2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCongress critters and Senators have to release thorough financial disclosures EVERY. SINGLE. YEAR.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_in_Government_Act
This is why I always thought concern over Kerry and McCain's taxes was idiotic. The same goes for Bernie. Anyone that has spent decades as a public official subject to this law has been releasing relevant financial information since this law was passed. This is just one of the many reasons the "criticism" aimed at Bernie Sander's over his tax returns is disingenuous nonsense.
Romney, of course, wasn't subject to these disclosures and thats why his tax returns were important. Otherwise, I would defend him on it as well.
Of course, when Sanders does ultimately put the information out there and there is nothing interesting to see, I'm sure the people running their mouths about it today will give a full throated apology right?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)It's the hypocrisy--wags his finger at Clinton over transcripts, but doesn't meet the minimum transparency measures expected of candidates himself.
Sanctimony and hypocrisy are two sides of the same coin.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)...a Clinton supporter talking point. Thats about as low hanging fruit as it gets if I wanted to turn your remarks right back in your face... however I don't think theres any reason to go for such an easy cheap shot right this moment.
But as I asked another poster in another thread...
Have you even bothered to look at Bernie's financial disclosures? What question do you want answered that you can't get from those disclosures? Do you even have an actual, valid argument to make regarding what you want to see in Bernie's tax returns that you aren't seeing in his decades of public financial disclosures? I'm trying to understand if you and others are complaining about this because you THINK there is merit to it or because its just something to complain about.
I expect you'll be able to answer those questions with answers that make sense right?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Bernie likes to talk the talk, but not walk the walk.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)And you failed to answer any of my questions. Please don't be cowardly. The questions weren't hard ones to answer. Trying to make this about her speech transcripts is just evasion.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)standard?
Sanders has made a great big sanctimonious show of his asking for Clinton of those transcripts, while not providing anywhere near the same level of personal financial disclosure that Clinton has.
That makes him a giant hypocrite.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)I'm pretty sure he said that he would release them, he just hasn't done it yet. That in and of itself makes your claims of hypocrisy a total failure of an argument. Now please, will you answer my questions? Were my questions too inconvenient for you to bother with? It's awfully hard to take you seriously when you duck behind other topics in order to hide from very legitimate questions that I have asked.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... for everyone to see
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)public speeches are not the same as private speeches. Romney proved that one the hard way with his 47% remark.
All Hillary's public speeches are available. It's the private ones to the big banks that are interesting because of conflict of interest.
But then you knew that. You guys are scared she might actually have to expose herself and post them, and there will be things on there that don't look good.
So sad...too bad.
And don't worry, be happy...Bernie will get his tax filings posted when he has time. He probably hasn't even been home in weeks. These events run seven days a week in multiiple states. Do you really expect him to stop campaigning to run home and do this for you?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)unprecedented levels of transparency from his opponent.
Just another business as usual politician.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)He said he's been busy. That's not an excuse, that's a reality. He's campaigning away from home and is not going to run home to fix this for you right this minute.
Someone is looking for a reason to be angry, or they are very very impatient. Like a child who can't be reasoned with.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)It's we've been busy...his wife is with him, helping with his campaign. And she always does their taxes. So just how childish can you get? Potty humor?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)but not the rest?
The numbers on that return look off, deductions are very, very high.
The person who prepared his taxes doesn't have a very good record in making accurate financial disclosures.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Don't you guys ever get tired? Hillary loves playing this game.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Maybe they should not "rush" to get them out, but instead make sure they are accurate.
submitted 13 hours ago * by anthroengineer
Edit: So far we have four names: Bidzina Ivanishvill, Prince Salman, Sultan Al-Nahyan, Petro Poroshenko
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027737406
I can always find my last tax filing fairly quickly. Going back further is a bit harder, but I'm not the greatest filer.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)You can't believe everything you read on the Internet, even on reddit.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)But if you want something more legit, here is the source on the Clintons refiling for errors.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-clinton-taxes-exclusive-idUSKBN0NE0CA20150423
Oh, and that came from the reddit link. Quite often you can get good news from reddit.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Hillary Clinton's family's charities are refiling at least five annual tax returns after a Reuters review found errors in how they reported donations from governments, and said they may audit other Clinton Foundation returns in case of other errors.
the point is, it's better to make sure you filed correctly before making your tax filings public.
