Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

murielm99

(33,084 posts)
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:44 AM Apr 2016

Sensitivity Training:

Bernie's Meltdown Over Hillary's Truth Telling Exposes the Nature of a Bully

http://www.thepeoplesview.net/main/2016/4/1/sensitivity-training-bernies-meltdown-over-being-called-out-for-lies-exposes-hallmark-of-bully

The Sanders campaign is demanding that Hillary Clinton apologize for telling the truth. They and their supporters are having an absolute meltdown over the fact that Hillary Clinton called them out on crafty lies they have been telling about her, and as a consequence, they can no longer furnish that lie without explanation.

At issue is Sanders' longstanding accusation that Hillary Clinton "takes money from the fossil fuel industry." Approached by an aggressive Greenpeace activist about that talking point from the Sanders camp, Secretary Clinton finally called out Sen. Sanders, saying, "I do not. I take money from people who work for companies. I am so sick of the Sanders campaign lying about me."

snip

Under any reasonable person theory, taking money from an industry would mean taking direct contributions from the companies or their PACs, which the Clinton campaign does not do. Her Presidential campaign takes money, as does Sen. Sanders, from individuals who work for certain employers. Given his own contributors who work in the fossil fuel industry, it's doubtful Sanders is in favor of restricting the rights of citizens to give to their candidate of choice because of their employers. No has Sen. Sanders returned the money from those individuals, making it just a tad hypocritical for him to be challenging contributions made by other individuals to other candidates.

It is, however, true that the biggest fossil fuel dealers in the world, the Koch brothers, are spending millions supporting Bernie Sanders' candidacy in the Democratic primary.

