2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Supporting Super Delegates In WA Will Soon Be Sorry
Washingtonians overwhelmingly chose Bernie.
If you oppose the overwhelming choice of your constituents, wait until a primary challenger comes along with Bernie's platform.
Patty, Maria, and the rest will be toast.
They can unleash the "establishment" all they want, but 4 to 1 support Bernie's ideas and not the corrupt powers that be.
Them.
Hell will be paid.
You heard it here first.
Especially you Rick Larson.
You might as well retire now.
Hell, I may even primary your Hillary loving ass.
And I am just a regular old American tired of being screwed by the 1% and the politicians they control.
jfern
(5,204 posts)In Vermont, Hillary still has the support of Leahy, Shumlin, and Dean as superdelegates despite failing viability for pledged delegates. In NH, she has the same number of delegates as Bernie despite losing by 22 points thanks to her 6 superdelegates.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)But they're gonna find out.
How about "Occupy Dumbasses"?
Howard Dean, head sellout.
Dumbass in general......
Howard, who is signing your paychecks these days?
Hmmmmmmm?
The people standing on our throats with their jack boots.
We're not that stupid.
COLGATE4
(14,886 posts)out of the Elephant?
scottie55
(1,400 posts)And millions more.
COLGATE4
(14,886 posts)scottie55
(1,400 posts)Telling the Democrats of Washington to get lost.
Bad idea Rick.
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/sanders-backers-demand-washington-superdelegates-feel-the-bern/
It is just starting.
"The people" won't stay stupid much longer.
It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to know when you are being screwed Ricky.
Zira
(1,054 posts)state.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)LisaM
(29,634 posts)And a fair chunk were independents.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)We have a wonderful mail in ballot primary system that we Washingtonians love. The Democratic party chose not to use it. And as far as Independents, WA has an open caucus. Democrats seem to loath Independents until they need their vote in November. 40% of Americans consider themselves Independents. Don't be surprised if there is no love lost come November.
LisaM
(29,634 posts)I'm not a fan of mail-only ballots, especially after reading how many spoiled ballots go uncounted.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)I am one of those Independents that you so easily dismiss. You can shut us out of the primaries if you wish, but that just leaves one place for us to go. Well actually two but only one would actually get my vote. And the caucuses are being spoiled as well. We have heard story after story of how people's votes are getting changed or not counted and delegates going to a candidate that it should not have. I have voted using both the caucus method and the mail in vote primary and absolutely love the mail in ballot primary.
LisaM
(29,634 posts)And this is Democratic Underground.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Time some of us are doing something about it.
LisaM
(29,634 posts)I'm getting a bit cranky about this.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Really? Like petitions will really turn the tables on a Wall Street ran government?
Cranky?
Wait till they take your house.
Wait till they take your health care.
Wait till they privatize your Social Security.
Wait till they bomb Iran.
Cranky?
Having Wall Street and the MIC in charge of our government makes me cranky.
LisaM
(29,634 posts)I don't have a house and have never owned one.
Just find your own damned group. I'm tired of people coming here and slamming the Democrats. I
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)certain individuals you can always use the trash thread or ignore list function. I use it quite a lot and am about to use it now. Bye.
LisaM
(29,634 posts)I don't want to live in a bubble. It doesn't mean I have to like people coming to Democratic Underground and railing away about the Democratic party nonstop.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Certain Democrats bent on destroying the party for their own security.
How has the centrist concept worked out while we lost the last 900 races in state houses and governorships?
Working class people won't come out and vote for the people who are tossing them under the bus for a couple large campaign contribution checks.
They haven't figured this out yet.
So we lose, and lose, and lose some more.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)why did you just ask someone to go away?
LisaM
(29,634 posts)Point taken. I don't want to discourage dialogue, but the endless ranting against the Democratic party is wearing. Why come to this forum? OTOH, I have never blocked or ignored anyone and I sent one alert in 15 years for an obvious racist comment in 2008.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)suffer under Obama's Race to the Top education policy and Democrats spend trillions on war and yet told me and my children we don't have enough tax revenue to spend on education and Democrats caving to cuts to WIC, food stamps, no COLAs for SS, a million jobs lost due to NAFTA and other trade policies, wage stagnation for average Americans while Democrats give billionaires tax breaks, and many other betrayals to the people of this country I am now an Independent and I can post on this website whether you like it or not.
