2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhat happened to the uplifting Bernie?
I have to admit that I have never ever felt the Berne, not even a little. But I could always kinda sorta see, if I squinted, why people I respect and admire are drawn to him. I remember a friend of mine signing up for Bernie because he appreciated Bernie's honesty and integrity and the way Bernie spoke truth to power, as my friend put it.
But gosh the guy on the stage tonight didn't seem much like that Bernie. The guy on stage tonight was scowling, angry, hectoring, defensive, full of snark and sarcasm, not one moment of grace toward his opponent. It was the kind of guy you run away from, not the kind of guy you embrace.
I found myself asking what exactly is it that the young, especially, see in this guy. Doesn't seem particularly joyful, hip, cool, light-hearted or anything. Doesn't even seem to be having very much fun.
Maybe the Berne is burning out.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)aikoaiko
(34,214 posts)Its not surprising that you don't understand why the young prefer Bernie to HRC.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)I mean if this was your first serious look at Bernie, would he have won you over? I kinda doubt that this Bernie would win the hearts and minds of many.
aikoaiko
(34,214 posts)Bernie presents a compelling alternative to Clinton style politics.
Its the same Bernie. He's always been outspoken and sometimes gruff.
apcalc
(4,528 posts)Unknowledgeable, and as usual , rudely finger wagging. Intolerable.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)kennetha
(3,666 posts)It was a post about how different Bernie seemed tonight from the early Bernie.
Beacool
(30,518 posts)kennetha
(3,666 posts)I mean you gotta give credit where credit is due.
But he seems much harsher and angrier and it seems like all of his joy is gone.
Beacool
(30,518 posts)I still think that Hillary will win NY. I lost any interest in him when he called the most qualified person to run for office in many years, "unqualified". From now on, I have zero interest in what he has to say on anything.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)kennetha
(3,666 posts)You may not think they are adequate. But the are concrete, detail, with clear goals.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)listen to her the more i like her.
she went into detail tonight about flying all night to try and get a cease fire between israel and gaza.
howard fineman said with hillary you already half 1/2 the solution to problems. i wish i had the exact quote.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)Bernie has them on his website.
Where is Hillary's comprehensive plan to bring Wall Street, NRA, the arms dealers, hedge fund managers and the fracking industry to heel?
How is Hillary going to inplemement 15 dollar minimum wage across the board, give affordable eduaction and healthare for all?
iAZZZo
(358 posts)[/br]
he was overwhelmed by hillary's enthusiastic support, as so many of us have been

LAS14
(15,506 posts)... of places where barriers need to be broken down. I don't recall "agism." I think she should add that. Including these photos with your sarcastic comment is agism. Not "pure" agism, as I was starting to say, because this is on top of sexism. Your attitude is disgusting.
I'm with her because she's concerned for the whole country. Not just the noisy, purist idealogues.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)That one is on Hillary's supporters. They simultaneously calls Bernie too old and his supports took young in a negative manner. That is the definition of agism.
brush
(61,033 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)Bernie is still probably running too positive a campaign. I mean he never mentioned Clinton Foundation pay to play. That's some serious low hanging fruit if you're going to go negative against Hillary.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)and he isn't very adept at it. just crude innuendo.
Unless he wants to go full bore Rovean.
jfern
(5,204 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)sooner or later we will find out the truth.
senz
(11,945 posts)She cuts and destroys because she has no ethical boundaries; he cannot fight on that level and shouldn't even try.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)to me that signaled he will never has as much leverage as he does now- that he may not get another debate, so he was all in trying to get her to adopt his (vague method of implementing) policies word for word. That was weird.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)And on a more serious note, he knows just how bad that editorial interview was. They've tried really hard to avoid talking about the details of his plans, and they just couldn't get past the NY'ers. The television media has been feeding the horserace, the print media has an entirely different set of concerns.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)When Walter Mondale KNEW that he was going to get creamed by Reagan, he went out and campaign like a relentless happy warrior to the end. I read an interview with him afterward about that. He said he owed it to himself, his party, his supporters to campaign on, not in an angry and bitter tone of an already defeated man, but in an uplifting tone that would give his supporters hope and belief.
Do you think Bernie will display the kind of Grace in defeat that Hillary did in 2008?
jfern
(5,204 posts)"John McCain has a lifetime of experience that he'd bring to the White House. And Sen. Obama has a speech he gave in 2002." - Hillary in 2008
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)but when she said that i posted "that f------g b--ch".
i supported obama in '08.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Mondale is a true blue Democrat.
