2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTheories on why Sanders hasn't released his tax returns?
I doubt that there's any embarrassing income there. My guess is that his charitable contributions were embarrassingly low (perhaps zero) for one or more of the years, and he simply doesn't want to look like a cheapskate.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Through a Sanders Foundation.
Let's see the Clinton's taxes.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)https://www.hillaryclinton.com/p/files/returns/WJC_HRC_2013_Form_1040.pdf
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/p/files/returns/WJC_HRC_2012_Form_1040.pdf
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/p/files/returns/WJC_HRC_2011_Form_1040.pdf
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/p/files/returns/WJC_HRC_2010_Form_1040.pdf
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/p/files/returns/WJC_HRC_2009_Form_1040.pdf
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)So I posted the online links to their tax returns. I'm not sure that I understand your post.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,853 posts)JoFerret
(10,710 posts)we don't know without seeing the documents do we?
And trust a politician? Really - now THAT is naive.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Because they don't want to talk about issues.
JoFerret
(10,710 posts)and will talk policy till your ears drop off.
Sanders hits his key themes over and over again.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Probably because she changes them like a chameleon.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)and links to her policy papers many times. Amazing you have missed them all.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Cuz they change from week to week...
Armstead
(47,803 posts)He and Jane are kind of busy and preoccupied....and their income and taxes are not a whole lot different than the one they released.
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
Nanjeanne
(6,589 posts)Yes . . . that's right - they were released in 2015:
According to his tax forms, Sanders and his wife paid $27,653 in federal income tax and another $7,903 in Vermont income tax last year. The couple paid an effective tax rate of 19.6 percent on their federal taxable income of $140,994.
Sanders reported receiving $156,441 from his Senate job, after contributions to a savings plan and health insurance. The couple reported receiving another $46,213 in Social Security benefits, of which $39,281 was taxable.
Sanders also reported income of $4,982 from the pension he receives having been mayor of Burlington, Vt., in the 1980s. And his wife had another $4,900 in compensation for sitting on a commission devoted to the management of low-level radioactive waste disposal.
On a separate disclosure form required of presidential candidates, Sanders reported having between $25,000 and $65,000 in credit card debt at some point during the past year.
Sanders spokesman Michael Briggs said the debt was related to weddings of a daughter and niece and that Sanders and his wife had since paid the balance on the two credit cards down to zero.
Like a lot of Americans, they use credit cards to pay everyday expenses, Briggs said.
On the disclosure form, which was filed May 29 with the Federal Election Commission, Sanders also noted having received $1,017.42 in 2014 from the publisher of a book that includes the text of a nearly nine-hour filibuster he conducted in 2010. The book is titled The Speech: A Historic Filibuster on Corporate Greed and the Decline of Our Middle Class. Sanders also reported receiving an $850 honorarium for having appeared on HBOs Real Time with Bill Maher.
The money from the book and the television appearance were both donated to charity, Briggs said. Sanders donated another $8,350 to charity last year, Briggs said.
On his Vermont tax return, Sanders made a total of $150 in voluntary contributions to support four causes: at-risk children; endangered wildlife; military veterans; and the environment.
On his federal return, Sanders -- who advocates for public financed elections -- elected to support the presidential election campaign fund.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/06/30/on-tax-returns-sanders-and-wife-report-200000-in-income-mostly-from-his-senate-post/
questionseverything
(11,841 posts)they are not even due yet
Nanjeanne
(6,589 posts)because it requires actually reading something other than a tweet.
And they seem to think Sanders travels with his tax returns from 2009 in his back pocket so he can just "release them already". Or that he has a tax accountant on speed dial that can do it for him. Or maybe call his man-servant to go to his vault and get them ready for publication . . .
Or who knows what else. So ridiculous.
questionseverything
(11,841 posts)figures it is much to do about nothing
JoFerret
(10,710 posts)PatrickforO
(15,426 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)R B Garr
(17,984 posts)in itself. His behavior becomes the subject instead of the returns. I think you have a good guess, though, about the charities. But now it does look suspicious, mostly because he's such a moralizer yet he can't conform to the most basic of requirements himself.
