2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIf Hillary has it in the bag, why would she risk upsetting/alienating Bernie supporters?
Last edited Wed Apr 6, 2016, 03:40 PM - Edit history (1)
Could someone please explain the logic to me? I'm not seeing it.
riversedge
(79,148 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Rockyj
(538 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)she cant even brush her hair without someone getting offended here.
And so many have the nerve to talk about Trump being thin skinned.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Does she think she can win the general election without us? Is that her gambit? I know she claims to be a horrible politician, but don't you think she's smart enough to know who she needs voting for her if she wants to actually win the Presidency? Just dismissing this rather large group of people doesn't seem like a good idea. Doesn't it seem like there is something she could do to try and make it so people might like her and vote for her?
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)Then Bernie will take care of it. I totally trust Bernie, like most, and don't trust Hillary, like most do not.
riversedge
(79,148 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)said explicitly that going forward she was going to 'Disqualify him. Defeat him. Go after his gun record. Scorched earth now. Party unity later.'
Not made up.
I know, I shouldn't even bother to respond to a Hillarybot who thinks all factual things about her or her campaign that show her as something less than Saint Hillary is made up by her enemies. Nope. She does it all herself.
TheBlackAdder
(29,963 posts)Nanjeanne
(6,491 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)dropping out of the race, endorsing Bernie, and apologizing for her entire career in public service?
Nanjeanne
(6,491 posts)fire David Brock and dismantle her SuperPacs. She could embrace the idea of universal healthcare through a single-payer system that isn't a handout to the insurance companies. She could support a federal $15/hour minimum wage. She could speak out strongly against the settlements in Israel and how she would work toward a two-state solution. She could support reinstating Glass-Steagall.
That's a start!
Become Bernie, yes, we haven't seen any posts ripping her apart for taking on some of his positions.
Basically you are saying that there is nothing that she can do to make you stop hating her guts.
Nanjeanne
(6,491 posts)out against fracking, against the death penalty, against regime change, against SuperPacs. Or for Glass-Steagall, for single-payer . . . or anything I listed so no need to do it all again.
And I don't hate her guts at all. I just don't align myself with her policies and I don't think her judgement has been sound. I believe the things she will get done are exactly the same things I don't want done - so don't put words in my mouth please.
But thanks for playing!
HughLefty1
(231 posts)Another reason to vote Bernie.
Nanjeanne
(6,491 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)She doesn't support fracking, she supports local determinations on it, including approval only if the fracking meets a bunch of criteria that it rarely does.
death penalty--you're mad at her for supporting the death penalty?
She's not going to lie to you and say we can enact single payer on the federal level right away--Bernie Sanders told us in 2010 that it had to begin on the state level and not in Washington DC.
$15 very well may be too high for some areas with low wages and cost of living. If you think someone is a big meanie for holding that opinion, then the obvious retort is "why don't you support a $30/hour minimum wage for the nation?"
She is bad on Israel/Palestine, unfortunately that's also the mainstream position.
I disagree with her on Glas-Steagall, but her overall wall street regulation plan is actually pretty good. And you can even get transcripts.
Nanjeanne
(6,491 posts)I support Clinton?
Yes I don't like the death penalty. I'm not mad at her. How silly. I support the candidate that is against killing.
I think Sanders is better on wall street regulation on fracking on $15/hour. I don't think someone is a big meanie for holding any opinion. I don't even know what that means. Why would I support a candidate over a candidate that I agree more with? Why would I support a candidate who's positions change so much I honestly have no idea what she would actually do and who I am very fearful of as far as her judgement on trade agreements, regime change, etc. When President Obama would agree to a Grand Bargain and means-test SS and increase Medicare and SS retirement age - why would I think Clinton won't do the very same things. She has given me no indication that she wouldn't and I believe Sen. Sanders when he says he won't.
Why do Clintonites not understand that Bernie supporters don't like Clinton's positions and many think she is simply a poor candidate that has much more baggage than Sanders in a general election?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I asked you what it would take for you to stop being pissed at her.
