Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think there have been enough debates. (Original Post) hill2016 Mar 2016 OP
oh H2O Man Mar 2016 #1
Why did I think when I opened this OP that a Hillary supporter would be saying this. bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #2
Who else would. hobbit709 Mar 2016 #5
I have my doubts ibegurpard Mar 2016 #15
I agree with them as a Bernie supporter Blue_Adept Mar 2016 #17
Many people haven't seen a debate yet. When there is a debate in a state or region the local TV news think Mar 2016 #3
My state doesn't vote until June 7th HughLefty1 Mar 2016 #10
exactly! oldandhappy Mar 2016 #13
"At this point"... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #4
more than halfway through the primaries... hill2016 Mar 2016 #9
"do we really need more debates"... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #12
She agreed to more debates. Broward Mar 2016 #6
The late Al Davis would love the Clinton campaign DefenseLawyer Mar 2016 #7
Every poll will disabuse you of that notion Bad Thoughts Mar 2016 #8
But each candidate needs to decide what is best for their campaigns hack89 Mar 2016 #24
That was not the OP's argument Bad Thoughts Mar 2016 #36
It is the foolish politician that doesn't go for the kill first chance they have hack89 Mar 2016 #37
I agree. Enough with the debates already. If anything, there should have AgadorSparticus Mar 2016 #11
I love watching Hillary debate, so I have mixed feelings about it. MoonRiver Mar 2016 #14
There's two more official debates scheduled. NWCorona Mar 2016 #16
So you think people who haven't voted yet should be deprived of exposure to Bernie? Avalux Mar 2016 #18
Have people been living under a rock for the past three months? LonePirate Mar 2016 #32
Whether you're right or not, two more debates were agreed upon. PragmaticLiberal Mar 2016 #19
It appears after each debate Bernie picks up more supporters angstlessk Mar 2016 #20
Ya why get free prime time tv to present our Democrat issues and ideas on how to solve our problems awake Mar 2016 #21
I think this post is meaningless. JudyM Mar 2016 #22
Why not do some reseach if you are interested? riversedge Mar 2016 #28
My question was rhetorical. They had far more debates. JudyM Mar 2016 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author JudyM Mar 2016 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author JudyM Mar 2016 #23
Most of the debates have been on subscription cable tv--not everyone has access nt TheDormouse Mar 2016 #25
I think one was on npr? correct if wrong. Have any networks offered? riversedge Mar 2016 #27
I agree. riversedge Mar 2016 #26
How many of these debates have focused on New York regional issues? TheDormouse Mar 2016 #29
As a Political Junkie and a Sanders supporter Sky Masterson Mar 2016 #30
Awwww, c'mon. This is just now getting GOOD. Let's have two or three more debates and really Land of Enchantment Mar 2016 #31
I think NY'ers deserve to hear where the candidates stand on fracking in NY State TheDormouse Mar 2016 #35
Your candidate disagrees, debate NY is on. Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #38
What is there left to discuss? athena Mar 2016 #39
Then why did Hillary agree to debates in April and May? Joe the Revelator Mar 2016 #40

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
5. Who else would.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:51 PM
Mar 2016

The ones who believe in the corporate foregone conclusion want to squash any and all uprisings.

Blue_Adept

(6,431 posts)
17. I agree with them as a Bernie supporter
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:19 PM
Mar 2016

It's not like there'll be much new if anything that comes from this. It all just gets to be mindnumbing after a while - both for those that follow it and those that don't care.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
3. Many people haven't seen a debate yet. When there is a debate in a state or region the local TV news
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:48 PM
Mar 2016

and newspapers promote the fact fact that there is a debate in their state. This gets more people exposed to the Democratic message.

If Democrats are going to win people need to know what they stand for.

Debates in many different parts of the country are a great way to get exposure to Democratic issues.

HughLefty1

(231 posts)
10. My state doesn't vote until June 7th
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:56 PM
Mar 2016

Many folks don't get serious about watching debates or researching the candidates until a few weeks before their local elections.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
4. "At this point"...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:49 PM
Mar 2016

Odd that 'at this point', how did you decide that this exact time frame would be 'the point' at which no further debates are needed?

Don't the 22 remaining primaries and folks that have yet to cast their votes get a voice in that time frame? Do their voices and votes count?

I bet if HRC and her supporters push this I bet they will make their decisions much quicker and not in the direction you'd like...

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
12. "do we really need more debates"...
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:01 PM
Mar 2016

you'd think HRC and her supporters would scramble for the chance to debate foreign policy issues in light of the recent Brussels attack since they believe their candidate is 'stronger' on that particular issue...

'More than halfway through'... again, 22 primaries left with all those voters yet to decide, stronger candidates would jump at the idea of more debates to strengthen their position

HRC and her supporters must not feel that strongly about their position...

Broward

(1,976 posts)
6. She agreed to more debates.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:51 PM
Mar 2016

If she goes back on her word, she'll likely lose many votes in the general election if she's the nominees. Also, no way should Bernie endorse her.

Bad Thoughts

(2,608 posts)
8. Every poll will disabuse you of that notion
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:54 PM
Mar 2016

Clinton goes up, Sanders goes down.
Sanders goes down, Clinton goes up.

