2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSensitivity Training:
Bernie's Meltdown Over Hillary's Truth Telling Exposes the Nature of a Bully
http://www.thepeoplesview.net/main/2016/4/1/sensitivity-training-bernies-meltdown-over-being-called-out-for-lies-exposes-hallmark-of-bully
The Sanders campaign is demanding that Hillary Clinton apologize for telling the truth. They and their supporters are having an absolute meltdown over the fact that Hillary Clinton called them out on crafty lies they have been telling about her, and as a consequence, they can no longer furnish that lie without explanation.
At issue is Sanders' longstanding accusation that Hillary Clinton "takes money from the fossil fuel industry." Approached by an aggressive Greenpeace activist about that talking point from the Sanders camp, Secretary Clinton finally called out Sen. Sanders, saying, "I do not. I take money from people who work for companies. I am so sick of the Sanders campaign lying about me."
snip
Under any reasonable person theory, taking money from an industry would mean taking direct contributions from the companies or their PACs, which the Clinton campaign does not do. Her Presidential campaign takes money, as does Sen. Sanders, from individuals who work for certain employers. Given his own contributors who work in the fossil fuel industry, it's doubtful Sanders is in favor of restricting the rights of citizens to give to their candidate of choice because of their employers. No has Sen. Sanders returned the money from those individuals, making it just a tad hypocritical for him to be challenging contributions made by other individuals to other candidates.
It is, however, true that the biggest fossil fuel dealers in the world, the Koch brothers, are spending millions supporting Bernie Sanders' candidacy in the Democratic primary.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)I'm being generous and assuming most of Sanders' supporters on DU simply have no idea how campaign finance works. Sanders and his team do, though, which is why I find his campaign's cynical pandering so disappointing. I still voted for the guy, but damn he's making swallowing that harder every day.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)Sad attempt from Clinton camp trying to obfuscate the reality of her fossil fuel money.
George II
(67,782 posts)In case you missed it, this is 2016.
Response to George II (Reply #62)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Octafish
(55,745 posts)And Libya. And Honduras. And Haiti. And Somalia. And Yemen...and a lot of other places where "Money trumps peace."
George II
(67,782 posts)It's like everything else he's done in Congress in his 25 years - he votes for (bad stuff) or against (good stuff) and has an "out" (i.e., excuse) for each and every negative vote he's cast.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)He voted to support the troops once there -- and when they come home.
I'm surprised you didn't mention that.
George II
(67,782 posts)We don't have combat troops in several of those countries you mention, but he still voted for the military equipment to conduct those wars.
His convenient excuses are, "it would have passed anyway so I voted against it", "it would have been vetoed anyway so I voted for it." Always an excuse.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I want to see if you're telling the truth about voting to "continue war".
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Autumn
(49,020 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Wonder whose payroll he's on? Possibly the same as "yes, we are a real news outlet!" dailynewsbinners, and red-baiting, racist, homophobic, Kissinger-approving Grace what's-her-name.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I'm waiting for little missiwishiwassmartrpants to give us her expert opinion.
Shit, it's not April fools anymore, too late!
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Spamdan's MO.
Smarty and some of the recent ones we've been treated to get very little traffic, but People's Spew has picked up steam. Someone is funding it.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I just saw more links to her blog, the one where she features videos from Project Veritas.
Makes you wonder who the real Trump supporters are.
Maybe Rove is paying them.
murielm99
(33,084 posts)Bernie and his supporters bully, lie, and belittle.
DemonGoddess
(5,127 posts)thank you for the post!
George II
(67,782 posts)thanks for caring
polly7
(20,582 posts)murielm99
(33,084 posts)GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)UtahLib
(3,182 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)murielm99
(33,084 posts)but I like the avatar. I own that CD and play it fairly often. Etta could belt!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Like HOT DAMN, got a good one this time. Might keep this one, I love her.
pacalo
(24,857 posts)When someone surrounds themselves with only yes-people & sycophants, any straight-shooting might make her feel "bullied".