She's not going to adopt Bernie's platform, so what could she do to make it such y'all aren't constantly angry at her?
If the answer is nothing, then don't complain if she doesn't care that you're angry.
Nanjeanne
(6,491 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)if that means disagreeing with Bernie Sanders.
Nanjeanne
(6,491 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)any time she disagrees with Bernie they think it's because:
1) she's a rightwing monster;
2) she's the most corrupt person ever;
3) she's an inveterate liar
and of course, whenever she agrees with Bernie, it's because:
1) she's pandering
2) she's Stealing the Bern
3) she's lying and will double-cross everyone once in office.
the healing can't begin until the fighting ends
Nanjeanne
(6,491 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)kristopher
(29,798 posts)Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)She sure as hell can fire him.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Why not just ban it, but allow exceptions if a proposal is proven absolutely safe? Her approach strikes me as waffling in favor of fracking by making it possible as a by-right activity....Sounds trivial but makes a difference when it gets down to greedy zoning boards or state governments.
I am. I think it is morally wrong.
Totally disagree with that. I would prefer any president set that as a goal NOW and fight like hell for it....and keep fighting like hell for it as long as necessary....even if it means "incremental" public option as a step. And even if the GOP votes it down. SELL THE DAMN IDEA AND ACTUALLY MEAN IT!.
The national minimum wage is a floor. But $15 is the minimum livable wage these days -- and unless it is national we will have areas keeping it low to attract cheapskate employers.
I agree, except I think the public does get frustrated with Israel's overreactions and intransigence sometimes.
Her plan is basically what Bernie is saying, ex cept with a lot more words.
dchill
(42,660 posts)A progressive who gets things done.
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)Only approved talking points of brock inc. Are posted to by most HRC supporters.
ibegurpard
(17,072 posts)Like many of the fools on this board?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)2) they won't begin to stop being pissed at her until they've internally processed the fact that she'll be the nominee
3) the quickest way to make (2) happen is to smash Sanders in New York, Pennsylvania, and Maryland so that his supporters can't cling to hope.
Politics is a rough business.
Obama didn't do that in 2008, mainly because he didn't have that option.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)Hillary's actions tell us she's desperate, despite the official narrative.
blm
(114,412 posts)politics.
The constant beratement OF supporters and BY supporters is absolutely stupid. I understand the newly engaged who are experiencing their first primary battle, but, those in the more-seasoned HRC camp taking aim at them are being extremely shortsighted, imo.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... but little to no substance.
Can someone point to what Hillary did or said that was so egregious.
The only thing I can come up with is she said Bernie is not really a Democrat ...
... and, that's kinda indisputable.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)beaglelover
(4,416 posts)Jesus Christ. Bernie supporters really need to put on their big boy pants now. They love to dish it out all day long but when it's thrown back at them they retreat to their safe spaces and play the victim card. Unbelievable!!
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Thank you for making it clear for me/us.
for the impaired.
Merryland
(1,134 posts)because I'm a registered Democrat & therefore MUST be loyal. Oh, and must FEAR Cruz & Trump more than I loathe Hillary.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)They are manufacturing extremely thin skins. I think they want to interpret everything as an insult to their sensibilities. It's gonna be impossible to avoid.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)
"Does anyone think they'd vote for Cruz or Trump or any puke in the fall? Please clap."
Orsino
(37,428 posts)It'll be okay.
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)..a lot of Dems have had it with the lesser of evil, moderate crap. They are tired of the New Dem/Third Way crowd and the Clintons. This is the year they may not fall in line. Hillary and her people may be in for a rude awakening.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)So, ask yourself -- why does HRC give a shit about the hardcore Sanders clan?
bvf
(6,604 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)just ready for when the much anticipated purge starts.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)
I love being on lists.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)these folks will end up voting for her anyway. Especially when Bernie endorses her and campaigns for her.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Merryland
(1,134 posts)She's going down.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)if you think that he is wrong.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)use the Republicans are WORSE than me mantra to get your vote. Risking alienating
voters now is irrelevant to her..if she loses the primary she will be finished in politics.
