2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie has now apologized for the "whore" remark and ...
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Goblinmonger (a host of the 2016 Postmortem forum).
... acknowledged that it was entirely inappropriate.
Perhaps his supporters here who were so vociferous in defending and rationalizing the comment would like to follow suit.
Who would like to go first?
Not everyone at once, now ....
salinsky
(1,065 posts)He's right, there is no place for language like that.
https://twitter.com/BernieSanders/status/720590717706506240
(easier to follow link in body of post)
... thanks for the pro tip.
Dr. Songs comment was inappropriate and insensitive. Theres no room for language like that in our political discourse, Sanders tweeted Thursday.
Response to salinsky (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Let's just say it's "cautious politician" time.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... I see what you did there.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)That's been used here for years.
Dem2
(8,178 posts)
salinsky
(1,065 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)I associate ALL Third-Way Democrats with the term "Corporate Whores" simply because they are. That's how they make their living. I don't think he revealed anything most folks don't already know.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... and then used the term "corporate Democratic whores".
Really despicable.
Bernie was right to apologize.
You should follow his lead on this.
revbones
(3,660 posts)http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=corporate+whore
Basically it does apply to Hillary and many Democrats as well as most if not all Republicans...
Buttons3345
(39 posts)Do they fit? Someone forgot to teach you manners! Naughty, naughty!
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)I firmly believe that Third-Way Democrats are the epitome of "Corporate Whores". Why? Because they are. It's how they make their fortunes.
Buttons3345
(39 posts)More than I can say for his supporters!
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)He obviously disagrees with your statement.
gabeana
(3,170 posts)who will on purpose blow this out of proportion, anything to not talk about issues and make it personal
because your likes want to portray any criticism of Hillary as sexist plays into the victim card goes,
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)to create your new meme du jour.
You folks should head away from DU for a bit and see how these types of silly manufactured memes are playing on sites like twitter. Seems to me your attacks hurt your own candidate far more than they do the candidate you are hoping to attack.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The two terms have completely different meanings, corporate whore isn't a sexist slur.
Dem2
(8,178 posts)I initially saw out-of-context quotes and actually felt he didn't mean to draw a link to Hillary in the statement.
I was wrong and am pissed off that I was misled into thinking that he didn't mean to imply that Hillary is a "corporate Democratic WHORE".
It's indefensible. Hillary is a woman and you can NEVER link those words. Ever.
Stop.
Quit while you're ahead.
Even Bernie has said:
Dr. Song's comment was inappropriate and insensitive. There's no room for language like that in our political discourse.
Listen to Bernie. Please.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)She wasn't called a gender based slur, go paddle it somewhere else.
It wasn't the best choice of words but it's not the same as calling someone a whore.
Dem2
(8,178 posts)But I can tell you that I think you're
1) wrong and
2) defending something that it is indefensible
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Tomorrow it will be another non-issue to distract people.
It's all rather boring and predictable at this point.
Dem2
(8,178 posts)I generally trash all the "poutrage of the day" posts, but this one was witnessed by my kid attending the rally and it left an impression that was disturbing to my kid.
I feel that an apology was necessary in this instance and both parties apologized, thus this was a real honest to goodness screw up on the part of said speaker. I'm ready to move on if you are.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Dem2
(8,178 posts)Sad and pathetic. I suppose you feel like you've never lost an argument.
I can see why.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Dem2
(8,178 posts)God damn it, you are not being a nice person.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Leave your kid out of it, they are irrelevant to whether or not I find the term corporate whore offensive.
Dem2
(8,178 posts)It was OFFENSIVE to my kid FFS.
My god.
I'm done with you.
Go ahead, get in your last word.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It's really a lame attempt to shame me because I wasn't properly horrified by a term that's not the least bit offensive.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)pwnage.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)That's fucking insane. What kind of parent lets their kid roam around adults in NY where people fucking cuss all the fucking time?
Very funny.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I am assuming your child is old enough to go out alone, but fuck if I know.
Dem2
(8,178 posts)Not sure if you know this.
