2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy Hillary supporters believe Bernie is done.
It's simple, do the math.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)lapfog_1
(29,226 posts)why are so many hillary people trying to convince DU that this is the case?
or are you just trying to convince yourselves?
William769
(55,148 posts)I'm just playing this tit for tat Game with Sanders supporters. The only difference between the two of us is, I'm using facts.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)The longer Bernie drags this out the harder it will be to fight Trump.
I am sure Bernie sees what we all see. If he stays in for some ego reason he hurts all of us.
You all don't need Bernie to rise up and start a revolution.
Even if he was in the White House he faces the same Congress that Hillary would.
And with health care he would have to try and improve the ACA just as Hillary would. Single payer needs to start in the states. We have to over turn Citizens United by putting new Justices on the Supreme Court to do that.
Bernie and Hillary would nominate the same type of justices.
jfern
(5,204 posts)Coincidence
(98 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)I think you have forgotten something
Response to William769 (Original post)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)to sit down and shut up.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)I agree. You won. So twist the knife in us Berners, such are the spoils of victory.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Hillary's backstabbing at Nancy Reagan's funeral was bad enough for me.
William769
(55,148 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)William769
(55,148 posts)Never!
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)I've got nothing against you.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)Justice Kagan was appointed by Obama?
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)Everyone assumes that the actions of their rival candidate are malicious. Hillary didn't mean to backstab anyone (why, for gods sake would a presidential candidate do that on purpose?). She has been busy with the campaign, and on the way to the interview some aid gave her a few (incorrect) talking points that she repeated, then later apologized for. Because you already dislike her, you assume the worse, but come on people. We are all human. Mistakes are made, I am happy when people own up to them and apologize.
And on that topic...why would falsely crediting a dead women with something nice possibly be a 'backstab'. Everyone tries to say nice things when someone dies. It doesn't change history, or take away anyone's rights.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)DOMA, DADT, "marriage is a sacred union between man and woman" and the rest of the vile bile.
If you don't understand how praising Nancy Reagan for "silent activism" is a backstab to the people she and her gay-hating husband wanted to let die, if you think that is just an "oops" moment, then let me refer you to this post
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1474965
and this one
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511483223
And that last one also addresses Clinton's sorry attempts to say sorry.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)"Bernie supporter who understands probability and statistics"?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1055201
Bernie supporters do not say things like that about Bernie or his supporters.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Some Hill-shills are now suddenly truning into "Bernie-supporters who understand it is time to concede"?
Wow, new depths...
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Both seem to forget that their posts and recs are visible to the public. I hope they're not representative of Hillary supporters on the whole, because they aren't doing themselves any favors.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)And next we will hear the blaming of millennials again: "why won't you cross this bridge we just burned down?"
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)timeout. Pure sarcasm. I've had hundreds of pro-Bernie posts. THAT was sarcasm. And, I was suicidal. But you can think what you want.
riversedge
(70,305 posts)Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 17, 2016, 07:47 AM - Edit history (1)
The hardest part was having my sister call me a "fucking bastard" for supporting Bernie. She's been, other than my wife, my best friend for my entire life. She's got a LOT invested in Hillary personally, and I in Bernie. At least I had.
But it's over now. I really worry about our country and the world, and I honestly thought it might be our chance to re-claim our system of government from the ultra-wealthy. But again, Bernie lost, and resoundingly so. I'm not going anywhere in terms of doing myself in, and thanks for giving a damn. I hope Hillary does well. I will be voting for her.
riversedge
(70,305 posts)have a purpose in life--your family. And yes, you need them and they need you. So keep yourself grounded. And thanks for the conversation
In my younger days I probably would believe in a revolution. Sanders is appealing in many respects but I also think given the make up of our government, it will not happen.
I need to get some sleep eye.
Later.
Old Crow
(2,212 posts)Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)Your hidden posts are not sarcasm. Anyway, you have a nice evening.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)Cut it out
Response to William769 (Original post)
Post removed
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Because he's the only liberal in the race. Hillary prefers the term 'progressive', which she has co-opted to mean as far left as I have to pretend to be until the GE.
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)It's just a "talking point" to get Sanders supporters to lose heart.
Clinton supporters are showing contempt for half the voters in the country, who haven't voted yet. That includes me.
So just shut up about "the math." Your talking about MY VOTE. I understand "the math" perfectly well and Sanders can still win the nomination. That is very clear FROM "THE MATH."
And besides all that, you really don't understand the Bernie Sanders campaign. It has never been just a "horse race." It is about NEW IDEAS, or, rather, some new, and some old that go back as far as Harry Truman who wanted Medicare for all, and the public university system in California and other places, which was FREE TUITION in the '60s and ''70s until the Reagan junta. So now, guess what? Hillary Clinton and her supporters are supporting REAGAN policies.
And you wonder why we won't quit.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)We do not want Hillary to be the nominee. She does not have our vote.
Funny how that works.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)It's that whole reducing denominator over time when the numerator fails to reduce at an equivalent rate thing.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Carlo Marx
(98 posts)Nor can they list any meaningful accomplishments. It's like Santorum stuttering when asked why he supported Rubio. I heard a Clinton surrogate tonight on the Benjamin Dixon Show try and answer the 'name one Hillary accomplishment' with the children's chip program. Haha. Very funny. Throwing crumbs to children after you pushed welfare reform, which has been empirically determined to have increased poverty among women and children is insulting and a cynical betrayal of liberal values. Oh yes, Hillary just squirmed away from the label of liberal with Chris Matthews the other night.
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)I don't think she's for Bernie's platform of pipe dreams.
Gothmog
(145,567 posts)There is no way to overcome this delegate lead