2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumsoutherncrone
(5,510 posts)Never forget: She was a Republican before she claimed to be a Democrat.
msongs
(73,753 posts)southerncrone
(5,510 posts)than words.
blue neen
(12,465 posts)It's a fair enough question. Actions such as not financially supporting down ticket candidates do indeed speak louder than words.
southerncrone
(5,510 posts)candidates than w/money. THIS is one of the main problems in our politics today--too much emphasis on MONEY! Money over people. It really is a sad state of affairs. If you haven't noticed, this is his view of the situation.
The 2-party system creates the polarization of our populous, perhaps that is why he didn't join. I don't know, & would never presume to speak for him on that question. He has supported Democratic candidates over the years. Doubt he supported any Republicans, for instance, Goldwater. Why did Hillary support him? It's a fair question.
blue neen
(12,465 posts)Bernie, however, will have no chance to get any of his ideas and ambitions on board without Democrats in the Senate and House. And, to get Democrats in the Senate and House will require spending money.
If it is his "view of the situation", then why does Bernie spend so much time telling us all how much money he has raised? Record numbers! So, why not help get other Democrat elected as well. The Koch Brothers will be spending millions upon millions against our Democratic candidates. Bernie either wants to help get a lot of other Democrats elected or he doesn't.
I don't know much about 1964 politics. Apparently, neither Bernie or Hillary were Democrats at that time. In fact, in 1976 Bernie ran against the Democratic candidate for Senate, Pat Leahy.
Really sleepy, so if you reply, I'm not ignoring you---just going to bed.
AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)that the Democratic Party has been infested with corporate Horton Hears a Who
.99center
(1,237 posts)Patriot act, welfare reform, wall street bail out, LGBT rights , Civil Rights Act. He's always been to the left of the Democratic Party and on the right side of progress. How about those with a D in front of their name voting against LGBT rights, should he support them financially? Maybe he should've joined the party while it was divided on Civil Rights, while he was being arrested for fighting for Civil Rights. Luckily for the party Bernie hasn't dug into the fact that he's been fighting the right wing from both parties all of his life.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)Nothing personal, but I claimed independent status for decades. I still voted Dem, but publicly identifying as a "Clinton Democrat" was cringe worthy embarrassing back in the 90s because of their constant "gate" crap. Obama finally brought me over formally but it isn't just his policies - I am not embarrassed by him and know NOTHING about his penis.
If Hillary gets the nod, I will switch back to Independent.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)But this year he wants to focus on his election since they are giving him no support AND he has started to support specific candidates this year rather than give to the party. And do you blame him? All they have done to him this year is try to bury him.
Learn something before simply parroting talking points.
merrily
(45,251 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)that it has been a factor esp. since Bill Clinton's term as POTUS, which established and entrenched 3rd-way/DLC ideology in all the highest places.
They don't admit to history, which is that 3rd-way/DLC operatives intended to completely reorient the Dem party, to make it identical to Republican orthodoxy w.r.t. economic and foreign policy, while retaining a nominal credibility as defenders of "liberal" social justice concerns, esp. on abortion and a woman's right to choose. They don't admit to the historical record of Bill and Hillary Clinton's political work, they don't take responsibility for the consequences, esp. for all the dead and imprisoned, the impoverished and disenfranchised.
That just isn't their concern.
Arneoker
(375 posts)A devotee of an ideology that required you to say even dumber things?
FarPoint
(14,765 posts)Bernie has only claimed to be a Democratic for 10 months ...Elizabeth Warren was a Republican in the 90's.. I think Hillary was still a Virgin when she explored the republican party before identifying herself as a Democrat.
jfern
(5,204 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... only one of them IS a Democrat, that sort of leaves Bernie out of the running for that role, doesn't it?
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)I am sure I witnessed someone to the right of Rockefeller republicans last night.
apcalc
(4,528 posts)She was a Republican in early college, about 45 years ago, realized that party didn't
"Fit" and became a Democrat.
And Sanders? Please.... He is not now and never was a Democrat. He loathes the Democratic party.....
" It would be hypoctitical of me to run as a Democrat because of the things I have said about that party" Bernie Sanders, Socialist Scholars Conference, New York City, April 1990
merrily
(45,251 posts)If Sanders loathes the Democratic Party, why has he been caucusing with Democrats since he first got to the House? Why has he campaigned for Democrats--and they for him? Why did the head of the DSCC and the head of the DNC call him an asset and refused to support any Democrat against him? Why has he been the nominee of the the Vermont Democratic Party more than once?
He did not belong to the Party until recently because he did not want to be beholden to its big donors and he is not a fan of Third Way. Neither am I. That doesn't mean I am not a Democrat.
Who, in your book, is a Democrat holding office today?
djean111
(14,255 posts)This is a tired old meme, fails miserably - and ya know what? if Hillary personifies the Democratic Party - Third Way, hawk - then I am thinking the Democratic party may have oozed to far to the right for me. A Democratic candidate who is FOR war, the TPP, fracking, Wall Street dominance, cluster bombs - this is not what MY vision of the Democratic Party is or was. Ugh. Shameful, really.
ReRe
(12,189 posts)N92LB
(3 posts)Bernie is an independent by nature. Unfortunately the ruling class have successfully hobbled any significant political action let alone presidential campaign that is not supported by the two party system. That said Hillary's rhetoric and her campaign has greatly resembled some the most disgusting aspects of republicans and neo-conservative politics at large.
amborin
(16,631 posts)LetThemEatCake
(9 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Raine
(31,177 posts)Lone_Wolf
(1,603 posts)Is there any questions she's a Republican? She's all for Big Business, anti-labor, for military interventions, in fossil fuels back pocket, police militarization and for the prison industry, and so on.
jfern
(5,204 posts)And she has mentioned she'd be open to more abortion restrictions, called it the "unborn child" and said anti abortion people can be feminists, so she's not perfect there either.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts).
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Pro-free trade, Pro-War for Profit, Pro-BigOil as shown while SoS.
Pro-BigFinance, as shown by....who pays million$ for speeches on nothingness to a person who wants to regulate them or tax them?
Could go on, but meh, those four are enough. DINO = republican
bvf
(6,604 posts)the capital D is all that matters. Thinking (lack of it, really) like this is what has enabled the party to become pulled so far to the right that Reagan would now be right at home in it.
The ignorant simply look for the shiny sticker to tell them who to vote for. It beats thinking, and if this is how a nation's citizenry is inclined to choose its leaders, it gets what it deserves: More war dead, more income inequality, a crumbling national infrastructure, an increasingly privately operated prison system, jammed with weed smokers and obscenely disproportionate numbers of minorities, etc., etc.
See that "D"? That means it's OK.
The Republican establishment would welcome a Clinton presidency with open arms. Believe it.
Zira
(1,054 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Must be a Republican.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Getting their hands on Social Security is the mother lode. They want privatization bad.