Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:28 AM Mar 2016

Hillary Supporting Super Delegates In WA Will Soon Be Sorry

Washingtonians overwhelmingly chose Bernie.

If you oppose the overwhelming choice of your constituents, wait until a primary challenger comes along with Bernie's platform.

Patty, Maria, and the rest will be toast.

They can unleash the "establishment" all they want, but 4 to 1 support Bernie's ideas and not the corrupt powers that be.

Them.

Hell will be paid.

You heard it here first.

Especially you Rick Larson.

You might as well retire now.

Hell, I may even primary your Hillary loving ass.

And I am just a regular old American tired of being screwed by the 1% and the politicians they control.

121 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Supporting Super Delegates In WA Will Soon Be Sorry (Original Post) scottie55 Mar 2016 OP
They don't care jfern Mar 2016 #1
They Don't Know What Heat Is scottie55 Mar 2016 #3
Like the ant threatening to beat the s---t COLGATE4 Mar 2016 #58
You Mean Millions Of Ants scottie55 Mar 2016 #63
Uh huh. nt COLGATE4 Mar 2016 #64
Rick Larson's "Problem" Was On The Front Page Of The Seattle Times Today scottie55 Mar 2016 #2
I demand they feel the Bern. We should not have delegates that don't represent the people of the Zira Mar 2016 #19
Where does Larsen say that? Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #54
Sonething like 4% of Washingtonians attended the caucuses LisaM Mar 2016 #4
And who's fault is that? The Democratic party chose to get delegates from the caucuses. liberal_at_heart Mar 2016 #13
I agree that a closed primary is the way to go. LisaM Mar 2016 #18
Don't get me wrong. You and I do not agree. liberal_at_heart Mar 2016 #34
I am a lifelong Dem. LisaM Mar 2016 #37
And Too Many Democrats Represent Wall Street And Not The Voters scottie55 Mar 2016 #43
Fine, seek out their website and join it. LisaM Mar 2016 #52
+1 COLGATE4 Mar 2016 #59
"Fine, seek out their website and join it" scottie55 Mar 2016 #65
Joke's on you. LisaM Mar 2016 #75
There is nothing saying we can't be here. If you don't like what you are hearing from liberal_at_heart Mar 2016 #83
I've never used it. LisaM Mar 2016 #85
Not The Democratic Party Per Se scottie55 Apr 2016 #100
If you don't want to live in a bubble.... daleanime Apr 2016 #109
I tried to address that! LisaM Apr 2016 #110
And? I voted straight Democratic ticket for 20 years. After watching my autistic son liberal_at_heart Mar 2016 #84
I'm sorry about your son. I feel for anyone's personal tragedies. LisaM Mar 2016 #88
I thought Bernie was going to drive turnout up to historic levels redstateblues Apr 2016 #105
Will Bernie supporters be asking Alan Grayson to switch his vote to Hillary? nt Cali_Democrat Mar 2016 #5
Not our job to advocate for your candidate. JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #7
Any word from Grayson as to whether or not he will switch his vote? Cali_Democrat Mar 2016 #8
I don't hang out with Grayson. I wouldn't know. JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #9
I agree. Hillary supporters should demand it. I NorthCarolina Mar 2016 #25
SNAP! LisaM Mar 2016 #60
The support WON'T Hold IMO fun n serious Mar 2016 #6
Even Bigger Turn Off To Be Primaried scottie55 Mar 2016 #15
Less people turn out to vote in Caucases fun n serious Mar 2016 #10
Lol, that ought to go over well nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #11
Such drama... LuvLoogie Mar 2016 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #14
yes evidence shows low attendance caucuses lead to massive dumping of elected officials nt msongs Mar 2016 #16
Washington's Caucus Just Shy Of 2008 Turnout Record w4rma Mar 2016 #21
Caucuses have low turnout vs primaries metroins Mar 2016 #28
Washington has a primary and a caucus the Democratic Party wants to use the caucus results. Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #77
We need this for California dana_b Mar 2016 #17
Many supers aren't elected, and - therefore - will never be accountable to the voters. (nt) w4rma Mar 2016 #20
There will be a list of every elected super delegate that voted for her and they will be voted out PonyUp Mar 2016 #22
These attacks on super delegates are amusing Gothmog Mar 2016 #23
The superdelegate system is so corrupt even the GOP did away with it. Vinca Mar 2016 #27
Super delegates are most concern about the party as a whole Gothmog Mar 2016 #33
Hmmm . . . seems I've heard people cracking wise about Bernie's "Wall Street" speeches which, Vinca Mar 2016 #35
When Trump Sleazes Up To The Convention scottie55 Mar 2016 #44
Nancy Pelosi will not force congressional candidate to run on Sanders unrealistic platform Gothmog Apr 2016 #115
"Nancy Pelosi will not force . . ."????????????????? Vinca Apr 2016 #118
Raising taxes worked great for President Mondale Gothmog Apr 2016 #120
So how is Hillary funding her 10 billion investment in manufacturing in New York? Vinca Apr 2016 #121
Down ballots would get as far away from Bernie as possible redstateblues Apr 2016 #106
Yeah, because what we need are more GOP in Congress. nt Jitter65 Mar 2016 #24
Lol rjsquirrel Mar 2016 #26
If the Sanders voter temper tantrums result in them actually running for local office alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #29
Get a list of Super Ds who are voting against their constituents, start an ActBlue account to fund peacebird Mar 2016 #30