Apparently people change their mind. Sometimes they want information.

Please, take a good look at all the surveys. Then return here with a new OP: "We need more debates to convince people about Hillary!"

hack89

(39,179 posts)
24. But each candidate needs to decide what is best for their campaigns
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:47 PM
Mar 2016

as a front runner, Hillary has no desire to give Bernie a helping hand before some major primaries. Bernie is desperate - it is not Hillary's job to help him.

Bad Thoughts

(2,608 posts)
36. That was not the OP's argument
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:10 PM
Mar 2016

She made it seem as if static polls would indicate an electorate that was unchanging. The polling tells a different story.

You separate point has its own flaw: candidates benefit in the generals from an extended primary that keeps the conversation about the issues alive in the public consciousness. Even the candidate who is ahead should not, indeed, must not, give up on that advantage.

hack89

(39,179 posts)
37. It is the foolish politician that doesn't go for the kill first chance they have
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:19 PM
Mar 2016

it is dangerous letting an opponent hang around any longer than necessary. There will be plenty of time for issues once the nomination is wrapped up.

AgadorSparticus

(7,963 posts)
11. I agree. Enough with the debates already. If anything, there should have
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:59 PM
Mar 2016

Been more democratic debates last fall., but insead, it has been 24/7 showings of the clowns on the right. And we wonder why trump is ahead....

MoonRiver

(36,959 posts)
14. I love watching Hillary debate, so I have mixed feelings about it.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:04 PM
Mar 2016

IMO, she always wins, hands down. But I agree that it probably will change no opinions, at this point.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
16. There's two more official debates scheduled.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:16 PM
Mar 2016

End of story!

Anything else looks weak! The argument up to this point and a major criticism of DWS, was that there wasn't enough debates.

Hillary looks weak and like she's hiding something. If the DNC backs her position. It will look even worse.

I'm waiting for what DWS has to say.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
18. So you think people who haven't voted yet should be deprived of exposure to Bernie?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:21 PM
Mar 2016

Whether you will admit it or not, Bernie does not have the name recognition of Hillary Clinton, so not everyone knows who he is. What usually happens after they hear him - they switch.

That's why Hillary and her supporters (like you), don't want another debate.

It's undemocratic.

LonePirate

(13,838 posts)
32. Have people been living under a rock for the past three months?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:01 PM
Mar 2016

People know who Bernie Sanders is. They may not be fully informed about his policy positions but almost all Dems and Dem leaning Independentsno now who he is and that he is running for President.

I'm all for more debates even if I am personally tired of them. Pretty much every Dem debate has been exactly like all of the other oneself have regard to the issues.

PragmaticLiberal

(911 posts)
19. Whether you're right or not, two more debates were agreed upon.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:23 PM
Mar 2016

I don't really care if one of them is in New York or not...they just need to be held.


angstlessk

(11,862 posts)
20. It appears after each debate Bernie picks up more supporters
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:32 PM
Mar 2016

A NY debate??? Never...Hillary has much to loose, and Bernie has much to gain.

awake

(3,226 posts)
21. Ya why get free prime time tv to present our Democrat issues and ideas on how to solve our problems
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:35 PM
Mar 2016

Just let the Republicans get the air time and we can just keep going along to get along.

I am so tired of the way the DNC keeps rolling over and letting the right set the agenda.

JudyM

(29,491 posts)
22. I think this post is meaningless.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:40 PM
Mar 2016

How many debates did Hillary get with BO? Any idea? Probably not.

Response to JudyM (Reply #22)

Response to hill2016 (Original post)

TheDormouse

(1,168 posts)
29. How many of these debates have focused on New York regional issues?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:57 PM
Mar 2016

We've had debates about the auto industry in Michigan and Ohio.
Debates about the Texas border.
Debate about the effect of climate change on Florida cities.

What about a debate on issues of specific interest to New Yorkers and others of that region?

Sky Masterson

(5,240 posts)
30. As a Political Junkie and a Sanders supporter
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:57 PM
Mar 2016

I want more.
I think Bernie has more to gain then Hillary does from it, so denying Bernie the Debate is a simple chess move.

Land of Enchantment

(1,217 posts)
31. Awwww, c'mon. This is just now getting GOOD. Let's have two or three more debates and really
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:00 PM
Mar 2016

delve into the meat and bones of the issues. I want to hear more about Hillary's spiritual awakening concerning Citizen's United, the top $$$$$$ donors who comprise the rotting entrails that are corporate funded elections and maybe--just once---some mention of climate change and global warming.

We're just getting started!!!!!




TheDormouse

(1,168 posts)
35. I think NY'ers deserve to hear where the candidates stand on fracking in NY State
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:10 PM
Mar 2016

and on whether the candidates support a greenhouse emissions/carbon tax.

athena

(4,187 posts)
39. What is there left to discuss?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:08 PM
Mar 2016

The last two debates were almost exactly identical. If there is another debate, I probably won't watch it because I can't stand to see Sanders wave his hands in the air and shake his head the entire time Clinton is speaking. President Obama was a good enough politician to know not to do that.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I think there have been e...