2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI'm taking bets on whether Bernie will meet with the Pope.
A real sit-down one-on-one meeting with substantive exchange of views, not a hi-bye meeting.
Any takers?
We can use bitcoin. Relatively anonymous but verifiable by everyone.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)hill2016
(1,772 posts)but I'm sure you'll have takers
awake
(3,226 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,674 posts)Why not just relax and see what happens? Maybe he'll go to the conference and maybe he won't; maybe he'll see the Pope and maybe he won't. Why the hell do you care so much?
Seems like the optics of Bernie being invited to talk about the idolatry of money while Hillary is busy idolizing money at George Clooney's mansion is getting worrisome among some folks, no?
awake
(3,226 posts)The only other possibility that the Hillary' supporters are trying to make a big deal to distract from Bill's remarks in Philly about BLM when he really stepted in it.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)redwitch
(14,944 posts)It is an honor that he was invited to this conference. As I'm sure you know.
basselope
(2,565 posts)Doubt it will be a long sit down, but little doubt they will meet.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)so sad and bitter
DrDan
(20,411 posts)even though he may or may not meet the Pope
basselope
(2,565 posts)When one is invited to someone's home, you usually get to meet them.
The silly thing has been this concept that he lied.
It shows how little people understand the term.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)very clear
basselope
(2,565 posts)To say otherwise is to completely distort reality.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)video evidence is there
He does not know that. No one here knows that. It was clearly not true.
And there was no reason to inflate the situation. He could have said he hopes to meet with the Pope while there. But no - he clearly says otherwise. The invitation was an honor in itself. There was no reason to inflate its meaning or intent.
Even if it turns out they meet, on that show, on that date, he knowingly did not state the truth.
basselope
(2,565 posts)He stated what he reasonably believe to be the truth.
He will likely meet the pope.
Sorry.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)"You're meeting with the Pope?"
"Yup"
"Pope Francis has invited Bernie to visit him."
shakes head in agreement
so . . . what did I distort? He agreed he was meeting with the Pope - which we both know is unknown at this point. He also agreed that he was invited by the Pope. Which is also untrue according to the Vatican itself
"In a telephone interview, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, the senior Vatican spokesman, said that the invitation to Sanders did not come from the pope and that he was unaware of whether the pontiff had been informed before the offer was extended. Rather, the invitation came via the hand of an influential Argentine cleric in Vatican City, Monsignor Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, who heads the ancient Pontifical Academy of Sciences."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sanders-ties-his-advocacy-for-a-moral-economy-to-the-work-of-pope-francis/2016/04/09/1082454e-fe58-11e5-80e4-c381214de1a3_story.html?postshare=5551460219544263&tid=ss_tw
basselope
(2,565 posts)He was the Vatican IS the Pope, so an invitation from the Vatican, is an invitation from the Pope and yes, he will meet him.
The fact that Hillary is this desperate to try and distort this is quite sad.
So sorry it didn't work out for you.
I could give you some Pinocchios if you want.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)yesterday we had "the Pope personally approves all invitations"
today we have "the Vatican IS the Pope"
at a loss of words right now - but the picture of a generic Bernie supporter is becoming more clear.
basselope
(2,565 posts)'today we have "the Vatican IS the Pope" "
It was actually on Friday that this was initial explained, but to the chagrin of Clinton supporters.. one of them even posted a now locked thread complaining about this.
It is more likely than not you read that post (since you rec'd it) and now you claim this notion has just come up "today". So you are intentionally, with foreknowledge distorting the truth.
But, reality is that an invitation from the Vatican IS an invitation from the Pope, just as an invitation from the White House IS an invitation from the President.
So sorry it didn't work out for and that you had to resort to lies.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)So why would the Vatican now say the invitation did not come from the Pope?
basselope
(2,565 posts)So you did see it.
The lies keep on piling up.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)was it in an OP? Could you post the link to refresh my memory.
basselope
(2,565 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)I find it hard to believe I rec'ed it. But not denying it if you saw it. Can you provide link or subject line.
basselope
(2,565 posts)It was mentioned within the OP as a "false justification" that some have used to cover up the "lie".
But since there was no lie, the post was ultimately locked.
The fact is.. Sanders didn't lie.
Sorry.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)"The Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi told The Daily Beast that it wasnt the pope who personally invited the politician. The invitation was made on behalf of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, not by Pope Francis, he said. There is no expectation that the pope will meet Mr. Sanders. He then added that he could not completely exclude the possibility, but that nothing was on the agenda at the moment."
*********************************
The Vatican (who is the Pope) states the Pope did not personally invite Sanders . . . via the Vatican's invitation, hence the Pope's invitation. The Pope's invitation is not from the Pope.
See the paradox?
basselope
(2,565 posts)You fail to understand the relationship.
You are trying to infuse the word "personally" into it to create a paradox that does not exist.
