.
- unaffordable medical insurance
- fracking
- American steelworkers out of work due to foreign competition
- death penalty
- gun violence
and on, and on ...
Vote for Hillary if you are basically satisfied with the way things are now.
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)I just want them to spend the time blasting on the POS trump since the damn media won't do it.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.