2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy do so many Americans view Hillary unfavorably?
I think they see a panderer with no convictions. Any thoughts?
randr
(12,648 posts)it has grown old.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Kokonoe
(2,485 posts)But so do we, its not a secret, and we don't like it.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)The media has given her so much cover that her favorability scores are actually a lot higher than they should be.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)dchill
(42,660 posts)With "media" you answer your own question.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)I think they see her as part of the problem in Washington. I also think that in a democracy when you behave (or your campaign does) as if you are inevitable and people's choice is just an afterthought it rubs people the wrong way.
It is not her turn. She hasn't won anything yet. In my opinion she came at this race believing it was a formality. That does not sit well with people.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)have NOTHING to do with it.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)which has nothing to do with why her favor-ability numbers are so low...
why don't her supporters ask why she can't get them up?
or are you just laying this at the feet of the 'stupid, uninformed, etc.' electorate?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Bernie Sanders has certainly played a role by bombarding his followers with emails etc about how evil she is. Her numbers went south when he entered the race.
Once we're free of him angrily trying to paint her as Nixon on steroids, her numbers will go back up gradually.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)after the previous, what did you say, "25 years of rightwing demonization..."...and that it is only because of Bernie that her current numbers are so bad...
'her numbers will go back up gradually..."...just like any object does once it hits a bottom...it bounces up...a little...
blame everyone but Hillary...that sounds like a winning argument...
we'll all keep track wen your post(s) start touting the fact that Hillary has climbed up past zero...post often, please...wouldn't want to miss it...
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)islandmkl
(5,275 posts)you ought to stick to who YOU will vote for if it isn't YOUR primary pick this November...
because that is how it works...don't you know?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(101,853 posts)If somebody thinks I am making it up they should cite a poll to correct me.
Oh, I see the e-mails are being flogged...If she wasn't running for pres this would be a non-story.
The attacks on her from the right and the fringe left have taken a toll.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(101,853 posts)islandmkl
(5,275 posts)i don't know how old you are...your posts don't reveal much maturity...but i DO know this:
you have no evidence of base core DEMOCRATIC PARTY principles except Third Way/old-DLC 'evolution'...
YOUR party will have its day, in fact it probably already has and is heading for its last hurrah...
about voting: only an asshole thinks it's any of his/her business who anyone else is going to vote for...you remind me of the 'my way or the highway' kind of people we have been fighting against for a lifetime...and apparently they are not all Republicans...your type is too busy chasing the money to swallow tear gas or get your head smacked in protest...
you like things as they are, that is apparent...many of us Democrats, and there are more of us than you can possibly admit to yourself, are working for the changes...
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)you do not belong here.
This is a progressive, DEMOCRATIC website. People who are okay with Trump defeating the Democratic nominee don't give a fug about anyone else.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)I don't have to choose Trump and I don't have to take a fucking loyalty oath...
especially to Third Way RepublicanLite DINO's...
you are in the wrong party, probably the right forum for you to spread your bullshit, but you are not a Democrat...
you are whatever the Third Way has evolved...
but...you are about half-assed amusing, I'll give you that...
hedda_foil
(16,985 posts)I get all the emails as most of us do. The reasons put up by Hillary's team and. fans completely misread why we're not hilaryous for Hillary because you automatically believe that anything that's negative about your candidate is a right wing lie.
Duval
(4,280 posts)Why do you make stuff up like this? I really don't understand.
aikoaiko
(34,214 posts)Maybe you've seen different emails.
Put up or....
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)when I got a firsthand look at what her campaign was up to.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)It's a good thing reality doesn't require your approval.
still_one
(98,883 posts)So far Hillary has won these primaries:
Iowa, Nevada, South Carolina, Alabama, American Samoa, Arkansas, Georgia, Massachussetts, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Northern Mariana Islands, Florida, Illinois, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Arizona
The upcoming primaries in April, according to the polls are favoring Hillary.
So what are we saying, any state that Hillary won doesn't count?
So supporters who vote for Hillary don't count, only those who have an "unfavorable feeling count"
Here is my response to those who push that theme:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141419098
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)JudyM
(29,785 posts)name a few things she's achieved that have been so great for the public interest? I'm drawing a blank...
rachacha
(173 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)"Because we have Youtube."
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)I know a lot of people overseas who are cheering Bernie on.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)87% of the expats who voted in the Democrats Abroad primary in Japan voted for Bernie
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)i didn't get burned because someone yelled 'FIRE!'...
i got burned when i was handed the burning stick...