Either your child is old enough to go out alone or not. If your child is old enough to go out alone I guarantee you he has heard a lot of rough language especially if he is on a college campus. Fuck he has probably heard it from his professors.
frylock
(34,825 posts)brush
(61,033 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)You need to drop it because I don't give a flying fuck about all of this manufactured drama.
I have no pearls to clutch or vapours to get.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... just how low can they go?
[rhetorical] - don't answer that.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)You said God damn it!! Taking the good lords name in vain!!!! Oh the shame. The horror. Some one save me from the ugliness.
See how that works!
If you were at the rally and took the picture how could you have taken the statement out of context when you heard it with your own ears. Or am I missing something in your post?
Sorry your child was hurt. Perhaps you should not take a child to an adult event!
Dem2
(8,178 posts)Thanks for the 5-year old remarks, however.
Very mature.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)directed towards heard it?
Just how abstract is guilt suppose to become these days? Because if it is you owe me an apology for lots of things other people said to someone else.
Dem2
(8,178 posts)Dr. Song's comment was inappropriate and insensitive. There's no room for language like that in our political discourse.
https://twitter.com/BernieSanders/status/720590717706506240
That was good enough for me, I'm moving on...
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)That's the point I'm making.
Dem2
(8,178 posts)My kid is a big Bernie fan, it was offensive to them, I think it makes a difference as they were actually at the rally and took that photo, recollecting clearly the offensive remark. It matters to me and it should matter to you.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Answer -- because you can't be. It's absurd and untenable.
I'm not going to be upset because you say your children were upset.
Nice argument.
You've won.
Buttons3345
(39 posts)Bernie apologized because he has manners. If someone supporting him becomes vulgar, then yes he has to say something. Someone who is out there trying to get supporters for their candidate should be sticking to the issues without name calling.
sus453
(164 posts)the term, "corporate whore" really means. It would be a good civics lesson. Also, what age were your kids attending that rally.
Also, this is the 21st century - the puritan fear of children hearing language they probably use anyway is outdated. That's not to say you should encourage the use of that language, but people do talk like that. And Hillary is indeed a corporate whore.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Dr. Song's comment was inappropriate and insensitive. There's no room for language like that in our political discourse.
What part of this don't you understand?
But hey, double-down on this pathetic sexist statement by another clueless 1%er shill of Bernie if you must! I swear Sanders most fervent supporters are his worst enemies!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It's not sexist and it's not going to make me have a cow.
Was that clear enough?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)I won't stop you.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Buttons3345
(39 posts)You need to grow up you bully!
What is a slur?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=corporate+whore
Basically it does apply to Hillary and many Democrats as well as most if not all Republicans...
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... and he referred to Hillary twice by name directly preceding vomiting it up.
The shoe fits you quite well ...
... and, the shoe is misogyny.
revbones
(3,660 posts)Whether you are willing to admit it, you know this is just more juvenile fake outrage a la Karl Rove style. You know he didn't call her a whore. You are intelligent enough to know that, as well as the difference between a "whore" and a "corporate whore".
But if you feel the need to continue the fake outrage, have at it.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... he directly named Hillary twice.
Who the hell do you think he was talking about?
It's not nice to call a lady a "corporate Democratic whore".
Doesn't go over well in polite society.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)I don't think an apology was required
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... that's why Sanders supporters have made such a name for themselves.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Take it up with Haitian garment workers.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)But as far as the rest of us, pffft.
It's just another way they're trying to claim moral superiority.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)and defensible. For those of you that rarely talk politics or are simply pretending to be too dumb to know the meaning of the word employed in political context, be assured it is very well known and defined especially by the politically literate.
One who has sold more than their labor to the corporation; one who has forsaken personal values and constitution for corporate $$; meaning of "whore" belittled when preceded by the word corporate; person who will sell their soul for $$.
My efforts are not driven by my passion for work, but by my own gluttony, my addition to money. I have become what I once despisedforsaken myself, sacrificed my values at the corporate alter of greed. I am a corporate whore.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... and he twice referred to Hillary by name directly preceding the vile slur.
