Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SocialLibFiscalCon

(92 posts)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 10:22 PM Apr 2016

Why is Brian Williams held to a higher standard than Hillary Clinton?

Last edited Sun Apr 10, 2016, 07:13 AM - Edit history (1)

Brian Williams "embellished" his story about being in a helicopter that was shot down in Iraq. In reality he was in the helicopter behind it, but the story was better when he LIED and said he was in the one forced to land after taking fire.

When the truth came out, he was universally vilified and suspended from his job as the lead news anchor for NBC. He eventually resurfaced on the B team at MSNBC after a lengthy hibernation, but the man's reputation has been eternally damaged.

Hillary Clinton also "embellished" her story about ducking sniper fire on the tarmac in Bosnia. She told reporters that she literally had to duck to avoid sniper fire after landing. The reality is, they were told there could be sniper fire in the area, but she was greeted by a large group of people on the tarmac, including children and soldiers. None of them appeared to be in a hurry or the least bit concerned about any bullets flying!

When the truth came out, turns out she LIED also to make her story sound better. When asked about it she gave some bullshit answer and everyone just moved on. She continues to lead the race for the Democratic nomination. No repercussions whatsoever for blatantly lying to the American public.

Can someone please explain to me why a television news anchor would be held to a higher standard of integrity than a presidential candidate?

Edit: Still waiting for the first HRC supporter to offer an answer to this question?

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why is Brian Williams held to a higher standard than Hillary Clinton? (Original Post) SocialLibFiscalCon Apr 2016 OP
Thank you I keep asking, why this is not discussed as something that should be considered. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #1
it is easy - everyone knows - she has no standards SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #13
Keep this kicked. She is a perpetual liar. That matters to voters, as the untrustworthy numbers show ViseGrip Apr 2016 #2
Brian's still employed at MSNBC Politicalboi Apr 2016 #3
He's still employed SocialLibFiscalCon Apr 2016 #16
I liked that guy. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #4
His bits with Stewart were comedy gold Doctor_J Apr 2016 #11
News anchor is a trusted and responsible position where standards apply? Fumesucker Apr 2016 #5
Because she's the anointed one. No Democrat may question her holiness. BillZBubb Apr 2016 #6
"She has never lied--she even said so. How can you not believe her?" Wait just a minute I can think rhett o rick Apr 2016 #8
Here is an intelligent article about this. athena Apr 2016 #7
Oh come on! Who "planted" this memory in Hillary's brain? BillZBubb Apr 2016 #9
So then who planted the false memories in her mind? Wilms Apr 2016 #10
Those bad video games I bet Politicalboi Apr 2016 #12
The Manchurian Candidate? krawhitham Apr 2016 #21
Hillary is the corporatist Neocon candidate. As "frontrunner"... dchill Apr 2016 #14
"IT'S HER TURN!" Odin2005 Apr 2016 #15
C'mon HillBots.... Anyone? SocialLibFiscalCon Apr 2016 #17
K&R! Katashi_itto Apr 2016 #18
MRAs for Bernie! nr LexVegas Apr 2016 #19
That's all you got? SocialLibFiscalCon Apr 2016 #23
People are still under the delusion that they can trust corporate media Ruby the Liberal Apr 2016 #20
It will come back in the general and be a major issue if she beats Bernie krawhitham Apr 2016 #22
Clinton Statute of Limitations? islandmkl Apr 2016 #24
Crickets from the Clintonistas? SocialLibFiscalCon Apr 2016 #25
This is a Fine question!! oldandhappy Apr 2016 #26
K&R. A VERY good question. nt Bonobo Apr 2016 #27
Excellent question; amborin Apr 2016 #28
Kick azmom Apr 2016 #29
She was really tired DefenseLawyer Apr 2016 #30
Kick... Fumesucker Apr 2016 #31
Funny SocialLibFiscalCon Apr 2016 #32
 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
3. Brian's still employed at MSNBC
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 10:32 PM
Apr 2016

I hate looking at him with Rachel. He isn't anything close to Rachel. I haven't been liking her reporting lately, but she is 100% better than Brian Williams. Hillary is just a pathological liar, and nothing can be done except to beat her at the polls, or hope more drips out of the Panama Papers about the Clinton Foundation and money laundering, and arms deals. Protecting women and children one gun at a time.

