Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 12:57 PM Apr 2016

I'm taking bets on whether Bernie will meet with the Pope.

A real sit-down one-on-one meeting with substantive exchange of views, not a hi-bye meeting.

Any takers?

We can use bitcoin. Relatively anonymous but verifiable by everyone.

110 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm taking bets on whether Bernie will meet with the Pope. (Original Post) hill2016 Apr 2016 OP
I bet he doesn't even go to Italy. kennetha Apr 2016 #1
I wouldn't want to take this bet hill2016 Apr 2016 #2
Why do you care and what does it have to do with this forum? awake Apr 2016 #3
Seems obvious when someone comes out and says he is meeting with the Pope to gain an edge in NY. Hoyt Apr 2016 #4
This whole Vatican thing really has you worked up, doesn't it? The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2016 #5
I could not have said it better awake Apr 2016 #8
of course Rosa Luxemburg Apr 2016 #14
Why does it matter? redwitch Apr 2016 #6
Of course he will meet with him. basselope Apr 2016 #7
of course he will - he said so on national TV DrDan Apr 2016 #70
poor thing basselope Apr 2016 #72
he shouldn't be - still an honor and he should treat it as such DrDan Apr 2016 #74
He likely will. basselope Apr 2016 #75
neither he, nor anyone here knows - and he claimed otherwise DrDan Apr 2016 #76
No, not at all. basselope Apr 2016 #78
what do you mean "no, not at all"? DrDan Apr 2016 #79
He didn't "claim otherwise" in any form of lie. basselope Apr 2016 #80
he clearly stated he would be meeting with the Pope on The View DrDan Apr 2016 #81
Incorrect. basselope Apr 2016 #82
here's video proof DrDan Apr 2016 #83
Video proof of what? Your inaccurate distortion? basselope Apr 2016 #85
lol DrDan Apr 2016 #86
Because it wasn't "unknown at that point" and still isn't "unknown". basselope Apr 2016 #88
okee dokee then DrDan Apr 2016 #89
And now we can see the definition of a lie... basselope Apr 2016 #91
there ya go assuming again - I did not see that post DrDan Apr 2016 #93
You rec'd it. basselope Apr 2016 #96
that is perhaps true then - I do not remember it DrDan Apr 2016 #98
If you rec'd it, it was an OP, since you can't rec comments. basselope Apr 2016 #100
I do not remember rec'ing an OP where the premise was made that Vatican=Pope DrDan Apr 2016 #101
That wasn't the "premise" of the post. basselope Apr 2016 #105
perhaps you can shed some wisdom on this statement from the Vatican . . . er, the Pope . . . whoever DrDan Apr 2016 #90
No paradox at all. basselope Apr 2016 #92
even the Vatican does not hold that view DrDan Apr 2016 #95
Not exactly true... basselope Apr 2016 #97
I'm taking bets on whether Hillary will meet with FBI agents soon TheCowsCameHome Apr 2016 #9
What do you wager? All those off shore accounts and you still won't whatchamacallit Apr 2016 #10
You're on. How much and how will you send me the money when you lose? panader0 Apr 2016 #11
WHO GIVES A SHIT???. SocialLibFiscalCon Apr 2016 #12
From what I've read, the Pope is traveling that week. So it becomes a very easy bet. nt magical thyme Apr 2016 #13
Actually he's not going to Greece now until 4/16 riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #18
well that changes things...I'd thought the trip was same day! nt magical thyme Apr 2016 #49
The Pope changed the dates... riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #50
can you pass me some of that popcorn? magical thyme Apr 2016 #51
He moves in mysterious ways TheFarS1de Apr 2016 #59
It doesn't matter. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #15
Claiming the Pope invited him when he didn't is not an issue? athena Apr 2016 #19
The Vatican did invite him...this has been proved... Ken Burch Apr 2016 #20
The Vatican is not the Pope. athena Apr 2016 #22
If the Vatican did it, it reflects what the Pope wanted. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #24
He said "Yup" when asked "You're meeting with the Pope?" athena Apr 2016 #33
At the worst, he assumed an invitation from the Vatican meant he'd meet with the Pope. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #34
You're just proving my point. athena Apr 2016 #37
No, I just proved he didn't lie. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #39
If you think Hillary is a conservative, you clearly know nothing about her athena Apr 2016 #43
Do you have any idea how foolish you're going to look when Bernie meets with the Pope? frylock Apr 2016 #94
Bishop Sorondo is a close aide to Francis and he issued the invite to Bernie. riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #29