95 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sensitivity Training: (Original Post) murielm99 Apr 2016 OP
Ahahahaha Is this Satire? April Fool's ended 45 minutes ago here nt GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #1
So, no response? Recursion Apr 2016 #2
I'll Let Hillary 2008 respond for me GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #3
Once again, Sanders supporters demonstrate their obsession with the past. George II Apr 2016 #62
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #65
And innocent people are still dying in Iraq. Octafish Apr 2016 #74
And Sanders voted to fund every American penny used to do so. George II Apr 2016 #82
The difference is, Bernie didn't vote for war. Octafish Apr 2016 #85
He's voted to continue "war". That's his out on this issue, "I didn't vote for it", until he did. George II Apr 2016 #86
Links to those quotes and the specifics about the bills you say he voted for please. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #90
Link to back up that claim, please. Which bills? What else was in them? beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #89
'When someone shows you who they are, believe them.' nt. polly7 Apr 2016 #83
Oh yes indeed, I completely agree, polly. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #91
Yeah sure, I voted for Hillary too Autumn Apr 2016 #69
It's Spamdan! SMC22307 Apr 2016 #5
He's too stupid, no one would pay him except maybe to entertain at parties beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #14
Keep repeating FUD often enough, and dumbasses will believe it. SMC22307 Apr 2016 #20
That could be, same with grace laine the homophobe/racist. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #24
Your response only proves the point of the article. murielm99 Apr 2016 #7
agreed DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #56
As are many of the responses in this thread, many from "new" members! George II Apr 2016 #70
+1 itsrobert Apr 2016 #76
This is still a joke, right? polly7 Apr 2016 #4
See post 7. murielm99 Apr 2016 #8
No. nt. polly7 Apr 2016 #10
LOL (n/t) SMC22307 Apr 2016 #21
See post 3 nt GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #22
K&R. nt UtahLib Apr 2016 #6
And people follow his lead and behave the same way bravenak Apr 2016 #9
Off topic, murielm99 Apr 2016 #11
I was surprised to find it in the list bravenak Apr 2016 #17
Bernie had a meltdown?!!1! pacalo Apr 2016 #12
That is laughable, murielm99 Apr 2016 #15
Subjective talk. pacalo Apr 2016 #23
SpamDan = troll who lives in mom's basement and was banned from DU beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #13
Seriously, 'sensitivity training' for a decent, 'sensitive' man from a troll banned from here? polly7 Apr 2016 #16
He's a nasty, lying troll who hates hates progressives. Who takes him seriously? beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #18
Hmmmm ........ polly7 Apr 2016 #26
OMG did you read this part?: beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #30
Ease off, you pinhead bully brute! SMC22307 Apr 2016 #38
I like coddled eggs Fairgo Apr 2016 #48
I like poached eggs. SMC22307 Apr 2016 #67
The hard boilers thank you for your vote Fairgo Apr 2016 #87
I support eggs of all colors... SMC22307 Apr 2016 #94
Good grief ........ polly7 Apr 2016 #39
"TROLL." SMC22307 Apr 2016 #25
Oh, a definite troll! polly7 Apr 2016 #28
DU chewed up and spit the guy out. SMC22307 Apr 2016 #34
That's a very illuminating thread. polly7 Apr 2016 #40
"Not sure why anyone would link to a troll site" SMC22307 Apr 2016 #44
Sleep well! nt. polly7 Apr 2016 #45
That thread was magnificent. And I hope he's reading this one. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #32
If so, howdy-ho Spamdan! SMC22307 Apr 2016 #35
I found an old picture of you, SpamDan: beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #37
!! polly7 Apr 2016 #41
........... polly7 Apr 2016 #42
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #52
Sure, everyone knows SpamDan's a joke on the internet. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #63
You are replying to someone who was also banned from DU (DU2). demmiblue Apr 2016 #68
Wait, he was banned before? beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #71
Same user name? (n/t) SMC22307 Apr 2016 #95
lol. posting it again with a different title still doesn't make it true! Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #19
He should return the money bravenak Apr 2016 #27
Thank you, muriel! Cha Apr 2016 #29
That's funny, Hillary attacked Obama in 2008 for the defense Hillary is now using BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #31
You post a hit piece from TM99 Apr 2016 #33
I am a proud HRC supporter, murielm99 Apr 2016 #36
You're not serious. polly7 Apr 2016 #43
I am sure you are proud, TM99 Apr 2016 #47
The only reason you are saying this is a discredited source murielm99 Apr 2016 #75
Bullshit. TM99 Apr 2016 #81
It's so strange ........ that group has often expressed polly7 Apr 2016 #84
Incongruencies abound TM99 Apr 2016 #93
No one doubts that you are proud Fairgo Apr 2016 #49
Bringing a PPR'ed troll back to DU is behaving with class? (nt) jeff47 Apr 2016 #72
It exposes the hypocrisy again, wherein Hillary can't express any strong emotion pnwmom Apr 2016 #46
people have been manipulated fun n serious Apr 2016 #50
"Bernie's Meltdown Over Hillary's Truth Telling ..." Holy shit - that there's some spin!!!! Scuba Apr 2016 #51
Typical politician. Lie on the stump, get caught, and it's the other guys fault. Laser102 Apr 2016 #53
K&R NastyRiffraff Apr 2016 #54
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #55
Wow you really hit all the nasty baiting themes in one disgusting post. Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #59
Is anything I stated untrue? n/t cosmicone Apr 2016 #60
None of it is lacking in bias dripping tropes and classic baiting verbiage so truth is not possible Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #66
Yay, more delusional ramblings of a tombstoned troll! whatchamacallit Apr 2016 #57
Hey murielm99, do you endorse all the PPR'd trolls who are 'for Hillary' or just this one? Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #58
K&R mcar Apr 2016 #61
Poor Bernie! Always the victim.... Walk away Apr 2016 #64
+1 itsrobert Apr 2016 #77
what a pantload. welcome to ignore. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #73
And then there is actual BIG OIL behavior from HRC SHRED Apr 2016 #78
Hillary saying she doesn't take the money is the getaway driver saying "I only drive". Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #79
you're funny dana_b Apr 2016 #80
Projection and hypocrisy: the line is ever further blurred. eom Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #88
The People Spew frylock Apr 2016 #92

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
2. So, no response?
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:46 AM
Apr 2016

I'm being generous and assuming most of Sanders' supporters on DU simply have no idea how campaign finance works. Sanders and his team do, though, which is why I find his campaign's cynical pandering so disappointing. I still voted for the guy, but damn he's making swallowing that harder every day.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
3. I'll Let Hillary 2008 respond for me
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:48 AM
Apr 2016


Sad attempt from Clinton camp trying to obfuscate the reality of her fossil fuel money.

George II

(67,782 posts)
62. Once again, Sanders supporters demonstrate their obsession with the past.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:11 PM
Apr 2016

In case you missed it, this is 2016.

Response to George II (Reply #62)

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
74. And innocent people are still dying in Iraq.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:04 PM
Apr 2016

And Libya. And Honduras. And Haiti. And Somalia. And Yemen...and a lot of other places where "Money trumps peace."

George II

(67,782 posts)
82. And Sanders voted to fund every American penny used to do so.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:33 PM
Apr 2016

It's like everything else he's done in Congress in his 25 years - he votes for (bad stuff) or against (good stuff) and has an "out" (i.e., excuse) for each and every negative vote he's cast.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
85. The difference is, Bernie didn't vote for war.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 03:02 PM
Apr 2016

He voted to support the troops once there -- and when they come home.

