Hopefully Hillary increases her lead to 250 - 300 tomorrow

[hill2016]

to make it harder for Bernie to catch up. I think this is very doable!

[NurseJackie]

1. That's very likely ...

... and even if it's not that much, it will still be an INCREASE! Which means, of course, that Bernie falls further behind!

She with the most delegates gets the nomination. He with the fewest delegates returns to the Senate.

Go, Hillary!

[HERVEPA]

3. Infantile post.

[SheenaR]

5. I don't want to ruin your excitement

The lead was supposed to increase by 100+ tomorrow and she was and is expected by pundits to win all 5. It won't and she won't. By definition that is largely underperforming. So pump the brakes. The momentum is not in your favor

and whatever other ones you flood your posts with.

While I am at it, where should I send your shirt?

http://www.bravenewlook.com/products/399255754?s=1&utm_source=facebook

Safe to click btw

[roguevalley]

11. since when have the pundits been right yet. She was supposed to obliterate him in Michigan

[brooklynite]

18. ...and instead he got a "virtual tie" (remember when that's what folks called Massachusetts?)

Bottom line, he still underperforming his targets; the goal here isn't to "win" States, it's to win enough delegates, and he's not.

[Chan790]

33. Oh...they're both virtual ties. As was IA.

It's really stupid to call any of them a win for anybody. They're not moving the needle either way for Sanders or Clinton and at the convention, the delegates will offset sufficiently as to have no real impact on the outcome.

The only reason we have any attention to who wins a functional tie in a proportional primary is because ties in politics, like ties in sports, make for bad TV. Let's all stop feeding the media stupidity and call them what they are: ties and non-decisive wins where the assigned delegate-gain is less than a handful and has no clear impact. (If IA yesterday didn't show that...Clinton "won" the caucus...and lost the delegate vote in Mercer Co. yesterday, likely flipping the outcome statewide.)

Winner-take-alls are different, but proportional contests can be and often are ties, actual or functional.

[CajunBlazer]

35. Say three states are "virtual ties" and FL and NC go big for Clinton

Bernie gets still further behind in delegates with 5 less states to contest. How is that good for Bernie?

In order to catch up before the convention Bernie needs to win big in a bunch of states while not losing any more by wide margins. Because if Hillary gets to the convention with even a one pledged delegate lead, the super delegates are going to give her the nomination on the first ballot.

You with the jumping frog - show me a probable path for Bernie to catch up because I don't see one.

[DCBob]

2. Easily.. more likely around 320 after tomorrow.

[SheenaR]

6. Ayyyy

So she wins all 5 tomorrow?

[DCBob]

8. No.. but wins FL and NC big.

FL: 70-30
NC: 60-40

The rest are awash.

[SheenaR]

9. I got ya

Florida could certainly get out of hand. I'm basing mine on the premise that NC will be much closer.

That's why they are predictions. Someone is bound to be right!

[DCBob]

10. You may be right about NC.

But Florida I am confident is going big for Hillary... very big.

[Barack_America]

25. Can I quote you on that? 70-30. That's your prediction?

[DCBob]

29. Well close to it..

It all depends on whether "The Force" is with her!

[brooklynite]

19. I'm also giving her Ohio by a narrow margin

[revbones]

4. Yes. We'll see tomorrow...

I'm seeing the opposing predictions on the Bernie side. It'll be interesting.

[bigwillq]

28. Congrats on 1,000 posts!

[MoonRiver]

7. Yes, it's going to be a very exciting and hopefully successful day for the Secretary!

[morningfog]

12. Won't happen. I think it will be on the order of 20-30.

[Ron Green]

13. Something like that could happen; it would be a disaster of epic proportions

for the people of the United States and the world.

[CajunBlazer]

36. Well, that's one opinion heard from

Wait we still have to hear from at least one hundred more before we can make a determination.

[Carlo Marx]

14. Do you guys clap and cheer at your tv when Hillary name drops Henry Kissinger or quietly cringe?

How about when she stumbles and stammers to justify taking millions of dollars from Wall Street, "September 11" or "everybody's doing it"--do you whoop it up and high five over her brilliant response or awkwardly hope they move quickly to another topic?

[Alfresco]

20. Do you see RED when you read a pro-Hillary post? :-)

[Logical]

24. I see red, like gop red. Nt

[Alfresco]

26. I imagine republicans do too.

[Betty Karlson]

15. You will understand I hope quite the opposite.

[Alfresco]

16. She will. The press will be describing her lead as insurmountable putting added pressure on the BS.

[NurseJackie]

21. Such added pressure on the campaign will be reflected here proportionately as well.

Oh well. It won't last too much longer. Be patient.

[Alfresco]

32. Yep, won't be long now. :-)

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

17. Hopefully, you will discover Wednesday that you "misspoke".

[CajunBlazer]

37. Wanna bet?

I had to say something - no one else replies to your posts and I didn't want you to get lonely.

[GreatGazoo]

22. Hopefully we go forward with the most electable candidate.

[Logical]

23. Lol, what was the point of this post?? Random thougts? Nt

[mathewsleep]

27. Day dreaming/wishful thinking

[lumberjack_jeff]

30. It's all a football game to you, isn't it? n/t

[CajunBlazer]

38. It really does come down to the math

and the math really isn't looking good for Bernie.

[hill2016]

39. i assure you Sanders and his team

are watching the delegate count very very carefully

[highprincipleswork]

31. Oh, hopefully she will not.

[oldandhappy]

34. or not