It's comical that he or his spokespeople would compare tax returns to Wall Street speeches. How phony can you get. Tax Returns are a requirement for every candidate.
Since Bernie makes Wall Street the cornerstone of his campaign, a Wall Street vs. Wall Street exchange would be equitable. Bernie should release a list of the Wall Street execs he would prosecute and list their crimes. Then he can continue preaching about Wall Street. The Wall Street meltdown was 8 years ago, so surely he has a list of bad guys he wants to put in jail. New Yorkers need to know! Get those guys out on Front Street so Bernie can round them up.
Nanjeanne
(6,589 posts)He is on the road and his taxes were done by his wife so it's not like he's calling his accountant to make copies for him. I'm sure he'll get to them when he gets back home. I doubt they will be much different than his 2014 ones.
Just because "twitter" cuts down soundbites to make it sound like he isn't going to release them - he said he would as soon as he can.
R B Garr
(17,984 posts)Nanjeanne
(6,589 posts)What do you think you will discover? Sanders has a tax haven in the Cayman Islands?
R B Garr
(17,984 posts)so release his own documentation or quit accusing people of nefarious wrongdoings just to get people to clap for you.
Nanjeanne
(6,589 posts)But "nefarious wrongdoings just to get people to clap for you" is really funny. Thanks for that laugh.
R B Garr
(17,984 posts)himself to his own standards. Yeah, what a laugh. Hilarious.
Nanjeanne
(6,589 posts)charity and earned about $200,000.
Damn that man - he is so immoral.
Don't use up all your outrage. Once he releases more than 2014 you are going to need something else for your faux-scandal.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I would stay away from the desperate, don't get any on you.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Nanjeanne
(6,589 posts)said his wife did the taxes - not as an excuse - but because he doesn't have a tax accountant who has copies on file for him. So he would need to (like many people) go to his home or office or safe deposit box - or wherever they are filed - and have copies made and do whatever else one does to get that information to the media (I'm sure there is some personal info like SS #s etc that has to be redacted, etc.).
I'm sure most people don't have their returns from 5 years ago in their pockets to be whipped out as needed.
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)Ethics in Government Act of 1978 is what requires all presidential and vice presidential candidates were required to release certain financial documents. Sanders and Clinton are not running for president right now they are running for nomination. Once Sanders get the nomination he will be required to provide the financial forms called for in Ethics in Government Act of 1978. Asking for them now is just a stupid tactic. More so if you are someone whining about personal attacks like Clinton is.
R B Garr
(17,984 posts)he should hold himself to as high a standard as he sets for her. If he can't even provide basic documentation but constantly rails against others, then he's a hypocrite.
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)You think corruption and people with loads money is good for America. I understand that. I am surround by GOP people down here in SC so I hear same thing from them all time. They are not evil people they just think "Some day I am going to be a %1 so must protect them" So I do understand where you are coming from on this.
R B Garr
(17,984 posts)the "1%'ers" because I think Sanders should quit whining about other people when he hasn't accounted yet for himself. That's hilarious. I could also imply you're protecting "1%ers" because you obviously condone Susan Sarandon shilling for Bernie and she's worth $50 million. Thanks for your "concern"
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)Well if you think talking about Wall Street committing fraud and almost causing a total collapse of world economy as whining I do so bye bye I no longer see you.
R B Garr
(17,984 posts)Name their names and crimes. The WS meltdown was 8 years ago, so surely he has a list by now. If he's going to moralize about it, then he should back up his claims with names and crimes. I'm so tired of the vapid whines from his campaign when it's obvious he hasn't really given it much thought except how to attack people during his stump speech. Everyone clap for Bernie!
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)They could release 2015 alone, but why not wait 2 weeks and let it all get analyzed simultaneously?
Nothing really will change. The filing date -is- before New York primary
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...and the 2014 return was already released.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)...from the HRC camp isn't going to work.
Not even close.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)Ya got nothin else
PatrickforO
(15,426 posts)MONEY has changed hands.
