2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAt last - a major media outlet gets beyond the Sanders PR.
This was a headline in Google News. It's Google News that's the "major" outlet, not Quartz.... whatever that is.
http://qz.com/663579/the-pope-met-with-bernie-sanders-out-of-politeness-and-good-manners-he-says/
Again, to Bernie supporters that ask what problem I have with Sanders' "meeting" the Pope. The problem I have is the spin. The implication that there was more of a connection between the two than there is. It is a spin designed to appeal to Catholics in this country. New York Catholics first and foremost at this point.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Oh, and Bernie says "Send $27!"
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)The Pope, and probably God, too, would sure like to see Bernie elevated into his proper place as POTUS.
The press from this event was basically free and the same amount of press, if bought, the price would have been ten times as much. So Bernie comes out ahead all the way around.
The international exposure was ten times the pittance the campaign laid out for the flight, etc. Now people the world over have heard of Bernie, some for the first time, and once he is in office the reputation endowed by the Pope, and probably God, too, will ensure the people respect him as Bernie makes world peace and begins to limit income disparities.
The Pope, and probably God, too, appreciate your concerns.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)
God told me to post this.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)shows all you got
lol so sad
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Good to see you beginning to understand. We kinda doubt some here have the sense to get with the program so whenever we see someone getting a glimpse of the realities we embrace them. Good dawg!
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)This is what we need!
An appreciation for the absurdity!
You a find a way to get Bernie elected - I'll vote for him!
Even with his satanic papist ties.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Hillary 9,350,572.
Bernie 6,946,913.
Hillary +2,403,659.
Best Democrat? You got some work to do.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/democratic_vote_count.html
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Do not join us. Please don't bring the support for wars and the continued same old politics into the revolution. We don't need it.
Just vote for Bernie in the GE, and that will be all, dawg.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)Do you still think black folks in the south have slave/master mindset?
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)a mere 13% voted in SC. And yes, since SC just did take down the confederate battle flag from the capitol, it is evident there exists in that state a longing for the old days and old ways.
RandySF
(84,283 posts)LAS14
(15,506 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)starting to filter out.
By the next news cycle, the truth will be known. That incontrovertible video clip of Pope Francis on the plane, explaining exactly how the "meeting" took place, will be on all the news shows tomorrow.
Cha
(319,076 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)realmirage
(2,117 posts)I'm sure you will also find that funny
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Math that.
Maru Kitteh
(31,759 posts)bummer; I know.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Hey, but she might manage to cheat her into the nomination. Ya got that, amirite?
Maru Kitteh
(31,759 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Fuck man 'splaining and everyone that uses that lame fucking excuse of a meme.
Maru Kitteh
(31,759 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Bu bye
Maru Kitteh
(31,759 posts)Have a good one bro
brush
(61,033 posts)Once Trump gets through with that repug convention when they try to steal the nomination from him, their nominee won't be able to get elected to dog catcher.
Get real.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)And Independents can't stand her.
brush
(61,033 posts)There is such a thing as the Obama coalition that will back her. It helped Obama win the last two elections, remember?
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)brush
(61,033 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)brush
(61,033 posts)I don't understand at all WTH you're talking about at all.
Don't bother to respond. I don't want to hear it.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)Loki
(3,830 posts)I'm asking a real question, because just the term alone suggests that could be a possibility,. There isn't a Republican out there that I would vote for, ever. They never deviate from the party line and are so anti women, LGBT, people of color, that I could never in good conscience cast a vote for them. They continue to try and rig voting to favor their party at the expense of the people of this country and we, the collective we, have allowed it to happen. So please explain why you call yourself and Independent. I don't believe that is really a political reality.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)You're trying to set up a gotcha situation and it's in very poor form. That you're focused on the individual here on DU that points out the realities of polls out there (showing Clinton behind every other candidate and slipping) How are you proposing to heal the rift in the Democratic party that has formed? The only thing Clinton has to offer most people is that she's not as bad as the other guys, and that may not be enough to motivate the Dem base.
That's the real question here.
Loki
(3,830 posts)w4rma
(31,700 posts)Loki
(3,830 posts)What do you define as an "Independent". Is any supporter of Bernie able to put a definitionon with that ideology or do you all just like to call people names and feel superior? If you can't, then say so. My ideology isn't preventing me from understanding it, but apparently yours can't define it.
Seeinghope
(786 posts)To keep Trump out of office.
Years ago when the Republicans were not so rabid the Independents looked at the candidates individually as well.
You could look for leadership qualities, background, personality, actual qualifications for the office vs. The other candidate. It also depended on the state of the country. If it was in economic turmoil it might be the time for somebody who would be strongest in that area. In war time a General might look good.