Despicable.
You shouldn't defend such crass behavior.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)I am sorry you are only just noticing this now.
Like Santa Clause not being real, finally learning that some of the corporate political whores are Democrats, and few have been paid so handsomely as Both William Jefferson AND Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Must be as disappointing a moment as the time I was 4 yrs old and caught my parents placing the gifts under the tree when I had expected a meet and great with the Grand Old Elf himself, it hurts, I understand.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... and he named Hillary directly twice before vomiting the disgusting term.
Despicable.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Most corporate whores are men, it's not a sexist slur.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... you're good at it.
And, the diminishment of the Sanders campaign accelerates.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I'm sure there are plenty of other people who will share the poutrage and milk it for all it's worth.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... Dr. Song's comment was inappropriate.
Bernie has acknowledged that fact.
You should do the same for condoning and rationalizing it.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Words used to describe them not so much.
revbones
(3,660 posts)is much much worse than being on stage in a racist minstrel skit using "CP Time" - that your staff approved the script of...
Oh, the horrors!
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)Terrible and Bernie was there and said nothing.
IamMab
(1,359 posts)peace13
(11,076 posts)....Mrs. smith that boy called me stupid. Mrs. Smith's reply...Well are you...Me...no! Mrs.Smith...then what are you worried about. Hmmmmm....If Hill isn't a corporate $hore then, no worries. I think the speaker should have had more guidance but that ship is sailed. Bernie apologized, said it was wrong so now we can all put our big boy pants on and get on with it. Can we please talk about the issues now?
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)I am not and I think "whore" is a fittingly pejorative description of a disgustingly corrupt subsection of politicians.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)I said it was like the CPT, it was inappropriate and poorly thought out, but neither sexist or racist in intent. I said that from the start and I even said Shillary was a term that bagged me more. Corporate whore is a term that is very extreme and carries baggage from the use of the word in it, but has a unisex meaning. I think it is too crass a word for use in a public venue, and a very stupid choice for a word used against a group that is struggling to be the first female president (so they do face real sexism) and they also play incredibly dirty so there is no way they would not grab on any loaded word.Did you come out against all of the horrible moves Hillary has done so far on first seeing them?
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... I wish more of your fellow travelers felt the same way.
frylock
(34,825 posts)"Fellow traveller" is a term, often pejorative, for a person who sympathizes with the beliefs of an organization or cooperates in its activities without maintaining formal membership in that particular group. The term was first used in the early Soviet Union to characterize writers and artists sympathetic to the goals of the Russian Revolution who declined to join the Communist Party.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fellow_traveller
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)One is offensive name calling and the other is just bidness.
rurallib
(64,688 posts)Triana
(22,666 posts)And though I understand Song's message, it was a very poor choice of words.
"candidates beholden to corporations instead of us" might have been a better choice.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... but unfortunately, it would appear that you are an outlier.
He made a mistake. I don't know the guy but we'll assume his apology is sincere.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)the shoe still fits, we just have the advantage of not running for president and being able to speak bluntly with truth.. faux outrage is still faux outrage..
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... but because you are not running for president it is your prerogative to be very ugly.
Carry on.
The diminishment of the Sanders campaign continues ...
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)and defensible. For those of you that rarely talk politics or are simply pretending to be too dumb to know the meaning of the word employed in political context, be assured it is very well known and defined especially by the politically literate.
One who has sold more than their labor to the corporation; one who has forsaken personal values and constitution for corporate $$; meaning of "whore" belittled when preceded by the word corporate; person who will sell their soul for $$.
My efforts are not driven by my passion for work, but by my own gluttony, my addition to money. I have become what I once despisedforsaken myself, I am a corporate whore.
Some of them are Republicans, some of them are Democrats, but few have so openly sacrificed their values at the corporate alter of greed. As Bill and Hilary Clinton (within our party at least)
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)FUCK your guilt by association. I still don't like corporo-political whores.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Stay the fuck under that spreading chestnut tree.
ibegurpard
(17,081 posts)But I bet an authoritarian like you would...