LisaM
(29,634 posts)I think you would have been worse off under McCain or Romney, but I always thought Obama was a bit conservative, too. I do think Hillary is more liberal than he - thought so in 2008, too. I have friends with an autistic son and they both love Obama and Hillary, but have had struggles. I do not like Obama's education policies, thankfully, he's pulled back on some of them. I didn't like the fact, when he was running, that Michelle Obama was the only person in their immediate family who'd ever attended public school.
But, Obama has had no help from Congress or the Senate; Bernie Sanders would have it even worse. I think his actual plans are non-existent or uneven. I have barely heard him speak to standardized testing and K-12 education. I am not comfortable with his (admittedly long ago) essay about teachers, and I don't like his wife's stance on professor tenure at her university.
Believe me, I, and a lot of Democrats, care about these issues. But to come here day after day after day and be told this is all the Democrats' fault - policies and narratives all launched under Reagan - is discouraging. I don't like it. I don't think it's the constructive way forward.
The Democratic party has always been known as the Big Tent. I'd like to keep it that way, even when I don't agree with everything everyone in it says.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)On second thought 5% may be historic low
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)...considering Bernie was blasted in Florida.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)really DO feel that representing the will of the voters in his state is warranted. Start a petition demanding just that and I WILL sign it.
LisaM
(29,634 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)With that attitude. It's a big turn off to be threatened. People will react.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)By people that want to represent the 99%, and not the 1% and the powers that be.
But the 1%'ers money is soooooo much the easier road right?
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)In an election of officials more people vote.. More people who KNOW the current State officials and like them. Very different. Tjey should not be worried about what happened in a caucus.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)LuvLoogie
(8,815 posts)Response to LuvLoogie (Reply #12)
silvershadow This message was self-deleted by its author.
msongs
(73,754 posts)w4rma
(31,700 posts)metroins
(2,550 posts)And elections.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)It was just under 08's record and it is a caucus because the Party wanted it that way.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)the least they can do is wait until after we vote
w4rma
(31,700 posts)PonyUp
(1,680 posts)if they go against the will of the people.
We will see how many of them choose Hillary over keeping their jobs.
Gothmog
(179,869 posts)Vinca
(53,994 posts)Gothmog
(179,869 posts)Sanders is poison to down ballot candidates and has refused to raise money for the party. The attempts to flip these super delegates is going to be fun to watch and laugh at
Vinca
(53,994 posts)it turned out, were Democratic fundraisers. Considering his favorability ratings, I don't see how he wouldn't be good for down ballot candidates. In any case, if the GOP thinks the superdelegate system isn't fair, that speaks volumes. I'm sure you would agree with me if Hillary and Bernie were reversed in the superdelegate numbers.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)The Republicans wished to high heaven they had a thousand super delegates.....
Too late Chongo.
Gothmog
(179,869 posts)Sanders plan to raise taxes would kill down ballot candidates http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/27/politics/nancy-pelosi-bernie-sanders-taxes/
Speaking at the House Democratic Caucus' annual retreat here, Pelosi sidestepped a question about the growing concerns of fellow Democrats over the impact Sanders could have on 2016 House and Senate races, saying, "I'm very proud of all three of our candidates."
But the top House Democrat didn't mince words when it came to Vermont Senator Sanders' health care proposal, dismissing the notion of a single-payer health care plan, curtly saying, "That's not going to happen."
Vinca
(53,994 posts)It's nice to know we have such a bunch of independent thinkers on our side. Do they have rings through their noses so they can be easily led around?
Gothmog
(179,869 posts)The Democrats will not adopt a rather dumb platform that will kill down ballot candidate
Vinca
(53,994 posts)Money coming out of the sky on a flaming pie?
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)Now now you'll be ok.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)That would be a great thing.
You might even actually build a worthwhile movement that way.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)A primary opponent for them. I say we primary every last one of them, if only to get their effing attention!
Get a list of contact info for them also and publish it widely telling folks to write & call them. Put the pressure on any Super D who votes against their states will.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... mid-term and off year elections?