You expect the "movement" to become active in ... JoePhilly Mar 2016 #31
Versus Debbie Wasserman Schultz who supports Republicans in mid terms? Human101948 Mar 2016 #67
Democrats Screwing Democrats scottie55 Mar 2016 #80
Snark duly noted. Yes I do, in fact. And there are a lot of Sanders/Warren type Ds running already. peacebird Mar 2016 #82
Should have gotten busy in 2011, instead of calling for an Obama primary challange. JoePhilly Mar 2016 #86
I fully supported and worked for Obama's re election. Stupid assumtion on your part. peacebird Mar 2016 #89
I did not say any of the things you claim ... JoePhilly Mar 2016 #91
Actually you DID say those things. Your candidate is proCorporat America, pro War. Anti WeThePeople peacebird Mar 2016 #92
I did not say those things and ... JoePhilly Apr 2016 #113
I wonder if the roles were reverse...would you be advocating the supperdelegate to switch to Hillary beachbum bob Mar 2016 #32
Those who fail to learn from 2008 are doomed to repeat it. CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #41
With The Entire Media And Entire Democratic Party Elite Structure Against Him scottie55 Mar 2016 #45
200+ delegate deficit. That IS losing, no matter what you want to call it. Math > your opinion CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #48
And If The Primaries Started In Washington, Oregon, California, Alaska, and Hawaii scottie55 Mar 2016 #79
There is a troubling amount of rage and violence in these threats that are being made, synergie Mar 2016 #36
The candidate claiming that he best represents "Democratic values" sure seems to be attracting CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #40
Maybe Some Folks Are Getting Tired Of Being Ripped Off By A Rigged System scottie55 Mar 2016 #46
Telling Establishment Loving Democrats The People May Primary Them scottie55 Mar 2016 #81
Humor me, how is voters saying they are going to primary officials violence? nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #90
threatening to primary unresponsive politicians ibegurpard Apr 2016 #114
Sounds like you want to do more than primary them KingFlorez Mar 2016 #38
...and generally, incredibly weak and meaningless. brooklynite Mar 2016 #51
Yeah, threats and harassment will certainly put Sanders over the top. That's the ticket! nt CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #39
Ignoring The Base Helped Us Retake The Senate In 2014.... Oh Wait.... scottie55 Mar 2016 #49
You. Are. Not. The. Base. Base voters don't abandon their party. They are the loyal voters who... CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #53
Wish I could rec a post. Bobbie Jo Mar 2016 #71
I suggest you seek out the term nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #94
It's not surprising that everything you know comes from Politics 101. You need... CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #95
You mean like a masters in history? nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #96
Are rage & violence the only two tones that some Sanders supporters can muster these days? Tarc Mar 2016 #42
No One Is Threatening Violence - No One scottie55 Mar 2016 #47
The rhetoric of the OP is quite violent Tarc Mar 2016 #72
The OP Is Not From A Violent Person scottie55 Mar 2016 #74
Negativity and anger fuel Bernies campaign redstateblues Apr 2016 #107
Isn't that a risky argument? Onlooker Mar 2016 #50
5% Not exactly a mandate? redstateblues Apr 2016 #104
Way to not win and influence people upaloopa Mar 2016 #55
And Whistling Past The Graveyard scottie55 Mar 2016 #56
The people voting for Bernie do not represent the people not even 4% I see upaloopa Mar 2016 #61
We Watch Republicans Take Over Everything scottie55 Mar 2016 #68
Gloating sadists FTW! BeyondGeography Mar 2016 #57
Please primary them all away! Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #62
Sacrificing pawns (congressmen and senators) to protect the queen is considered good strategy. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #66
Some Democrats Are Tired Of Losing scottie55 Mar 2016 #70
If in the end Bernie gets the most pledged delegates and popular vote. asuhornets Mar 2016 #69
Just Another Way To Screw Him scottie55 Mar 2016 #73
All 1%ers asuhornets Mar 2016 #98
I Agree Completely scottie55 Apr 2016 #102
You mad bro? taught_me_patience Mar 2016 #76
Mad = No scottie55 Mar 2016 #78
lol nothing is going to happen. just like with dws. people will post on the internet JI7 Mar 2016 #87
A primary threat from BS supporters makes me laugh GusBob Mar 2016 #93
One day, the Secret Service is going to be paying certain Sanders supporters a visit. NuclearDem Mar 2016 #97
How Dare You Threaten To Primary An Establishment Candidate scottie55 Apr 2016 #99
already happened at least once JI7 Apr 2016 #101
"Sir? Did you write this post threatening to vote against your congressman?" lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #103
No, Actually Primary A Congressman scottie55 Apr 2016 #111
I do enjoy a good superdelegate rant thread. LonePirate Apr 2016 #108
There Are 15,000 People In Washington State That Qualify For Psychiatric Care I Read scottie55 Apr 2016 #112
Jim McDermott? ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #116
Cool rant bro! NT Adrahil Apr 2016 #117
I've already informed Patty and Maria that their votes at the convention Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #119