I'm surprised you didn't mention that.

George II

(67,782 posts)
86. He's voted to continue "war". That's his out on this issue, "I didn't vote for it", until he did.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 03:24 PM
Apr 2016

We don't have combat troops in several of those countries you mention, but he still voted for the military equipment to conduct those wars.

His convenient excuses are, "it would have passed anyway so I voted against it", "it would have been vetoed anyway so I voted for it." Always an excuse.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
90. Links to those quotes and the specifics about the bills you say he voted for please.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 04:48 PM
Apr 2016

I want to see if you're telling the truth about voting to "continue war".

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
5. It's Spamdan!
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:49 AM
Apr 2016

Wonder whose payroll he's on? Possibly the same as "yes, we are a real news outlet!" dailynewsbinners, and red-baiting, racist, homophobic, Kissinger-approving Grace what's-her-name.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
14. He's too stupid, no one would pay him except maybe to entertain at parties
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:00 AM
Apr 2016

I'm waiting for little missiwishiwassmartrpants to give us her expert opinion.

Shit, it's not April fools anymore, too late!

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
20. Keep repeating FUD often enough, and dumbasses will believe it.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:07 AM
Apr 2016

Spamdan's MO.

Smarty and some of the recent ones we've been treated to get very little traffic, but People's Spew has picked up steam. Someone is funding it.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
24. That could be, same with grace laine the homophobe/racist.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:09 AM
Apr 2016

I just saw more links to her blog, the one where she features videos from Project Veritas.

Makes you wonder who the real Trump supporters are.

Maybe Rove is paying them.

murielm99

(33,084 posts)
7. Your response only proves the point of the article.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:52 AM
Apr 2016

Bernie and his supporters bully, lie, and belittle.

murielm99

(33,084 posts)
11. Off topic,
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:57 AM
Apr 2016

but I like the avatar. I own that CD and play it fairly often. Etta could belt!

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
17. I was surprised to find it in the list
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:02 AM
Apr 2016

Like HOT DAMN, got a good one this time. Might keep this one, I love her.

pacalo

(24,857 posts)
12. Bernie had a meltdown?!!1!
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:57 AM
Apr 2016

When someone surrounds themselves with only yes-people & sycophants, any straight-shooting might make her feel "bullied".

I don't think she could handle Trump one-on-one. Now, that is a bully.

murielm99

(33,084 posts)
15. That is laughable,
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:01 AM
Apr 2016

coming from a Bernie supporter. Anyone, IRL or online, who dares to criticize St. Bernard is shouted down and bullied. It is true here, and everywhere. It has been commented on by journalists, citizens and politicians. Bernie supporters have raised political bullying to a new level.

pacalo

(24,857 posts)
23. Subjective talk.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:07 AM
Apr 2016

Bernie is not a bully & to claim so on behalf of Hillary is doing her no favors when her supporters are enthralled with her possibly being the first woman president. She's got to show a thicker skin; the job calls for it.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
13. SpamDan = troll who lives in mom's basement and was banned from DU
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:57 AM
Apr 2016

Has meltdown every other hour because Bernie supporters are mean to him, writes about Bernie's "meltdown" with straight face.

Wonders why everyone is laughing.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
16. Seriously, 'sensitivity training' for a decent, 'sensitive' man from a troll banned from here?
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:01 AM
Apr 2016

ffs.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
18. He's a nasty, lying troll who hates hates progressives. Who takes him seriously?
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:05 AM
Apr 2016

Every time someone calls him on his lies he freaks out and calls them a bully.

He cannot tolerate any criticism whatsoever and only communitcates with people who agree with him. Ttalk about projection.


beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
30. OMG did you read this part?:
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:15 AM
Apr 2016
Why? Because bullies don't have anything to go on beside for their bluster, red-in-the-face attack, and brute force. They thrive on not being challenged, on not having to answer to anyone for their behavior. When they are stood up to, they want everyone to coddle them and be sensitive to their hurt feelings while they go on being the biggest pinheads on the face of the earth.



Fairgo

(1,571 posts)
48. I like coddled eggs
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:24 AM
Apr 2016

and I can coddle the shit out of an egg. I coddle them like a boss. I might be the king coddler.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
67. I like poached eggs.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:36 PM
Apr 2016

Let's fight!

(Great, now I'm going to be spending too much time on Pinterest looking at pretty pics of egg coddlers...)

