Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 02:43 AM Mar 2016

Using the deaths of veterans to attack Bernie is disgusting.

Last edited Wed Mar 30, 2016, 03:22 AM - Edit history (1)

The latest from one of the main pro-Hillary propaganda sites is that Bernie is somehow responsible for the VA scandal because he was chair of the Senate Veterans Committee. This is pure Karl Rove 'Art of War' tactics, taking a strength of your opponent and turning it around as a supposed weakness.

I mean my god, during the scandal he only held 7 hearings! Think of what might have resulted if he had just held that 8th hearing! After only 7 hearings, he was able to get the 2014 Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act passed - getting both Democrats and Republicans on board.

The propaganda seems to say that it's all Bernie's fault because he was on the Senate committee - I'm guessing they believe he should have personally inspected the rolls of veterans in every single VA hospital. Is Chuck Grassley personally responsible for narcotics deaths? Why not, he's the chair of the Senate International Narcotics Control Committee. Are Dianne Feinstein or Lamar Alexander responsible for Flint's water crisis? Why not, they are the chair and ranking member of the Senate Energy and Water Development Commitee.

One thing the propaganda outlets fail to note:

Nobody voted for long VA waits - but Clinton's war votes certainly helped cause those long waits.


As a disabled veteran and a Democrat, I am completely disgusted with the disingenuous and malicious attempts of these propaganda sites, and their propaganda being cited here to use the deaths of veterans in this manner against someone that has been nothing less than a true champion to veterans.

In my mind these types of tactics just show why citing the Daily Beast, Blue Nation Review and The Daily News Bin should only result in disgust and ridicule.

Edited to add that during this time of the so-called scandal, Hillary was on record many times trivializing the "scandal" It's funny that her campaign and propaganda outlets would now use something she said wasn't a big deal, to try to attack Bernie - but then she's always seemed to think little of veterans and soliders.


65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Using the deaths of veterans to attack Bernie is disgusting. (Original Post) revbones Mar 2016 OP
VA issues are near and dear to me. Juicy_Bellows Mar 2016 #1
The veterans that Sanders wouldn't have placed in a Meat Grinder if he were president? TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #63
This level of hypocrisy is usually reserved for partisan Republicans..... virtualobserver Mar 2016 #2
"Pure Karl Rove 'Art of War' tactics, turning strengths of your opponent into weakness" senz Mar 2016 #49
Veterans have criticized him for being slow to respond BainsBane Mar 2016 #3
As a Hillary supporter, you must surely note the hypocrisy in your statement revbones Mar 2016 #6
I don't justify the Iraq war BainsBane Mar 2016 #8
Is Hillary also responsible? She was in the Senate revbones Mar 2016 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author revbones Mar 2016 #7
Has she ever visited a VA Hospital? Downwinder Mar 2016 #10
Sorry - deleted that post since I later posted the video in one above it. revbones Mar 2016 #11
Thats OK. I'll stay. Downwinder Mar 2016 #12
Really? Seems like they were pretty busy blaming Hillary for her inaction revbones Mar 2016 #16
So Hillary gets them injured, and Sanders was slow to patch them up? Prism Mar 2016 #26
That's an old article, they had to go looking for something to smear him with. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #4
Exactly. Hillary parades out mothers of victims revbones Mar 2016 #15
You must have missed her campaign event in Wisconsin yesterday BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #27
Wow - that was an excellent response. nt revbones Mar 2016 #28
They have no shame. Pitiful. ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #5
If Hillary becomes the nominee revbones Mar 2016 #13
Hillary is a shameless liar. Vattel Mar 2016 #14
She also has enough on her payroll or that of her super-PAC... nt revbones Mar 2016 #21
+10000 senz Mar 2016 #53
Just add it to the list of reasons why Hillary's campaign tactics make me less likely to support her Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #17
Hence all the recent trustworthy propaganda posts revbones Mar 2016 #18
I didn't find her trustworthy in 2008 and I don't now. But I still considered voting for her until Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #19
Before the first debate in Jan revbones Mar 2016 #20
You are Me! Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #23
You are me too. pdsimdars Mar 2016 #45
I think Hillary is doing a service to show the Democratic Party for what it has become BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #29
I just hope she doesn't get to show the USA for what it's become, but merrily Mar 2016 #60
+1 Marr Mar 2016 #65
Yeah! What could the chair of the Veterans Committee possibly have to do with the VA? DanTex Mar 2016 #22
Maybe hold 7 hearings like he did? revbones Mar 2016 #24
Eventually... DanTex Mar 2016 #25
drip, by drip...nt Jitter65 Mar 2016 #31
Yes, because the Senate Committee micro-manages all VA Hospitals revbones Mar 2016 #32
It was on his watch, and he dropped the ball. DanTex Mar 2016 #33
Yep, because Senators are supposed to micro-manage VA Hospitals in states. revbones Mar 2016 #36
He's supposed to effectively oversee the VA, which he obviously didn't do. DanTex Mar 2016 #39
If they had done something outstanding, Bernie would be taking and getting all the credit for it. n Jitter65 Mar 2016 #30
Yeah, too bad he only got legislation passed to address it revbones Mar 2016 #34
Of course. Everything good is because of Bernie, but none of his mistakes are his fault. DanTex Mar 2016 #35
What mistake? You think passing legislation to address the problem was a mistake? revbones Mar 2016 #37
He ignored the problem for ideological reasons for too long, as even he has admitted. DanTex Mar 2016 #40
Where did he admit he personally ignored it? Didn't think so. revbones Mar 2016 #41
In that NYT article. And he was chair of the committee, Hillary wasn't. I'd have thought DanTex Mar 2016 #44
Another instance of being unable to provide a substantiating quote? revbones Mar 2016 #46
I gave you the link above: “We should have done better.” DanTex Mar 2016 #50
"ideological desire to believe in government programs"?!? Kentonio Mar 2016 #64
It's interesting the logical leaps that Hillary followers will use revbones Mar 2016 #38
Remind me when Bernie could hire and fire at the VA and had oversight merrily Mar 2016 #42
Exactly! revbones Mar 2016 #43
BOOM! VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #48
Great point. They blame him for failures over which he had no direct authority. senz Mar 2016 #61
Oh, my. That's two incredibly huge compliments in two days. merrily Mar 2016 #62
As of a year ago, I count as a veteran. VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #47
If you need to talk with someone that has been through it, please contact me. revbones Mar 2016 #51
Oh wow, that definitely does sound eventful. VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #57
do you have any understanding how hypocritical you heading is..... Sheepshank Mar 2016 #52
Pointing out the hypocrisy doesn't make you a hypocrit revbones Mar 2016 #54
At the time it was actually happening noamnety Mar 2016 #55
It's just funny that revbones Mar 2016 #56
Oh I totally agree. noamnety Mar 2016 #58
Anyone who would accuse Bernie of mistreating veterans in any way Maedhros Mar 2016 #59
 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
2. This level of hypocrisy is usually reserved for partisan Republicans.....
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 02:55 AM
Mar 2016