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)Soon it becomes truth to many people. That is how Rush did it for years and years with his ditto heads. No thinking involved. Just keep telling your brain the same thing over and over.
basselope
(2,565 posts)tech3149
(4,452 posts)My knowledge of her biography indicates that the driving force in her life is personal ambition. She has always found a way to enmesh herself with the centers of power and influence. I think the same can be said of most of the political class as well as the professional class, and I don't like them much either.
The contrast between her and most in DC or political power circles and Sen Sanders is blindingly obvious.
The fact that most of these candidates are even spoken of is a tribute to the influence of the corporate media disinformation network.
Brother Buzz
(39,900 posts)which effectively bashed her and the Big Dog for the last twenty-five years
doc03
(39,086 posts)we have the Sanders people attacking her.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Just because right wing loonies oppose Hillary doesn't mean that anyone who opposes her is a right wing loony.
I oppose her because with the exception of a handful of vital social issues (some of which she has conveniently "evolved" on), her views are antithetical to my own. I am a proud progressive, and it would be risible to suggest otherwise (although I'm sure that won't stop you from doing so).
I was adamantly against the illegal Iraq invasion. There was abundant evidence that the arguments for war were fraudulent. She voted for it. Her explanation for why she did so is unbelievably lame. As was her tepid apology. (Oops! Sorry about all the dead people!)
I strongly opposed the PATRIOT (sic) ACT, which I see as a flagrant violation of the Fourth Amendment. She voted for it. (She also co-sponsored another appallingly un-Constitutional bill, one that would've criminalized flag-burning.)
Hillary Clinton is an unrepentant hawk. She has been identified as such by people of great international respectability, such as Jeffrey Sachs. Meanwhile, she gets the support and advice from truly dangerous and despicable characters, such as Robert Kagan (co-founder of PNAC) as well as war criminal Henry Kissinger.
Throughout her career, Hillary has strongly supported "free trade" (sic), that is until Sanders shined an unflattering light on this support and she suddenly started backpedaling, hoping that the American people haven't been paying attention to her positions for the past 20 years or so.
She claims to be against Citizens United and yet in the meantime she benefits from millions in SuperPAC cash. The alleged "pragmatists" among us suggest that given the current system, she has no choice. Sanders has easily proven that pathetic rationalization is utter horseshit.
She supports the death penalty. I adamantly oppose it. Moreover, I find her apparent delight in the death of Qaddafi to be truly creepy.
I could go on for paragraphs, but since you're unlikely to change your mind based on my post, I'm not going to waste any more time.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)The PATRIOT Act is an Orwellian cancer, supported by the same hawkish nature that got scores of our servicemen and women killed.
pkdu
(3,977 posts)every day , instead of trying to post positive posts about their favored candidate ? Enquiring minds want to know.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)pkdu
(3,977 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Camp weathervane is so true.
egalitegirl
(362 posts)One reason is that the Clintons and Bushes are partners and work together on projects like the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund. People don't view such partnerships favorably especially when the positions of Clintons and Bushes on wars are identical.
Larkspur
(12,804 posts)While the Right Wing throws everything they can against the Clintons, they are like moths attracted to a flame. They put themselves in positions easy for Republicans to attack them. Like Bills philandering. HRC's personal email server, while not illegal, set her up for attacks about transparency and trustworthiness.
still_one
(98,883 posts)I guess all those Hillary supporters don't count, huh?
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)No matter what it takes.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)She'll be on whichever side of an issue gives her the most personal advantage. She's not a leader, she's an evolver.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)That is hilarious and also true!
Vinca
(53,994 posts)She always seems to be enacting the role of candidate. Everything appears scripted and plotted out with opinions subject to change if the need arises. She admits she's not a natural politician and that's an understatement.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)She rose to fame due to marriage, not hard work. She is a weak and deeply flawed candidate.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Is there any point to posting these?
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)chknltl
(10,558 posts)...for instance. We on the left who don't like her have reasons that hardly match up to what the hate mongers who program Fox News propagandize their viewers with. Many of us on the left are tired of politicians who support a government Of By and For the highest bidders!
If you think about it, the right wing electorate has been programed to believe that Trickle Down Economics is a good thing. In T.D.E., the government is expected to let Big Buisness call the shots, government is supposed to get out of the way in such a system. For this reason conservative voters think it's a great idea to lower taxes on EVERYONE!
