As Hillary Loses Big Again, AP Plays the Race Card to Explain Away Sanders' Wisconsin Win

[k8conant]

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tom-blumer/2016/04/05/hillary-loses-big-again-ap-plays-race-card-explain-away-sanders


"Despite headlining the story at its front page as relating to Cruz, AP's story covered both races. Here what Julie Pace and Scott Bauer wrote about Sanders' victory ...


draping front-runners Trump and Clinton in uncertainty and preventing both from fully setting their sights on the general election.

For Sanders, Wisconsin was favorable territory, with an overwhelming white electorate and liberal pockets of voters"
....
Darn that Bernie Sanders. He's winning in predominantly white states and distracting Mrs. Clinton from the all-important task of winning the general election."

[chillfactor]

1. sanders picked up +7 delegates...

and this is a BIG win?

[NWCorona]

2. Yes it is.

[Kalidurga]

3. Bernie loves all his delegates forever and ever

Hillary loves them just as long as she needs them.

[Kelvin Mace]

5. NYT says +14 over HRC

45-31

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/wisconsin

[jfern]

4. He won Menominee County by 27 points, it's one of the least white counties in the country

[delrem]

7. Probably a "liberal pocket of voters".

Hillary Clinton doesn't do well with liberals. Or the left. Her crowd has to take a deep breath before mouthing the lie that she's "progressive", then scramble like an exposed centipede for the nearest rock.

[jfern]

8. Native Americans in this case

[delrem]

6. It's those dastardly "liberal pockets of voters"!

+12.7% isn't a small margin, when HRC was up by so much just awhile ago.

It's like people are waking up from a snooze.