Thanks. n/t. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #35
Maybe this helps -- ?? CountAllVotes Apr 2016 #104
huh? and you know this how? DrDan Apr 2016 #53
Here you go: Ken Burch Apr 2016 #61
where does that say the Pope personally approved the invitation DrDan Apr 2016 #62
Everything a Vatican official does has to have papal approval. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #63
and that includes invitations to academic conferences? - link please DrDan Apr 2016 #64
If the Pope didn't want these people to participate, they wouldn't have beein invited TO the Vatican Ken Burch Apr 2016 #65
and there is no reason for you guys to inflate your importance - just makes you look silly DrDan Apr 2016 #66
ANY Vatican invitation is by definition a Papal invitation. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #67
then a simple link showing the Pope personally approves all invitations to Vatican City DrDan Apr 2016 #68
oh dear . . . ". . . invitation to Sanders did not come from the pope . . ." DrDan Apr 2016 #69
It's a trivial difference. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #71
because you made such a big deal out of it and because Bernie decided to lie about it DrDan Apr 2016 #73
I don't know this teevee show but the way it looked to me, its a pretty fluffy show? riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #40
Any honest person would have corrected the misinterpretation. athena Apr 2016 #44
I would not hold anything similar against Hillary riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #45
No bet...But you can get a 50/50 on Hill being indicted. nt jmg257 Apr 2016 #16
Depends: Is Lesbos on his itinerary? robbedvoter Apr 2016 #17
The Pope is meeting with gay woman on April 16th? awake Apr 2016 #21
With this Pope, it could happen. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #25
They'll both be there on the 15th, though. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #36
Yay, another Bernie and the Pope thread! Awesome. I don't bet but I think if he CAN CTyankee Apr 2016 #23
What odds are you going to give me on Hillary meeting with the Pope? Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #26
When she's President Trenzalore Apr 2016 #31
Did you know Bill Clinton pointed his finger at the BLM movement? B Calm Apr 2016 #27
bitcoin lol ibegurpard Apr 2016 #28
how many people ever get that? 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #30
Ooh...that one Bernied.... IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #38
OH SNAP - "Check the cloud Hillary, maybe your invite came by email and you wiped it with a cloth." jmg257 Apr 2016 #41
Photo the Pope and Bernie. dinkytron Apr 2016 #32
The Pope knows he can't be seen to be influencing an election. No meeting at all. nt IamMab Apr 2016 #42
Actually Pope Francis has a history of dropping in on these conferences riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #47
Would he go to hell? Jail? Gitmo? GeorgeGist Apr 2016 #48
Bernie might hide in a bathroom stall with a photographer itsrobert Apr 2016 #46
you mean like this? magical thyme Apr 2016 #52
Funny! What the heck is this? Ned_Devine Apr 2016 #56
It will be interesting to see what happens Gothmog Apr 2016 #54
That'll be great if/when he does Ned_Devine Apr 2016 #55
Are you DU's resident bookie? TSIAS Apr 2016 #57
Im laughing at Hillary partisans bizarre obsession AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #58
Was he supposed to? The invitation wasn't for a meeting with him, was it? Gore1FL Apr 2016 #60
If they do, I hope they have a little chat about guns and gays. stone space Apr 2016 #77
After what you've posted about "ammosexuals" as well as homophobic images, you should look inward. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #99
Seeing how the Pope will be in Greece on the day of this conference, the chance is 0%. Tarc Apr 2016 #84
I'm in....He won't...n/t asuhornets Apr 2016 #87
I'm taking bets on the number of days it will take the House of Representatives Vinca Apr 2016 #102
Why? What does it have to do with issues? snowy owl Apr 2016 #103
last call...any takers? hill2016 Apr 2016 #106
nobody took right side of this bet? GreatGazoo Apr 2016 #107
YOU LOST! ViseGrip Apr 2016 #108
Kick and rec frylock Apr 2016 #109
LOLOLOLOLOLOL! bvar22 Apr 2016 #110
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
4. Seems obvious when someone comes out and says he is meeting with the Pope to gain an edge in NY.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:00 PM
Apr 2016