jfern

(5,204 posts)
1. They don't care
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:32 AM
Mar 2016

In Vermont, Hillary still has the support of Leahy, Shumlin, and Dean as superdelegates despite failing viability for pledged delegates. In NH, she has the same number of delegates as Bernie despite losing by 22 points thanks to her 6 superdelegates.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
3. They Don't Know What Heat Is
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:36 AM
Mar 2016

But they're gonna find out.

How about "Occupy Dumbasses"?

Howard Dean, head sellout.

Dumbass in general......

Howard, who is signing your paychecks these days?

Hmmmmmmm?

The people standing on our throats with their jack boots.

We're not that stupid.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
2. Rick Larson's "Problem" Was On The Front Page Of The Seattle Times Today
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:33 AM
Mar 2016

Telling the Democrats of Washington to get lost.

Bad idea Rick.

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/sanders-backers-demand-washington-superdelegates-feel-the-bern/

It is just starting.

"The people" won't stay stupid much longer.

It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to know when you are being screwed Ricky.

 

Zira

(1,054 posts)
19. I demand they feel the Bern. We should not have delegates that don't represent the people of the
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:24 AM
Mar 2016

state.

LisaM

(29,634 posts)
4. Sonething like 4% of Washingtonians attended the caucuses
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:37 AM
Mar 2016

And a fair chunk were independents.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
13. And who's fault is that? The Democratic party chose to get delegates from the caucuses.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:05 AM
Mar 2016

We have a wonderful mail in ballot primary system that we Washingtonians love. The Democratic party chose not to use it. And as far as Independents, WA has an open caucus. Democrats seem to loath Independents until they need their vote in November. 40% of Americans consider themselves Independents. Don't be surprised if there is no love lost come November.

