2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThings GET MESSY When Hillary Clinton Is Asked The DREADED TRANSCRIPTS Question
Segami
(14,923 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)if they ever see the light of day - messy
pangaia
(24,324 posts)She is absolutely insufferabnlelebabble..
840high
(17,196 posts)uponit7771
(93,532 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)They hate a lot of stuff. As a Bernie supportet, I don't hate her at all. I only met her once and was not impressed.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)in ten seconds, release them
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)That's the problem lol!
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)1. OK, so we have established that the transcripts exist.
2. We have established that all other contenders on the Democratic side have released all of the documents she required.
3. Thus we have established that the rest of the democratic party is behind the idea of transparency.
4. The set, "Those who have not released transcripts to paid political events" = (HRC) U (Republicans)
5. Republicans do not embrace transparency; they embrace play for pay
6. HRC could release the transcript is she believed it was important.
7. HRC enacts a "pay for play" argument for avoiding a democratic value of transparency.
What party is she from again?
It's very confusing.
unc70
(6,501 posts)I don't think any of the Repubs have any transcripts lurking around either -- apparently they and Bernie have already released anything relevant.
Looks like it's Clinton's turn to release those transcripts.
DJ13
(23,671 posts).....while NEVER answering the questions directly.
Then as soon as Bernie started responding to a question CNN would let Hillary interrupt and off she would go again.
I bet she had three times as much air time as Bernie last night.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)krawhitham
(5,072 posts)If she beats Bernie it will just be Her and Trump
Do you really think Trump has any Wall Street speeches to release, and if he does he will not have any issues releasing them