2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow Many Of These 'TERMS/EXPRESSIONS' Do You Find To Be Acceptable Or NOT Acceptable?
How Many Of These 'TERMS/EXPRESSIONS' Do You Find To Be Acceptable Or NOT Acceptable? Have you ever used any of these terms to express a thought or describe someone's character, and if so, which one did you use?
| 18 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
| A - Corporate Whore | |
1 (6%) |
|
| B - Media Whore | |
0 (0%) |
|
| C - Attention Whore | |
0 (0%) |
|
| A + B | |
4 (22%) |
|
| A + C | |
0 (0%) |
|
| B + C | |
0 (0%) |
|
| A + B + C | |
10 (56%) |
|
| Yes, but the term is not listed. | |
0 (0%) |
|
| None. | |
3 (17%) |
|
| 0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
| Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
|
Segami
(14,923 posts)AuntPatsy
(9,904 posts)Frankly it's a job, kind of like plumbers, It can be a shitty job but it pays well....
Frankly I don't think I have, doesn't mean I haven't but don't recall using that word to describe a political morally corrupt individual...
Frankly not all whores are morally corrupt and it is a service, so the word is not all that useful when describing certain horrific human beings...mostly that can be found in political arenas, media arenas, as well as religious ones....
Point is, its not the word needed to convey just how ugly they are as human beings....
senz
(11,945 posts)1
: a woman who engages in sexual acts for money : prostitute; also : a promiscuous or immoral woman
2
: a male who engages in sexual acts for money
3
: a venal or unscrupulous person
Example:
For writers, to blurb or not to blurb can be a tricky matter.
Blurb too often, or include too many blurbs on your book, and you might get called a blurb whore. Rachel Donadio, New York Times Book Review, 17 Aug. 2008
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/whore
Segami
(14,923 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)I find that acceptable. Whining about someone out of ours, or Bernie's control, using the word whore, referring to a money hungry sellout, is not acceptable.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)pat_k
(12,626 posts)Unless you intend to create a "story" that distracts from what matters, you don't use Media Whore or Corporate Whore or whatever, at a candidate's rally.
Poor judgment.
But only because the noise machine will try to turn it into a "big story."
I don't think many who hear about it would be genuinely outraged.
And those who fain outrage are unlikely to ever support Bernie anyway.
Paul Song apologized -- undoubtedly wishes he hadn't used in the context. Shit happens.
Stallion
(6,638 posts)that's a shot presumably at every Democratic officeholder that has been elected after taking corporate donation
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)One is a name calling slur, the other is just bidness.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)I do not like someone trying to put me on the defensive by automatically being offensive. Childish P/A tactics.
just my opinion.