Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You know how far the party has fallen when the NY Daily News is the democrats' paper of record (Original Post) whatchamacallit Apr 2016 OP
who did the NY Times endorse? nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #1
well, they endorsed the invasion of Iraq TheSarcastinator Apr 2016 #3
Hillary and then NYT called for her to release the transcripts. morningfog Apr 2016 #6
obviously the transcripts stuff wasn't important enough for them to endorse her geek tragedy Apr 2016 #11
Time flows in one direction. jeff47 Apr 2016 #19
time is a flat circle nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #20
You're welcome to cite any evidence of that claim. (nt) jeff47 Apr 2016 #21
. geek tragedy Apr 2016 #29
Well then spam their quotes instead of the NYDN garbage. whatchamacallit Apr 2016 #8
What's Joe Scarborugh think about all this? JoePhilly Apr 2016 #2
I got no use for either of them. morningfog Apr 2016 #7
actually JoScar is firmly in the Clinton Cult TheSarcastinator Apr 2016 #9
Guess you missed this OP ... JoePhilly Apr 2016 #13
I read about 'Morning Joe' from two DUers, both Clinton supporters. Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #16
No apcalc Apr 2016 #28
.. mcar Apr 2016 #40
A choice between an accomplished person like Hillary and a "fantasist" Renew Deal Apr 2016 #4
Wait I need to vote for that person. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #15
Why are you focused on gender? Renew Deal Apr 2016 #18
No why are you focused on gender? northernsouthern Apr 2016 #30
Your words "So I can vote for a female president" Renew Deal Apr 2016 #32
Why are you so obsessed with her gender? northernsouthern Apr 2016 #36
You brought it up Renew Deal Apr 2016 #38
why? northernsouthern Apr 2016 #39
No. Why did you bring up gender in the first place. Renew Deal Apr 2016 #41
Wait? northernsouthern Apr 2016 #42
The NY Daily News called Bernie a "fantasist who’s at passionate war with reality" Renew Deal Apr 2016 #43
Oh, thanks for clarifying that. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #44
Here is what the NY Daily News said... Renew Deal Apr 2016 #45
Who is calling that paper any sort of "paper of record?" MineralMan Apr 2016 #5
Bernie fans seem to like the NY Observer... SidDithers Apr 2016 #10
and the NY post nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Apr 2016 #14
None of the major papers should be the paper of record for Democrats. BillZBubb Apr 2016 #17
The NY Times has endorsed Hillary oberliner Apr 2016 #22
It shouldn't be after Judith Miller. Fawke Em Apr 2016 #26
I was just thinking the same thing - Hillary Inc. loves that tabloid propaganda. n/t Avalux Apr 2016 #23
Isn't it just some creepy tabloid? Fawke Em Apr 2016 #24
At least it isn't the NY Post Dem2 Apr 2016 #25
NYDN was owned by the Tribune Co Depaysement Apr 2016 #27
Maybe Pravda is still in print. RandySF Apr 2016 #31
The Clinton Cult Just Cited the WSJ in Another Thread TheSarcastinator Apr 2016 #33
What about how far the Left has fallen when it's citing Joe Scarborough? CalvinballPro Apr 2016 #34
You're not left? whatchamacallit Apr 2016 #35
this has been hard to watch. along with more war, secret speeches, etc. just dandy! ViseGrip Apr 2016 #37
I see Dems here regularly citing Sputnik, RT, InfoWars, Zerohedge, etc. Blue_Tires Apr 2016 #46

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
3. well, they endorsed the invasion of Iraq
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 09:54 AM
Apr 2016

and allowed Judy Miller to fill their pages with Bush & Clinton-endorsed WMD BS that led the the deaths of hundred of thousands if not millions, so who f*cking cares?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
11. obviously the transcripts stuff wasn't important enough for them to endorse her
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 09:56 AM
Apr 2016

without having seen them

The Times loves process stories. Transcripts are a classic example of a never-ending process story.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
2. What's Joe Scarborugh think about all this?
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 09:53 AM
Apr 2016

Bernie fans seem to be turning to the insightful Joe Scabby on a regular basis these days.

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
9. actually JoScar is firmly in the Clinton Cult
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 09:55 AM
Apr 2016

I don't know which reality you're tuned into, but if you believe conservative Joe Scarborough endorses Sanders you need to take your meds.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
16. I read about 'Morning Joe' from two DUers, both Clinton supporters.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 10:28 AM
Apr 2016

I tuned in to see the show just once, to find out who his sidekicks were. Some DU moderates post about that show almost daily and I have often commented that Joe's ratings are so low that it's a waste of time mulling what he says.....

The Daily News endorsed Mitt Romney over Obama in 2012. Cite them as you wish. They call the President 'Bam' and they say 'Get a Grip, Bam!' and that sort of thing. I do not care for that sort of thing. Do you? Bam? Really?

Renew Deal

(81,856 posts)
4. A choice between an accomplished person like Hillary and a "fantasist"
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 09:54 AM
Apr 2016

"who’s at passionate war with reality" is a simple choice

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
15. Wait I need to vote for that person.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 10:15 AM
Apr 2016
A choice between an accomplished person like Hillary


You are saying there is an accomplished person that is like Hillary? So I can vote for a female president but they will be accomplished instead of Johnny Come Lately to the senate as Hillary is?

