Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 03:06 PM Apr 2016

Hillary Clinton doesn't believe in a moral economy.


She believes in a greed based economy where billionaires build up huge piles of money by exploiting workers and natural resources for their own private profit, without regard for the consequences.

Pretty big differences between the world view of the two candidates.
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton doesn't believe in a moral economy. (Original Post) Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 OP
and we all know this... grasswire Apr 2016 #1
bernie is running as a democrat because "that's where the money is" lol nt msongs Apr 2016 #2
Would rather see him running as an independent? Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #4
Hillary has a love of all people not money: She would be a GOP if she was greedy lewebley3 Apr 2016 #12
LOLOLOLOLOLOL nt grasswire Apr 2016 #16
LOLOLOLOLOLOL azmom Apr 2016 #26
She believes in the system. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #3
THIS SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #10
It starts slow. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #11
yes - a house of cards is a better description SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #13
I think she believes in it -- I do think she has lost sight of what it means Armstead Apr 2016 #5
I think she believes in appearances. senz Apr 2016 #7
That too Armstead Apr 2016 #8
The problem with making poor people reliant on private charity senz Apr 2016 #14
Yes! Replace the word 'charity' with 'industry' and your comment is still true Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #15
Yes, if we're talking actual reliance. senz Apr 2016 #17
That's why we need to break up the big banks - at the very least -and hold them socially accountable Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #18
Yes, total agreement on both counts. senz Apr 2016 #20
it's like her view of progressivism--she embodies it, the critics only help the RW chorus assailing MisterP Apr 2016 #25
Of course she does Avalon Sparks Apr 2016 #6
Well senz Apr 2016 #9
^this Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #22
Evidently her supporters don't, lagomorph777 Apr 2016 #19
No, she does not, we don't either because we haven't done our research....n/t pantsonfire Apr 2016 #21
her religion, The Family, says: Only the Elites Matter and Will Achieve Dominion .... amborin Apr 2016 #23
She might. winter is coming Apr 2016 #24
I agree. Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #27
 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
3. She believes in the system.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 03:10 PM
Apr 2016

Like many on here that like the closed elections and the 6 month voter block out for new members. The other things you mentioned are just a bonus.

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
11. It starts slow.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 03:32 PM
Apr 2016

But as you can see from this computer model of her economic, environmental, and diplomatic policies it speeds up quickly...


 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
5. I think she believes in it -- I do think she has lost sight of what it means
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 03:14 PM
Apr 2016

I'm not splitting hairs.

She represents the form of thinking that charity and good corporate works to help the underprivileged are good.

But she has lost sight of the fact that a truly moral economy works to make things like charity less needed, and to reduce the number of underprivileged through a systemically moral economic structure and value system in which the wealthy and corporations have less of a proportion of the overall wealth and power.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
14. The problem with making poor people reliant on private charity
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 03:37 PM
Apr 2016

is that it gives private charities unilateral power over people. Private power is unelected and unaccountable. The recipients have no say in the matter.




 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
15. Yes! Replace the word 'charity' with 'industry' and your comment is still true
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 03:52 PM
Apr 2016

The problem with making people reliant on private industry is that it gives private industry unilateral power over people.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
17. Yes, if we're talking actual reliance.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 04:13 PM
Apr 2016

Some things -- like highways, water and sewage systems, fire departments, parks and beaches, elementary and secondary education -- really should be publicly owned. But of course there's nothing wrong with small businesses, retail shops, manufacturing, etc. However, monopolies hold too much power.

Just thinking out loud here. I truly believe we are capable of finding a good, workable balance and that too much ideology in any direction is not good in economic planning.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
18. That's why we need to break up the big banks - at the very least -and hold them socially accountable
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 04:33 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie gets it:
The six largest financial institutions in this country today hold assets equal to about 60% of the nation’s gross domestic product. These six banks issue more than two-thirds of all credit cards and over 35% of all mortgages. They control 95% of all derivatives and hold more than 40% of all bank deposits in the United States.
link

That much concentrated power is a threat to our economy and a threat to democracy.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
25. it's like her view of progressivism--she embodies it, the critics only help the RW chorus assailing
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 11:48 PM
Apr 2016

her and sabotage the vote by staying home

Avalon Sparks

(2,565 posts)
6. Of course she does
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 03:19 PM
Apr 2016

She's a member of the club.

She didn't even have to run a transnational Corp or be born into it.

Just sing for her supper a little and maintain a marriage of both spouses having political power t alternate times. Kaching, more speaking fees.

Wonder how much they'll add to their personal checking account if she gets Pontus and Bill goes on another speaking tour?

Corruption!

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
19. Evidently her supporters don't,
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 04:35 PM
Apr 2016

based on all the ridicule about Bernie's trip to the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton doesn't b...