LisaM

(29,634 posts)
18. I agree that a closed primary is the way to go.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:08 AM
Mar 2016

I'm not a fan of mail-only ballots, especially after reading how many spoiled ballots go uncounted.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
34. Don't get me wrong. You and I do not agree.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 11:16 AM
Mar 2016

I am one of those Independents that you so easily dismiss. You can shut us out of the primaries if you wish, but that just leaves one place for us to go. Well actually two but only one would actually get my vote. And the caucuses are being spoiled as well. We have heard story after story of how people's votes are getting changed or not counted and delegates going to a candidate that it should not have. I have voted using both the caucus method and the mail in vote primary and absolutely love the mail in ballot primary.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
43. And Too Many Democrats Represent Wall Street And Not The Voters
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:40 PM
Mar 2016

Time some of us are doing something about it.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
65. "Fine, seek out their website and join it"
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:26 PM
Mar 2016

Really? Like petitions will really turn the tables on a Wall Street ran government?

Cranky?

Wait till they take your house.

Wait till they take your health care.

Wait till they privatize your Social Security.

Wait till they bomb Iran.

Cranky?

Having Wall Street and the MIC in charge of our government makes me cranky.

LisaM

(29,634 posts)
75. Joke's on you.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:55 PM
Mar 2016

I don't have a house and have never owned one.

Just find your own damned group. I'm tired of people coming here and slamming the Democrats. I

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
83. There is nothing saying we can't be here. If you don't like what you are hearing from
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:06 PM
Mar 2016

certain individuals you can always use the trash thread or ignore list function. I use it quite a lot and am about to use it now. Bye.

LisaM

(29,634 posts)
85. I've never used it.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:18 PM
Mar 2016

I don't want to live in a bubble. It doesn't mean I have to like people coming to Democratic Underground and railing away about the Democratic party nonstop.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
100. Not The Democratic Party Per Se
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:50 AM
Apr 2016

Certain Democrats bent on destroying the party for their own security.

How has the centrist concept worked out while we lost the last 900 races in state houses and governorships?

Working class people won't come out and vote for the people who are tossing them under the bus for a couple large campaign contribution checks.

They haven't figured this out yet.

So we lose, and lose, and lose some more.

LisaM

(29,634 posts)
110. I tried to address that!
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 01:22 AM
Apr 2016

Point taken. I don't want to discourage dialogue, but the endless ranting against the Democratic party is wearing. Why come to this forum? OTOH, I have never blocked or ignored anyone and I sent one alert in 15 years for an obvious racist comment in 2008.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
84. And? I voted straight Democratic ticket for 20 years. After watching my autistic son
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:11 PM
Mar 2016

suffer under Obama's Race to the Top education policy and Democrats spend trillions on war and yet told me and my children we don't have enough tax revenue to spend on education and Democrats caving to cuts to WIC, food stamps, no COLAs for SS, a million jobs lost due to NAFTA and other trade policies, wage stagnation for average Americans while Democrats give billionaires tax breaks, and many other betrayals to the people of this country I am now an Independent and I can post on this website whether you like it or not.

LisaM

(29,634 posts)
88. I'm sorry about your son. I feel for anyone's personal tragedies.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:26 PM
Mar 2016

I think you would have been worse off under McCain or Romney, but I always thought Obama was a bit conservative, too. I do think Hillary is more liberal than he - thought so in 2008, too. I have friends with an autistic son and they both love Obama and Hillary, but have had struggles. I do not like Obama's education policies, thankfully, he's pulled back on some of them. I didn't like the fact, when he was running, that Michelle Obama was the only person in their immediate family who'd ever attended public school.

But, Obama has had no help from Congress or the Senate; Bernie Sanders would have it even worse. I think his actual plans are non-existent or uneven. I have barely heard him speak to standardized testing and K-12 education. I am not comfortable with his (admittedly long ago) essay about teachers, and I don't like his wife's stance on professor tenure at her university.

Believe me, I, and a lot of Democrats, care about these issues. But to come here day after day after day and be told this is all the Democrats' fault - policies and narratives all launched under Reagan - is discouraging. I don't like it. I don't think it's the constructive way forward.

The Democratic party has always been known as the Big Tent. I'd like to keep it that way, even when I don't agree with everything everyone in it says.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
105. I thought Bernie was going to drive turnout up to historic levels
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:57 AM
Apr 2016

On second thought 5% may be historic low

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
8. Any word from Grayson as to whether or not he will switch his vote?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:45 AM
Mar 2016

...considering Bernie was blasted in Florida.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
25. I agree. Hillary supporters should demand it. I
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 08:26 AM
Mar 2016

really DO feel that representing the will of the voters in his state is warranted. Start a petition demanding just that and I WILL sign it.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
6. The support WON'T Hold IMO
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:42 AM
Mar 2016

With that attitude. It's a big turn off to be threatened. People will react.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
15. Even Bigger Turn Off To Be Primaried
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:22 AM
Mar 2016

By people that want to represent the 99%, and not the 1% and the powers that be.

