2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhat is with the strange perversion by Bernie Sanders
and his followers, of always attempting to portray Hillary Clinton as nervous, or scared.
It's so bizarre.
LexVegas
(6,261 posts)That whine is ridiculous.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Either way: it has to stop. It is beyond silly at this point. Feel the Bern!
Vattel
(9,289 posts)the meaning of "beating a dead horse." I think the idea is that you trying to hurt the horse by beating it, but it has already been beaten so much that it is dead and so there is no point beating it anymore. I don't think the idea is that you are trying to revive the horse by beating it. If I am wrong, that would be interesting. (By the way, I just made up the term necropugilism.)
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)My understanding is that in rural times, reluctant beasts of burden would be beaten to force them into movement again. Such beatings would, at times, verge into cruel animal abuse, and kill the horse (/ mule/ ass). To the best of my understanding, "beating a dead horse" means that you try more of the same failed approach (earlier beatings have already killed the horse) and somehow expect that this time, the animal will magically respond and move again.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)as trying to "revive" the horse. I thought you were talking about bringing it back to life as opposed to just trying to get it to move again.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)But it is - again - most silly to believe that what killed the horse will now revive it.
Love,
Betty
Vattel
(9,289 posts)than the issue that the thread is about!
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)riversedge
(71,497 posts)Loudestlib
(980 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)of that for me. I certainly have never seen it on DU but a jury could have taken care of that. I assume you mean they're against Sen Sanders because he's Jewish and I'd like to see some proof of that.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Is it really sexism that speech patterns, or speech tone is judged on her.. But none of the others?
Is it really sexism that her outfits or makeup is criticized openly, but a certain someone else's sloppy oversized suits gets a complete pass?
Is it sexism that she is guilty of the high crime of having succeeded, completely within the system, and is guilty of some unspoken crime for doing so?
Is it sexism that she is condemned for her vote on the Iraq war (as a junior, first term senator), oftenby the same people who, ironically supported John Kerry (who was also an Iraq war vote, along with the majority of other Democrats that served at that time)?
Is it sexism that anything she says that is critical of one of the men who are running gets examined and criticized, yet all of the other candidates can apparently get away with saying whatever criticisism's they'd like and it's "truth"?
Well, hell, I guess you are right, it is sexism. Worse, just stating that it is apparently warrants no consideration, and complete dismissal by others based on the responses.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)You should feel very small for brushing that off as if it was some rookie mistake. Senators are supposed to know better. They are supposed to have the seniority to know right from wrong. Like a certain senator from Vermont did - with regard to Iraq, with regard to Panama, with regard to gay rights, with regard to pretty much every major issue your preferred candidate got DEAD WRONG.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)"all dead horses must still receive their daily beatings."
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Poor Hillary, always the victim.
rachacha
(173 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)"I think General Ripper found out about your preversion, and that you were organizing some kind of mutiny of preverts."
Best movie ever made.
livetohike
(22,488 posts)boring. All they have left is to attempt to make Hillary look weak.
hereforthevoting
(241 posts)Perogie
(687 posts)She didn't look weak when she stopped the financial meltdown. So strong and effective.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Not sure where the hypocrite part comes from, but I don't think like a Clinton supporter.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Using anger, demonization, empty promises he'd never be able to fulfill.
Sadly, it's the approach Trump has also taken. Anger, demonization, empty promises that your target group want to hear.
Demagoguery- an appeal to people that plays on their emotions and prejudices rather than on their rational side. Demagoguery is a manipulative approach that appeals to the worst nature of people.
livetohike
(22,488 posts)ucrdem
(15,700 posts)"The system is rigged" can mean a lot of things including "affirmative action president." It's never struck me as a particularly progressive sentiment and it's strange to hear Democratic elected officials repeat it.
livetohike
(22,488 posts)Hillary's character. He talks about transparency, yet he has only released one tax year (and it isn't complete). He rails against Wall Street, yet undoubtedly is invested there through retirement accounts. If Wall Street is so corrupt, why support them with personal investments?
hereforthevoting
(241 posts)Actually I appreciate that she is expressive at times.
Even when she flipped a lid at the Greenpeace girl i was like "Oooh, at least part human!"
djean111
(14,255 posts)What is bizarre, really, is what you consider a "strange perversion". It almost looks like you just wanted to get Bernie Sanders and strange perversion in the headline.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)and, as far as Hillary & Co. are concerned, we cannot ever be too cynical.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)As you intended, I am sure.
It's a word and it's description fits.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Probably not. Seems to be a common trait among you all. Though I have to say that a lack of shame can be helpful in some ways.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,136 posts)KPN
(15,852 posts)if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck.
hopeforchange2008
(610 posts)Perogie
(687 posts)just very strange when we see someone laugh about killing another person
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)NY when we smoked bin laden. We blew car horns, we threw confetti out windows, we celebrated for a week. Was that strange? I don't think so.
Response to Perogie (Reply #9)
Post removed
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Always. The. Victim.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Hillary being nervous, and I see posts here all the time about how she's either afraid to debate Sanders, or she's debating Sanders now because she's nervous.
It the strangest thing.
I had the pleasure of seeing Hillary Clinton last night. I can assure you, she was not nervous or scared, she was pumped up and ready to go.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Until then, my Friend KMOD, I will express my reservations at the thought of another four years of conservative government.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)and probably NY ? That kind of nervous?
