2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy does Bernie invest in Wall Street if he thinks "the business model of wall street is fraud"?
How do you explain this cognitive dissonance?
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Some companies more prone to fraud than others.
That said, where is he, or anyone else, supposed to put their money? In a mattress? In a hole in the back yard?
Lame.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Would it not be safer there if Wall Street is as bad as Bernie says it is? Wouldn't the money be safer in a savings account or CD at least? Or on some other more honest exchange? I dunno, the Icelandic Stock Market or European? He seems to be an unwise investor to take the chances he is taking given what he thinks.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)if this is the level of disingenuous discourse. I expect this from the Westboro Baptist crowd.
treestar
(82,383 posts)more reasons not to vote for Bernie as the level of discourse is apparently just say something and it can be true. You've dodged the question. If Bernie thinks it is fraudulent, he would not put his money there. He'd find some other way to invest. No one puts their money in what they think is a fraud. If Wall Street is going to steal it from and that's what you truly believe, a person would not invest there.
Bernie doesn't really believe what he's saying, or he wouldn't put his money in Wall Street.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Murders, rapes, robberies, carjackings, violent assaults and domestic violence are occurring in your city, so why don't you move if you believe these crimes are going on?
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Like Goldman Sachs Morgan Stanley... etc... Not every company or mutual fund that is traded on NY SE or NASDAQ!
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)'Bernie is anti-capitalism'
So... point out where he can't work and be involved within the societies economic system to make changes within said system?
Can a system be fraudulent?
Should HRC divest herself of everything she is against on her platform? Just using your 'argument' within the context of the candidate you support
Can you defend your intellectual dishonesty?
hill2016
(1,772 posts)Bernie does.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)If that's the best of replies you have to my point, well... one doesn't need to say anything further, I'll let your words stand alone there...
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)that harm workers.
But you know that.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)LexVegas
(6,060 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Last edited Mon Apr 4, 2016, 07:59 PM - Edit history (2)
Yup, there's a lot about Sanders that doesn't mesh with the image of himself.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/bernie-sanders-wife-accounts-for-reported-assets-120261
angrychair
(8,698 posts)That is, and I quote, "DEDICATED TO ELECTING DR BEN CARSON PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES."
Link to the home page of your reference site:
http://www.democracy.love/
good job using right-wing wingnut websites to make your point. Going to follow it up with a source on Stormfront or tomato bubble or wherever you go for you other conspiracy theories?
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)I'll replace it with another link in a minute.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)I have a 401k. It was the only retirement option available at my job.
If you want to start railing against 401ks please proceed. I'd love to get rid of them and bring back pensions.
grntuscarora
(1,249 posts)The right and neo-liberals destroyed the defined benefit plans and left us with the Russian roulette called Wall Street to fund our retirements.
treestar
(82,383 posts)where they are going to steal your 401k - you obviously don't actually believe that.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)no need to regulate it, since the free market works always to be fair.
Right.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)His 401k is just an extra goodie he has available to him.
tralala
(239 posts)but yet he owns several pairs of underwear that only he may wear, to the exclusion of all others? Hypocrisy much?
grntuscarora
(1,249 posts)grntuscarora
(1,249 posts)Not that hard to figure out.
frylock
(34,825 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,190 posts).
I'm sure there's some service out there that you feel is corrupt, but you use because it's the only offering out there.
Perhaps SBS should just place his money under a mattress.
====
These silly OPs are revealing, how people get torqued up over stupid shit that doesn't mean anything.
.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)yet he's okay to invest with Wall Street?
TheBlackAdder
(28,190 posts).
There were a series of scandals, such a LIBOR, etc.
Question: If a billionaire and you makes equal trades, who is positioned a dozen times before the other is even considered?
.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)but you might as well speak Chinese to the OP. I sincerely doubt she, or many Americans for that matter, know what LIBOR is.
Blue Meany
(1,947 posts)invested in funds that are professionally managed, and funds are created and managed by investment banks.. Supposedly this is there to protect individuals who might engage in wild speculation on the Stock Market, but I think it is really just another way of channeling money to Wall Street Banks. It is possible to set up a self-directed IRA, but it is a fair amount of work and there are management fees involved.