But the 1%'ers money is soooooo much the easier road right?

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
10. Less people turn out to vote in Caucases
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:47 AM
Mar 2016

In an election of officials more people vote.. More people who KNOW the current State officials and like them. Very different. Tjey should not be worried about what happened in a caucus.

Response to LuvLoogie (Reply #12)

msongs

(73,754 posts)
16. yes evidence shows low attendance caucuses lead to massive dumping of elected officials nt
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:29 AM
Mar 2016
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
77. Washington has a primary and a caucus the Democratic Party wants to use the caucus results.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:09 PM
Mar 2016

It was just under 08's record and it is a caucus because the Party wanted it that way.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
20. Many supers aren't elected, and - therefore - will never be accountable to the voters. (nt)
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:55 AM
Mar 2016
 

PonyUp

(1,680 posts)
22. There will be a list of every elected super delegate that voted for her and they will be voted out
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:23 AM
Mar 2016

if they go against the will of the people.
We will see how many of them choose Hillary over keeping their jobs.

Gothmog

(179,869 posts)
33. Super delegates are most concern about the party as a whole
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:09 AM
Mar 2016

Sanders is poison to down ballot candidates and has refused to raise money for the party. The attempts to flip these super delegates is going to be fun to watch and laugh at

Vinca

(53,994 posts)
35. Hmmm . . . seems I've heard people cracking wise about Bernie's "Wall Street" speeches which,
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:48 PM
Mar 2016

it turned out, were Democratic fundraisers. Considering his favorability ratings, I don't see how he wouldn't be good for down ballot candidates. In any case, if the GOP thinks the superdelegate system isn't fair, that speaks volumes. I'm sure you would agree with me if Hillary and Bernie were reversed in the superdelegate numbers.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
44. When Trump Sleazes Up To The Convention
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:42 PM
Mar 2016

The Republicans wished to high heaven they had a thousand super delegates.....

Too late Chongo.

Gothmog

(179,869 posts)
115. Nancy Pelosi will not force congressional candidate to run on Sanders unrealistic platform
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 08:48 AM
Apr 2016

Sanders plan to raise taxes would kill down ballot candidates http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/27/politics/nancy-pelosi-bernie-sanders-taxes/

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi maintains she isn't taking sides in the Democratic primary for president, but pushed back against Bernie Sanders' pledge that he would raise taxes to pay for his health care plan, saying flatly on Wednesday, "We're not running on any platform of raising taxes."

Speaking at the House Democratic Caucus' annual retreat here, Pelosi sidestepped a question about the growing concerns of fellow Democrats over the impact Sanders could have on 2016 House and Senate races, saying, "I'm very proud of all three of our candidates."
But the top House Democrat didn't mince words when it came to Vermont Senator Sanders' health care proposal, dismissing the notion of a single-payer health care plan, curtly saying, "That's not going to happen."

Vinca

(53,994 posts)
118. "Nancy Pelosi will not force . . ."?????????????????
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 01:14 PM
Apr 2016

It's nice to know we have such a bunch of independent thinkers on our side. Do they have rings through their noses so they can be easily led around?

Gothmog

(179,869 posts)
120. Raising taxes worked great for President Mondale
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 01:31 PM
Apr 2016

The Democrats will not adopt a rather dumb platform that will kill down ballot candidate

Vinca

(53,994 posts)
121. So how is Hillary funding her 10 billion investment in manufacturing in New York?
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 01:35 PM
Apr 2016

Money coming out of the sky on a flaming pie?

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
29. If the Sanders voter temper tantrums result in them actually running for local office
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 08:32 AM
Mar 2016

That would be a great thing.

You might even actually build a worthwhile movement that way.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
30. Get a list of Super Ds who are voting against their constituents, start an ActBlue account to fund
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 08:33 AM
Mar 2016

A primary opponent for them. I say we primary every last one of them, if only to get their effing attention!