A nickel a post, maybe?
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Since he doesn't have a 25 year history of dishonesty and corruption, and hasn't gotten filthy rich off his government job, hasn't taken legal bribe money, nobody cares.
JoFerret
(10,710 posts)for those running for president. And I do care.
What's the problem? Seems like a self-inflicted wound left to fester.
And IF there is some minor problem in the filing then better get it over with now rather than wait for it to get worse.
TM99
(8,352 posts)It is not a legal requirement.
Individual income tax returns including those of public figures are private information, protected by law from unauthorized disclosure. Indeed, the Internal Revenue Service is barred from releasing any taxpayer information whatsoever, except to authorized agencies and individuals.
Like all other citizens, U.S. presidents enjoy this protection of their privacy. Since the early 1970s, however, most presidents have chosen to release their returns publicly. In the hope of making this information more widely available, the Tax History Project at Tax Analysts has compiled an archive of presidential tax returns.
http://www.taxhistory.org/www/website.nsf/Web/PresidentialTaxReturns
Sanders 2014 tax return is available on that site in all its glory. The 2015 one will follow after filing this year. The Sanders team will likely release previous ones as well to follow tradition.
But it is categorically false to spread a lie that it is a legal requirement when it is most certainly not.
JoFerret
(10,710 posts)according to Money magazine at least. (Mostly pension stuff as I recall from the article - all quite usual and respectable)
So nothing excessive but not sackcloth and ashes either.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)
Har har. It is to laugh, Phil Gramm! (not present in photo)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511200048
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)It's not like they can call up their accountant & tell them to release a copy.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Appears I was wrong.
smiley
(1,432 posts)Why don't we wait until the tax deadline and then maybe you have a reason for this question.
JoFerret
(10,710 posts)just hasn't released them. Not for years apparently.Nor have Drumpf, Kasich and Cruz. Clinton has.
smiley
(1,432 posts)If he says he'll release them. If he continues to delay, then yes I think that is an issue.
As far as I know he has released his 2014 taxes. Was he required to release taxes for years prior?
http://www.taxhistory.org/www/website.nsf/web/presidentialtaxreturns
smiley
(1,432 posts)JoFerret
(10,710 posts)Sanders made it clear years ago that he doesn't believe in charity.
(I don't fault him for that. A decent society takes care of its needy.)
Nanjeanne
(6,589 posts)JoFerret
(10,710 posts)But he is on record as saying he doesn't believe in charity.
But - whatever - giving or not giving is irrelevant (to me). Doesn't matter to me.
Transparency on something as basic as taxes does matter when a person is seeking to become President.
beedle
(1,235 posts)I don't believe in it much either, for the same reason, but if the reality is that government doesn't look after a cause you believe in, then a person can step up without having to denounce government support of 'charitable' causes.
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)... He probably did a half-assed job on his taxes, and now has to have them professionally redone to figure out what's really going on. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if in the end he's owed money by the government.
The only other explanation for him not releasing them is that he didn't file, but that seems unlikely.
Response to Nye Bevan (Original post)
Post removed
JoFerret
(10,710 posts)WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)...but when a Bernie supporter points out what a total ass the Hillary clown made of himself, now it's a problem?
I got your number, Ferret.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)we have reached bottom.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)man the slime factor is multiplying like roaches.
methinks the desperation is exploding
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)One SWEARS he's in bed with the Kochs because you know, those folks all stick together, another said he took 23 million in illegal contributions which was debunked weeks ago but the truth means nothing.
Ugly thing to see when Bernie's one of the poorest senators on the hill, if he's being bought out by special interests he must work for next to nothing.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)and when that implosion is coming from camp clinton, it is even uglier and more fictional
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Some are even saying Trump will make a big deal out of it. Like that wouldn't backfire?
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)you just made my evening! well done!
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)the nominee of their party.
Since you are soooo convinced that HRC will be
winner, why do you care?
Perhaps HRC put hers out there because she
was assured this time around it would be a
piece of cake?
Never count your chickens before they are hatched.