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,674 posts)
5. This whole Vatican thing really has you worked up, doesn't it?
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:01 PM
Apr 2016

Why not just relax and see what happens? Maybe he'll go to the conference and maybe he won't; maybe he'll see the Pope and maybe he won't. Why the hell do you care so much?

Seems like the optics of Bernie being invited to talk about the idolatry of money while Hillary is busy idolizing money at George Clooney's mansion is getting worrisome among some folks, no?

awake

(3,226 posts)
8. I could not have said it better
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:10 PM
Apr 2016

The only other possibility that the Hillary' supporters are trying to make a big deal to distract from Bill's remarks in Philly about BLM when he really stepted in it.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
74. he shouldn't be - still an honor and he should treat it as such
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:42 AM
Apr 2016

even though he may or may not meet the Pope

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
75. He likely will.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:13 PM
Apr 2016

When one is invited to someone's home, you usually get to meet them.

The silly thing has been this concept that he lied.

It shows how little people understand the term.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
81. he clearly stated he would be meeting with the Pope on The View
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:35 PM
Apr 2016

video evidence is there

He does not know that. No one here knows that. It was clearly not true.

And there was no reason to inflate the situation. He could have said he hopes to meet with the Pope while there. But no - he clearly says otherwise. The invitation was an honor in itself. There was no reason to inflate its meaning or intent.

Even if it turns out they meet, on that show, on that date, he knowingly did not state the truth.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
82. Incorrect.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 03:00 PM
Apr 2016

He stated what he reasonably believe to be the truth.

He will likely meet the pope.

Sorry.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
86. lol
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 03:38 PM
Apr 2016

"You're meeting with the Pope?"

"Yup"

"Pope Francis has invited Bernie to visit him."

shakes head in agreement

so . . . what did I distort? He agreed he was meeting with the Pope - which we both know is unknown at this point. He also agreed that he was invited by the Pope. Which is also untrue according to the Vatican itself

"In a telephone interview, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, the senior Vatican spokesman, said that the invitation to Sanders did not come from the pope and that he was unaware of whether the pontiff had been informed before the offer was extended. Rather, the invitation came via the hand of an influential Argentine cleric in Vatican City, Monsignor Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, who heads the ancient Pontifical Academy of Sciences."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sanders-ties-his-advocacy-for-a-moral-economy-to-the-work-of-pope-francis/2016/04/09/1082454e-fe58-11e5-80e4-c381214de1a3_story.html?postshare=5551460219544263&tid=ss_tw

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
88. Because it wasn't "unknown at that point" and still isn't "unknown".
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:00 PM
Apr 2016

He was the Vatican IS the Pope, so an invitation from the Vatican, is an invitation from the Pope and yes, he will meet him.

The fact that Hillary is this desperate to try and distort this is quite sad.

So sorry it didn't work out for you.

I could give you some Pinocchios if you want.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
89. okee dokee then
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:04 PM
Apr 2016

yesterday we had "the Pope personally approves all invitations"

today we have "the Vatican IS the Pope"

at a loss of words right now - but the picture of a generic Bernie supporter is becoming more clear.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
91. And now we can see the definition of a lie...
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:19 PM
Apr 2016

'today we have "the Vatican IS the Pope" "

It was actually on Friday that this was initial explained, but to the chagrin of Clinton supporters.. one of them even posted a now locked thread complaining about this.

