This message was self-deleted by its author

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

This message was self-deleted by its author (GeorgiaPeanuts) on Tue Apr 5, 2016, 08:04 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

[Ash_F]

1. Anything on other demographics?

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

3. I didn't see any, I saw this on FB nt

[Punkingal]

2. That's interesting....

CNN says the voters were 84% white...sounds good for Bernie!

[awake]

10. That would give Berrnie 57% with out any people of color voting for him

If that number holds up Bernie will get a dubbel digit victory. We have seen exit polls be wrong before but I like how it shaping up.

[VMA131Marine]

4. Bernie will win by double digits if this is accurate...

[reformist2]

21. That was my reaction as well... because Wisconsin is a pretty white state!

86% white, in fact.

[Kittycat]

5. I saw this earlier on Twitter

was this your image? There's a time stamp in the lower right. I'm central, and it's almost 2 hrs before me. Seems odd to release it so soon. However, everything I've read does show favorable overall for Sanders, but not by such a large margin.

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

8. It's not mine I saw it on FB

[MadBadger]

24. It's from 3 hours ago. The time in the bottom right says 4:24pm

[Kittycat]

28. I don't watch them any more.

Some of the stations used to occasionally flash EST/CST time stamps. I couldn't tell which was up on the screen.

[Codeine]

6. It's sad when Democrats openly root for low black voter turnout. nt

[Kittycat]

11. I'm not rooting for low black turnout.

But what is the complete minority turnout? I think I saw an early exit poll that 25% of dem turnout was minority. How does that relate to Wisconsin population overall? Certainly off in densely populated areas, but in rural areas, it's likely far less diverse.

[mhatrw]

12. LOL. Where did you see anybody doing that?

I'd love to see everybody vote.

[Barack_America]

13. Who's doing that? It's just math.

The electorate today was primarily white, as one would expect in WI.

I want everyone to vote.

[Viva_La_Revolution]

14. that's a LIE. no one said that.

[Ash_F]

15. Don't get too excited. We'll see how the demographics voted soon enough.

[Kittycat]

17. State Demographics Overall: 86.2% White, 6.3% Black, 2.3% Asian, 1% Native, 2.4% Other, 1.8% 2ormore

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin#Demographics

According to the 2010 Census, the racial composition of the population was:

86.2% White American (83.3% non-Hispanic white, 2.9% White Hispanic)
6.3% Black or African American
1.0% Native American and Alaska Native
2.3% Asian American
1.8% Multiracial American
2.4% Some other race
In the same year, 5.9% of the total population was of Hispanic or Latino origin (they may be of any race).[61]

http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/05/politics/wisconsin-exit-polls/index.html

In the Democratic contest, more than eight in 10 voters were white -- about the same as in 2008 -- and Democrats made up almost three-quarters of the voters, while independents made up the other quarter.

[Cali_Democrat]

18. Welcome to neo-DU. nt

[Lizzie Poppet]

19. Feel free to link to ANY such claim.

Failing that, have some dignity and honor and delete that accusation.

[Codeine]

22. Oh please. I can read the subtext.

None of you are stupid enough to say it outright, but the cheering that accompanies reports of high white voter numbers is unbecoming of a Democrat, and it speaks volumes to those who know how to listen.

[Lizzie Poppet]

23. That's what I thought: you've got nothing.

Figures...

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

26. I didn't cheer anything... This post doesn't even show minority turnout

[reddread]

30. maybe our minds work differently?

way off base. whats really sad is that a wild statement like yours can stand without
universal rebuke.
seriously.

[Cal Carpenter]

33. Aw man, that's just nasty

No one is doing that here.

GDP is like a sickness these days. No one can take anything at face value. It's just sad.

[Codeine]

35. You may have a point; I don't take anything here at face value.

Perhaps I should, but it's such a fucking nasty cesspool. . .

. . . into which I willingly dive, of course.

[panader0]

38. What utter BS

[Robbins]

7. I think CLinton's goose in WI is cooked

bernie up 35% among white voters and if polls are accurate and he led with black voters In Wi as well a huge win In Wis.with huge
white turnout minority votes aren't going to win it for clinton and some of minority votes will go to bernie.

get ready to hear wis is ilrelvent since bernie won.and wis is state dems need In GE.Gore and kerry just barely won it in 2000 and
2004.

[mindwalker_i]

32. I hope it's thoroughly cooked

... for the same reasons that pork should be thoroughly cooked.

[Barack_America]

9. Wow. This is going to be a blowout if true.

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

16. Now all the negative hit pieces by Washington Post make sense

The collusion between Clinton campaign and the media couldn't be more obvious

[azmom]

20. Kick

[KingFlorez]

25. I don't think that is real

That data generally does not get released until after the polls close.

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

27. Are you suggesting...

Someone generated a fake image that matches exactly how MSNBC has been releasing exit poll data with and then displayed it on their TV for maximum fake?

[MadBadger]

29. While i agree with you, there are stranger conspiracies on this site

[KingFlorez]

31. I just know how the information is released

So far that sort of data has not been released until after the polls have closed. It usually gets released with the top line numbers at the top of the hour.

[Godhumor]

43. No, they mistakenly showed their placeholder graphic to populate when numbers actually come in

Actual demographic breakdowns by candidate are always embargoed until after polls are closed. Always. What the OP captured is a test of inputting numbers in the placeholder. Sometimes they get broadcast by accident.

[paulthompson]

34. That's good news, but...

As a Sanders supporter, I like those numbers. And I think he'll do better than many suspect with non-White voters.

But what about early voters? Those aren't counted in exit polls, are they? Clinton typically does a lot better with the early voting. Does anyone know what percent of voters in that state vote early?

[paulthompson]

37. Also

Has anyone seen the exit poll numbers on the Republican side? What would be revealing there?

[Robbins]

40. I have heard previously

bernie was getting a lot of early vote for a change In Wis.

[kenn3d]

36. Bernie will win Wisconsin, but...

We all should be more concerned about the WI voter ID (Suppression) laws, which discriminates against and suppresses voting by POC, poor, students, homeless, and Democrats generally. Bernie's count will suffer all these discriminations, and Hillary will also suffer from some of them.

Bernie will win Wisconsin and probably by double-digits despite demographics and Republican voter suppression tactics. But his margin would likely be much larger with well-run fair elections.

[Zira]

44. I agree with this, and for every state.

[Godhumor]

39. They showed their placeholder graphic for some reason, has happened before

Actual demographic breakdowns are embargoed until after polls are closed.

[KingFlorez]

41. Exactly

[factfinder_77]

42. 88.9 % white demographic

http://www.infoplease.com/us/census/data/wisconsin/demographic.html