Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 01:30 PM Mar 2016

Telling poll numbers from Wisconsin

Although they rate all of the candidates for their upcoming primary, Marquette Law School's poll is telling.

https://law.marquette.edu/poll/


Candidate Net favorable Net within party Net among independents Net within other party
Kasich 6 9 11 -4
Rubio -8 47 -12 -46
Sanders 11 51 21 -56
Cruz -18 46 -31 -56
Clinton -18 55 -29 -89
Trump -43 0 -43 -76


Among Indies, Clinton is -29 net negative, while Bernie is +21!
True, among dems, she has 55 and he has 51. What is telling is that Sanders (and Kusich) are the only ones with net positive numbers. Clinton is tied with cruz, and Trump has some real problems in that state.


One other point of interest. Since he dropped out of the presidential nomination race, Scott Walker had a -39 net negative rating. It is the same now. Or the end of February when they ran this poll. I suspect that there has not been much change. Although Bernie signs are popping up, according to my Wisconsin buddies.
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Telling poll numbers from Wisconsin (Original Post) ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2016 OP
If I'm reading that right, SheilaT Mar 2016 #1
according to my friends, Scruz has been investing time and money ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2016 #4
Sanders has not been vetted: and he not going to be the nominee: lewebley3 Mar 2016 #9
Explain what you mean by vetted. SheilaT Mar 2016 #12
He has not had his records or Doc's searched: or his attachment to lewebley3 Mar 2016 #15
Somehow I doubt that Sanders has kept SheilaT Mar 2016 #16
His record? Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #14
Hillary -10 since November Viva_La_Revolution Mar 2016 #2
Anecdotal evidence. I know it's not data, but .... Scuba Mar 2016 #3
same here in Colorado SoLeftIAmRight Mar 2016 #5
BBBBBEEEEENNNNNGGGGGHHHHHAAAAAZZZZZIIIII!!!!!11111 CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #8
Wow, how the mighty have fallen ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2016 #6
That's an old poll, but I expect Sanders to win WI by 15-20 points. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #7
I felt that he was growing while she was fading. ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2016 #10
not really, WI was always a really, really good state for him. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #11
Uh, oh, open primary. SheilaT Mar 2016 #17
it is a safe prediction that the losers will dismiss it and winners will geek tragedy Mar 2016 #20
I was convinced he would pull out Illinois ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2016 #24
The IL polling changed after MI--pollsters all changed their turnout models geek tragedy Mar 2016 #25
Looks like Kasich has it ... Onlooker Mar 2016 #13
Kasich is +6, Bernie is +11. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #19
Bernie and Kasich aren't running against each other Onlooker Mar 2016 #21
There is not enough information there for your conclusion. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #22
I agree; these polls don't tell us much Onlooker Mar 2016 #23
When it comes to net favorable ratings, there is a very clear difference and trend. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #18
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
1. If I'm reading that right,
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 01:36 PM
Mar 2016

Sanders is the only candidate still in the race with a net favorable within his own party.

The only one with worse ratings than Clinton is Trump, so we could correctly characterize them as Hillary the Hated and Drumpf the Despised.

That does not bode well at all in a general election between those two.

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
4. according to my friends, Scruz has been investing time and money
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 01:39 PM
Mar 2016

heavily, and raising some interest and money in the process.

If Trump loses to Scruz, we can expect an open convention, riots, a group of armed thugs who will want to go to Cleveland armed and delusional, AND probably the most entertaining political event in my lifetime.

 

lewebley3

(3,412 posts)
9. Sanders has not been vetted: and he not going to be the nominee:
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 01:53 PM
Mar 2016


So, Sanders has not been attack: that's why he has
a good favorable rating.

He just a nice little old, until he becomes threat to someone:
then his record would be fair game.
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
12. Explain what you mean by vetted.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 02:02 PM
Mar 2016

That keeps on being thrown out there by Hillary supporters, and I don't think that word means what you think it means.

 

lewebley3

(3,412 posts)
15. He has not had his records or Doc's searched: or his attachment to
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 02:05 PM
Mar 2016


socialism explored. So far he is just a nice old man;
that would like to give free college away, and hates
business.
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
16. Somehow I doubt that Sanders has kept
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 02:09 PM
Mar 2016

some huge scandal cleverly hidden so far. He's been remarkably consistent in his views and voting for some thirty years now. Unlike some candidates I could name.

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
14. His record?
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 02:03 PM
Mar 2016

Brock is all over it. Clinton's rat who smeared Anita Hill. Only thing he could find to attack was Sander's arrest record.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
3. Anecdotal evidence. I know it's not data, but ....
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 01:37 PM
Mar 2016

I've seen exactly one Trump sign in Wisconsin.

I've seen exactly one Jindal sign in Wisconsin.

I've seen exactly one Hillary sign in Wisconsin.

I've seen more Bernie signs than I can count.





I have seen several bumper stickers with Hillary's name on them. They all read "Hillary lied and 4 Americans died."


Tuesday's results should be interesting.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
7. That's an old poll, but I expect Sanders to win WI by 15-20 points.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 01:47 PM
Mar 2016

He should net a similar number of delegates to what Clinton netted in North Carolina.

Clinton would do well to keep it within single digits in the land of Feingold (Feingold voters are Sanders voters).

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
11. not really, WI was always a really, really good state for him.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 01:58 PM
Mar 2016

demographics, open primary, Democrats there tend to be really, really liberal.

I doubt she was ever close there amongst likely voters.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
17. Uh, oh, open primary.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 02:10 PM
Mar 2016

Which means if he wins, and especially if he wins big, the Hillary group will totally dismiss it, as if a person can win the general election with only the voters of her political party, no Independents required.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
20. it is a safe prediction that the losers will dismiss it and winners will
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 02:16 PM
Mar 2016

overestimate its importance

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
24. I was convinced he would pull out Illinois
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:45 PM
Mar 2016

after being 23 points down here.

I still think there were some unusual hmmmm things in our primary.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
25. The IL polling changed after MI--pollsters all changed their turnout models
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:57 PM
Mar 2016

and there was poll herding going on.

IL was always going to be a close state.

WI will not be close.

 

Onlooker

(5,636 posts)
21. Bernie and Kasich aren't running against each other
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 02:38 PM
Mar 2016

My point was about the general election, in which case looks like Kasich will get most of the crossover votes.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
22. There is not enough information there for your conclusion.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 02:43 PM
Mar 2016

It is very likely that the (D)s who have a favorable opinion of Kasich will still vote for the (D) nominee.

Without breaking down exactly who does and does not view Bernie/Hillary favorably and then asking those people if they view Kasich favorably, we can't know what will happen as far as crossover votes go.







 

Onlooker

(5,636 posts)
23. I agree; these polls don't tell us much
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 02:46 PM
Mar 2016

Hillary may be more unpopular right now, but what will happen in the general election when Republicans play up his Castro comments, the VA scandal under his watch, his family on his campaign payroll, and anything else they can possibly find? His negatives will go up. Republicans seem to want him more than Hillary so have never really attacked him.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Telling poll numbers from...