2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie "big" Bronx rally
Word is over half of those in attendance at his rally a week ago were ineligible to vote in the Democratic primary. I guess a lot of college kids still think its "trendy" to not identify with a party. Thats fine, it keeps interlopers out of OUR candidate selection process. I believe its likely Bernie loses NY by 15 or more points. Possible even a 20 point margin.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)What good are humans? Are they registered as Democrats in New York? Are they ambulatory enough to get to the polls on April 19th? If not, THEY DON'T COUNT!!!
(Cue the mad nervous laughter...)
Vinca
(53,206 posts)I'm sure the results will be similar . . . on a much smaller scale, of course.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)They can't move very fast.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)That's your interpretation. So, you must be the one who's ageist.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)You should work up a night club act -- or join a circus.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)They'll be real proud, I am sure.
SalviaBlue
(3,105 posts)"I guess a lot of college kids still think its "trendy" to not identify with a party."
I have seen this agism towards millennials again and again from Hillary supporters on DU. Its not very smart, but I agree, it is ugly.
I am 60, BTW.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)SalviaBlue
(3,105 posts)against the young or the old.
Where did you call out the OP for his "ugly agist shit?" That is where it should have been nipped in the bud.
It appears that its okay with you for the OP to start a post slinging mud but you cannot abide someone responding in kind.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)but now it isn't?
At any rate- ragging on people because of their behavior- statistically, they are still not voting- fair game. Ragging on people because of physical limitations-"slow"- pretty damned ugly.
Unfortunately, it has always been hard to get the young to participate in elections- it has been the subject of endless discussion. That you take it as a slight doesn't make it cruel.
SalviaBlue
(3,105 posts)LonePirate
(14,326 posts)Vinca
(53,206 posts)RandySF
(80,781 posts)They worked their entire lives instead of sitting in their parents' basement waiting for free stuff.
Desert805
(392 posts)War and Death 2016!
merrily
(45,251 posts)Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)Congrats for showing excellently how the Hillary camp has more in common with GOP scam artists and their suckers.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)Of all the bullshit memes of this campaign this is the one that drives me the craziest.
Free stuff? So let me guess. The good old American way is to work for years to pay off your student debt. The good old American way is to get off your ass and find a company with a good health care plan. Otherwise you are screwed.
If this is your life, you got fucked by the American government. You are the sucker. You worked for a life that should have been easier. Don't bitch and moan because people are taking notice that all this stuff we work for years for is a birth "RIGHT" in almost every developed nation.
"Free stuff" is an uneducated, Republican world view. It's absolute bullcrap that a Progressive can look someone in the eye and say, "work for it kid. You wouldn't want to be one of those Canadian kids who has insurance and can get an affordable college education would you?"
All of us have been used by the American Government. We can bitch about it and pretend these "kids" don't know what the good old days were like. Or we can catch up with the rest of the civilized world.
I'm sorry Randy. The free stuff shit is weak.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)Fuck this republican "free stuff" meme. Brunch of uneducated detractors.
pkdu
(3,977 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Hillary demands that "progressives" rail against socialism and free stuff, so what's a "progressive" gonna do? Last week, we thought that government was a force for good, but that's not the current party line.
So... I guess I gotta push that button! What choice do I have? The lady in the lab coat demands it!
demmiblue
(39,143 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)And probably not for people who trash them like Mrs. Clinton and her supporters do. Good luck with that.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)TURN THAT RACKET DOWN!
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)LonePirate
(14,326 posts)She wil rack up double digit wins the following week as well and there will not be enough states remaining for Bernie to catch up, even with a 30 point win in CA.
Nanjeanne
(6,491 posts)I say Bird is the Word
[URL=
.html][IMG]
[/IMG][/URL]
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)People registering at the last minute just to vote in the primary. That's what an open primary is. It means you can register at the last minute.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Try again.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I do think the 6 month rule here is wrong and should be moved to a month.
katsy
(4,246 posts)"OUR"
Do you understand how ugly that sounds?
You think maybe the Democratic Party needs less voters identifying with it? Is that a "purity" "blood oath to party" kinda thing ya got going?
I accept that HRC will most likely win NY.
I can't accept that anyone would call SBS supporters "interlopers".