I don't think she could handle Trump one-on-one. Now, that is a bully.
murielm99
(33,084 posts)coming from a Bernie supporter. Anyone, IRL or online, who dares to criticize St. Bernard is shouted down and bullied. It is true here, and everywhere. It has been commented on by journalists, citizens and politicians. Bernie supporters have raised political bullying to a new level.
pacalo
(24,857 posts)Bernie is not a bully & to claim so on behalf of Hillary is doing her no favors when her supporters are enthralled with her possibly being the first woman president. She's got to show a thicker skin; the job calls for it.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Has meltdown every other hour because Bernie supporters are mean to him, writes about Bernie's "meltdown" with straight face.
Wonders why everyone is laughing.
polly7
(20,582 posts)ffs.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Every time someone calls him on his lies he freaks out and calls them a bully.
He cannot tolerate any criticism whatsoever and only communitcates with people who agree with him. Ttalk about projection.
polly7
(20,582 posts)I'm just going to read for awhile here.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Please coddle me!
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)and I can coddle the shit out of an egg. I coddle them like a boss. I might be the king coddler.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Let's fight!
(Great, now I'm going to be spending too much time on Pinterest looking at pretty pics of egg coddlers...)
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)You poachers with your fancy talk and new ways, you are going to scramble our chances for a win!
All you care about is the whites...not good enough.
You'll have egg on your faces when the chickens come home to roost
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)AND all in one basket!

polly7
(20,582 posts)SpamDan is quite melodramatic. I've been reading here a looong time and the behaviour he is describing doesn't fit the people he's trying to make it to ... at all.

He gets absolutely nailed in this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023662610
It's fuckin' hilarious.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Off to read the thread, thank you.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)It's hilarious that a couple of posters think *anything* has changed for the site as a whole.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Not sure why anyone would link to a troll site .......... but whatever.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)It's because HRC supporters are CLASSY, and we're red-faced pinhead bully brutes.
Well, this thread has been fun enough, but off to bed. 'Nite everyone!
polly7
(20,582 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)SpamDan is a rat fucking troll who is probably on Rove's payroll.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)
polly7
(20,582 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #13)
Post removed
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:00 PM - Edit history (1)
He's a jealous, lying little rat fucker and he's actively working to smear one of our candidates, that makes him a tool for Rove imo.
demmiblue
(39,941 posts)The lot of them got a fresh start on DU3.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Well that explains a lot, thanks for the tip.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Cha
(320,589 posts)BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)See the ad at this post:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1280&pid=163766
And now you go on Ignore with the rest of the Hillary supporters.
TM99
(8,352 posts)a troll who was banned on DU and expect us to take the article, the author, and you seriously?!
Well, it is still April Fool's Day, I guess.
murielm99
(33,084 posts)and not the one being fooled.
Hillary and her supporters have behaved with class. Bernie and his bullies? Not so much.
We will see who is serious by the time we have a nominee. It will not be Bernie.
polly7
(20,582 posts)If wanting to talk about the issues as I've seen here, is being bullied, I honestly feel sorry for anyone so victimized by it. That's gotta be hard to deal with day to day. And I am serious.
TM99
(8,352 posts)however, the facts are that you posted an article from a thoroughly discredited source.
Clinton is a lying narcissist who yells at activists, be they AA or environmentalists, for challenging her in public. Yeah, real classy that one.
The projection is so sickening when you have 'classy' Clinton supporters slut-shaming Sarandon and calling her an idiot, a buffoon, and a thug.
Shall I go on?
Yes, we may sadly indeed have Clinton as the nominee, thus ensuring a resounding defeat in the general for the left.
murielm99
(33,084 posts)is that it does not worship your candidate.
Slut-shaming? Name-calling? No one has done that here. I have not seen any of those names used here.
If I dared to call you or your fellow Bernie followers, or your candidate half the names that Hillary has been called, I would be banned here.
You are a hypocrite.
It is discredited because of the reasons given in this thread. The guy was banned as a troll from DU.
Talk about fucking projection. The only reason you are saying it is a creditable source is because it attacks my candidate.
And yes, indeed those did occur. If I called out the posters, I would get a hide, so open your eyes and go look at what your fellow Clinton supporters are doing.