It is more likely than not you read that post (since you rec'd it) and now you claim this notion has just come up "today". So you are intentionally, with foreknowledge distorting the truth.

But, reality is that an invitation from the Vatican IS an invitation from the Pope, just as an invitation from the White House IS an invitation from the President.

So sorry it didn't work out for and that you had to resort to lies.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
93. there ya go assuming again - I did not see that post
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:22 PM
Apr 2016

So why would the Vatican now say the invitation did not come from the Pope?

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
98. that is perhaps true then - I do not remember it
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:14 PM
Apr 2016

was it in an OP? Could you post the link to refresh my memory.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
101. I do not remember rec'ing an OP where the premise was made that Vatican=Pope
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:37 PM
Apr 2016

I find it hard to believe I rec'ed it. But not denying it if you saw it. Can you provide link or subject line.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
105. That wasn't the "premise" of the post.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 06:05 PM
Apr 2016

It was mentioned within the OP as a "false justification" that some have used to cover up the "lie".

But since there was no lie, the post was ultimately locked.

The fact is.. Sanders didn't lie.

Sorry.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
90. perhaps you can shed some wisdom on this statement from the Vatican . . . er, the Pope . . . whoever
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:16 PM
Apr 2016

"The Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi told The Daily Beast that it wasn’t the pope who personally invited the politician. “The invitation was made on behalf of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, not by Pope Francis,” he said. “There is no expectation that the pope will meet Mr. Sanders.” He then added that he could not completely exclude the possibility, but that nothing was on the agenda at the moment."

*********************************

The Vatican (who is the Pope) states the Pope did not personally invite Sanders . . . via the Vatican's invitation, hence the Pope's invitation. The Pope's invitation is not from the Pope.

See the paradox?

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
92. No paradox at all.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:22 PM
Apr 2016

You fail to understand the relationship.

You are trying to infuse the word "personally" into it to create a paradox that does not exist.

Obama doesn't PERSONALLY approve all white house invitation, but an invitation to the White House is an invitation from the President.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
95. even the Vatican does not hold that view
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:48 PM
Apr 2016

a Vatican spokesman states the Vatican invitation was not from the Pope.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
97. Not exactly true...
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:03 PM
Apr 2016

Again, they said PERSONALLY. You keep missing that qualifying word. An invitation from the Vatican IS an invitation from the pope because the Vatican is the pope.

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
9. I'm taking bets on whether Hillary will meet with FBI agents soon
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:11 PM
Apr 2016

A real sit-down several-on-one meeting with a substantive charges, not a "sorry, no thanks, I'm too busy today" kind of meeting.

Any takers?

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
10. What do you wager? All those off shore accounts and you still won't
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:11 PM
Apr 2016

Last edited Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:56 PM - Edit history (1)

put your money where your mouth is?

 
12. WHO GIVES A SHIT???.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:28 PM
Apr 2016

Seriously. This manufactured controversy is absurd. Let's focus on real issues instead of trying to distract with crap like this....

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
18. Actually he's not going to Greece now until 4/16
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:36 PM
Apr 2016

A visit by Pope Francis and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I to the island of Lesbos was announced Wednesday by church and government officials in Greece, NPR's Sylvia Poggioli reports. 

The Vatican confirmed the visit on Thursday, the Associated Press says. The trip is planned for April 16. 

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/04/06/473209431/pope-francis-patriarch-bartholomew-may-visit-greece-this-month

TheFarS1de

(1,017 posts)
59. He moves in mysterious ways
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 04:54 PM
Apr 2016
They honestly think that there will not be even a quick meet and greet when they are attending a Vatican conference , on a subject the current Pope is passionate about . I cannot wait for the poutrage when it does happen .

athena

(4,187 posts)
19. Claiming the Pope invited him when he didn't is not an issue?
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:38 PM
Apr 2016

I bet it would be a huge issue if Hillary had done it.