Obama doesn't PERSONALLY approve all white house invitation, but an invitation to the White House is an invitation from the President.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)a Vatican spokesman states the Vatican invitation was not from the Pope.
basselope
(2,565 posts)Again, they said PERSONALLY. You keep missing that qualifying word. An invitation from the Vatican IS an invitation from the pope because the Vatican is the pope.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)A real sit-down several-on-one meeting with a substantive charges, not a "sorry, no thanks, I'm too busy today" kind of meeting.
Any takers?
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:56 PM - Edit history (1)
put your money where your mouth is?
panader0
(25,816 posts)SocialLibFiscalCon
(92 posts)Seriously. This manufactured controversy is absurd. Let's focus on real issues instead of trying to distract with crap like this....
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)A visit by Pope Francis and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I to the island of Lesbos was announced Wednesday by church and government officials in Greece, NPR's Sylvia Poggioli reports.
The Vatican confirmed the visit on Thursday, the Associated Press says. The trip is planned for April 16.
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/04/06/473209431/pope-francis-patriarch-bartholomew-may-visit-greece-this-month
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)There is no issue here.
athena
(4,187 posts)I bet it would be a huge issue if Hillary had done it.
Here is the video. Bernie says "Yup" and nods when Joy Behar says "Pope Francis invited Bernie to visit him in the Vatican." It is a fact that the Pope did not invite Bernie to visit him. But it seems a lie is not a lie if it is told by Bernie.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Nobody in the Vatican sends out invitations without the Pope having agreed to it.
Bernie did not lie on this
athena
(4,187 posts)The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences is not the Pope. If the situations had been reversed, DU would be full of threads about how Hillary lied. Again, what we see here is that when it's Bernie telling it, a lie is no longer called a lie and no longer suggests horrible things about the speaker's character.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)It's one of the most centralized institutions in the world.
An invitation from the Vatican is the same thing as an invitation from the guy who runs the Vatican.
There is no issue here.
Bernie is telling the truth
athena
(4,187 posts)You have to really twist that into a pretzel to argue that it's not a lie.
It looks more and more like Bernie thinks he can say anything and get away with it. Among his supporters, he can, but not everyone is so enamored with him that they will look for any argument, no matter how roundabout, to turn his lies into truths.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)And it's still entirely possible he will meet with the Pope.
If that wasn't on the agenda, they'd have told him he could participate by teleconference or something.
So no, no lie.
athena
(4,187 posts)That everything Bernie says is the truth in the eyes of his supporters.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)It would have been a lie if Bernie had said he'd meet with the Pope when he knew he wasn't going to.
There is no issue here and nothing to be outraged about.
It's weird that your working so hard to save the conservative(pro-corporate equals conservative)candidate for the Democratic nomination.
athena
(4,187 posts)beyond the smears the right-wing noise machine has been spreading about her for decades.
I challenge you to read this:
http://www.thenation.com/article/can-hillary-clinton-win-over-the-left/
and continue to claim that Hillary is a conservative.
What's interesting is the lengths to which Bernie supporters will go to destroy the candidate who is most likely to be the Democratic nominee. The nastiness of Bernie's supporters is what helps the Conservatives.
frylock
(34,825 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)During the last Vatican conference on climate change, Francis was personally involved and it was a similar size.
I find it hard to believe Francis didn't approve this guest list.
Furthermore the "Vatican" is its own country and its not uncommon to refer to pretty much anything there as the "Vatican".
You dont say the latest papal encyclical came from the "Papal residence" although that would be most accurate. We say it came from the Vatican.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)Question: "What is the Holy See?"
Answer: The term "Holy See" is from the Latin Sancta Sedes, meaning holy chair. It is said that the Holy See is the jurisdiction in Rome of the Catholic Church. In other words, it is similar to a government, which is not surprising considering that the Vatican is its own country and has its own money and its own laws. However, there is a difference between the Holy See, which dates back to early Christian times, and Vatican City, which came into existence in 1929 with the signing of the Lateran Treaty between the See and the Italian government. The Holy See is an episcopal designation, while Vatican City is primarily a political and diplomatic one.
The government of the Holy See includes tribunals, congregations, pontifical counsels and numerous other bureaucratic entities. Of course the pope is the head of the See, as he is considered the head of the Catholic Church. The secretariat of state is the second in command of the See and oversees the 175 diplomatic worldwide relationships and offices. The See is a member of numerous international organizations, including the United Nations.
*******
Bottom line is this:
The Vatican is a place and the pope is the head of the Catholic Church.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)good heavens . . . this place is getting creepier and creepier with these bogus claims
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)and that that was the social protocol for all Vatican-hosted events
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)They don't just let you go off on your own tangents in that shop.
The link proves Bernie wasn't lying.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)And this conference wouldn't be happening there.
It would just be at Georgetown or some Catholic university in Latin America.
There is no reason for you guys to be doubling down on what you know is non-issue. It just makes you look silly.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)why say you are meeting with the Pope when you do not know if you will be or not - just state the truth - that you hope to meet with the Pope
Why state the Pope personally approved Bernie's invitation when you have no idea whether that is the case or not.