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I will agree that it is not appropriate in a political campaign, especially if used directly against a female candidate.
But I am not going to change my view that it is perfectly acceptable and well describes those who sell their political position (or media influence) inappropriately to the highest bidder.
"I will agree that it is not appropriate in a political campaign, especially if used directly against a female candidate."
That's big of you.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)And you know it.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)salinsky
(1,065 posts)... that doesn't even make any sense.
Try again.
brush
(61,033 posts)Have at it with repugs.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)10 our Fathers....unbelievable. Wasn't it a wonderful diverse and YUUUUUUGGGGEEE rally!
peace13
(11,076 posts)...Hill's got a lot of I'm sorry's right on this forum. She better get busy. People are responsible for the words that come out of their mouths and no one else.
Way to turn an apology into a dagger. Twist away.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)He was invited by the campaign to speak as a surrogate of and advocate for the candidate.
Bernie was correct to apologize.
It's unfortunate that his followers lack his sound judgement.
peace13
(11,076 posts)I'm ok with the apology. Why do people use the term follower instead of supporter. Blind follower, as in cult perchance? Just so you know, it's not nice!
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... I use the terms "follower" and "supporter" interchangeably.
Maybe, I should rethink that.
Mea Culpa ...
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)that thought it was a great thing.
Bernie Sanders himself just said it was wrong so go ahead and tell me where Bernie is wrong on this BS supporters.....
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... and they think referring to Hillary as a "corporate Democratic whore" is not only defensible ...
... they think it's commendable!
They are who we thought they were.
And, they sure as hell aren't Democrats.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Agreed.
Apparently Sanders followers think any democrat that isn't a Bernie acolyte is a "democratic corporate whore"!
DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)Corporate sellouts put us all in danger.
ibegurpard
(17,081 posts)He doesn't need to apologize for someone else's language nor will I apologize for using the word in a generic sense to apply to politicians who trade access and votes for money and campaign support. No one called Hillary a whore.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... as a surrogate of and advocate for the candidate.
Bernie was right to apologize.
Too bad his supporters lack his good judgement.
ibegurpard
(17,081 posts)I'll continue to take responsibility for my own actions. Corporate whores need to be purged from the Democratic Party.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... but, you might not like it.
ibegurpard
(17,081 posts)Unimportant.
On the ground is where it's happening.
Turin_C3PO
(16,385 posts)Once a nominee is chosen, people aren't allowed to advocate or state they're voting for another candidate, but they also don't have to affirm a vote for the nominee. Many progressives just stay silent on the subject until after the election. No big deal. I'm voting for whoever is the nominee but I would never support a "purge".
katsy
(4,246 posts)Totally appropriate remark and accurate description. No apology from me. Fuck no. Most politicians are corporate whores because of the costs involved in reelection. They are corporate whites, shills.
The remark was appropriate. I hope it causes people to really think about the shithole this country could become because of the fucked up agendas forced upon us by these corporate monkeys.... whores. It's what they are.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)The term was "corporate Democratic whores", and he referred to Hillary directly by name twice before dropping it.
Let's just keep in mind that this slur was used in an interparty political primary.
It is entirely inappropriate and completely unjustifiable.
Thank goodness Bernie has the good judgement and tact that his supporters clearly lack.
katsy
(4,246 posts)Same thing as corporate republican whore.
Not sexist. FACIST
They are fucking fascists. M/F/B/W/H/A/other/LGBTQ/athiest/thiest/hypocrit
/human/indy/gop/democrat
However they identify they are fucking corporate whores.
Nothing has infuriated me more than HRC milking this as a gender issue. It is not. It is not now. It was not when the term corporate whore was coined. It is accurate when calling out corporate democratic whores like DWS and when calling out corporate republican whores (like all the GOP).