Here is the video. Bernie says "Yup" and nods when Joy Behar says "Pope Francis invited Bernie to visit him in the Vatican." It is a fact that the Pope did not invite Bernie to visit him. But it seems a lie is not a lie if it is told by Bernie.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
20. The Vatican did invite him...this has been proved...
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:41 PM
Apr 2016

Nobody in the Vatican sends out invitations without the Pope having agreed to it.

Bernie did not lie on this

athena

(4,187 posts)
22. The Vatican is not the Pope.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:44 PM
Apr 2016

The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences is not the Pope. If the situations had been reversed, DU would be full of threads about how Hillary lied. Again, what we see here is that when it's Bernie telling it, a lie is no longer called a lie and no longer suggests horrible things about the speaker's character.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
24. If the Vatican did it, it reflects what the Pope wanted.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:46 PM
Apr 2016

It's one of the most centralized institutions in the world.

An invitation from the Vatican is the same thing as an invitation from the guy who runs the Vatican.

There is no issue here.

Bernie is telling the truth

athena

(4,187 posts)
33. He said "Yup" when asked "You're meeting with the Pope?"
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 02:04 PM
Apr 2016

You have to really twist that into a pretzel to argue that it's not a lie.

It looks more and more like Bernie thinks he can say anything and get away with it. Among his supporters, he can, but not everyone is so enamored with him that they will look for any argument, no matter how roundabout, to turn his lies into truths.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
34. At the worst, he assumed an invitation from the Vatican meant he'd meet with the Pope.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 02:09 PM
Apr 2016

And it's still entirely possible he will meet with the Pope.

If that wasn't on the agenda, they'd have told him he could participate by teleconference or something.

So no, no lie.

athena

(4,187 posts)
37. You're just proving my point.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 02:11 PM
Apr 2016

That everything Bernie says is the truth in the eyes of his supporters.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
39. No, I just proved he didn't lie.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 02:15 PM
Apr 2016

It would have been a lie if Bernie had said he'd meet with the Pope when he knew he wasn't going to.

There is no issue here and nothing to be outraged about.

It's weird that your working so hard to save the conservative(pro-corporate equals conservative)candidate for the Democratic nomination.

athena

(4,187 posts)
43. If you think Hillary is a conservative, you clearly know nothing about her
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 02:19 PM
Apr 2016

beyond the smears the right-wing noise machine has been spreading about her for decades.

I challenge you to read this:
http://www.thenation.com/article/can-hillary-clinton-win-over-the-left/
and continue to claim that Hillary is a conservative.

What's interesting is the lengths to which Bernie supporters will go to destroy the candidate who is most likely to be the Democratic nominee. The nastiness of Bernie's supporters is what helps the Conservatives.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
29. Bishop Sorondo is a close aide to Francis and he issued the invite to Bernie.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:54 PM
Apr 2016

During the last Vatican conference on climate change, Francis was personally involved and it was a similar size.

I find it hard to believe Francis didn't approve this guest list.

Furthermore the "Vatican" is its own country and its not uncommon to refer to pretty much anything there as the "Vatican".

You dont say the latest papal encyclical came from the "Papal residence" although that would be most accurate. We say it came from the Vatican.

CountAllVotes

(20,868 posts)
104. Maybe this helps -- ??
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:54 PM
Apr 2016

Question: "What is the Holy See?"

Answer: The term "Holy See" is from the Latin Sancta Sedes, meaning “holy chair.” It is said that the Holy See is the jurisdiction in Rome of the Catholic Church. In other words, it is similar to a government, which is not surprising considering that the Vatican is its own country and has its own money and its own laws. However, there is a difference between the Holy See, which dates back to early Christian times, and Vatican City, which came into existence in 1929 with the signing of the Lateran Treaty between the See and the Italian government. The Holy See is an episcopal designation, while Vatican City is primarily a political and diplomatic one.