Get a list of contact info for them also and publish it widely telling folks to write & call them. Put the pressure on any Super D who votes against their states will.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
31. You expect the "movement" to become active in ...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:00 AM
Mar 2016

... mid-term and off year elections?

And where you going to get these primary opponents?

This is what the "movement" should have been doing for the last 7 years.

 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
67. Versus Debbie Wasserman Schultz who supports Republicans in mid terms?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:30 PM
Mar 2016

Her leadership led to catastrophic losses for the Democrats during the 2014 midterm elections. She directly assisted in losses by refusing to support three Democrats, Miami-Dade Democratic Party chair Joe Garcia, former Hialeah Mayor Raul Martinez and businesswoman Annette Taddeo, who were challenging Republican Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart, Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, because she is friends with her Republican colleagues.

http://observer.com/2015/09/debbie-wasserman-schultz-must-go/

She should be anathema and because of "Democrats" like you she continues to hold a premier position in the Democratic Party.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
80. Democrats Screwing Democrats
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:50 PM
Mar 2016

The DWS way.

No wonder most of the country is voting for nut jobs.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
82. Snark duly noted. Yes I do, in fact. And there are a lot of Sanders/Warren type Ds running already.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 05:22 PM
Mar 2016

And considering the movement just started less than a year ago, I think we are doing pretty well so far.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
86. Should have gotten busy in 2011, instead of calling for an Obama primary challange.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:20 PM
Mar 2016

The "movement" tends to be reactive and fickle.

Skips mid-terms. Wanted Warren. Accepted Bernie. And did little to develop other "acceptably liberal" 2016 candidates.

As you say ... the "movement" only started a year ago ... but it spent 7+ years whining about Obama and doing little else.

And that, is why you fail.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
89. I fully supported and worked for Obama's re election. Stupid assumtion on your part.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:27 PM
Mar 2016

So, guess what? Your assumptions are your downfall. You assume that because I support Bernie I am not a democrat. I have spent 41 years working for and voting for Democrats. So Eff YOU if you think I did not support Obama through his second election.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
91. I did not say any of the things you claim ...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:31 PM
Mar 2016

And Eff me ... owww.

I'm simply pointing out that the angriest of Bernie's supporters on DU now, were also angry at Obama for the last 7+ years.

They needed to get busy a long time ago.

As for you ... I'm going to bet that you are one of Du's Bernie supporters, who is now "very disappointed" with Obama.

Am I wrong?

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
92. Actually you DID say those things. Your candidate is proCorporat America, pro War. Anti WeThePeople
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:48 PM
Mar 2016

I am very disgusted by Hillary, little Debbie, and the DNC

And I will NEVER vote for HRC

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
32. I wonder if the roles were reverse...would you be advocating the supperdelegate to switch to Hillary
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:09 AM
Mar 2016

I don't think so.....

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
41. Those who fail to learn from 2008 are doomed to repeat it.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:24 PM
Mar 2016

Clinton recognized her shortcomings and adjusted, hiring Obama's delegate team to chart her course, and now she's winning.

Sanders has adopted every trailing-campaign plea and tactic that didn't work for Clinton 8 years ago, and now he's losing.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
45. With The Entire Media And Entire Democratic Party Elite Structure Against Him
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:43 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie is practically tied.

I wouldn't call that losing.

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
48. 200+ delegate deficit. That IS losing, no matter what you want to call it. Math > your opinion
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:48 PM
Mar 2016

#FeelTheMATH

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
79. And If The Primaries Started In Washington, Oregon, California, Alaska, and Hawaii
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:47 PM
Mar 2016

Who would be losing?

It isn't even the 4th quarter yet.

We know the referees are paid off, but there is still time on the clock......

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
36. There is a troubling amount of rage and violence in these threats that are being made,
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:57 PM
Mar 2016

especially considering what these Superdelegates are going through from the doxing and the campaign endorsed harassment, abuse and threats from the devoted and very very angry Bernie followers, who are seemingly intent on raining hell upon their victims for not doing their bidding.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-superdelegates-idUSMTZSAPEC2TAP0RGD

Proportional allocation of delegates is already in the pledged delegates, abusing SDs won't help your cause, and if you have issues with that process ask Tad Devine why he helped create this system.