You my dear are the only hypocrite in this thread.
polly7
(20,582 posts)hate and derision against trolls banned here that head to Discussionist. I guess it depends on who's propping up at the time the lies you need out there.
TM99
(8,352 posts)in the Clinton world.
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)You proud like a boss. If you are going to march into the septic tank, do it proudly.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)pnwmom
(110,324 posts)without being considered out of control -- but Bernie can wave his arms around and yell on a daily basis and that's just fine. That's just Bernie being Bernie.
And in this case she is justifiably angry. 97.7 % of the donations from individuals in the industry (not the companies themselves, which are barred from donating) have been going to the GOP -- not either Dem.
That shows how much employees in the industry prefer the GOP.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/apr/01/sorting-out-clintons-fossil-fuel-contributions/
According to the latest tallies from Center for Responsive Politics, Clinton's campaign has received $307,561 from people who work for oil and gas interests so far in the presidential race. Sanders has received nearly six times fewer dollars $53,760.
For Clinton, that's 0.2 percent of the more than $159.9 million her campaign committee, Hillary for America, has raised. For Sanders, it's 0.04 percent of $139.8 million.
Super PACs supporting Clinton have directly given an additional $25,701. Sanders does not have a super PAC.
So far, 97.7 percent of donations from people connected the oil and gas industry have gone to Republicans.
But in Clintons case, that doesn't include "bundlers," a fancy name for fundraisers who collect money from individual donors and bundle the money together for a campaign.
A bundler might, for example, arrange to have each executive from an oil company, along with each adult member of his or her family, give $1,000 per person, which is bundled together and given to the campaign. It's legal because the individuals aren't violating the per-person limit.
The Huffington Post article from July 17, 2015, cited by Sanders found that "nearly all of the lobbyists bundling contributions for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clintons campaign have at one time or another worked for the fossil fuel industry." It links to 40 registered lobbyists but only offers details on some donors who still work for the industry.
However, the Greenpeace report says that when you add in the bundlers donations (lobbyists with some alleged tie to the fossil fuel industry), Clinton's total rises to nearly $1.8 million. The fossil fuel industry's share of the Clinton coffers goes up to 0.8 percent.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)to think everyone and everything except Bernie is crooked. They now do not trust anything they see. It's sad that this has happened in a presidential campaign. Usually this is seen in Cults.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Laser102
(816 posts)In other words, busted.
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)Thanks for posting that, muriel. The People's View gets it right every time.
Response to murielm99 (Original post)
Post removed
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)This is exemplary of the Clinton cohort and exactly why I oppose them. Red baiting, Jew baiting, and all with a casualness that should give chills even to the most extreme conservatives in our Party.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)when employing such bigoted lexicons. It's really a rotten post and every word in it is reeking with that rot.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Because there are some real pips in that cohort. I can't believe anyone posts this guy's crap here, he's attacked every Democrat that breaths, including Obama and Clinton and he was banned by EarlG as a troll.
Do you endorse all the PPR'd or just some of them? Have you told the admins how you feel about this blogger, whom they call a troll yet you see as a valid expression of your own political views?
A thread in which this community tells that smear merchant what for:
Liberals Without A Conscience
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023662610#post23
Barf.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)He has no platform except "1% Oligarchy" and his campaign is coming to an end after Wisconsin so he has to start attacking in order to get some attention. When he gets swatted back he's all WAAAAAAA! And that's about that. No one but his Followers care.
Now he is desperate for another debate where he will say the same thing he always does and answers every question with his Big Bank spiel. Enough with the free advertising Bernie. Let the Millennials send in more of their weekly allowance to fund your campaign in NYS. They like hearing your stump speech all day every day. The rest of the world is getting bored.
thanks for caring
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)The State Department under Hillary's leadership promoted hydraulic fracking worldwide while working closely with big oil interests.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511630955
http://m.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron
Ooops...
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)dana_b
(11,546 posts)oh and "the peoplesview"??
thanks for the laugh!
I feel better now.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Brock Nation Review, Daily New Spin, and The People Spew have been seeing some heavy rotation this week. That's how you know that Mrs. Clinton's campaign has gone sideways.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.