The government of the Holy See includes tribunals, congregations, pontifical counsels and numerous other bureaucratic entities. Of course the pope is the head of the See, as he is considered the head of the Catholic Church. The secretariat of state is the second in command of the See and oversees the 175 diplomatic worldwide relationships and offices. The See is a member of numerous international organizations, including the United Nations.

*******

Bottom line is this:

The Vatican is a place and the pope is the head of the Catholic Church.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
53. huh? and you know this how?
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 04:06 PM
Apr 2016

good heavens . . . this place is getting creepier and creepier with these bogus claims

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
62. where does that say the Pope personally approved the invitation
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 08:44 PM
Apr 2016

and that that was the social protocol for all Vatican-hosted events

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
63. Everything a Vatican official does has to have papal approval.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 08:50 PM
Apr 2016

They don't just let you go off on your own tangents in that shop.

The link proves Bernie wasn't lying.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
65. If the Pope didn't want these people to participate, they wouldn't have beein invited TO the Vatican
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 08:59 PM
Apr 2016

And this conference wouldn't be happening there.

It would just be at Georgetown or some Catholic university in Latin America.

There is no reason for you guys to be doubling down on what you know is non-issue. It just makes you look silly.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
66. and there is no reason for you guys to inflate your importance - just makes you look silly
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 09:03 PM
Apr 2016

why say you are meeting with the Pope when you do not know if you will be or not - just state the truth - that you hope to meet with the Pope

Why state the Pope personally approved Bernie's invitation when you have no idea whether that is the case or not.

I am not downplaying the honor of receiving the invitation. Just be honest as to what it really represents.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
67. ANY Vatican invitation is by definition a Papal invitation.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 09:11 PM
Apr 2016

The Pope doesn't give his staff the freedom to invite whoever the heaven they want. The invitation goes out in the name of an with the authority of the Holy Father.

And Bernie didn't claim he would be the single most important person invited by the Pope.

There is no issue here, and you guys have no reason to pretend you are outraged

You make yourselves look like schoolyard bullies by not letting this go.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
68. then a simple link showing the Pope personally approves all invitations to Vatican City
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 09:32 PM
Apr 2016

should be easy for you - with your all-encompassing knowledge of Vatican social protocol.

And why put words in my mouth - I never said Bernie claimed he "would be the single most important person invited by the Pope." Where did that come from?

I simple reminded you that he did clearly state he would be meeting with the Pope - with video evidence. We both know that is currently a stretch - at best. He knows no such thing. It might happen. It might not. No one knows at this point. Why make the claim?

You have no reason to pretend to be more important than you really are. The invitation was an honor in itself. No reason to inflate the whole situation.

You make yourselves look like typical bravado-filled BB-bullies - the ones Bernie personally tried to reign in.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
69. oh dear . . . ". . . invitation to Sanders did not come from the pope . . ."
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:14 AM
Apr 2016

"In a telephone interview, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, the senior Vatican spokesman, said that the invitation to Sanders did not come from the pope and that he was unaware of whether the pontiff had been informed before the offer was extended. Rather, the invitation came via the hand of an influential Argentine cleric in Vatican City, Monsignor Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, who heads the ancient Pontifical Academy of Sciences."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sanders-ties-his-advocacy-for-a-moral-economy-to-the-work-of-pope-francis/2016/04/09/1082454e-fe58-11e5-80e4-c381214de1a3_story.html?postshare=5551460219544263&tid=ss_tw

*************************************************************************************************

You really should remind Rev. Lombardi of proper Vatican protocol - that the Pope personally approves all invitations to the Vatican/Vatican City.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
71. It's a trivial difference.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 10:53 AM
Apr 2016

It was in the name of the Pope.

Why are you dwelling on something only conservatives would think matters?

This is a dead issue.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
73. because you made such a big deal out of it and because Bernie decided to lie about it
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:41 AM
Apr 2016

"in the name of the Pope" - and the Pope personally scrutinizing the invitation list are two very different, non-trivial things

you decided to make up some bogus protocol to make it a papal matter, which it isn't

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
40. I don't know this teevee show but the way it looked to me, its a pretty fluffy show?
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 02:16 PM
Apr 2016

When the first woman made the erroneous statement, Bernie could have corrected her with "the Vatican " or just let it go as a minor slip.