I would love to see this become a political issue, because I think if we could withdraw our money from Wall Street control and invest in small, locally-owned businesses we could stimulate the economy, raise wages, and start making a dent in economic inequality.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Rather than making a fool of yourself with moronic OPs like this one.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Where did it all go?
treestar
(82,383 posts)Why not do that instead of letting Wall Street steal his money and use it for fraud?
Bernie doesn't believe his own hype.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)I have an Roth Ira with Fidelity, and I am voting for Bernie.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)and lobbyists fund in the future, but for now its all he has on his salary.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Last edited Mon Apr 4, 2016, 07:54 PM - Edit history (1)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_pensionThat 401k is just gravy.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)And use for their care after retirement, as they advance in age.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)They guarantee a set monthly amount ("defined benefit" upon retirement that you can plan on and is not subject to fluctuations like a 401k. But they're as rare as hen's teeth these days.
The closest thing to a defined benefit pension most people get is Social Security--which Bernie is getting as well.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)msongs
(67,405 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)You must be so proud.
Oh wait. No you didn't. You copied it without attribution from Brock and added some fluffier-nutter to it.
dr60omg
(283 posts)Jane Sanders was a provost at Goddard College as soon as I saw CREF and then TIAA I knew what it was
TIAA-Cref is used by universities across the United States. It is usually the retirement vehicle for a large percentage of scholars and university administration. Since Jane Sanders is a PhD and she taught at Goddard: guess what. Part of her salary is automatically invested in TIAA-Cref. TIAA-Cref allows people who have money with them often to chose between instruments.
Valic is another instrument often used by Universities. And both companies also use other instruments and it is approved by the college or university ... So, it may be within her college or university's parameters
Did you notice the net worth?
Did you also check to see where retirement accounts from Goddard are? I know the blog person did not and that is why it is absurdity and the highest level ... http://vtdigger.org/2015/07/15/goddard-college-reaches-contract-agreement-with-faculty-staff-unions/
Now why did I put this article up because it talks about the union contract and the concessions reached particularly regarding TIAA-CREF
When Jane Sanders was at the college ... it was not an issue for people at universities and colleges around the country --- TIAA-CREF was something we could take with us from university to university
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)into the stock market by making sure that regular bank accounts return 1% or less, even though there is clearly a demand for credit at interest rates of 20% and up as evidenced by the high consumer credit card debt in the U.S..
It's a racket, and he is a victim along with anyone else who has a little money saved and would like to invest it to try to keep pace with the cost of living.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Last edited Mon Apr 4, 2016, 08:01 PM - Edit history (2)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_pensionhttp://www.bankrate.com/finance/retirement/retirement-benefits-for-congress.aspx
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)I know there is desperation in the air at Camp Clinton. Thanks for this ridiculous notion of why people shouldn't vote for Sanders. Glad to see that's the best you got the day before the Wisconsin primary.
vintx
(1,748 posts)Shit like 'If you're an environmentalist why do you have a computer?'
Sadly unsurprising to see it trotted out by turd way supporting new democrats
Shameless
GeorgeGist
(25,320 posts)are part of Wall Street?
revbones
(3,660 posts)if it wasn't one of the more stupid ones from Brock & Co.
Show me some links where Bernie said not to invest please.
Also, your username seems to lessen your credibility since it makes it look like you just signed up to troll for Hillary. Not accusing you, just saying...
matt819
(10,749 posts)Unless you keep your money under the mattress and you have more money than it's reasonable to keep only in a savings account, Wall Street is going to part of your financial life. How and where you invest that money is the measure of your social and moral character.
Now, if Bernie is invested in fracking companies or pharmaceuticals, then o might raise an eyebrow.
And, no, I don't begrudge the man having some money on the bank. He's been working for 50 years. He's not a monk dedicated to a life of poverty.
Joob
(1,065 posts)Capitalism. Hell if I knew what to invest in just to make cash I would too
What is wrong with capitalism?
Yes he's fighting Wall-street, not capitalism
He's fighting corruption IT CAUSES in politics
But by all means, keep bringing this up. I hope it coms up in the debate if Hillary decides on a date that's not ridiculous or with a moderator that has worked with her campaign
I swear, YOU GUYS SEE this and think it's okay, I will not be staying in the Democratic party if she is the nominee fuck corruption