So called Democrats (like Brock) foul our nest.

The Clintons have a history of using very questionable political people...like Dick Morris and Mark Penn.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
49. "Pure Karl Rove 'Art of War' tactics, turning strengths of your opponent into weakness"
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:42 PM
Mar 2016

They are doing it ALL OVER the board today -- attacking his ethics, accusing him of secrecy, family problems, and now blaming him for veterans' deaths -- full on Karl Rove.

The Clinton campaign is getting down and dirty, attacking in the lowest, most dishonest ways while keeping the Queen of dishonesty above board looking soft and innocent.

Absolute lies at every level.

BainsBane

(57,780 posts)
3. Veterans have criticized him for being slow to respond
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 02:55 AM
Mar 2016

They have every right to do so. That information has been in the public domain for years now. I read about it ages ago.

Sanders has no right to run for the presidency without questions or criticism from citizens and other candidates. He has made his position as head of the Veterans Committee and the legislation he championed central to his campaign. It is perfectly acceptable to scrutinize that.

Your determination that a politician comes before the rights of the people is highly offensive to me. I do not share your view that one man is more important than the citizens he seeks to represent.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
6. As a Hillary supporter, you must surely note the hypocrisy in your statement
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 03:13 AM
Mar 2016

"Your determination that a politician comes before the rights of the people is highly offensive to me". If I wasn't so offended by the whole thing, I'd be rolling on the floor laughing at your hypocrisy in that statement.

That Hillary followers would try to pin the deaths of veterans on any member of the Veterans Committee, because of delays due to the overburdening of the VA Hospital system because of votes like her Iraq War vote is disgusting and appalling. Trying to justify it as something legitimate to scrutinize him on when he voted against the Iraq War, and is a champion to veterans is not only hypocritical but stunning given Hillary's incredibly weak record on such issues.

BainsBane

(57,780 posts)
8. I don't justify the Iraq war
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 03:27 AM
Mar 2016

I will not justify what is wrong.
But to argue that he gets a pass for stonewalling on misconduct at the VA is ridiculous.
That criticism of him as head of the Veterans Committee has been around far longer than his candidacy for presidency. The article below, which came up on a very quick google search, is from 2014.
http://watchdog.org/146352/bernie-sanders-va-response/

To pretend it is the creation of the Clinton campaign only reveals your own complete lack of interest in the issue.