And where you going to get these primary opponents?
This is what the "movement" should have been doing for the last 7 years.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)Her leadership led to catastrophic losses for the Democrats during the 2014 midterm elections. She directly assisted in losses by refusing to support three Democrats, Miami-Dade Democratic Party chair Joe Garcia, former Hialeah Mayor Raul Martinez and businesswoman Annette Taddeo, who were challenging Republican Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart, Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, because she is friends with her Republican colleagues.
http://observer.com/2015/09/debbie-wasserman-schultz-must-go/
She should be anathema and because of "Democrats" like you she continues to hold a premier position in the Democratic Party.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)The DWS way.
No wonder most of the country is voting for nut jobs.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)And considering the movement just started less than a year ago, I think we are doing pretty well so far.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)The "movement" tends to be reactive and fickle.
Skips mid-terms. Wanted Warren. Accepted Bernie. And did little to develop other "acceptably liberal" 2016 candidates.
As you say ... the "movement" only started a year ago ... but it spent 7+ years whining about Obama and doing little else.
And that, is why you fail.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)So, guess what? Your assumptions are your downfall. You assume that because I support Bernie I am not a democrat. I have spent 41 years working for and voting for Democrats. So Eff YOU if you think I did not support Obama through his second election.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)And Eff me ... owww.
I'm simply pointing out that the angriest of Bernie's supporters on DU now, were also angry at Obama for the last 7+ years.
They needed to get busy a long time ago.
As for you ... I'm going to bet that you are one of Du's Bernie supporters, who is now "very disappointed" with Obama.
Am I wrong?
peacebird
(14,195 posts)I am very disgusted by Hillary, little Debbie, and the DNC
And I will NEVER vote for HRC
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... I don't give a shit who you vote for.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)I don't think so.....
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)Clinton recognized her shortcomings and adjusted, hiring Obama's delegate team to chart her course, and now she's winning.
Sanders has adopted every trailing-campaign plea and tactic that didn't work for Clinton 8 years ago, and now he's losing.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Bernie is practically tied.
I wouldn't call that losing.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)#FeelTheMATH
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Who would be losing?
It isn't even the 4th quarter yet.
We know the referees are paid off, but there is still time on the clock......
synergie
(1,901 posts)especially considering what these Superdelegates are going through from the doxing and the campaign endorsed harassment, abuse and threats from the devoted and very very angry Bernie followers, who are seemingly intent on raining hell upon their victims for not doing their bidding.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-superdelegates-idUSMTZSAPEC2TAP0RGD
Proportional allocation of delegates is already in the pledged delegates, abusing SDs won't help your cause, and if you have issues with that process ask Tad Devine why he helped create this system.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)a lot of people who represent the exact opposite.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Whoda thunkit.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Because they don't like being ignored is not violence.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I will be over here, processing photos and all that.
ibegurpard
(17,081 posts)Is violence and abuse?
What a disgustingly entitled sentiment.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)"You will be sorry" threats are not cool, because they sound incredibly creepy.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)The Revolution (tm) could be lining up dozens of House and Senate candidates today, to be there when Sanders gets elected. Apparently they're going to wait for two years.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)scottie55
(1,400 posts)Do we even want a party?
Maybe we should just have an auction instead of elections.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)...stick with a party through thick and thin. Base voters don't vote for alternate party candidates, ever.
Base voters are the opposite of the Sanders coalition, which is made up of people who can't decide whether or not they can get along with other voters for more than one election cycle.
Stop fooling yourselves, you're no one's base. Bernie's maybe, but not Democrats. All your purity votes and protest votes have robbed you of any influence you have over the Democratic Party. If the party has moved rightwards, it's because they learned that leftist voters are an unreliable constituency, and the Democratic Party wants to win elections, not litmus test contests.
Go found your own party and run it however you want. Then it can be as perfect as you can make it.
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)You nailed it here.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)BASE REVOLT
By the way, they teach about these things in basic political science courses.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)...to take some higher-level courses next. And don't sleep through them like you clearly did 101.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)But they teach about base revolts in poli sci 101
I am not surprised that some folks chose to insult when things like this are pointed out though
Tarc
(10,601 posts)The candidate of peace sure has some contrarian followers...
