Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kgnu_fan

(3,021 posts)
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 11:17 AM Mar 2016

The payday loan family behind Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s deregulatory zeal

http://littlesis.org/news/2016/03/11/the-payday-loan-family-behind-debbie-wasserman-schultzs-deregulatory-zeal/

Why is Rep. Wasserman Schultz going to bat for an industry that is bleeding her constituency dry to the tune of $280 million per year? One possibility: Florida’s leading family of payday loan profiteers is a major donor to Wasserman Schultz, and shelled out a series of large contributions to her campaign last June. Perhaps she is repaying the favor.

For Florida-based Amscot Financial, predatory lending is a family business. CEO Ian MacKechnie – who is worth millions – has said that he “sympathizes with his hard-luck customers” and that he wants to “feel like we’re offering valuable services at reasonable prices.”



See Map
The Payday Loan Family Funding Debbie Wasserman Schultz







31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The payday loan family behind Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s deregulatory zeal (Original Post) kgnu_fan Mar 2016 OP
She's disgusting on so many levels Roland99 Mar 2016 #1
Pure filth. FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #10
And she is meddling with the entire Presidential election process. kgnu_fan Mar 2016 #13
And this, my friends, is what we are supposed to donate to, to vote for - this is what now djean111 Mar 2016 #2
"Let's Make A Deal." dchill Mar 2016 #3
This is a perfect preview of an Hillary administration. Do you favor the payday loan industry? Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #4
Absolutely disgusting. TDale313 Mar 2016 #5
Payday loan interest astrophuss42 Mar 2016 #6
This is what Democratic Party has become...corrupt....We need to clean it up. kgnu_fan Mar 2016 #7
We've always had corrupt Democrats but it seems like we used to be more embarrassed about them. Gidney N Cloyd Mar 2016 #9
Now she is influencing Presidential Election process. Horrible for the Party. kgnu_fan Mar 2016 #11
Thanks. I was wondering why she took this position. MgtPA Mar 2016 #8
Support Tim Canova, giving DWS her FIRST primary ever merrily Mar 2016 #12
kick kgnu_fan Mar 2016 #14
Just contributed to Tim via DU angstlessk Mar 2016 #15
Millions agree with you. Unfortunately, those millions do not all vote in her district. merrily Mar 2016 #17
Hey they voted for a "Democrat", so maybe they want angstlessk Mar 2016 #20
They voted for a Democrat who campaigned for three Republicans, so who really knows? merrily Mar 2016 #21
SO you WANT DWS to win? angstlessk Mar 2016 #23
um, no. I'm the one who posted the donation links for Tim Canova on this thread. merrily Mar 2016 #25
Once...I will do more if he looks viable angstlessk Mar 2016 #27
Catch 22. Donating only way to help ensure he is viable. She takes PAC money. He doesn't. merrily Mar 2016 #28
The moment I think he has a 'chance in hell' I will angstlessk Mar 2016 #30
+1 n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #31
Hillary sure surrounds herself with scumbags... AzDar Mar 2016 #16
That is so painful to me. She did not have to do this. Why is she contaminating herself? kgnu_fan Mar 2016 #18
After 2008, she is taking no chances. And it's her turn. merrily Mar 2016 #22
Disastrous turn... nt kgnu_fan Mar 2016 #24
"Only" for the Party. She seems to be thrilled, FBI investigation and all. merrily Mar 2016 #26
she thinks she can do this PRECISELY because "we're the party of the poor" MisterP Mar 2016 #19
Are we still? Are you sure? merrily Mar 2016 #29
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
2. And this, my friends, is what we are supposed to donate to, to vote for - this is what now
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 11:19 AM
Mar 2016

passes for a "Democrat".
Not doing that any more.

Kip Humphrey

(4,753 posts)
4. This is a perfect preview of an Hillary administration. Do you favor the payday loan industry?
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 11:20 AM
Mar 2016

astrophuss42

(290 posts)
6. Payday loan interest
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 11:24 AM
Mar 2016

Exactly the kind of thing I started voting for democratic party candidates because of.

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,847 posts)
9. We've always had corrupt Democrats but it seems like we used to be more embarrassed about them.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 11:38 AM
Mar 2016

kgnu_fan

(3,021 posts)
11. Now she is influencing Presidential Election process. Horrible for the Party.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 11:44 AM
Mar 2016

Trust? Integrity? Accountability?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
17. Millions agree with you. Unfortunately, those millions do not all vote in her district.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 01:31 PM
Mar 2016

merrily

(45,251 posts)
21. They voted for a Democrat who campaigned for three Republicans, so who really knows?
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 02:44 PM
Mar 2016

Still, many morans figure the one you already know is better than the one you don't know--and learning about a new candidate is such "hard" work, so why bother, when you can just re-elect Debs?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
25. um, no. I'm the one who posted the donation links for Tim Canova on this thread.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 02:49 PM
Mar 2016

I've also donated to him three times (so far)--from Boston, MA. You?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
28. Catch 22. Donating only way to help ensure he is viable. She takes PAC money. He doesn't.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 03:14 PM
Mar 2016

angstlessk

(11,862 posts)
30. The moment I think he has a 'chance in hell' I will
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 03:55 PM
Mar 2016

donate as much as I can...probably 100...but she gets that much from a corporation that bundles that much times 100

WE NEED ONLY GOVERNMENT FINANCED ELECTIONS..and NOT CORPORATE FINANCED ELECTIONS!

kgnu_fan

(3,021 posts)
18. That is so painful to me. She did not have to do this. Why is she contaminating herself?
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 01:32 PM
Mar 2016

merrily

(45,251 posts)
26. "Only" for the Party. She seems to be thrilled, FBI investigation and all.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 02:51 PM
Mar 2016

And, to think, once the Enquirer story came out, I blamed Edwards for not bowing out sooner.

See? Everything really is relative.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The payday loan family be...