I am not downplaying the honor of receiving the invitation. Just be honest as to what it really represents.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)The Pope doesn't give his staff the freedom to invite whoever the heaven they want. The invitation goes out in the name of an with the authority of the Holy Father.
And Bernie didn't claim he would be the single most important person invited by the Pope.
There is no issue here, and you guys have no reason to pretend you are outraged
You make yourselves look like schoolyard bullies by not letting this go.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)should be easy for you - with your all-encompassing knowledge of Vatican social protocol.
And why put words in my mouth - I never said Bernie claimed he "would be the single most important person invited by the Pope." Where did that come from?
I simple reminded you that he did clearly state he would be meeting with the Pope - with video evidence. We both know that is currently a stretch - at best. He knows no such thing. It might happen. It might not. No one knows at this point. Why make the claim?
You have no reason to pretend to be more important than you really are. The invitation was an honor in itself. No reason to inflate the whole situation.
You make yourselves look like typical bravado-filled BB-bullies - the ones Bernie personally tried to reign in.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)"In a telephone interview, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, the senior Vatican spokesman, said that the invitation to Sanders did not come from the pope and that he was unaware of whether the pontiff had been informed before the offer was extended. Rather, the invitation came via the hand of an influential Argentine cleric in Vatican City, Monsignor Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo, who heads the ancient Pontifical Academy of Sciences."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sanders-ties-his-advocacy-for-a-moral-economy-to-the-work-of-pope-francis/2016/04/09/1082454e-fe58-11e5-80e4-c381214de1a3_story.html?postshare=5551460219544263&tid=ss_tw
*************************************************************************************************
You really should remind Rev. Lombardi of proper Vatican protocol - that the Pope personally approves all invitations to the Vatican/Vatican City.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)It was in the name of the Pope.
Why are you dwelling on something only conservatives would think matters?
This is a dead issue.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)"in the name of the Pope" - and the Pope personally scrutinizing the invitation list are two very different, non-trivial things
you decided to make up some bogus protocol to make it a papal matter, which it isn't
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)When the first woman made the erroneous statement, Bernie could have corrected her with "the Vatican " or just let it go as a minor slip.
For that audience it seems as though it would be splitting hairs to say, "it was Pope Francis' close aide who invited me".
Only political junkies are scrutinizing every minutia.
athena
(4,187 posts)I know I would have.
But Bernie is held to a different standard. He knows that whatever he says will be twisted by his supporters to be the words of an honest man of integrity.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Its small in the framework of the entire event.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)robbedvoter
(28,290 posts)because that's where the Pope will be on April 16
awake
(3,226 posts)That's news.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)n/t.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)There is no issue, there is no lie.
Give it a rest.
CTyankee
(63,903 posts)go, he will go. I think it would be invaluable to his campaign. From what I understand, the Pope will be in Greece during the meeting. But he doesn't have to meet the Pope. JUst sitting down with other world leaders holding similar beliefs will add to his foreign policy rep and make him look like a leader. The GOP will have fits and migraines...good!
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)I'd like some of that action.
Or we each put some money down and if Hillary meets with the Pope you get the money and if Sanders does I do. If neither do, it's a push.
Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)They most likely will meet
B Calm
(28,762 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)MIRT how much more obvious does this one have to get for you?
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)But you can take all the bets you want. Fact is Bernie was invited, Hillary was not. Fact is, the Vatican turned down an invite to Hillary's pay to play money exchange um ... charity.
Check the cloud Hillary, maybe your invite came by email and you wiped it with a cloth.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)Winner!!
dinkytron
(568 posts)yup, that's how tight they are going to be. They were born to be pals
IamMab
(1,359 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Going to meet the group isn't akin to an individual meeting.
And I just had a huge laugh at your statement that the Pope wouldn't influence elections. The Church's entire history is political maneuvering! Centuries of it!!
GeorgeGist
(25,319 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)and when the Pope comes into the bathroom he and the photographer pop out for a Photo Op. Unfortunately, Bernie would probably have toilet paper stuck in his shoes.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Gothmog
(145,130 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Just as it would be if Hillary did
TSIAS
(14,689 posts)I hope the authorities don't find out. Illegal bookmaking is against the law.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)With it all..
Gore1FL
(21,127 posts)I thought it was to participate in a conference on the global economy. Do you know something different?
stone space
(6,498 posts)That's a conversation that they both might benefit from having.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)What a disgusting use of homophobic dog whistles to promote an agenda.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)Vinca
(50,261 posts)to start impeachment proceedings against a President Hillary Clinton. 2? 3?
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)hill2016
(1,772 posts)GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)Now serving up hot steaming crow for the Hillary crowd in this thread.
I heard its not too bad with a little hot sauce.
Lets review:
First, the attack was that Bernie invited himself. When that nasty piece of Brock propaganda was proved to be FALSE, The Weathervane Crowd immediately pivoted to...Well, he won't be speaking at the conference...WRONG AGAIN.
THEN, Bernie won't meet the Pope, so why bother to go?
WRONG AGAIN!
Hmm. I see a trend.
Bernie Sanders Met with Pope Francis
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280176019