Now though the Parties on both sides have changed so radically that more people cannot feel totally aligned with either one.
Independents are a party within their own right. They are the anti Democrat and anti Republican bullshit. They are the people that were more believers of politics before they became so rabid. That is why Bernie Sanders is attracting so many Independents. He is talking about things that actually appeal and apply to voters with authenticity.if a Republican Candidate candidate came along that wanted to revolutionise the Republican Party and do some of the things that Bernie Sanders wants to do then some Independents would vote for him or her. It is about what the candidate stands for, stood for, if they are establishment.....
Independents can be more leaning to liberal and more leaning conservativeeven so they could and most likely would vot for the "other" side if there was enough appeal.
After all it is really what is best for the country
99Forever
(14,524 posts)You seriously underestimate just what a low opinion the vast majority of Americans have of Clintons and all they represent.
brush
(61,033 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... primaries are NOT generals. I'd suggest some grade school level courses in American Government to start, then moving on to adult stuff. You clearly don't even grasp the most fundamental basics of how the process works.
As such, bub bye, you gone.
brush
(61,033 posts)If she's so hated, why is that?
Shouldn't be so hard to answer since you're so smart (not).
Mike__M
(1,052 posts)The next week: it's over next week. Still true.
The next week: it's over next week. Still true.
The next week: it's over next week. Still true.
The next week: it's over next week. Still true.
The next week: it's over next week. Still true.
The next week: it's over next week. Still true.
The next week: it's over next week. Still true.
The next week: it's over next week. Still true.
How long can this go on?
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Apparently joined DU to express 'concern' and poutrage. IDK if Brock pays time and a half on weekends.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Sanders hasn't 'spun' anything. He was invited to speak at the conference - true. A brief, informal, meet and greet happened with the Pope - true. No Papal endorsement was asked, given, or claimed - true. So get over your butthurt and find something else to be poutraged about.
pkdu
(3,977 posts)Sachs got him the invitation , fare doos. .supporters gotta support. No problem there as long as facts are acknowledged.
Sanders Bro-stalked him at 4am according to the Pope in the lobby as he ( Pope) was leaving for Lesbos. Hey , if Bernie was leaving for Rome airport at 4am , I'll even retract the stalking part.
Just facts , not mountains out of molehills , on either side.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Response to LAS14 (Original post)
Post removed
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(135,713 posts)So it looks more like posts are hidden for no other reason than someone doesn't like what is posted.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
On Sat Apr 16, 2016, 10:11 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Pope says Bernie Bros need psychiatrists ...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511753389
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Joking about mental illness is not funny, using it to smear other members is illiberal and adds to the stigma of those suffering from mental illness.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Apr 16, 2016, 10:16 AM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Stalking is a serious problem, and to use it to try to make some grade-school political points is worthy of a hide.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Hiding not because of alerter's comments (the Pope made the first reference) but because the spin is so strong the whirlwind makes me sick.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: He's quoting a linked to article. Not sure if that's the Pope's real words or not. Doesn't appear to be a satire site.
If these were the poster's own words I might see a hide justified but not in this case. How about rebutting the article instead?
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I am really getting tired of people abusing the Alerts because they don't agree with what is said. The poster was quoting the Pope and not attacking anyone in particular.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(135,713 posts)Cha
(319,076 posts)from the Pope and not BS.
mythology
(9,527 posts)This is obviously the first time that has ever happened. Ever.
I have no idea what your point is. Is Sanders supposed to have not mentioned this and just disappeared for the weekend or something?
2naSalit
(102,793 posts)a week's worth of hoopla about how Berne was going to meet the Pope and have a talk and all that. Here's what the Pope said about the "meeting"...
Autumn
(48,962 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)betsuni
(29,078 posts)in Hillary Clinton's hair that we have to hear about all the time. Every word is examined, dictionaries consulted, the worst possible meaning ascribed to every utterance. LIES! IMMORAL! we are demanded to think.
Sanders says "We had an opportunity to meet with him. It was a real honor for me ... to spend some time with him." This leaves an entirely different impression than the reality of a five minute stop-and-chat, more like: "We had an opportunity to meet him. It was a real honor for me to express my admiration for him."
Why the big surprise from the worst Hillary nitpickers that Sanders should get a little nitpicking in return? So what.
smiley
(1,432 posts)In a presidential election no less!
IamMab
(1,359 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Pretty popular in Asia.
TM99
(8,352 posts)and it continues now.
Just eat your fucking crow and clock out for the night.
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)Pin feathers get stuck between your teeth.