Renew Deal

(81,856 posts)
18. Why are you focused on gender?
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 10:40 AM
Apr 2016

Is that all you think about when you see Hillary? Do you see her gender as an accomplishment?

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
30. No why are you focused on gender?
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:04 AM
Apr 2016

I implied she had no accomplishments and merely was the last on board of any issue, but you chose to focus on her gender. That was 1/3 of my post that you focused in on. Is that all you think others think about with Hillary? Why would you even imply gender as an accomplishment? You are hung up on her gender. I on the other hand thought you were talking about an accomplished politician that was "like" Hillary as you said it, and I was not sure what the like was...since Bernie is accomplished, but you were against him by the tone of your first post it couldn't have to do with party affiliation, and Hillary is white and has white or graying hair so that is also like Bernie, height is far too specific a detail, but a female politician that could break the glass ceiling would be great, so I guess I figured you were implying that aspect of her...so I figured you were talking about Warren, Turner, Gabbard, etc. I was just wondering which one you were endorsing?

Sorry if I thought you were talking about a female, who was this politician "like" Hillary, but with accomplishments?

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
36. Why are you so obsessed with her gender?
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 01:25 PM
Apr 2016

I said


Wait I need to vote for that person.

A choice between an accomplished person like Hillary


You are saying there is an accomplished person that is like Hillary?
So I can vote for a female president but they will be accomplished instead of Johnny Come Lately to the senate as Hillary is?


And you only saw the part not in bold? You zeroed in on her sex? You don't seem to have an issue that you were saying she did not have experience? Why are you so infatuated by it? Plus you still have not told me who this candidate "like" Hillary Clinton was? Why do you keep dodging the question? What are you trying to hide? Is it Cruz you were going to say was like Hillary?
 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
39. why?
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 02:15 PM
Apr 2016

Why did I bring up that you seem obsessed with Hillary's gender? Because I was not sure if it was a healthy obsession. Also why did you not deny the Cruz line? Are you referring to him instead?

Renew Deal

(81,856 posts)
41. No. Why did you bring up gender in the first place.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 02:20 PM
Apr 2016

I said:
A choice between an accomplished person like Hillary and a "fantasist" "who’s at passionate war with reality" is a simple choice

You said: You are saying there is an accomplished person that is like Hillary? So I can vote for a female president but they will be accomplished instead of Johnny Come Lately to the senate as Hillary is?

Why does her gender stand out to you enough to bring it up?

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
42. Wait?
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 02:29 PM
Apr 2016

You said:

I said:
A choice between an accomplished person "like" Hillary and a "fantasist" "who’s at passionate war with reality" is a simple choice


You are right I did not notice that you said the person was like Hillary but accomplished and a fantasist...
Is that why you are hinting at Cruz? I am not sure if you are on the correct forum, this is the DNC, the closest we get to republican is the third way.

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
44. Oh, thanks for clarifying that.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 02:56 PM
Apr 2016

The NYDN, they are a well respected newspaper right? A very non-biased source? I have not heard of them yet.

So if I am understanding you correctly you are saying Bernie is the candidate with accomplishments that is also "fantasist" like Hillary?

Renew Deal

(81,856 posts)
45. Here is what the NY Daily News said...
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 03:13 PM
Apr 2016

On April 19, New York Democrats will have unusual say over the party’s nominee. They have in Clinton a superprepared warrior realist. They have in opponent Bernie Sanders a fantasist who’s at passionate war with reality.

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/vote-hillary-clinton-article-1.2598171

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
5. Who is calling that paper any sort of "paper of record?"
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 09:54 AM
Apr 2016

The answer is: Nobody. It is a New York City tabloid. It publishes what it chooses to publish, just like most newspapers.

It endorsed Hillary Clinton. Other papers have done the same. That is their prerogative. Any newspaper can endorse anyone it chooses.

The NY Daily News is not, in any way, a "paper of record." The only one using that phrase is you. It is just another newspaper.

Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
17. None of the major papers should be the paper of record for Democrats.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 10:29 AM
Apr 2016

They are all tarnished by the corporate stench.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
26. It shouldn't be after Judith Miller.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 10:57 AM
Apr 2016

Frankly, the old gray lady seems to be far more corporate than Dems should like.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
24. Isn't it just some creepy tabloid?
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 10:54 AM
Apr 2016

It was when I was a newspaper reporter, some 13 years ago.

I considered it about the same level as the shock mags with pictures of Bat Boy and alien leaders meeting with the president.

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
27. NYDN was owned by the Tribune Co
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 10:58 AM
Apr 2016

Longtime Republican paper until the 70s. Now owned by neocon "Democratic" billionaire Mort Zuckerman. This guy makes Dinos look like radical leftists.

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
33. The Clinton Cult Just Cited the WSJ in Another Thread
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 12:10 PM
Apr 2016

It's Rupert Murdoch and KKKarl Rove all the way for the Hillaryans.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
46. I see Dems here regularly citing Sputnik, RT, InfoWars, Zerohedge, etc.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 03:17 PM
Apr 2016

Please keep telling us how "embarrassingly lame" the Daily News is...

We know damn well you'd be singing a different tune had they endorsed Sanders, so kindly piss off.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»You know how far the part...