2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIf "whore" is out as the metaphor for a politician who serves corporations, what's the 2nd choice?
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)It doesn't match the Manolos.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)not too sure if that'd work...
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Also not very accurate.
Nothing wrong with serving business as part of the job. It's a matter of priorities, perspective and why serve big ciorporations and industry lobbyists at the expense of the public interest
DrDan
(20,411 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)too long.
In one thread I read here corporatist was mentioned, but that is not really the same thing.
corporatist agenda of furthering the interests of well-connected corporations
Furthering corporate interests does not always means selling your ethics to do so.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)term
noun
noun: term; plural noun: terms
1. a word or phrase used to describe a thing or to express a concept, especially in a particular kind of language or branch of study.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)It's still too long. It's replacing a single word. (not counting corporate, as that has to be used anyway)
DrDan
(20,411 posts)"means" should be singular
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)typos happen
DrDan
(20,411 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)That's what I thought you were talking about. I can tell you are starting to get anal about this, so I'm signing off. I'm not into this kind of sub-thread.
Here, have a lollypop. Maybe this will improve your day.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)when they were perfectly accurate.
and then you call me "anal".
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I was just saying it was too long. But you really are getting anal now so you are going on ignore. And I thought I was anal retentive.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)who has completely sold themselves out.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)other citizens, I suggest identifying them by name. Smearing everyone you don't like with some perjorative label let's the real villains odd Scott free. They're chuckling in safety while your guns are emptied ineffectually at..."corporatists" and "shills" and"whores."
Try targeting people like Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, John Kasich, your own congressman IF appropriate. Scalia's permantly safe from you, but his legacy is not. He belonged in prison, but his "judicial philosophy" that channels power and wealth away from the people to a ruling class continues its evil, undemocratic function every day.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)see my post above.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I haven't laughed enough today!
Merryland
(1,134 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Shameful.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)for someone who takes money for acts that they don't want to talk about? I would like a nicer word to describe it.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)To type I am afraid. Quite accurate though!
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)and if you thought this your sick!!!!!!!!
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Can always count on her supporters to twist and misrepresent fucking everything and not contribute.
You know kind of like "When I win!" as opposed to "When we win!".
Shameful.
TM99
(8,352 posts)lie made up by Brock and company.
It is not actually the truth.
So keep your shame to yourself bud!
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)And if it is a lie that was made up, why did Bernie apologize? Camp Pinocchio caught in their own web.
TM99
(8,352 posts)You saw what you wanted to hear which was not what was said.
Sanders is an astute politician. When there is outrage, faux or real, he apologizes. Unlike your candidate and her surrogates who 'wish they could apologize' but do not.
The only web being spun here is by the Clinton machine liars.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)But carry on...I know you will.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)but really the whole thing has been well described
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)The 'Not Hillary' Party is Berning out.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)When used politically.
But you already knew that.
Carry on.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)But do enjoy the Poutrage of the Day.
Glad you've moved on from the pope.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)It's been used as non gender in the past, but one can't wait to associate it with Hillary because it's an easy way to promote faux outrage on behalf of the Queen.
Where's the effort or are you guy's just phoning it in anymore?
daleanime
(17,796 posts)Seasonal help?
Valet?
The Help?
Personal Assistance?
Henchmen/women?
Hey you?
The Badguy?
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Even Lord Dominator has SOME flavor of scruples. (Also, I find "culero" works.)
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Funtatlaguy
(10,870 posts)Or
Evening working person.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)But it appears that corporate whore gets under the skin of people I hold in contempt, so I am going to switch to that.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)"Dr. Song's comment was inappropriate and insensitive." Bernie Sanders
Ask Bernie Sanders.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)inappropriate and insensitive,maybe,but not false.
Autumn
(45,054 posts)Dr. Song's comment was 100% truth.
longship
(40,416 posts)Not sexist. However, it is true.
Just look at her donor list.
Citizens United is my number one issue in this election. There is only candidate who has the right position. That's Bernie Sanders. Hillary HAS sold her soul.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)You'll find all kinds of words in there you've used in the past.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)But you can pretty much count on EVERYTHING in your journal.
You sound exactly like my Republican stepfather who gifted me with PTSD, except you support Hillary.
So no, done with that mentality.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)If my threads are oh-so-offensive, you'd have posted at least one.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)This is a great hide.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1406605
Bernie's a whiney little girl? Yea my Republican stepfather was classic at that one.
Oh BTW Here is some great *whining*
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/clinton-lashes-out-i-am-so-sick-the-sanders-campaign-lying
another
(9 posts)elana i am
(814 posts)DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)Corporate sellouts hurt all of us, not just themselves.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Real-life whores are just making a living.
Corporate whores - persons who sell morally dubious services to corporations - are screwing everyone.
demwing
(16,916 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)Your vocabulary is so limited you have to struggle to find non-sexist terns.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)that we still cannot use!
Old Codger
(4,205 posts)A person of questionable terpitude
PaulaFarrell
(1,236 posts)Karmadillo
(9,253 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... over and over and over.
There are no other terms to use.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)i still prefer 'corporate whores' to refer to corporate whores...
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Xyzse
(8,217 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 14, 2016, 12:53 PM - Edit history (1)
Whore = Person who sells their virtue.
Corporate Whore = Provides Specificity, it is the type. Lessens the catch-all phrase, and is more appropriate.
Much like, a corporate whore is a whore, while not all whores are corporate whores.
There are varying degrees.
Like, a kitten is a cat, while not all cats are kittens.
Stating that, I am not fond of the term, and I hope the guy does apologize for using that term.
Even if I am not ok with this, there really is a difference between those two negatives. It does not excuse his usage, but please get the term right.
On Edit -
I see that he apologized:
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)MineralMan
(146,286 posts)"Whore," on the other hand, is a very poor choice, indeed, especially when applied to a woman who is running. Very bad choice of words, I think.
But, what's said is said.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Still not quite apt.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)how about "SECs Workers"?
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Sounds classier, too.
zazen
(2,978 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)One-eyed Charlie kinda works but the relationship isn't quite accurate in description because we aren't supposed know we are sold out and are supposed look up to them.
Overseer? Doesn't benefit quite enough.
I guess pimp pretty well captures it. Selling our asses not their's for the filthy lucre.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)ALCON,
Your concern has been noted, now shut the fuck up.
~ZV
ContinentalOp
(5,356 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)yodermon
(6,143 posts)not hard.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Sometimes you can see the strings.
Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)works.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Proxy?
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)arikara
(5,562 posts)brownnoser
ass-kisser
backscratcher
bootlicker
flunky
kowtower
lackey
hack
courtesan
grifter
floozy
shill
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)blood-suckers, vampires, plunderers and profiteers
I think profiteers as an insult may be too unfair to members of our party committed to political capitalism and it's social asymmetries.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)speaktruthtopower
(800 posts)4ricksren
(72 posts)w4rma
(31,700 posts)gordyfl
(598 posts)"Hey big spender, spend a little time with me."
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Towlie
(5,324 posts)It's the automatic association of "whore" with women that's misogynistic, not the association of "whore" with one who sacrifices one's principles for money.
Umbral18
(105 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)"Whore" is not a word that should be used to attack any women candidates, even if "corporate whore" is part of the political lexicon.