But I apologize, I interrupted your chasing the red dot. You can go play now. Brock and Hillary are waiting.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)As I said, he confirmed the returns will be released. I guess he should write you a personal apology for not doing it on your time table.
Such illusions of self importance are sad really...
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)He should drop the sanctimony over Clinton's speeches while making excuses for his own lack of transparency.
He doesn't have to do it because I demand it, no.
But, I and plenty of others will be pointing out the hypocrisy and speculating about why he didn't disclose this from the get-go and lead by example.
Is he hiding something? He took a massive number of deductions in 2014--around 27% of his income.
okasha
(11,573 posts)DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)the attached schedules are always quite revealing.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Cause she knew you guys would go for this no matter what.
There is NO comparison. He said he will post them (when they have time) and he will when he gets home from campaigning long enough to do it. And she said she refuses to release her speeches (unless some impossible conditions are met by all republican candidates who could care less if she reveals them or not). So basically she said NO SHIT SHIRLOCK!
But you guys are chasing the red dot she is flashing around for you...I bet she enjoys the game.
So Sanders will be completely transparent, if the kitties chasing the laser dot can just hold their bladders, but she will never show her speeches. No transparency on her side, but that's what we have learned to expect from her.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)no
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)of the vetting process for a candidate.
a candidate who has not even released a full tax return has not been close to vetted
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Thats all you care about and you know it.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)for months and months and months, using the same script, I probably would still not care.
But when a candidate fancies himself the High Priest of Transparency, he best follow the creed he demands others follow.
Or, at the very least, meet the standard met by the person he's sanctimoniously scolding.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)There you go again. I'm surprised Hillary's finger hasn't fell off as much as she whags that thing around.
Seriously, I don't have a lot against Clinton, I even defended her a few nights ago, in this forum, regarding fossil fuel donations. But you really should STFU about finger wagging when you are backing someone that would have the world heavyweight title for it if there was such a thing.
And there is no hypocrisy, he said he'd release them. Your claims of hypocrisy are an utter lie and you are only disgracing yourself.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)1) demanding unprecedented levels of disclosure from his opponent and criticizing her for a supposed lack of transparency; and
2) falling woefully short of the level of disclosure that the opponent had provided?
You see nothing wrong with the less transparent candidate attacking the other on the issue of transparency?
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)"he said he'd do it so shut up"
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)So basically yea... though I'm more likely to say "he will do it, chill the fuck out".
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)He'll release the returns soon and you'll conveniently forget you ever pretended to care.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)what qualifies as soon--before New York? After the convention?
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)You're just pissing and moaning about nothing and you know it.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Did the family dog eat the Schedule A?
"he said he will disclose it" is not good enough.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Its not good enough for you because you are choosing to be petty.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Each on Saturday released brief summaries of their recent returns that described their income and tax bills in broad terms, but both provided few details on things like which deductions they claimed and why, or how much they gave to charity.
That may undermine their repeated demands that Trump provide his returns, something hes refused to do because he says hes being audited.
Rubio, whos long been dogged by questions over his personal finances, provided the first two pages of each of his last five tax returns. They show he paid a 23.5 percent tax rate on $335,561 in income in 2014. His income has varied widely over the past five years, from as little as $183,826 in 2010 to $929,439 in 2012.
Cruz followed several hours later, also by releasing only the first two pages of his tax returns from the past four years. They show he paid $442,701 in taxes on $1.2 million in adjusted gross income in 2014.
The twin releases are aimed at upping the pressure on Trump to produce his own returns. Eager to slow his momentum before Super Tuesday, theyve argued that Republicans have a right to know of any problems with Trumps taxes before the party settles on a nominee. That could potentially embarrass Trump by showing he paid an unusually low tax rate or used aggressive tax-avoidance strategies or perhaps isnt as wealthy as he boasts.
