2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton doesn't believe in a moral economy.
She believes in a greed based economy where billionaires build up huge piles of money by exploiting workers and natural resources for their own private profit, without regard for the consequences.
Pretty big differences between the world view of the two candidates.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)"the love of money is the root of all evil"
msongs
(67,395 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)I doubt it.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)Like many on here that like the closed elections and the 6 month voter block out for new members. The other things you mentioned are just a bonus.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)and it is the slow road to destruction
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)But as you can see from this computer model of her economic, environmental, and diplomatic policies it speeds up quickly...
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)and the storms are on the way
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I'm not splitting hairs.
She represents the form of thinking that charity and good corporate works to help the underprivileged are good.
But she has lost sight of the fact that a truly moral economy works to make things like charity less needed, and to reduce the number of underprivileged through a systemically moral economic structure and value system in which the wealthy and corporations have less of a proportion of the overall wealth and power.
senz
(11,945 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)is that it gives private charities unilateral power over people. Private power is unelected and unaccountable. The recipients have no say in the matter.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)The problem with making people reliant on private industry is that it gives private industry unilateral power over people.
senz
(11,945 posts)Some things -- like highways, water and sewage systems, fire departments, parks and beaches, elementary and secondary education -- really should be publicly owned. But of course there's nothing wrong with small businesses, retail shops, manufacturing, etc. However, monopolies hold too much power.
Just thinking out loud here. I truly believe we are capable of finding a good, workable balance and that too much ideology in any direction is not good in economic planning.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Bernie gets it:
That much concentrated power is a threat to our economy and a threat to democracy.
senz
(11,945 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)her and sabotage the vote by staying home
Avalon Sparks
(2,565 posts)She's a member of the club.
She didn't even have to run a transnational Corp or be born into it.
Just sing for her supper a little and maintain a marriage of both spouses having political power t alternate times. Kaching, more speaking fees.
Wonder how much they'll add to their personal checking account if she gets Pontus and Bill goes on another speaking tour?
Corruption!
senz
(11,945 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)based on all the ridicule about Bernie's trip to the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.
pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Anyone wanna volunteer to explain "moral" to her?
Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)Thanks for the thread, Cheese Sandwich.