Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cyberpj

(10,794 posts)
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 06:27 PM Mar 2016

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (cyberpj) on Thu Mar 17, 2016, 08:48 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) cyberpj Mar 2016 OP
Why are you posting something to cast a false light on Sanders? - He said he would never do it! nt TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #1
Except for the "past tense" part, this post is pretty positive for Sanders. w4rma Mar 2016 #3
Still, it's akin to a "If Sanders Killed 20 kittens, would he still be a viable candidate" TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #5
You sound just like Edmund Blackadder ... earthshine Mar 2016 #13
I disagree. It's just proper English for the thought I was expressing. Wow. nt cyberpj Mar 2016 #14
I would switch to him for that. I don't like cats. RealAmericanDem Mar 2016 #18
The OP is pointing out... gcomeau Mar 2016 #7
I understand the OP, but Sanders said he would never give the election to the GOP. Moot point! TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #9
It SHOULD be a moot point. gcomeau Mar 2016 #10
Thank you. My point was, too many Dem people questioning his choice don't appreciate it. nt cyberpj Mar 2016 #15
I wrote IF HE HAD RUN AS INDEPENDENT ---because he didn't. I don't understand how that's false? cyberpj Mar 2016 #12
Well people need a history lesson nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #2
Hillary would still have more delegates and Total vote count. riversedge Mar 2016 #4
You comprehend this is talking about a GE scenario right? gcomeau Mar 2016 #8
It's an automatic reflex. They can't help it. n/t djean111 Mar 2016 #11
In the context of this explanatory post your response sounds like a child's nah-nah-nah-nah-nah..... cyberpj Mar 2016 #16
The voters will speak and we will have a nominee. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #6
THANK YOU! I thought I was showing his smart and fair side with the post but the bullets fly fast cyberpj Mar 2016 #17

TheBlackAdder

(29,981 posts)
1. Why are you posting something to cast a false light on Sanders? - He said he would never do it! nt
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 06:31 PM
Mar 2016
 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
3. Except for the "past tense" part, this post is pretty positive for Sanders.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 06:34 PM
Mar 2016

And I agree with it, completely, except for the past tense part.

TheBlackAdder

(29,981 posts)
5. Still, it's akin to a "If Sanders Killed 20 kittens, would he still be a viable candidate"
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 06:39 PM
Mar 2016

.


Many people just read the title and reminding people he could possibly do a Trump sends negative signals.


.

 

earthshine

(1,642 posts)
13. You sound just like Edmund Blackadder ...
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:09 PM
Mar 2016

full of empty verbiage and blather.

This OP is fully pro-Bernie, just like me.

 

cyberpj

(10,794 posts)
14. I disagree. It's just proper English for the thought I was expressing. Wow. nt
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:09 PM
Mar 2016

RealAmericanDem

(221 posts)
18. I would switch to him for that. I don't like cats.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:19 PM
Mar 2016
 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
7. The OP is pointing out...
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 06:51 PM
Mar 2016

....that all the whining temper tantrum throwing posts about Sanders running as a Democrat when he's really an Independent (and there have been *a lot* of them) are mind blowingly stupid.

We WANT Sanders running as a Democrat and not an Independent. So anyone bitching about it is being ridiculous.

TheBlackAdder

(29,981 posts)
9. I understand the OP, but Sanders said he would never give the election to the GOP. Moot point!
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 06:54 PM
Mar 2016

.


It just adds a tinge of negativism to him.


.

 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
10. It SHOULD be a moot point.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 06:55 PM
Mar 2016

Tell that to all the morons outraged that he's NOT running as an Independent as if that's somehow dishonorable and cheating rather than helping us.

 

cyberpj

(10,794 posts)
15. Thank you. My point was, too many Dem people questioning his choice don't appreciate it. nt
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:11 PM
Mar 2016
 

cyberpj

(10,794 posts)
12. I wrote IF HE HAD RUN AS INDEPENDENT ---because he didn't. I don't understand how that's false?
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:08 PM
Mar 2016
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
2. Well people need a history lesson
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 06:32 PM
Mar 2016

it was the tens of thousands of conservadems and the United States Supreme Court that gave Florida to Bush. I predict the same Conservadems will give the WH to Trump, if they can... after all they already are crossing.

And no young one, I am not going to argue facts with you. They are well known, sadly in academia and OUTSIDE the United States.

riversedge

(81,095 posts)
4. Hillary would still have more delegates and Total vote count.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 06:37 PM
Mar 2016
 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
8. You comprehend this is talking about a GE scenario right?
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 06:52 PM
Mar 2016
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
11. It's an automatic reflex. They can't help it. n/t
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:04 PM
Mar 2016
 

cyberpj

(10,794 posts)
16. In the context of this explanatory post your response sounds like a child's nah-nah-nah-nah-nah.....
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:16 PM
Mar 2016

about an election process that ain't over yet.

Just an unnecessary opinion unrelated to the discussion of WHY.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
6. The voters will speak and we will have a nominee.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 06:42 PM
Mar 2016

The runner up will endorse the winner. Sanders was smart enough to not run as an independent.

 

cyberpj

(10,794 posts)
17. THANK YOU! I thought I was showing his smart and fair side with the post but the bullets fly fast
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:18 PM
Mar 2016

and furious around here don't they?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This message was self-del...