But Rubio and Cruz undercut their own promises of transparency by releasing only partial returns, said Joe Thorndike, a tax historian.
Until they release full returns, this exercise is more about politics than real transparency, he said. I wish both Rubio and Cruz would take a page from their hero, Ronald Reagan, who released a full return when running in 1980. It was only a single year, but one complete return is more valuable than a dozen partial ones.
Asked why Rubio is not releasing his entire returns, campaign spokesman Alex Conant said, We're not ruling anything out. What we released today is consistent with what he released during his Senate campaign and way more than any of the other top GOP candidates have released.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/marco-rubio-tax-returns-219905
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)I don't give 2 shits about Rubio and Cruz.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)And I believe wholeheartedly, for Bernie, everything will be.
I don't believe the "clock is running out" right this minute or anything like that. and thats where we are really differing. Cruz should release everything as well. Rubio didn't make it far enough for it to matter, so thats over with.
Honestly, I think I'm pretty damn fair and level headed about this shit.
tblue37
(65,340 posts)Last edited Mon Apr 4, 2016, 07:41 AM - Edit history (1)
insisted it was fake and also demanded to see his transcripts. No matter what Bernie shows, they will move the goal posts and demand more.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)At least right now I think it is, if they keep it up, I might change my mind, lol.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)you continue defending Hillary's refusal to release those transcripts.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)business organizations.
pugetres
(507 posts)She made almost $100,000 from an initial investment of $1,000 in a matter of months a return of 10,000% under the guidance of a lawyer who was also outside counsel to Tyson Foods Inc., Arkansas' largest employer. The returns weren't made public until 1994.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)'tax return' demands. And just like the birth certificate nonsense, I expect these new demands will prove similarly malleable.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It's a witch hunt, even after he released them they would continue to say he and Jane have money in overseas accounts.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)that we are on the same side for once.
I believe that we should have a transcripts for taxes challenge.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)...sources as well.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)riversedge
(70,204 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)riversedge
(70,204 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Thats a mighty short attention span if you really think that?
Autumn
(45,064 posts)4now
(1,596 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Aside from that, Bernie is going to release his tax returns anyway and it will be a moot point.
4now
(1,596 posts)And why he is blaming his wife.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)But you know that.
4now
(1,596 posts)Simple.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)And he will. And you'll all look very foolish.
4now
(1,596 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)It's not 'blaming his wife' to tell the press that his wife does his returns, its an explanation of why he couldn't for instance just ring his accountant and have them mailed over.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)There's a chance an infrequent poster could see it and actually think it was true.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Set the facts straight though, as much as you have the patience for. We all need to do our part.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Is this a preview of Monday's meme?
How low will you go?
4now
(1,596 posts)Then he won't have to blame anyone.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)4now
(1,596 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)4now
(1,596 posts)I mean there has got to be a reason.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)What kind of person automatically assumes Bernie can't be trusted with money? That is odd.
Don't bother responding, I've seen enough.
4now
(1,596 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)attempt to tell us we are stupid, like they did with the "Hillary doesn't take money from the fossil fuel associates."
Want to pee on my leg and tell me that it is raining?
aidbo
(2,328 posts)riversedge
(70,204 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)riversedge
(70,204 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)I mean, its bullshit and its totally based on phony, disingenuous concern.
Marr
(20,317 posts)they literally *do not care* about anything beyond stirring shit for the Queen.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)papers that will make HRC look bad.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)are the standard. I.E. not what Bernie has produced so far.
Call my cynical, but I have trouble accepting Bernie's "My wife ate our tax returns" defense for why they haven't been released already. I was born, but not yesterday.
robbedvoter
(28,290 posts)Not just words. Just as much as I want Trump's as well. And BTW, I have a pretty good idea why both are reluctant - basically their base would be in shock at the discrepancy from the words.