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
40. The candidate claiming that he best represents "Democratic values" sure seems to be attracting
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:22 PM
Mar 2016

a lot of people who represent the exact opposite.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
46. Maybe Some Folks Are Getting Tired Of Being Ripped Off By A Rigged System
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:44 PM
Mar 2016

Whoda thunkit.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
81. Telling Establishment Loving Democrats The People May Primary Them
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:53 PM
Mar 2016

Because they don't like being ignored is not violence.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
90. Humor me, how is voters saying they are going to primary officials violence?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:28 PM
Mar 2016

I will be over here, processing photos and all that.

ibegurpard

(17,081 posts)
114. threatening to primary unresponsive politicians
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 08:30 AM
Apr 2016

Is violence and abuse?
What a disgustingly entitled sentiment.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
38. Sounds like you want to do more than primary them
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:19 PM
Mar 2016

"You will be sorry" threats are not cool, because they sound incredibly creepy.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
51. ...and generally, incredibly weak and meaningless.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:51 PM
Mar 2016

The Revolution (tm) could be lining up dozens of House and Senate candidates today, to be there when Sanders gets elected. Apparently they're going to wait for two years.

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
39. Yeah, threats and harassment will certainly put Sanders over the top. That's the ticket! nt
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:20 PM
Mar 2016
 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
49. Ignoring The Base Helped Us Retake The Senate In 2014.... Oh Wait....
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:49 PM
Mar 2016

Do we even want a party?

Maybe we should just have an auction instead of elections.

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
53. You. Are. Not. The. Base. Base voters don't abandon their party. They are the loyal voters who...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:53 PM
Mar 2016

...stick with a party through thick and thin. Base voters don't vote for alternate party candidates, ever.

Base voters are the opposite of the Sanders coalition, which is made up of people who can't decide whether or not they can get along with other voters for more than one election cycle.

Stop fooling yourselves, you're no one's base. Bernie's maybe, but not Democrats. All your purity votes and protest votes have robbed you of any influence you have over the Democratic Party. If the party has moved rightwards, it's because they learned that leftist voters are an unreliable constituency, and the Democratic Party wants to win elections, not litmus test contests.

Go found your own party and run it however you want. Then it can be as perfect as you can make it.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
94. I suggest you seek out the term
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 08:12 PM
Mar 2016

BASE REVOLT

By the way, they teach about these things in basic political science courses.

 

CalvinballPro

(1,019 posts)
95. It's not surprising that everything you know comes from Politics 101. You need...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:31 PM
Mar 2016

...to take some higher-level courses next. And don't sleep through them like you clearly did 101.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
96. You mean like a masters in history?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:38 PM
Mar 2016

But they teach about base revolts in poli sci 101

I am not surprised that some folks chose to insult when things like this are pointed out though

Tarc

(10,601 posts)
42. Are rage & violence the only two tones that some Sanders supporters can muster these days?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:35 PM
Mar 2016

The candidate of peace sure has some contrarian followers...

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
47. No One Is Threatening Violence - No One
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:47 PM
Mar 2016

Our party has thumbed it's nose at it's base for years, and continues to do so.

Here is just another prime example.

Sorry, is a real big word, and works in a lot of ways.

Ask DWS why we lose, and lose, and lose, and lose, and continue to lose to a pack of obviously crazy people.

Getting people to vote for corrupt folks worried more about their Super Pacs than the voters isn't working for the Democrats any more. Anyone notice?

 

Onlooker

(5,636 posts)
50. Isn't that a risky argument?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:50 PM
Mar 2016

First of all Sanders won about 5% (to HIllary's 2%) of the registered voters in Washington State. That's not exactly a mandate, though he did a good job at getting people out to the caucuses.

At any rate, using your argument, if Hillary continues to lead in pledged delegates and the number of states won at the end of the primary season, then I think you will have to change your point of view or accept that Bernie was defeated.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
56. And Whistling Past The Graveyard
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:06 PM
Mar 2016

Works so well....

The super delegates obviously want to keep our gravy train, pay to play government going just the way it is.