Pluck it real good!
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)This was nothing but a misrepresentation from beginning to end.
basselope
(2,565 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)Another peewee herman moment, that makes twice today.
I know what you are but what am I?
Sometimes it's best to just scroll on by.
basselope
(2,565 posts)So Sanders announces he is invited by the Vatican to speak and on the View when asked "so you're going to meet the Pope" says the dreaded word "Yup".
#1) The Clinton campaign tries to paint the picture of Sanders FORCING himself to be invited. That gets completely debunked. Clinton's campaign left with egg on face.
#2) The Clinton campaign starts throwing around the "Yup" as if it is some horrible lie Bernie told, when anyone with common sense could figure out he would much more likely than not meet the Pope because this was a high level conference on the Pope's signature issues.
#3) The Clinton campaign ends up with more egg on its face as Sanders ACTUALLY meets the Pope, just as he said.
Now they are trying to squirm out of it by returning to #1 and claiming it was an ambush, which is even more laughable this time.
So yeah, the Clinton campaign really bungled it, because they would have been far better off saying nothing than doing what they always do.. try to make EVERYTHING into a scandal and then look like fools when it turns out not to be.
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)to do with the OP OR my post.
tl;dr
Start your own OP. This mini-rant makes no sense whatsoever.
This was a misrepresentation from start to finish. Period. Mr. Clean is getting called on it, and rightfully so.
Either defend it or move on.
This Because Hillary nonsense is a non-answer.
basselope
(2,565 posts)He told the truth the entire time and it drove the Clinton campaign to make multiple false accusations.
Now it is has driven her supporters into a total frenzy.
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)from start to finish. Period.
basselope
(2,565 posts)Sanders version has been incredibly accurate from start to finish. Period.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)then you don't have to deal with their bullshit
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)Now what?
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Sanders went to the Vatican. How Awful.
Sanders went to the Vatican. How Awful.
Sanders went to the Vatican. How Awful.
Sanders went to the Vatican. How Awful.
Sanders went to the Vatican. How Awful.
Sanders went to the Vatican. How Awful.
Sanders went to the Vatican. How Awful.
Sanders went to the Vatican. How Awful.
Sanders went to the Vatican. How Awful.
Sanders went to the Vatican. How Awful.
Sanders went to the Vatican. How Awful.
Must Know More.
Must Know More.
Must Know More.
Must Know More.
Must Know More.
jfern
(5,204 posts)JimDandy
(7,318 posts)What's your source for that info?
According to the economist Jeffrey Sachs, who has also been attending the conference which ends today, the courtesy visit was prearranged. Last night the meeting was scheduled for 6am this morning, Sachs said in comments to CNA. They had the chance to talk for several minutes. No photographs were taken of the encounter.
http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/pope-francis-meets-bernie-sanders-vatican-confirms/#ixzz463soed1s
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)version of events at the meeting, since he was there also, and in fact they had!
LAS14
(15,506 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)isn't it?
LAS14
(15,506 posts)Seeinghope
(786 posts)BTW, I gues you didn't read the meaning of meeting that I posted from the Miriam Webster Dictionary
LAS14
(15,506 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)lmao.
If you guys just would've been adults about it and said, 'what a nice gesture', and moved the hell on like normal people, you wouldn't look so ridiculous now. But instead you had make petty denials of reality every step of the way, and be proved liars over and over, every step of the way.
I just don't get it.
basselope
(2,565 posts)uponit7771
(93,532 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)You know those meet and greets that people pay thousands of dollars for at concerts. That's EXACTLY what they are.
Sometimes you don't even get to shake their hand.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)Why is this concept so hard for people to understand?
LAS14
(15,506 posts)Those do matter in this situation.
basselope
(2,565 posts)Not quite sure why the Clintonites are clinging to this one after losing it every step of the way.
LAS14
(15,506 posts)if you think they do, we have no basis to pursue it. I wish you well in your on-going education.
basselope
(2,565 posts)You have to twist yourself into a pretzel to claim otherwise.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)besides Bernie ?
catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)"The four initial sponsors of Quartz were Boeing, Chevron, Cadillac, and Credit Suisse.[4] "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartz_(publication)
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)that an agnostic/Jew went so far out of his way to meet the Pope in the hopes of winning over a few Catholics. (The meeting was even a joke in the Homily.) I don't think it will have much consequence one way or the other.
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)joke about the Sanders/Pope meeting.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Let's be real. Bernie was trying to move the needle in the NY Primary. We shall soon see if it worked. I'm sure he is bummed that there was no picture permitted. I'm surprised Tad Devine didn't arrange to pull off a selfie