Fairgo

(1,571 posts)
87. The hard boilers thank you for your vote
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 04:03 PM
Apr 2016

You poachers with your fancy talk and new ways, you are going to scramble our chances for a win!
All you care about is the whites...not good enough.
You'll have egg on your faces when the chickens come home to roost

polly7

(20,582 posts)
39. Good grief ........
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:45 AM
Apr 2016

SpamDan is quite melodramatic. I've been reading here a looong time and the behaviour he is describing doesn't fit the people he's trying to make it to ... at all.








SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
34. DU chewed up and spit the guy out.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:20 AM
Apr 2016

It's hilarious that a couple of posters think *anything* has changed for the site as a whole.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
40. That's a very illuminating thread.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:49 AM
Apr 2016

Not sure why anyone would link to a troll site .......... but whatever.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
44. "Not sure why anyone would link to a troll site"
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:57 AM
Apr 2016

It's because HRC supporters are CLASSY, and we're red-faced pinhead bully brutes.

Well, this thread has been fun enough, but off to bed. 'Nite everyone!

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
32. That thread was magnificent. And I hope he's reading this one.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:17 AM
Apr 2016

SpamDan is a rat fucking troll who is probably on Rove's payroll.

Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #13)

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
63. Sure, everyone knows SpamDan's a joke on the internet.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:15 PM
Apr 2016

Last edited Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:00 PM - Edit history (1)

He's a jealous, lying little rat fucker and he's actively working to smear one of our candidates, that makes him a tool for Rove imo.

demmiblue

(39,941 posts)
68. You are replying to someone who was also banned from DU (DU2).
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:41 PM
Apr 2016

The lot of them got a fresh start on DU3.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
31. That's funny, Hillary attacked Obama in 2008 for the defense Hillary is now using
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:16 AM
Apr 2016

See the ad at this post:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1280&pid=163766

And now you go on Ignore with the rest of the Hillary supporters.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
33. You post a hit piece from
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:19 AM
Apr 2016

a troll who was banned on DU and expect us to take the article, the author, and you seriously?!

Well, it is still April Fool's Day, I guess.

murielm99

(33,084 posts)
36. I am a proud HRC supporter,
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:23 AM
Apr 2016

and not the one being fooled.

Hillary and her supporters have behaved with class. Bernie and his bullies? Not so much.

We will see who is serious by the time we have a nominee. It will not be Bernie.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
43. You're not serious.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:56 AM
Apr 2016

If wanting to talk about the issues as I've seen here, is being bullied, I honestly feel sorry for anyone so victimized by it. That's gotta be hard to deal with day to day. And I am serious.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
47. I am sure you are proud,
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:10 AM
Apr 2016

however, the facts are that you posted an article from a thoroughly discredited source.

Clinton is a lying narcissist who yells at activists, be they AA or environmentalists, for challenging her in public. Yeah, real classy that one.

The projection is so sickening when you have 'classy' Clinton supporters slut-shaming Sarandon and calling her an idiot, a buffoon, and a thug.

Shall I go on?

Yes, we may sadly indeed have Clinton as the nominee, thus ensuring a resounding defeat in the general for the left.

murielm99

(33,084 posts)
75. The only reason you are saying this is a discredited source
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:38 PM
Apr 2016

is that it does not worship your candidate.

Slut-shaming? Name-calling? No one has done that here. I have not seen any of those names used here.

If I dared to call you or your fellow Bernie followers, or your candidate half the names that Hillary has been called, I would be banned here.

You are a hypocrite.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
81. Bullshit.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:04 PM
Apr 2016

It is discredited because of the reasons given in this thread. The guy was banned as a troll from DU.

Talk about fucking projection. The only reason you are saying it is a creditable source is because it attacks my candidate.

And yes, indeed those did occur. If I called out the posters, I would get a hide, so open your eyes and go look at what your fellow Clinton supporters are doing.

You my dear are the only hypocrite in this thread.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
84. It's so strange ........ that group has often expressed
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:37 PM
Apr 2016

hate and derision against trolls banned here that head to Discussionist. I guess it depends on who's propping up at the time the lies you need out there.

Fairgo

(1,571 posts)
49. No one doubts that you are proud
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:28 AM
Apr 2016

You proud like a boss. If you are going to march into the septic tank, do it proudly.

pnwmom

(110,324 posts)
46. It exposes the hypocrisy again, wherein Hillary can't express any strong emotion
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:07 AM
Apr 2016

without being considered out of control -- but Bernie can wave his arms around and yell on a daily basis and that's just fine. That's just Bernie being Bernie.