You clearly are comfortable deciding what is right entirely in relation to what benefits one politician's career. That is your value system. Not mine. You don't get to project your crap onto me.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
9. Is Hillary also responsible? She was in the Senate
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 03:37 AM
Mar 2016

and downplayed the scandal you're implying he should be responsible for:




No, as a disabled veteran that has depended on the VA healthcare system for 22 years, I know a little more about it than you probably do (unless you are also a disabled veteran). I have experienced the service in mulitple states in multiple VA Hospitals and CBOCs. I know about the quality of care and have an inkling of why veterans had to wait for care.

In addition to the glut of soldiers returning from Iraq with crippling injuries and backing up the VA system - all due to votes such as Hillary's - many veterans don't follow up or miss the appointment letters that come in the mail due to various issues such as having moved or are homeless.

The scandal was about the backlog and that was caused by people like Hillary.

Response to BainsBane (Reply #3)

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
10. Has she ever visited a VA Hospital?
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 03:38 AM
Mar 2016

If so, I'll bet it was dressed up for an inspection tour.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
11. Sorry - deleted that post since I later posted the video in one above it.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 03:39 AM
Mar 2016

Guess you posted while I was deleting it.

 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
26. So Hillary gets them injured, and Sanders was slow to patch them up?
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:21 PM
Mar 2016

And you think Sanders is the problem in that equation?

LOL, ok.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
4. That's an old article, they had to go looking for something to smear him with.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 02:59 AM
Mar 2016

And I agree, I'm tired of the way they exploit veterans, victims of gun violence and minorities who need our compassion and support. If they cared at ALL about these issues they would be working against the real enemies across the aisle, not using them to smear another liberal who is on their side.

As a veteran you have every right to be outraged by this kind of exploitation. Bravo for standing up and speaking out!


 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
15. Exactly. Hillary parades out mothers of victims
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:42 AM
Mar 2016

when she thought it was convenient, but you don't hear much from her on that subject now huh?

She is just a candidate with issues of convenience that quickly fade away as more donor money comes in...

Thanks.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
27. You must have missed her campaign event in Wisconsin yesterday
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:23 PM
Mar 2016

She was out again with her campaign props, the mothers who have lost kids in shootings and other police incidents. One of the mothers said Hillary Clinton had approached her but that other candidate didn't.

MSNBC played the clip for Jane Sanders and she said her heart goes out to the woman, but they don't believe in contacting people who have suffered great personal tragedies to use them for their campaign.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
13. If Hillary becomes the nominee
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:41 AM
Mar 2016

those same people will be screaming bloody murder when the right-wing uses the same tactics - all without even noting their own hypocrisy.

And they keep posting loyalty oaths as if that will salvage things after right-wing attack repeats like this.

Nanjeanne

(6,641 posts)
17. Just add it to the list of reasons why Hillary's campaign tactics make me less likely to support her
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:51 AM
Mar 2016

if she is the nominee.

She has given up trying to earn my vote. So I've given up on her.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
18. Hence all the recent trustworthy propaganda posts
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:53 AM
Mar 2016

which are pretty funny. "No, really - you can trust Hillary" "Seriously, she doesn't have a trustworthiness problem" etc...

Because we see those types of articles about trustworthy people all the time...

Nanjeanne

(6,641 posts)
19. I didn't find her trustworthy in 2008 and I don't now. But I still considered voting for her until
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:56 AM
Mar 2016

her campaign took the same turn they took in 2008 - the desperate smears, lying and divisiveness. No articles can change my mind. I can reason for myself based on what I see of her. And I think her divisiveness has changed many people's feelings about the Democratic Party forever.

Tis a shame!

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
20. Before the first debate in Jan
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:59 AM
Mar 2016

I was willing and able to vote for her if she was the nominee. The blatant lies she told during that debate, such as Bernie wanting to get rid of ACA, Medicare, etc... and then sending out Chelsea to repeat the same lies - all made me stop and think. It just got worse from there.

I knew they pulled some crap in 2008 but I guess I overlooked it. I was in for John Edwards before the scandal since he was the only one talking about two Americas. After the scandal it was pretty much Obama, so I didn't pay her much more attention. Guess I should have...

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
45. You are me too.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:37 PM
Mar 2016

This is exactly my trajectory. Each day the disgust goes deeper. I don't want her near the Presidency.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
29. I think Hillary is doing a service to show the Democratic Party for what it has become
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:24 PM
Mar 2016

Better to have it out in the open so everybody can see it and stop living in denial.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
60. I just hope she doesn't get to show the USA for what it's become, but
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:56 PM
Mar 2016

that Bernie gets to show the USA for what it can be.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
24. Maybe hold 7 hearings like he did?
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:13 PM
Mar 2016

Facts are pesky things huh? Oh, what was Hillary doing at the time? Downplaying it.





Might want to read deeper to be able to see that. Might help in distinguishing between someone saying a tactic is right wing and calling someone a "right-winger".

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
25. Eventually...
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:19 PM
Mar 2016
“His ideological perspective blurred his ability to recognize the operational reality of what was happening at the V.A.,” said Paul Rieckhoff, the founder of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America. “The reality was that he was one of the last people to publicly recognize the gravity of the situation.”

...

In an interview last week, Mr. Sanders rejected the notion that he was slow to respond and lenient in his oversight, saying, “We did the very best that we could to make certain that veterans get the quality health care that they need.” Instead, he spoke of his chairmanship as a period of accomplishment, highlighted by the passage of what he called “the most comprehensive” veterans health care legislation in “many, many decades.”

But when Anderson Cooper of CNN asked him on Wednesday about why he did not act sooner to address the wait times, Mr. Sanders conceded, “We should have done better.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/07/us/politics/faith-in-agency-clouded-bernie-sanderss-va-response.html
 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
32. Yes, because the Senate Committee micro-manages all VA Hospitals
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:26 PM
Mar 2016

so he certainly should have caught it himself.




But wait... Did Hillary ever catch it? She was downplaying it as recently as 2015...

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
36. Yep, because Senators are supposed to micro-manage VA Hospitals in states.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:30 PM
Mar 2016

And Chuck Grassley personally responsible for narcotics in the US since he's the chair of the Senate International Narcotics Control Committee.

I'm sure you agree that Dianne Feinstein & Lamar Alexander are personally responsible for Flint's water crisis since they are the chair and ranking member of the Senate Energy and Water Development Commitee.


Good logic DanTex! You're really racking up the scoreboard now!

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
39. He's supposed to effectively oversee the VA, which he obviously didn't do.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:32 PM
Mar 2016

I guess if I were a Bernie fan, I'd also be trying to argue that people shouldn't hold their elected officials responsible for mistakes they make. Fortunately, Hillary is going to win, and we'll have an effective leader instead.

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
30. If they had done something outstanding, Bernie would be taking and getting all the credit for it. n
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:25 PM
Mar 2016
 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
34. Yeah, too bad he only got legislation passed to address it
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:28 PM
Mar 2016

Veterans' Access to Care through Choice, Accountability, and Transparency Act of 2014 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veterans%27_Access_to_Care_through_Choice,_Accountability,_and_Transparency_Act_of_2014

With Republican support no less - all while Hillary was downplaying it...

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
35. Of course. Everything good is because of Bernie, but none of his mistakes are his fault.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:28 PM
Mar 2016
 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
37. What mistake? You think passing legislation to address the problem was a mistake?
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:30 PM
Mar 2016

I'm sure Hillary got right on it. Oh wait - she was still dismissing it.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
40. He ignored the problem for ideological reasons for too long, as even he has admitted.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:33 PM
Mar 2016
 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
41. Where did he admit he personally ignored it? Didn't think so.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:35 PM
Mar 2016

And it's bizarre you say that would be an issue for you since Hillary was actively denying it was an issue at the time...

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
44. In that NYT article. And he was chair of the committee, Hillary wasn't. I'd have thought
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:36 PM
Mar 2016

that someone in that position would, you know, be paying close attention to the problems in the VA. But this is what happens when you have ineffective ideologues in leadership positions.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
46. Another instance of being unable to provide a substantiating quote?
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:39 PM
Mar 2016

And it must be odd to think that a sitting senator is supposed to micro-manage individual VA hospitals. Should someone from the Dept of Interior be cutting my grass too?

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
50. I gave you the link above: “We should have done better.”
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:43 PM
Mar 2016

And plenty of others cited in the article pointed out that his ideological desire to believe in government programs prevented him from appreciating the problems until they were glaringly obvious. You will of course make excuses for his incompetence, but outside the Bernie bubble, everyone understands what happened. He was in charge, and failed to effectively oversee the VA.

And it's entirely consistent with the Madoff-esque numbers behind his economic and healthcare programs. He believes they will work for ideological reasons, but the reality is, his numbers don't add up, and his plans would fail just as Single Payer did in Vermont.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
38. It's interesting the logical leaps that Hillary followers will use
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:32 PM
Mar 2016

to try to say Bernie is personally responsible for the VA scandal while Hillary was busy saying it didn't exist.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
42. Remind me when Bernie could hire and fire at the VA and had oversight
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:35 PM
Mar 2016

responsibility and authority over it.

This is one of the vilest things yet.



Come on, don't be shy, you People of Sense.* You must have something lower yet than this, pedophile enabler and wife abuser, no?


*"People of Sense" is derivative of a term created by Manny Goldstein, known to DUers as MannyGoldstein. Therefore, he owns the copyright. http://jackpineradicals.org/showthread.php?5610-Can-we-ADULTS-discuss-the-Massachusetts-primary I did not ask him for permission to steal the term. However, I trust linking to his article, which mocked my similarly-named article, purges me of this particular theft. If not, too bad.



Everybody---Limbo! Show just how looooow you can go. Do you even know?





 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
43. Exactly!
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:36 PM
Mar 2016

But they can't admit when they're wrong. They just double-down and try to twist words and repeat the falsehoods from propaganda outlets like The Daily Beast and BNR.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
61. Great point. They blame him for failures over which he had no direct authority.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 02:25 PM
Mar 2016

He was a congressman from Vermont, so they blame him for every bad thing that happened in Vermont!

Can you imagine blaming Hillary for every bad thing that happened in New York during her eight years as Senator?? (The only elected position she has ever held, btw)

If we were as dirty as Hill supporters, we'd blame her for 9/11! Sure we would -- they'd blame Bernie if the tables were turned! And for the delays in getting the site cleaned up, for the illnesses of rescuers and cleanup crew? Of course! They wouldn't bat an eyelash. It has probably never occurred to any of us to do something so low.

It don't get much lower than Clinton supporter -- not in my book, anyway.

(Re your Manny reference -- merrily, you are one of the most multifaceted, complex posters I've met on DU. It's tremendous fun. You are never boring. )

merrily

(45,251 posts)
62. Oh, my. That's two incredibly huge compliments in two days.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 03:35 PM
Mar 2016

(The other compared me to a meadlowlark! I requested smelling salts and I was not kidding.)

I just may float away because nothing can hold me down now.

Thank you so much, senz. Coming from a poster I admire, it means so much.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
47. As of a year ago, I count as a veteran.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:41 PM
Mar 2016

I'm staring the possibility of a medical discharge in the face; and seeing this kind of horseshit leveled at Sanders just makes me glad I might be getting out so I don't have to work for the lesser of evils if Bernie doesn't make it. These so-called Democrats disgust me-- and just show me that they really don't give a fuck about veterans; if they did, we wouldn't be fourth and fifth thought smear ammunition.

At least Bernie's been with us where shit went south. He voted against Iraq; but after being overwhelmed by the majority, he voted to fund us, because why go to war without ammunition or supplies? He's been the chair of the Senate Veteran's Committee for how long now? He's had our backs.

More than we can say for the entirety of the Clinton dynasty.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
51. If you need to talk with someone that has been through it, please contact me.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:43 PM
Mar 2016

My discharge was somewhat eventful. It involved Senator Mark Warren of VA stepping in to help me. If you need any advice on post-discharge steps, please let me know.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
57. Oh wow, that definitely does sound eventful.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:48 PM
Mar 2016

If anything comes up; I'll be sure to get in contact-- right now, they won't make the decision to go through with it till June; and with what I've been handling, my chances of squeaking through are slim at best. So it's likely in the coming days that I'll be getting in contact.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
52. do you have any understanding how hypocritical you heading is.....
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:43 PM
Mar 2016

...when you highlight and bold this line?

Nobody voted for long VA waits - but Clinton's war votes certainly helped cause those long waits.
 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
54. Pointing out the hypocrisy doesn't make you a hypocrit
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:45 PM
Mar 2016

Showing that it's hypocritical for Hillary followers to try to tie the deaths of veterans to Bernie when she actually helped cause many is not hypocritical in and of itself.

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
55. At the time it was actually happening
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:46 PM
Mar 2016

who were people blaming on DU and elsewhere? If they didn't think it was his fault then and only just now decided it was his fault, that's a clue it's Hillary campaign propaganda.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
56. It's just funny that
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:46 PM
Mar 2016

they are trying to tie those deaths to him when she actually voted for wars causing them and the backlog. Then she denied it was even an issue - while Bernie was holding 7 hearings.

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
58. Oh I totally agree.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:49 PM
Mar 2016

It would be like a tobacco company complaining that the senate isn't doing enough to oversee cancer treatments.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
59. Anyone who would accuse Bernie of mistreating veterans in any way
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:51 PM
Mar 2016

is simply an asshole with an agenda.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Using the deaths of veter...