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)He is with us not ahead of us with us. He speaks for us, but not instead of us. We aren't going to agree with everything he says and he is going to have his own opinions as well. So fuck this shit. He isn't responsible for everything that comes out of someone else's mouth. If he wants to apologize fine. He can apologize for Hiroshima and Nagasaki too I mean fuck it if we want to keep apologizing for shit we didn't do we might as well apologize for shit that matters where real people got killed and injured for life and lost family. As far as I know in this incident no one was fucking hurt. Except maybe the feelings of some Corporate Whore and her apologists.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:49 AM - Edit history (1)
One universe is online, where people bicker, fight, ruminate and hand wring over every damn thing that happens.
The other universe is real life--where the bigger picture is.
Bernie apologized in the bigger-picture universe. I think it's cool that he did it. This will be settled science in the newspapers and on television--and in the general sense. It's not that big of a deal.
But don't tell that to the faux outragemongers on the Interwebs! They'll continue to foam at the mouth and long after the majority has moved on. Frankly--I've heard the term "corporate whore" repeatedly from DUers of all stripes. It's manufactured controversy, because right now--there is no controversy. Remember, the Clinton campaign is in the "Destroy" phase of their oh-so brilliant, "Destroy, Defeat and Unify" grand plan.
People on DU and on other sites who continue with this faux outrage are doing this in a little online corner of the world. It doesn't matter.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)was it the words 'Democratic corporate whores' that are so offensive to you....
or the context/definition of what that phrase embodies?
it doesn't seem that it could possibly be both...
and if you think it was directed solely at Hillary, here again...words or definition?
if it's just the words, suggest something else that will suffice to portray the definition...
Autumn
(48,962 posts)pigs sprout wings. This is a non-issue, pumped up by Hillary supporters .
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)In every Google search.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... calling her "unqualified" was bad enough.
"Corporate democratic whore" should seal the deal.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)You'd think he called her the c-word from the reaction of some people.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)have mattered? Is there really a line at this point that people would not vigorously defend?
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)the season.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)vintx
(1,748 posts)Misogyny is one form of bigotry that most are still blind to. Most of us have a lot of growing to do on this issue.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... thanks for stepping up.
Mike Nelson
(10,943 posts)...does he disagree with the language or the label?
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)since I called it unacceptable yesterday.
However, has HRC ever apologized for applauding
the remark by M. Albright? I don't think so.
Threatening women, who may not vote for HRC,
with going to Hell is certainly a bigger insult to me.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... but, wow ...
... I don't see any equivalency with Albright's remark at all.
At worst, Albright's remark was dated and off key in our current political discourse.
But, it came from an old school feminist who has been through the gauntlet and fought the battles.
The "corporate Democratic whores" remark was just disgusting.
No comparison.
artislife
(9,497 posts)I want an apology from H for sending fracking around the globe, children dying because of bombs or regime change antics that she did to be tough as nails.
But that isn't gonna happen, isn't it?
Puglover
(16,380 posts)even more pathetic. If the "fake outrage" isn't fake.
Lordie.
artislife
(9,497 posts)and let you have a space for your melodrama.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)I was kidding. God I hope you know that.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Sometimes, I see red!
frylock
(34,825 posts)Someone upthread seems pretty upset that their college-aged kid was exposed to such foul language.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... aren't big on contrition.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Bernie Bros lol!
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)It was the truth. People who take money for favors are political corporate whores. It's your problem you associated it with Hillary. Nobody called her a whore. You guys just clutch your pearls and faint.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... and he had twice mentioned Hillary by name directly preceding spewing it.
No matter how you want to spin it, it can't be unsaid.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)I wouldn't have said it in a speech, but it's exactly correct and unobjectionable usage. It describes what they do.
But you did manage to make me waste my time, Mr. Not Actually Alinsky But Thinks He's Learned a Lesson About Word-Coding.
salinsky
(1,065 posts)... and you're correct.
"Corporate Democratic whores" is not very tactful.
And, when the two sentences preceding the term referred to Hillary directly by name, not very smart nor judicious.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)I'd rather say something injudicious than pursue pro-Wall Street policies in exchange for legal bribes dressed up as speech fees.
sus453
(164 posts)if the shoe fits . . .
Bernie as a candidate can't use such language, but face it, that's what she is, and we all know it.