MattP
(3,304 posts)Even Romney did two years
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Here's a list, start digging, maybe you'll find something Rove, I mean Brock missed:
Summary Assets Liabilities Transactions Reports Other
The original disclosure files can be accessed below by filing year.
2015 Presidential (filed in 2016)
2014 (filed in 2015)
2013 (filed in 2014)
2013 Amendment (filed in 2014)
2012 (filed in 2013)
2012 Extension (filed in 2013)
2011 (filed in 2012)
2010 (filed in 2011)
2009 (filed in 2010)
2009 Extension (filed in 2010)
2008 Extension (filed in 2009)
2008 (filed in 2009)
2007 (filed in 2008)
2006 (filed in 2007)
2005 (filed in 2006)
2004 (filed in 2005)
2003 (filed in 2004)
2002 (filed in 2003)
2001 (filed in 2002)
2000 (filed in 2001)
1999 (filed in 2000)
1998 (filed in 1999)
1997 (filed in 1998)
1996 (filed in 1997)
1995 (filed in 1996)
1990 (filed in 1991)
Here's a breakdown by year from Money Nation:
According to Center for Responsive Politics and Money Nation data:
Bernie Sanders Net Worth August 2015: $528,014
Bernie Sanders Net Worth May 2015: $440,511
Bernie Sanders Net Worth 2014: $330,408
Bernie Sanders Net Worth 2013: $330,506
Bernie Sanders Net Worth 2012: $460,506
Net Worth 2011: $308,005
Net Worth 2010: $429,004
Net Worth 2009: $105,003
Net Worth 2008: $219,504
Net Worth 2007: $345,503
Net Worth 2006: $188,504
Net Worth 2005: $128,001
Net Worth 2004: $115,501
Bernie Sanders net worth has fluctuated over time, from $115,501 in 2004 to $345,503 in 2007. The 2008 financial crisis may have caused a drop of 36% of Sanders net worth in that year. Sanders net worth sunk as low as $105,003 in 2009 and has gone as high as $460,506 in 2012.
Our figures above show a rise of $87,503 in Bernie Sanders net worth between May and August of 2015. However, only part of that rise comes from an actual change in Bernie Sanders net worth. Most of the change comes from amendments to disclosure forms. In other words, Sanders didnt suddenly make an extra $87,000.
http://moneynation.com/bernie-sanders-net-worth/
But you won't, I've seen your associates claim he's hiding money from Russia, Israel, fracking, the NRA, that he's got millions stashed in offshore accounts, that he TOOK 23 MILLION IN ILLEGAL CONTRIBUTIONS, etc. According to the records he's one of the poorest senators in Washington, how many millions has Hillary collected from Wall Street again?
This is just another excuse to try to smear Bernie because the heat is on your candidate. It reeks of desperation but watching you guys flail around is amusing, so you think we can't see this for what it is?
Please proceed.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The hyperventilating over manufactured poutrage is adorable. Like watching a school play.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)Y'all are so sadly predictable, and yet once these are released and nothing is afoot, you will look for another manufactured outrage to avoid the painful truth that the only candidate who hides shit is the corrupt Clinton y'all are supporting.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Which he handed out as gifts and then claimed it as a business expense.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)between Bern and the NRA~Gun Lobby
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)custodian, whom turned out to be herself.
Hawaiianlight
(63 posts)He seems to be in a slump maybe he should lay off some of those pitches out of the strike zone.
dflprincess
(29,346 posts)Perhaps you can give us a preview of what this week's talking points will be?
TM99
(8,352 posts)When Barack Obama released his 2000-2006 tax filings during the height of the presidential campaign, he was criticized for slightly-less-than-biblically-required charitable giving.
In those years, Obama (serving as Illinois state senator, then U.S. Senator) never offered more than six percent of his income to charity. Twice he gave less than one percent of his earnings.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/15/obama-tax-returns-for-200_n_187420.html
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)It's obvious that he's never had a career or income outside of public service, which means zero private sector income. No one wants to look like a career politician who mooches off of their spouse.