And in this case she is justifiably angry. 97.7 % of the donations from individuals in the industry (not the companies themselves, which are barred from donating) have been going to the GOP -- not either Dem.
That shows how much employees in the industry prefer the GOP.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/apr/01/sorting-out-clintons-fossil-fuel-contributions/

According to the latest tallies from Center for Responsive Politics, Clinton's campaign has received $307,561 from people who work for oil and gas interests so far in the presidential race. Sanders has received nearly six times fewer dollars — $53,760.

For Clinton, that's 0.2 percent of the more than $159.9 million her campaign committee, Hillary for America, has raised. For Sanders, it's 0.04 percent of $139.8 million.

Super PACs supporting Clinton have directly given an additional $25,701. Sanders does not have a super PAC.

So far, 97.7 percent of donations from people connected the oil and gas industry have gone to Republicans.

But in Clinton’s case, that doesn't include "bundlers," a fancy name for fundraisers who collect money from individual donors and bundle the money together for a campaign.

A bundler might, for example, arrange to have each executive from an oil company, along with each adult member of his or her family, give $1,000 per person, which is bundled together and given to the campaign. It's legal because the individuals aren't violating the per-person limit.

The Huffington Post article from July 17, 2015, cited by Sanders found that "nearly all of the lobbyists bundling contributions for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign have at one time or another worked for the fossil fuel industry." It links to 40 registered lobbyists but only offers details on some donors who still work for the industry.

However, the Greenpeace report says that when you add in the bundlers’ donations (lobbyists with some alleged tie to the fossil fuel industry), Clinton's total rises to nearly $1.8 million. The fossil fuel industry's share of the Clinton coffers goes up to 0.8 percent.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
50. people have been manipulated
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:29 AM
Apr 2016

to think everyone and everything except Bernie is crooked. They now do not trust anything they see. It's sad that this has happened in a presidential campaign. Usually this is seen in Cults.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
51. "Bernie's Meltdown Over Hillary's Truth Telling ..." Holy shit - that there's some spin!!!!
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 07:44 AM
Apr 2016

Laser102

(816 posts)
53. Typical politician. Lie on the stump, get caught, and it's the other guys fault.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 09:57 AM
Apr 2016

In other words, busted.

Response to murielm99 (Original post)

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
59. Wow you really hit all the nasty baiting themes in one disgusting post.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:41 AM
Apr 2016

This is exemplary of the Clinton cohort and exactly why I oppose them. Red baiting, Jew baiting, and all with a casualness that should give chills even to the most extreme conservatives in our Party.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
66. None of it is lacking in bias dripping tropes and classic baiting verbiage so truth is not possible
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:33 PM
Apr 2016

when employing such bigoted lexicons. It's really a rotten post and every word in it is reeking with that rot.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
58. Hey murielm99, do you endorse all the PPR'd trolls who are 'for Hillary' or just this one?
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:39 AM
Apr 2016

Because there are some real pips in that cohort. I can't believe anyone posts this guy's crap here, he's attacked every Democrat that breaths, including Obama and Clinton and he was banned by EarlG as a troll.

Do you endorse all the PPR'd or just some of them? Have you told the admins how you feel about this blogger, whom they call a troll yet you see as a valid expression of your own political views?

A thread in which this community tells that smear merchant what for:

Liberals Without A Conscience
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023662610#post23

Barf.

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
64. Poor Bernie! Always the victim....
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:27 PM
Apr 2016

He has no platform except "1% Oligarchy" and his campaign is coming to an end after Wisconsin so he has to start attacking in order to get some attention. When he gets swatted back he's all WAAAAAAA! And that's about that. No one but his Followers care.

Now he is desperate for another debate where he will say the same thing he always does and answers every question with his Big Bank spiel. Enough with the free advertising Bernie. Let the Millennials send in more of their weekly allowance to fund your campaign in NYS. They like hearing your stump speech all day every day. The rest of the world is getting bored.

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
78. And then there is actual BIG OIL behavior from HRC
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:49 PM
Apr 2016


The State Department under Hillary's leadership promoted hydraulic fracking worldwide while working closely with big oil interests.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511630955

http://m.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron



Ooops...

frylock

(34,825 posts)
92. The People Spew
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 04:59 PM
Apr 2016

Brock Nation Review, Daily New Spin, and The People Spew have been seeing some heavy rotation this week. That's how you know that Mrs. Clinton's campaign has gone sideways.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sensitivity Training: