2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDo Atheists have a right to oppose war?
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by azurnoir (a host of the 2016 Postmortem forum).
12 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Poll closed | |
Yes. | |
12 (100%) |
|
No. Atheists who oppose war should be legally stripped of all educational grants and loans, under the Solomon Amendment. They are Traitors, and should be dealt with as such. | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)I felt that it was wrong at the time, so it looks like we are on the same page here.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)WhiteTara
(29,715 posts)what is his amendment?
stone space
(6,498 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)Arkansas Granny
(31,516 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)Lars39
(26,109 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)far more than any deist. When it comes to war, more death and destruction has been caused by so-called 'religious' people, regardless of their affiliation, throughout recorded time.
Fuck all 'religious' warriors! They are all hateful bigots!
djean111
(14,255 posts)wrong?
As an atheist, or, really, as a human being, I just feel killing people is wrong. No deity needed!
stone space
(6,498 posts)At least, that's been my experience.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)WHy would you have to believe in an old man in the sky wearing a dress (who really needs your money) as a requirement to oppose the stupidity of war?
Stupid question that only a republican would think up.
stone space
(6,498 posts)beedle
(1,235 posts)the 'Solomon Amendment'?
Not sure how it would have anything specific to do with Atheism though?
T
Unless you equate "institutions of higher education" solely with atheism? ( a nice goal, but not reality at the moment.)
ETA: Just to be clear though, it's a stupid law no matter who it gets applied to.
stone space
(6,498 posts)The one that I refer is the one that initiated the Pacifist Purges of the US system of Higher Education in the 1980s, and which is ongoing to this day.
beedle
(1,235 posts)question still remains, what has Atheism have to do with it?
Like I said already, terrible law .. don't see the atheism connection (and I am one.)
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)And Im an Atheist.
If your point is that consciencious objection requires some sort of religious belief, i think you are drawing your assumptions and conclusions too broadly, here.
stone space
(6,498 posts)If your point is that consciencious objection requires some sort of religious belief, i think you are drawing your assumptions and conclusions too broadly, here.
I do, however, suffer the consequences of said law.
Nobody needs to convince me that I should have been afforded en education, despite my atheist pacifism.
I believed that all along, even while I was being denied that right.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Its like the thing about "sincerely held religious belief"- it would seem to me that a sincerely held religious belief should be anything anyone says it is.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)mistaken the law allows religious exemptions. A better question would be does our present law allow it?
longship
(40,416 posts)Equally logical and rational question. In other words, not at all.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Has somebody denied you an education on account of Hostess Twinkies?
Has anybody died as a result?
Do you seriously not see the difference?
longship
(40,416 posts)It is no more appropriate to ask about atheism and war than it is about atheism and Twinkies. They both are orthogonal questions.
That is my point.
There is no connection.
stone space
(6,498 posts)We're not talking about twinkies, here.
Atheists have cared about war for as long as I have been alive.
Vinca
(50,271 posts)Why wouldn't atheists have the right to oppose war?
stone space
(6,498 posts)It didn't make much sense to me, either.
Vinca
(50,271 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)Other than that, we seem to agree on this.