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Our party has thumbed it's nose at it's base for years, and continues to do so.
Here is just another prime example.
Sorry, is a real big word, and works in a lot of ways.
Ask DWS why we lose, and lose, and lose, and lose, and continue to lose to a pack of obviously crazy people.
Getting people to vote for corrupt folks worried more about their Super Pacs than the voters isn't working for the Democrats any more. Anyone notice?
Tarc
(10,601 posts)It reads like a Tea Party manifesto.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Ignoring the base has it's risks.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Onlooker
(5,636 posts)First of all Sanders won about 5% (to HIllary's 2%) of the registered voters in Washington State. That's not exactly a mandate, though he did a good job at getting people out to the caucuses.
At any rate, using your argument, if Hillary continues to lead in pledged delegates and the number of states won at the end of the primary season, then I think you will have to change your point of view or accept that Bernie was defeated.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Understatement of the year
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)scottie55
(1,400 posts)Works so well....
The super delegates obviously want to keep our gravy train, pay to play government going just the way it is.
Of course they oppose DEMOCRACY>
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)scottie55
(1,400 posts)And pretend ignoring our progressive base, and throwing them under the bus is a real good strategy for Democrats?
The super delegates have jobs.
It's the rest of us that are expected to work harder for less that has a problem.
They obviously don't understand.
Not like they didn't give Boeing 9 Billion in ransom.
BeyondGeography
(41,101 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Hillary doesn't have coattails but she will walk over the casualties.
Many of the superdelegates are going to get primaried, and we'll find out that Washington isn't as blue as we like to think it is. Clinton is going to lose us seats in both the congress and the senate.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)And losing, and losing.
Helping Wall Street and the MIC continue to rob our families is not a good strategy to win elections.
You heard it here first.
We are not all stupid.
asuhornets
(2,427 posts)then he will get the super delegates. But to think just because he won Washington-he should automatically get the super delegates.
He knew the rules...I thought he and his supporters hated super delegates, anyway.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Some of us are complaining about being screwed and actually opposing the 1% preferred candidate from the beginning.
The super delegates are just another way to say Sanders doesn't have a chance and Wall Street always wins.
Maybe not this time.
Too many people are tired of Wall Street's enablers making the laws they use to crush us with.
asuhornets
(2,427 posts)are not horrible people. geeezz you can't get mad with someone because they are wealthy.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)In fact I want to be wealthy someday too.
By the way, that's the problem.
How you gonna get wealthy when the deck is stacked against you.....
taught_me_patience
(5,477 posts)Pouting and whining not a good way to convince people of your position.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Tired of being ripped off every time I turn around = yes.
Not the same thing.
Some people don't think a completely corrupt government that only listens to campaign contributors is cool.
I might be one of them.
Do you think your government should care about you, or only the 1%?
Answer please.
JI7
(93,617 posts)But there went be any real effort to help another candidate and do the groundwork needed to help win.
GusBob
(8,249 posts)not gonna happen
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)scottie55
(1,400 posts)That ignores the will of the people.
Intolerable!
JI7
(93,617 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Did you know that dear leader is sooo sick of this?
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Not really the same thing.
My congressman is a friend of mine, and I would vote for him always.
It's just the fact that the "liberal base" has been ignored since the 80's, and because of this, most states are ran by Republicans if you haven't noticed.
Most people know they come 2nd after the big bucks.
Do you expect their vote or support?
LonePirate
(14,367 posts)They are almost always filled with people who claim to vote their principles and who constantly remind everyone that their vote belongs to them and no one else. Yet somehow, superdelegates are not allowed to vote their principles nor are they allowed to control their own vote - they must vote the way someone else tells them to vote. I usually don't see this much hypocrisy in people who are not Republicans.
It certainly makes for some reading.
scottie55
(1,400 posts)But there is no money to spend helping them.
Yet there is enough money to give Boeing a 9 Billion Dollar Tax Break.
This is getting old.
Boeing extortion is also getting old.
Build your planes in China, or 3rd World USA, and pay a 1 million dollar fee to fly them into, and over Washington State.
Screw your race to the bottom, tax free status Boeing.
ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)Really. Really? I don't think so. Jesus.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)will influence my votes for them when they run.