Not nice.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)If she manages to get the nomination, she and her supporters are going to be shocked when those interlopers tell them to fuck off.
katsy
(4,246 posts)I've been here for a few primaries buts I never felt as insulted as I do this primary season.
Never entertained not voting for the Democratic Party candidate then read all the awful stuff posted here about progressives.
I guess we're being told to fuck off on no uncertain terms. Nice.
If they want to have a voice within the party all they need to do is sign up as a Democrat.
katsy
(4,246 posts)Fair game for insults? Do you think that getting all possessive about "YOUR" Democratic Party is good form?
It's not. It's not okay to label millennials or any SBS supporters as "other". We aren't republicans. Someone once posted that progressives are the Party's conscious. I felt that resonate with me.
You don't have to agree. Just go easy on alienating people who have the right to disagree with you.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)Amaril
(1,267 posts)These "purity" posts kill me...........like where do they think new Democrats come from -- pods?
I was once told -- because I started out my political life registered as Republican (my parents -- and entire extended family -- were Republicans, and what did I know -- I was 18, from a town so small I dare you to find it on a map, and knew NOTHING of the world except what they exposed me to..........and then I went to college) -- that I'm not a "real" Democrat (even though I (have been registered as one for lo these last 30+ years).
Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)who may not even be registered to vote yet.
And may have found a reason to register to vote for maybe the first time ever.
We should demean them as you just did.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)eom
djean111
(14,255 posts)And, bye!
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Damn kids these days, why weren't they smoking grass on their own property?
merrily
(45,251 posts)"some say" and "everybody knows" have been overused quite a bit lately.
TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)"
"dchill
(42,660 posts)beedle
(1,235 posts)Which people?
"Me."
jmousso75
(71 posts)All the talk about Bernie supporters...... Time for me to leave the Democratic Underground. I feel like I'm on a republican site. Sad. Farewell.
TMontoya
(369 posts)"Democratic" Undergound. Sanders isn't a Democrat.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)Having hijacked the party in the 90's.
It's about time to take the party back from corporate politicians and racists who goes identity politics when it's politicallly expedient and then go back to the same old racist talking points after reigning in some undeserved votes after the hatchet job in the south and his civil rights record.
Hillary only wants to talk to white people. And only if they are rich with a check.
So if you are not rich and not white and have issues with her and her husband's political history, you might get a finger up your nose, a wilde eyed look, and almost yelling when lying at the same time.
Hillary Clinton have perfected Karl Rove methods. Her voters seem to buy into her mudslinging every single time.
choie
(6,520 posts)In this election
arcane1
(38,613 posts)How many ineligible people attend Hillary's rallies?
Oh, I forgot, her rallies don't exist
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)Seems that you Hillary supporters are hellbent on keeping the democratic party inside a small bubble of elitists,, suckers and secret racists who loves wars, corruption and any process to stop real democracy from working.
The Democratic party has been hijacked by 3rd way "democrats" who ran away from the label LIBERAL, while Bernie has never coward awy from the term LIBERAL after Bill Clinton unleashed RW hate radio...
Hillary does NOT represent the core of the democratic party. She represent her corporate donors and war hawks. And sometimes, I wonder if her followers are just as much interlopers hellbent on destroying the democratic party for their corporste owners.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)Did Bill continue Reagan's policy of marginalizing progressive, liberl voices in the media, yes or no?
Hillary and Bill was using the same RW talking point in the 90's, throwing both their liberal voters and African Americans under the
bus.
People in her, claiming "party loyalty" which is more of a personal cultism worshipping secret speeches, praises wars, and loves torture and spying on ones own people and loves Wall Street have adopted the exact same RW talking points as republicans, while falsely accusing Bernie and his supporters of not being "real democrats", while the opposite is the truth.
Hillary is not a real democrat. She's a dixicrat, a Goldwater girl, and a flip flopper that would make anyone dizzy.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)You are rewarding someone who belongs in the same war crimes trubunal as her fellow republican neocons.
OR to ask it in a different way:
Do you support Clinton's bombing of the Iraq in the 90s?`
`
Do you support Hillary's support for the "Patriot" Act in 2001?