Sadly, no. And, more's the pity. He's out for himself and HIS REVOLUTION(TM), and if he can't have it, screw everybody else.
Worst brand of political opportunist.
apcalc
(4,528 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)kennetha
(3,666 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(27,461 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I'm glad to see others give this thread the exact amount of respect it deserves.
shadowandblossom
(718 posts)Alot. They were very kind to him and didn't vet him for a long time.
I looked at his Wyoming rally, one person there was fanatically in love with Sanders, a true believer. Others in between, more like doing the thing they felt like they were supposed to like. A lot of people right behind him just looked uninspired. Same thing in a vid I saw from one of his New York speeches. There was a young guy sitting there yawning. The older people looked bored. It wasn't a flattering look. I hope it berns out. I find it to be an exclusive and ugly "movement" at this point.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)yes, and they ply the youngsters with dangerous marijuanas and rock and roll music!
N92LB
(3 posts)The media was certainly not kind but rather mocking dismissive and even belligerent to sanders and his supporters aren't enthusiastic nearly so much for bernie (which they profoundly are) as they are for the ideas and principles which he is promoting. Contrastly Hillary Clinton in the minds of many epitomizes everything wrong with the state of American democracy. As a candidate she will face difficulty garnering the enthusiasm of an increasingly struggling working class which knows that she as president will likely continue to tow the corporate line and at best provide them with only marginal support in return. She is a weak candidate and her failings in the state department, as a senator, as a first lady, and as a board member to Wal-Mart should DISQUALIFY her from the highest executive office in this country.
shadowandblossom
(718 posts)To be clear, I don't think the people who are phone logging, and going door to door, or who really just have a passion for it are anything but 100% sincere in their interest. Many people who go to the rallies and just like the man, are also, of course, in earnest. But there is an environment with younger people right now where there is so much peer pressure that I've heard many stories of young Clinton supporters who actually fake feeling the bern just to avoid criticism from their peers. Other people, less committed either way, are obviously going to join a wave that strong. Just my two cents.
As for the Walmart comments. Personally, I find that idea dumb. Mind that I'm saying that about the idea and not you. I don't know you, nor have any problem with you.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)and a standing ovation at the end of it.
Sounds pretty uplifting to me.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)He's always been the "complaining Bernie", the "scolding Bernie", the "snarky Bernie", the "defensive Bernie".
He was just able to hide it better early on. Given his temper, it was just a matter of time before "uplifting Bernie" would crack, and show his true colours.
reddread
(6,896 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)That's what. He wants the truth; she wants the spin and equivocation.
Here she is now:
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Perhaps, just perhaps, the reverse is actually far more true?
Perhaps, just perhaps, Sanders has not appreciated all the one way dirty tricks the Clinton campaign, her DNC cronies, and all her corporate media friends keep unleashing on him?
.99center
(1,237 posts)Not as shallow as you thought? Maybe younger folks aren't using the tried and true method of are they cool, funny, and attractive enough to want to have a beer with to select their president.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)#feelthebern
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Then, there's that authenticity thing...
Broward
(1,976 posts)Vinca
(53,994 posts)Nothing . . . NOTHING . . . is going to get between Hillary and her place in the history books.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]
Vinca
(53,994 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)in a plane, I believe?
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Instead of butting in and talking over the opponent, good manners in a debate is to signal to the moderator you want to speak.
Otherwise he and Clinton are about tied in the actual finger wagging department.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)If you bother looking you can tell he is biting his tongue waiting for her to finish -- rather than rudely jumping in -- but making that signal to make sure the moderator knows he wants time to respond.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Response to seabeyond (Reply #62)
Vilis Veritas This message was self-deleted by its author.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Response to seabeyond (Reply #103)
Vilis Veritas This message was self-deleted by its author.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Response to seabeyond (Reply #115)
Vilis Veritas This message was self-deleted by its author.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Response to seabeyond (Reply #117)
Vilis Veritas This message was self-deleted by its author.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)And then tell us how he had no sexual relations with that woman.
LAS14
(15,506 posts)... your opponent is finished (like Hillary did) and then take your turn. He behaves like a kindergartener.... and in that way hasn't changed since the start of the debates.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Yeah I wish Bernie's personality was a little "sunnier" and lighter. And he was a little bit faster on his feet in a debate.