For that audience it seems as though it would be splitting hairs to say, "it was Pope Francis' close aide who invited me".

Only political junkies are scrutinizing every minutia.

athena

(4,187 posts)
44. Any honest person would have corrected the misinterpretation.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 02:20 PM
Apr 2016

I know I would have.

But Bernie is held to a different standard. He knows that whatever he says will be twisted by his supporters to be the words of an honest man of integrity.

CTyankee

(63,903 posts)
23. Yay, another Bernie and the Pope thread! Awesome. I don't bet but I think if he CAN
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:44 PM
Apr 2016

go, he will go. I think it would be invaluable to his campaign. From what I understand, the Pope will be in Greece during the meeting. But he doesn't have to meet the Pope. JUst sitting down with other world leaders holding similar beliefs will add to his foreign policy rep and make him look like a leader. The GOP will have fits and migraines...good!

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
26. What odds are you going to give me on Hillary meeting with the Pope?
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:47 PM
Apr 2016

I'd like some of that action.

Or we each put some money down and if Hillary meets with the Pope you get the money and if Sanders does I do. If neither do, it's a push.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
30. how many people ever get that?
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:59 PM
Apr 2016

But you can take all the bets you want. Fact is Bernie was invited, Hillary was not. Fact is, the Vatican turned down an invite to Hillary's pay to play money exchange um ... charity.

Check the cloud Hillary, maybe your invite came by email and you wiped it with a cloth.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
41. OH SNAP - "Check the cloud Hillary, maybe your invite came by email and you wiped it with a cloth."
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 02:17 PM
Apr 2016

Winner!!

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
47. Actually Pope Francis has a history of dropping in on these conferences
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 02:29 PM
Apr 2016
http://ncronline.org/blogs/eco-catholic/vatican-worlds-mayors-vow-tackle-climate-change-poverty

Going to meet the group isn't akin to an individual meeting.

And I just had a huge laugh at your statement that the Pope wouldn't influence elections. The Church's entire history is political maneuvering! Centuries of it!!



itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
46. Bernie might hide in a bathroom stall with a photographer
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 02:28 PM
Apr 2016

and when the Pope comes into the bathroom he and the photographer pop out for a Photo Op. Unfortunately, Bernie would probably have toilet paper stuck in his shoes.

TSIAS

(14,689 posts)
57. Are you DU's resident bookie?
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 04:41 PM
Apr 2016

I hope the authorities don't find out. Illegal bookmaking is against the law.

Gore1FL

(21,127 posts)
60. Was he supposed to? The invitation wasn't for a meeting with him, was it?
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 05:00 PM
Apr 2016

I thought it was to participate in a conference on the global economy. Do you know something different?

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
77. If they do, I hope they have a little chat about guns and gays.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:17 PM
Apr 2016

That's a conversation that they both might benefit from having.



beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
99. After what you've posted about "ammosexuals" as well as homophobic images, you should look inward.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:18 PM
Apr 2016

What a disgusting use of homophobic dog whistles to promote an agenda.

Vinca

(50,261 posts)
102. I'm taking bets on the number of days it will take the House of Representatives
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:38 PM
Apr 2016

to start impeachment proceedings against a President Hillary Clinton. 2? 3?

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
110. LOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:56 PM
Apr 2016

Now serving up hot steaming crow for the Hillary crowd in this thread.
I heard its not too bad with a little hot sauce.

Lets review:
First, the attack was that Bernie invited himself. When that nasty piece of Brock propaganda was proved to be FALSE, The Weathervane Crowd immediately pivoted to...Well, he won't be speaking at the conference...WRONG AGAIN.

THEN, Bernie won't meet the Pope, so why bother to go?
WRONG AGAIN!

Hmm. I see a trend.

Bernie Sanders Met with Pope Francis
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280176019



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I'm taking bets on whethe...