Of course they oppose DEMOCRACY>

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
68. We Watch Republicans Take Over Everything
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:30 PM
Mar 2016

And pretend ignoring our progressive base, and throwing them under the bus is a real good strategy for Democrats?

The super delegates have jobs.

It's the rest of us that are expected to work harder for less that has a problem.

They obviously don't understand.

Not like they didn't give Boeing 9 Billion in ransom.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
66. Sacrificing pawns (congressmen and senators) to protect the queen is considered good strategy.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:27 PM
Mar 2016

Hillary doesn't have coattails but she will walk over the casualties.

Many of the superdelegates are going to get primaried, and we'll find out that Washington isn't as blue as we like to think it is. Clinton is going to lose us seats in both the congress and the senate.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
70. Some Democrats Are Tired Of Losing
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:32 PM
Mar 2016

And losing, and losing.

Helping Wall Street and the MIC continue to rob our families is not a good strategy to win elections.

You heard it here first.

We are not all stupid.

asuhornets

(2,427 posts)
69. If in the end Bernie gets the most pledged delegates and popular vote.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:32 PM
Mar 2016

then he will get the super delegates. But to think just because he won Washington-he should automatically get the super delegates.

He knew the rules...I thought he and his supporters hated super delegates, anyway.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
73. Just Another Way To Screw Him
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:17 PM
Mar 2016

Some of us are complaining about being screwed and actually opposing the 1% preferred candidate from the beginning.

The super delegates are just another way to say Sanders doesn't have a chance and Wall Street always wins.

Maybe not this time.

Too many people are tired of Wall Street's enablers making the laws they use to crush us with.

asuhornets

(2,427 posts)
98. All 1%ers
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:42 PM
Mar 2016

are not horrible people. geeezz you can't get mad with someone because they are wealthy.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
102. I Agree Completely
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:52 AM
Apr 2016

In fact I want to be wealthy someday too.

By the way, that's the problem.

How you gonna get wealthy when the deck is stacked against you.....

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
78. Mad = No
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:45 PM
Mar 2016

Tired of being ripped off every time I turn around = yes.

Not the same thing.

Some people don't think a completely corrupt government that only listens to campaign contributors is cool.

I might be one of them.

Do you think your government should care about you, or only the 1%?

Answer please.

JI7

(93,617 posts)
87. lol nothing is going to happen. just like with dws. people will post on the internet
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:22 PM
Mar 2016

But there went be any real effort to help another candidate and do the groundwork needed to help win.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
99. How Dare You Threaten To Primary An Establishment Candidate
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:46 AM
Apr 2016

That ignores the will of the people.

Intolerable!

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
103. "Sir? Did you write this post threatening to vote against your congressman?"
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:54 AM
Apr 2016

Did you know that dear leader is sooo sick of this?

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
111. No, Actually Primary A Congressman
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 02:33 AM
Apr 2016

Not really the same thing.

My congressman is a friend of mine, and I would vote for him always.

It's just the fact that the "liberal base" has been ignored since the 80's, and because of this, most states are ran by Republicans if you haven't noticed.

Most people know they come 2nd after the big bucks.

Do you expect their vote or support?

LonePirate

(14,367 posts)
108. I do enjoy a good superdelegate rant thread.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 01:12 AM
Apr 2016

They are almost always filled with people who claim to vote their principles and who constantly remind everyone that their vote belongs to them and no one else. Yet somehow, superdelegates are not allowed to vote their principles nor are they allowed to control their own vote - they must vote the way someone else tells them to vote. I usually don't see this much hypocrisy in people who are not Republicans.

It certainly makes for some reading.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
112. There Are 15,000 People In Washington State That Qualify For Psychiatric Care I Read
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 02:38 AM
Apr 2016

But there is no money to spend helping them.

Yet there is enough money to give Boeing a 9 Billion Dollar Tax Break.

This is getting old.

Boeing extortion is also getting old.

Build your planes in China, or 3rd World USA, and pay a 1 million dollar fee to fly them into, and over Washington State.

Screw your race to the bottom, tax free status Boeing.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
119. I've already informed Patty and Maria that their votes at the convention
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 01:16 PM
Apr 2016

will influence my votes for them when they run.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Supporting Super ...