Be careful of people who don't want to be remembered as a two time loser.
She and her surrogates will be throwing anything they can, anything..lets recall
her Bobby Kennedy statements during the last race. She proved she is capable
of doing anything to win.
On edit: Lets remember she is capable of losing too and this is not over yet.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Same shit happened in 2008
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)and she knows it. I'm pretty sure Sanders knows it too. And Obama.
A lot of shady stuff has been going on in ClintonWorld for a long time, and it's about to all hit the fan.
In answer to your question though, the more desperate she becomes the more stupid things she will do -- she doesn't hold up very well under pressure.
But it's true as you point out, she isn't acting like someone who is confident and assured of victory, and that is a huge tell in itself.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)is a repudiation of Hillary and Bill, particularly by young people, and they're not taking it very well. They remember when they considered themselves young countercultural types and want to pretend they haven't become the sellouts they once despised.
A loss in New York would be a humiliation and a rejection of the Clintons. Bill basically acknowledged that last week.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)No matter what kind of sleazy crap she pulls, she won't win those people over. She'll only confirm their opinion of her.
It'll get worse as her desperation and paranoia grow.
NCjack
(10,297 posts)WDIM
(1,662 posts)Even if he falls short on the corrupt superdelegates he will win the most States and its going to show the corruption of the DNC and their rigged system. The oligarchs only want the illusion of democracy when democracy works against them they rig it.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)GreenPartyVoter
(73,358 posts)Alfresco
(1,698 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)and should be holding herself far above the petty politics of the primary season.
I mean, after all, Bernie couldn't possibly win a single primary or caucus. Well, maybe New Hampshire, but that's it. And once Hillary swept the South in Super Tuesday of course it would be all over for him and she could move directly into general election mode. Certainly he couldn't do well in a closed primary or caucus, could he? Oh, Colorado's a Western state, so it doesn't really count, and Minnesota is an open caucus and besides, it's right next to Vermont. And he's well behind in the polling in Michigan.
I could go on and on, but we all know what's been happening. I recall reading somewhere last fall that around March 15 everything would shift in Bernie's favor. And it has.
Right now she and her minions are terrified they're going to lose NY. As well the should be. He's going to win Wyoming big in a few more days, and then he'll spend a couple of weeks blitzing around the entire state of NY, while she holds some more fundraisers in the NYC area. Once residents of NY, especially in that vast wasteland outside of the NYC and Westchester County zip codes, once they get to hear what Bernie has to say, and don't have to cough up several thousand dollars to hear it, they'll understand who the better choice really is.
Oh, and I'm calling all of Upstate New York a vast wasteland out of affection, because I was born in Utica, and lived there and in a small town a bit north until I was 14. I've been back a handful of times, and just love that part of the country. It's just that too many people in or near NYC seem to think that nothing worth being aware of exists outside of them. They're wrong, of course. I likewise like NYC, haven't been to visit nearly often enough, but there is a great deal more to this country than it.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)We moved out to Tucson Arizona when I was fourteen. Mom was getting us kids away from an abusive, alcoholic father. And of course Tucson was so incredibly different that it utterly changed me. I cannot begin to imagine what I'd be like or how my life might have gone had we not moved.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)As an adult I lived four years in Phoenix and did not care for it.
Plus, it's gotten far more right-wing since I moved away from that city nearly 30 years ago.
Since I went to high school there I do attend class reunions, which is nice.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Along with a sense of entitlement - and greed. Don't forget greed. The Clintons have been stuffing their pockets with money since Day One. What makes anyone think they will stop once they're in the White House again?
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)....it's because she KNOWS she getting her ass handed to her.
Give it up Clinton. You've already lost.
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)The more clout he has to demand changes from the party.
And he's starting to put the fear of God into them.
GreenPartyVoter
(73,358 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)It's the third quarter of the big game and her team is playing dirty to protect a lead. It's back-firing.
Vinca
(53,208 posts)The woman is a self-admitted terrible politician and doesn't know when to stop shoveling.