But on a more important level, he's real, he's got character...and people trust him. And who has a larger understanding of both what is wrong with our system and what is needed to fix it.
Trust and character translate on a larger sense to what they would actually do in office. Bernie proved in Burlington that he knows how to get things done pragmatically.
Gothmog
(179,868 posts)You can tell that he knows that he is losing and losing badly
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)He has a long career showing just that. Then you put he and Weaver together and it just gets ramped up.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Keep reelecting him by wide margins and over 80 percent voted for him in the Dem primary.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Bernie gets his share of grief for his ideological passion, and the grimpy side of his personality. He's had to do his share of fighting there.
But over time, people love the guy because they know he's the real deal, and he's been a good legislator. And before that a great mayor. And he's inspiring and likable if you take him for what he is.
The extent to which he went from unknown to a contender nationally, indicated that people respond to him outside of "Vermont"
My point is that altjhuuogh he may not be to your personal taste, "Those things" are not as negative as Clinton supporters paint them out to be.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Though I think I can make a very good argument that it is the reason he has limited clout with his colleagues after his very long political career.
I think Clinton has a similar yet different problem when it comes to personality. She rubs many the wrong way yet has unheard of clout and respect from most of her colleagues.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)II do have a certain respect for your opinions, which is why I responded.
Do I wish Bernie were a little more like Obama in terms of people skills? Sure.
But one of the biog reasons he doesn't have more political clout with colleagues is because he stands for values and principles that have been abandoned in the corrupt slime pit of contemporary politics. Going against the grain of the club is not going to make anyone popular.
senz
(11,945 posts)Hillary went very dirty about a week ago, and I think her ugliness shocked and disgusted Bernie, so it's harder for him to joke with her as much as he used to, although he did do a bit of it last night.
She, of course, never jokes with him, but she does smirk a lot, and I suppose that looks like a smile to those who cannot see.
randome
(34,845 posts)That's the kind of naive hero worship that ensures you are part of a losing campaign. If you aren't willing to see things for how they truly are, you will never 'win'.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]
senz
(11,945 posts)Cause and effect, easy to see.
If you saw things "as they are," and if you have a working conscience, you could not possibly support your candidate, so to be generous I'll assume you can't see things for how they are.
randome
(34,845 posts)That's a recognition of how things are, too: an Independent crashing another political party while trash-talking it and who is vying with Ted Cruz for the least number of Congressional endorsements.
Sanders has no connections or infrastructure to bring about the changes he wants. Clinton does. That's just how things are.
I don't even particularly like Clinton, but there she is and we'd be advised to make the most of it instead of giving up.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]
senz
(11,945 posts)The only way she got establishment support is through marriage to an ex-president, tremendous wealth, and a well-known and much-feared enemies list. Not through a single worthwhile quality of her own.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Cry wolf much?
kennetha
(3,666 posts)about a serious and accomplished woman like Hilary Clinton.
The only way she got establishment support is through marriage to an ex-president.... not through a single worthwhile quality of her own.
senz
(11,945 posts)The only way she got her carpetbagged senate seat and huge political standing was through a very famous name. She had nothing previously to earn it. She hadn't held previous office and didn't even live in New York.
Contrast Bernie: he worked hard and won every single office as an outsider and an unknown.
Big difference.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)It's disgustingly and patently sexist.
senz
(11,945 posts)And now you are trying to smear ME the same way you smear Bernie.
Finally seeing you clearly, kennetha.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Plus, he plays fair and honest.
Your candidate can't even compare on that level.
COLGATE4
(14,886 posts)naming two Post Offices were right on. Now THAT's a solid record.
senz
(11,945 posts)COLGATE4
(14,886 posts)Bernie authored and passed was naming two post offices. Otherwise, nothing but amendments. Not exactly a stellar record of achievement for being in the Senate as long as he has.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Clear and paid for?
How often in his speeches does he mention that states are going to have to raise taxes to fund 30% of his college plan, if they even want to go along with it?
There's nothing 'fair' or 'honest' about jumping to conclusions and calling someone a tool of big business and "unqualified", when you can't name a single example, and you can't fact check what someone actually said.
senz
(11,945 posts)He spelled out the financing of his proposals months ago.
https://berniesanders.com/issues/how-bernie-pays-for-his-proposals/
Bernie does his homework.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)It's an ingenious plan. Why aren't you aware of it?