Do you support Hillary's policies against Iraq,Syria and Libya?`
How about her close ties to the Facsists who ousted as legally elected government in Honduras?
If you do not support any of these, then you will not vote for her.
If you praise these actions and their consequences, you reward these actions by giving her your full vote of confidence and hope she will continue in the same track as she already has.
Plain and simple.
Cheap republican strawmen with no substance and absolutely void of intelligence is not befitting anyone who claims to be a reflective, informed and educated Hillary supporters with LIBERAL valies.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Not going to pretend we are living in simple times.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)Then you have more in common with republicans and seek to reward Hillary for said actions, crimes and transgressions.
These are NOT liberal policies and should not be adopted by any democrat.
At least we know you are partially praising her criminal incompetence...
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Not carrying water for Carl Rove anytime soon either. But you go right ahead.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)Why don't you explain exactly what she did in that list that has been so great for the country and humanity since you are pushing to reward her for them?
Iraq?
The "Patriot" Act?
Her husband's war on African Americans and the continuation of Reagan's deeply racist and political war on drugs?
Their close ties to Wall Streeet and the Panama Papers?
Her support for the military coup in Honduras?
Killing Gadaffi, creating the refugee crisis neither she nor some European countries refuse to take care of?
Admit it!
Hillary is a republican!
And if you don't think she should be held accountable for this, I can only speculate that you don't want to hold Dick Cheney accountable either.
Wonder why she claims to be trustworthy or transparent when she hold secret highly paid speeches to people she was supposed to legislate.
Perhaps she thinks that Lloyd Blankfein is a better citizen than some black kid in Detroit whose only source of income has been drug dealing since the jobs went overseas and the defunding of education and welfare started to kick in when Bubba started to destroy what FDR, JFK and Jimmy Carter has built. Policywise, Bill Clinton was never a democrat. A dixiecrat perhaps. But never a civil rights democrat like Bernie has been his entire life. Bernie Sanders have something in common with jimmy Carter that neither of the Clinton's have: A few ounces of integrity!
Bill Clinton's policies in this regard, was the beginning of the funneling of black teenagers into the plantation farms, also called "private prisons"...
She certainly seems unwilling to release all the non violent "offenders" from said private prisons.
She certainly does not want to talk about reparations. Neither to the AA community, nor the Native American community.
Don't be shy!
Show us the true face of establishment "democrats" and tell us which one of these she should be rewarded for by having earned your vote!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)She really must be all powerful.
Love Sanders plan for reparations too, BTW. Which is just as real as most of what you posted.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)She supported all these policies, didn't she?
The problem with "superpredators" could have been solve by a stroke of a pen. By ending the war on drugs. Like Carter wanted. Neither Bill or Hillary was interested in that. They went after the weakest in society - minority kids!
Hillary was SoS during Obama. Did she or did she not push for a hawkish policy against Libya and Syria?
Who are the one who laughs about a death that has led to what we have in Europe today? Hillary or Obama?
You certainly seem to want to give Hillary a free pass and the Bushies not. Why are you on the same side of the issue regarding her support for illegal wars, spying on ones own citizens and going after whistleblowers who exposed these crimes?
Why not address her support for those?
So why haven't Hillary addressed Reperations since people claims she gives a damn about African Americans?
Why not talk about that rather than obsessing about Bernie?
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)You avoided all of them. Instead, you sound butthurt and come with a feeble attack that resembles a 5 year olds temper tantrum.
You must be proud of supporting a candidate who has been on the same side of the neocons and neoliberals consistently since 2001!
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)How Progressive is that?
Hillary doesn't deserve to be President.
What's next? Only 'Real' Democrats have Civil Rights?
The New 'Jim Crow.'
choie
(6,520 posts)Where do you get your information from? I was there and I didn't see anybody taking a poll of the audience. More shit dressed as fact from Clinton supporters.
TSIAS
(14,689 posts)I don't think this is a great strategy to win over voters.
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)Making up shit is fun.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Especially since "interlopers" are forbidden by law to vote in the general election.
jillan
(39,451 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)People who are clearly excited and engaged are the best thing for democracy. But they're on the wrong team, so it's only democracy when they can't vote.
Response to TMontoya (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)independents, right?