Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:47 PM
redruddyred (1,615 posts)
what's going on with all these voting purges in upcoming primary states?
the hartmann program was going on and on last week about how people have been taken off the voter rolls. i had problems, now a friend of mine is having problems. is this a trend?
|
20 replies, 3196 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
redruddyred | Mar 2016 | OP |
elleng | Mar 2016 | #1 | |
redruddyred | Mar 2016 | #3 | |
stevenleser | Mar 2016 | #5 | |
redruddyred | Mar 2016 | #9 | |
hollysmom | Mar 2016 | #13 | |
elleng | Mar 2016 | #7 | |
Nite Owl | Mar 2016 | #8 | |
elleng | Mar 2016 | #10 | |
Lucinda | Mar 2016 | #2 | |
hollysmom | Mar 2016 | #4 | |
stevenleser | Mar 2016 | #6 | |
redruddyred | Mar 2016 | #11 | |
magical thyme | Mar 2016 | #12 | |
hrmjustin | Mar 2016 | #14 | |
redruddyred | Mar 2016 | #15 | |
hrmjustin | Mar 2016 | #16 | |
Post removed | Mar 2016 | #17 | |
Kip Humphrey | Mar 2016 | #18 | |
redruddyred | Mar 2016 | #20 | |
geek tragedy | Mar 2016 | #19 |
Response to redruddyred (Original post)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:48 PM
elleng (122,756 posts)
1. It's BEEN a trend,
for YEARS.
Recall florida: bush/gore? tptb been manipulating, and little ever done to stop it. |
Response to elleng (Reply #1)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:51 PM
redruddyred (1,615 posts)
3. from the DEMOCRATIC rolls tho? nt
Response to redruddyred (Reply #3)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:52 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
5. Primaries are handled by the secretaries of state, not the Democratic party.
If this was happening at a caucus, then yes, you could place blame at the state democratic party.
|
Response to stevenleser (Reply #5)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:56 PM
redruddyred (1,615 posts)
9. even in democratic states, with dem SoS this is happening
what's their bag?
|
Response to stevenleser (Reply #5)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:57 PM
hollysmom (5,946 posts)
13. I don't even know the states these peopel are in,
maybe a caucus maybe a straight election, i just know then as on-line friends, One was in Colorado, not sure what that was. Mostly I have to ask where they live when discussing things, too many people I know for over 10 years but never met in real life.
|
Response to redruddyred (Reply #3)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:53 PM
elleng (122,756 posts)
7. Yes,
and it seems some Dems even more eager to do so these days.
|
Response to elleng (Reply #1)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:54 PM
Nite Owl (11,303 posts)
8. After Bush won and
the electronic machines came to be we expected the dems to investigate and now it is clear why they didn't ever do anything, it's good for them too. At this point they are really so unafraid of consequences they are rather open about what they are doing.
|
Response to Nite Owl (Reply #8)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:56 PM
elleng (122,756 posts)
10. Yes, we expected the dems to investigate,
and NADA.
|
Response to redruddyred (Original post)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:49 PM
Lucinda (30,872 posts)
2. GOP getting ready for the GE
And all those people who don't vote in the primaries are still at risk.
|
Response to redruddyred (Original post)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:52 PM
hollysmom (5,946 posts)
4. but it is happening in the primaries as well, people being taken off the democratic rolls
and being told they changed their affiliation. I keep hearing more stories every day, some from people I know who are not on political boards but hobbie boards. it is not good.
|
Response to hollysmom (Reply #4)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:53 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
6. See my #5 nt
Response to hollysmom (Reply #4)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:57 PM
redruddyred (1,615 posts)
11. i know it happens every year but this is such an impt year
that any sort of fraud or clerical errors loom larger than usual
|
Response to redruddyred (Original post)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:57 PM
magical thyme (14,881 posts)
12. Election fraud
Note the pattern: large states with lots of delegates at stake. All using the same software.
Other pattern: running out of ballots. The 1st time happenstance. 2nd time coincidence. 3rd time enemy actionNow it's happened in state after state after state. Voter suppression by simply not having enough ballots. Have they not figured out that this election is generating huge turnout? Actually, they probably have. And they've determined that not having enough ballots on hand is a viable way to suppress turnout. It's not that they don't learn from experience. It's that they learn all the wrong lessons. |
Response to redruddyred (Original post)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:58 PM
hrmjustin (71,265 posts)
14. My brother was purged last year here in NY.
He is an independent and they said he had not voted in several years so they removed him from the rolls.
|
Response to hrmjustin (Reply #14)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:01 PM
redruddyred (1,615 posts)
15. my state doesn't issue permanent absentee ballots
even for folks on ssdi (permanently disabled)
that's definitely the most sensible and efficient policy |
Response to redruddyred (Reply #15)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:03 PM
hrmjustin (71,265 posts)
16. NY does. My grandparents were able to vote absentee for years.
Response to hrmjustin (Reply #16)
Post removed
Response to redruddyred (Original post)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:28 PM
Kip Humphrey (4,753 posts)
18. most likely enabler...
Response to Kip Humphrey (Reply #18)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:37 PM
redruddyred (1,615 posts)
20. i clicked thru the links and failed to discover your point
care to elaborate? is the problem that we are using machines and not paper ballots?
|
Response to redruddyred (Original post)
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:31 PM
geek tragedy (68,868 posts)
19. It's a conspiracy-Hillary hired NSA psychics to figure out
who would vote for Sanders and then arranged for state officials to purge the voter rolls.
(Note: sarcasm) |