When he says "free" he is talking about free for the student -- at a public college.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Clinton epitomizes the worst of the Democratic Party, and will continue to push it to irrelevance. I don't say that lightly....It's the results of decades of seeing them in action.
If she is the nominee the Democratic Party will probably go back into its nice comfy cocoon of non-issues. The only issues will be the low hanging fruit and plain vanilla platitudes. Politics will revert to the same old empty "Our team good, their team bad" gridlock we've had for decades. Clinton will get nothing of substance done.
The public will go back to the legitimate cynicism and detachment from politics and the fatalism of "You can't fight City Hall."
Meanwhile, behind the scenes the well-heeled pigs and the lobbyists and immoral corporations will continue to do their destructive work of dismantling the middle class and democracy, while the D and R teams will spat over what color the ball is.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)This is golden and unique opportunity. Democrats haven't controlled the presidency for 3 successive terms in my lifetime. And I'm no longer young. The last time that happened was during the FDR-Truman years. We cannot waste this opportunity.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I love a lot about him, though I wish he'd break free of the establishment more. I agree with Obama with a lot in principle.
I just don't see that with Clinton.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)He's much younger and was basically brand new to DC. This could be his run right now, following her. But that did not seem prudent to him. He ran hard to defeat her and he did so.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)They kissed and made up, and she served him well for four years. They clearly have a mutual admiration society and a deep bond.
randome
(34,845 posts)Our chances of retaking the Senate improve each day the GOP self-destructs a little more. It's going to be a new ballgame after this election, I really think that.
But since Clinton is clearly favored to win, we'd best get to work on her now, not complain and give up.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Regardless of whether the Dems, GOP or both are in power, I remember all the variations of "keep our powder dry" and complaints of the GOP power through filibusters and procedural moves....or worse yet the "American people are not ready for anything this liberal" cop outs.
Meanwhile the GOP were as relentless as wolverines, whether in power or not.
I would hope things will change from that stale gridlock.....but listening to Clinton, and seeing how the Dem elites have circled the wagons around her against that upstart populist Sanders and those awful Bernie-bros to deflect fro mthe core issues doesn't give me a lot of hope.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:47 AM - Edit history (1)
and Bernie is realizing he doesn't have enough of them. Desperation makes you do funny things.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)LAS14
(15,506 posts)It did feel like Bernie had changed his behavior more than Hillary.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)in Clinton was a person who avoided the questions of Social Security, transcripts, lied about Senator Sanders several times and constantly interrupted and screamed as they kept telling her that her time was up over and over.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)Bernie? Precise and Bernie don't occupy the same universe!
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)...on the advice of his handlers.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)jane123
(34 posts)He's just getting tired of Secretary Clinton not taking responsibility for her bad votes and bad decision and instead she tries to somehow with her long wondering answers to spin gold webs around her bad judgement and decisions. I imagine he is also tired of being lied about and mischaracterized. She clearly had a bad night last night because she is not used to being pressed for answers and not being outsmarted on the debate stage...and last night she clearly was for all the world to see.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)See how that works.
kgnu_fan
(3,021 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)I for one appreciate this update. Please let me know when nothing changes.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)No wonder she doesn't want to debate. The more she speaks, the more she turns people off.
JudyM
(29,785 posts)policy, and on and on. Corporations are essentially the employers of our politicians, because they fund them and set the agenda. There is abundant, hard, factual evidence of this in every arena. Can you see it on the republican side with the denial of climate change? It is essentially the same on the democratic side, although not as bad.
Executive branch policy and congressional legislation favor (or at least overweight) donors' interests. This is why Dems have been outraged by Citizens United, because it legalized massive corporate donations to politicians as "free speech." Yet Hillary is now essentially standing on the side of the conservative republicans' position in Citizens United.
rock
(13,218 posts)If your pants are on fire.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)They're tired of lies and the philosophy of incrementalism while income inequality keeps growing.
timlot
(456 posts)Bernie is like that rich uncle. Going to pay your college, your healthcare, your food. You look at him as the cool dad you wish you had.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)uplifting and it is dishonest in a very basic way to present yourself that way. Your posts are here for all to see, many OP's slamming Bernie Sanders. You don't even seem to like Hillary much, it's all about characterizing Bernie in a relentlessly negative light. I don't trust your posts because they have the feel of preset bias.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)And think that she will be a terrific president. I was passionately for her in 2008 and am even more passionately for her now.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)