KMOD
(7,906 posts)It's a closed primary.
You think she's going to lose NY? That's hilarious.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Try and retain at least a shred of dignity. Not easy for q Hillary supporter, I realize...but worth the effort.
Response to Lizzie Poppet (Reply #64)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Good christ, you're pathetic.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)but, you knew that.
djean111
(14,255 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)bigtree
(87,928 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)but, when I do it irritates you
It's so bizarre.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... it's just so unladylike.
Amirite??
Tanuki
(14,992 posts)it can work for Bernie. Trump was able to create a soundbite narrative for each one of his opponents (JEB! is low energy, etc.), and his followers obviously bought it, so Tad, Jeff, and Jane decided that Bernie's supporters will be just as easily led.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)And the person asking wasn't even a Bernie supporter!
She's losing it just like Bill.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)other than trying to promote the narrative that he has momentum and can still win. It's what any candidate in his position would do.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)but he's been calling her nervous throughout his entire campaign. He was saying this way back in September as well.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)People on DU do the same thing. People suggest that "internal polling numbers" or some other secret information must be showing that Bernie is doing better than all the public information suggests he is doing.
When all the tangible signs look bleak, you have to fall back on the intangible, unseen signs that are "really happening," behind the scenes. You have a rhetorical advantage in that situation, because if there is something going on that nobody can see, you can claim anything is happening that you want. You don't have to see any evidence, you just have to "feel" it.
It's like people that try to sell you a product by saying that there's some kind of secret that "they" don't what you to know.
KPN
(15,852 posts)firebrand80
(2,760 posts)We know who the Hillary voters are and who the Sanders voters are at this point. We can pretty much look at a State and call who's going to win it pretty accurately.
Any claim of "momentum" suggests that something has happened that has changed the race. The only "momentum" Bernie has is the result of the primary calendar having States favorable to him in succession. If Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia were happening simultaneously with these latest contests, there wouldn't be any "momentum."
If someone all of a sudden wins a State that we wouldn't expect them to win based on the way the race has gone so far, then it would time to suggest that something in the race has changed. MI looked like it might have been signaling something, but it really just turned out to be a case of bad polling.
KPN
(15,852 posts)Otherwise you might feel as if all hope is lost. MI was just a case of bad polling? So that means Bernie's accomplishment there was meaningless and all the other polls are perfectly right I guess, like in WI where he is leading now, and NY where he is steadily gaining on the anointed Third Way queen (sorry -- that's how I perceive her candidacy -- and I'm obviously not a fan of Third Way -- oh, they have some good ideas but in large part they strike me as a front for corruption).
Anyway, we shall see about momentum soon enough.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)but they are hardly perversions.
#IAmSick
About to lose her second "inevitable" primary.
100's of millions in rich people money going to waste again
An end to the Clinton money laundering operations
The end of 250,000 speaking fees
Nah. Nothing to be nervous about.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)After all unless he has landslide wins, which is extremely unlikely, his campaign is over.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Landslide victory after landslide victory. About to beat Her in Wisc, looks good to overtake Her in NY. A nationwide army of small amount donors who provide all the funds needed to overcome the David Brock ratfucking. I mean, I could not imagine a better scenario as Her implodes on Her own.
But you should not worry, Bernie does not keep shit lists like Her. He will represent all the people, even you.
Did you hear? Nevada flipped to Bernie.
mcar
(43,057 posts)but it's not sexism, not at all. Just fact.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I thinking this has to be projection. I have never felt desperate regarding a political campaign...any campaign.
I guess regarding the OP, it could also be a projections of how they hope Hillary supporters feel, because they are certainly feeling that way.
jillan
(39,451 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... it tells me that they are getting desperate. They see the same polls and delegate counts that everyone else sees. Bernie and his fans aren't stupid ... they're just hoping against hope for a miracle that will never happen.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,354 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)Cha
(300,934 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Response to KMOD (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)portraying her as a democrat.
hereforthevoting
(241 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)She should have wrapped this up weeks ago. Now it looks like it'll go to June 7.
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)Response to KMOD (Original post)
Hissyspit This message was self-deleted by its author.
Vinca
(50,548 posts)I've never heard a Bernie supporter describe Hillary as either nervous or scared. Ever. And when you post it - here we go again - all the Hillary supporters scream "sexism." I swear. You people are driving me out of my mind. Your candidate is a strong woman who would never cry "sexism," but you have a need to demean her and turn her into a whimpering softie.
Hissyspit
(45,789 posts)I'm going catatonic. I'm not going to make it to the convention.
Mike Nelson
(10,149 posts)...it's an attempt to portray her as unstable? We don't want to "make her too nervous" because Hillary will lose cognitive skills? I'm not sure. I do think that Bernie probably didn't think it out that way - he just felt it and said it that way. At least, he used some humor in his delivery. If it's a pattern, maybe not... but, if it is planned to portray her as unstable, it won't work.
rogerashton
(3,927 posts)We keep hearing that H will take off the gloves and go after Sanders in New York and after. Why should she do that? If she is confident that she is winning, no need. Indeed I'm pretty sure it would be a mistake. So why make that mistake and "pivot" to a more negative campaign against Bernie? One hypothesis is that she is nervous that Bernie is gaining on her. Nervous people make mistakes. I would be interested in hearing an alternative hypothesis, if you have one.
TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)with several underage "massage technicians"...but hey, that's just me, I guess. You keep up the good fight, by all means.