 
16. He's still employed
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 11:21 PM
Apr 2016

But he was punished for lying. He's the punchline of jokes at this point and took a big demotion.

When will she be called to account for basically doing the same exact thing?

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
4. I liked that guy.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 10:33 PM
Apr 2016

He was sooooooo amazing on The Daily Show and his interviews and other Cameos. When that came out I was so mad that he did that, it was a little lie, but why the F did he keep telling and adding to it. He should have known better. As sad as I was to see him get let go from his position, I also knew he had to be accountable for what he did. I am not sure when I will think he can be a reliable again, since news casters need to be truthful.

As for HRC, it did not get tons of press, some of the stories covering it were right-wing, so as Dems we tend to ignore them because of how many false attacks they do. I do wonder how many people know, but then again it has been a long freaking time, and maybe by now I would have been ok with Williams. But the story may explain why many people don't trust her, it is because she has lied and been caught. I have seen people that are sexist about her lies, they say it is harder for her since she is a woman, so she can get away with more (since it is loaded against her)...I am not sure if I agree, I would be fine with her being mean, gruff, etc, but lies always bug m a bit.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
5. News anchor is a trusted and responsible position where standards apply?
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 10:34 PM
Apr 2016

Politicians not so much.

If Brian Willams had been getting sexually serviced in his office by an intern he would have been gone too but we all saw that politicians have a different and far lower standard of behavior.

The standard I suspect is still live boy or dead girl.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
6. Because she's the anointed one. No Democrat may question her holiness.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 10:35 PM
Apr 2016

She has never lied--she even said so. How can you not believe her?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
8. "She has never lied--she even said so. How can you not believe her?" Wait just a minute I can think
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 10:38 PM
Apr 2016

of several.......... oh I get it.

athena

(4,187 posts)
7. Here is an intelligent article about this.
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 10:36 PM
Apr 2016
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/02/09/was-brian-williams-a-victim-of-false-memory/

Memories don’t live as single, complete events in one spot in the brain. Instead they exist as fragments of information, stored in different parts of our mind. Over time, as the memories are retrieved, or we see news footage about the event or have conversations with others, the story can change as the mind recombines these bits of information and mistakenly stores them as memories. This process essentially creates a new version of the event that, to the storyteller, feels like the truth.

...

The scientific literature is filled with fascinating studies of researchers planting fabricated memories from the simple to the bizarre — of being attacked by a vicious animal, for example, or even witnessing demonic possession. A seminal study by Dr. Loftus planted false memories of being a frightened child lost in a shopping mall. After reading a description of getting lost, about one in four study subjects came to believe the false memory as something that really happened to them.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
9. Oh come on! Who "planted" this memory in Hillary's brain?
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 10:42 PM
Apr 2016

Hint: it wasn't anyone other than Hillary herself. And it a lie to embellish her credentials. That's the Clinton way.

dchill

(42,660 posts)
14. Hillary is the corporatist Neocon candidate. As "frontrunner"...
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 10:52 PM
Apr 2016

She is allowed a pass on up to 100 lies per week. Mainstream media do not have a problem with this, as her water carriers, they reach that number by Tuesday. Williams lost his chair because his embellishments were not approved by the NBC News political warfare unit.

 
17. C'mon HillBots.... Anyone?
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:34 AM
Apr 2016

Would love to hear the Clinton horde's thoughts on this but apparently they only focus on conjuring up controversy about Bernie!

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
24. Clinton Statute of Limitations?
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 09:16 AM
Apr 2016

mis-remembered...

mis-spoke...

meant it when i said it...

evolved...

i did not say that...

i have long supported...

upon further investigation...

Note: my bad...didn't mean to put the word 'investigation' anywhere near this post...

 
25. Crickets from the Clintonistas?
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 10:26 AM
Apr 2016

I am not trying to be an ass here, merely asking for some intelligent reason why tv news people get punished for lying while someone running for president doesn't?

 
32. Funny
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 10:58 AM
Apr 2016

Clinton supporters were so quick to hide and ban some of my posts so I'm sure some of them have read this one. Wonder why none have them have bothered to offer an answer to this simple query? Hmmm....

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why is Brian Williams hel...