We on the left are against T.D.E. we expect everyone to have a fair chance at the American Dream. For this reason we on the left are at the very least wary of politicians who may be beholden to big corporations.
This is all known here at DU. My point, contrary to what is being repeated here in DU, very few of us are being swayed by the right wing echo chamber of hate directed against Hillary. Those points are designed to appeal to a fully different mindset.
Our mistrust stems instead for reasons that run contrary to that right wing mindset. I can not speak for everyone on the left but for many of us our Hillary 'mistrust' (hate is a tad strong i think), stems from her close associaton with the oligarchy. We simply don't want that style of government. If we are quick to point to it as a problem with right wing politicians why wouldn't it make sense to point it out as a problem in our own party?
Truth be told, I find it quite insulting to be compared to right wingers in the manner I've been hearing at DU. I don't need the right wing to give me my talking points-talking points I wouldn't agree with anyway, I can think for myself thank you.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)... already though
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)"It's what they offered." --Hillary on accepting hundreds of thousands for speeches to corrupt bankers.
She is simply clueless about how entitled, elitist, and out of touch that response sounds to a person like me who struggles by on Social Security and part-time work as an underpaid substitute teacher. Plus, she pals out with criminals like the Bushes and Kissinger. My mom always told me I would be known by the company I keep. That's a big problem for HRC.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)I can see her sitting on the can with a bunch of index cards labeled Choice, Wall Street, NAFTA, Fracking, and so forth.
"If someone asks about fracking... um... I got this! If someone asks about fracking, say that climate change is a looming threat and we need to transition away from fossil fuels towards renewable energies such as wind and solar! Yeah!"
:flush:
I have no sense of what she believes on any issue, or even if she has personal beliefs on a lot of issues.
She's "evolved" on so many things that shouldn't need "evolving" on, like gay marriage, and she hasn't "evolved" on things that she should have "evolved" on, like the death penalty.
Bernie, meanwhile, has clearly spent the last several decades mulling over where he stands on a lot of issues.
I don't doubt that he held similar beliefs 50 years ago to those he holds today.
History has caught up to him.
bjo59
(1,166 posts)as "a good business opportunity"?
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)potone
(1,701 posts)It is true that she and her husband were subjected to a lot of right-wing smears that were totally unjustified--Whitewater being the most obvious example--but she has her own problems with voters that are not because of those attacks. Many people simply do not agree with the way that the Democratic party has shifted to the right over the last decades, and it began with Bill Clinton. The consequences of his policies, which she has not disavowed, have been disastrous for most Americans, and she seems to offer more of the same.
To simply dismiss her critics as "far left purists" is to miss the point that the Democratic party no longer, except for some social issues, seems to represent the interests of most Americans. That is why, even ignoring her many changes of positions, many Democrats do not support her.
I agree, however, that there is a visceral hatred of her on the part of Republicans that is really not rational and has more than a small amount of misogyny at its base. They also hated her husband precisely because he took away issues like the so-called Welfare Reform from them. The real reason that the Republican politicians hated him was, quite simply, because he is a Democrat. What frightens me the most about them is that they feel entitled to rule and are angry when pesky voters decide otherwise, no doubt because they know that they are not representing our interests and don't like it that we know that.
GreatGazoo
(4,619 posts)If it weren't for those two things she would be fine.
randome
(34,845 posts)Either Clinton or Sanders will make a fine President. We should be supporting both instead of hating one or the other. And viewing Clinton as 'unfavorable' does not hide the notion that it is hate, not just policy disagreements.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]The truth doesnt always set you free.
Sometimes it builds a bigger cage around the one youre already in.[/center][/font][hr]
betsuni
(29,078 posts)Bill Bryson quote. Many Americans are literal thinkers, mindlessly believe rumors and propaganda, don't read, are anti-intellectual, take everything personally, can't discuss politics without emotion. Really embarrassing. Thinking Hillary Clinton is a pandering Satan is as stupid as demonizing public school teachers or your accountant. Idiots.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)And sick of the Clintons. We have 300 million + people in this country.
Just go away already.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Constant attacks from Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and the rest of the RW noise machine.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)The more you learn about Hillary Clinton, the less acceptable the idea of her in the Oval Office becomes.
?1430153051
Orsino
(37,428 posts)The TV has been pretty clear, you must admit, on what is expected of us.
I think the real reasons to oppose her candidacy are the ones the MSM won't touch.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)Notice a certain, distinct smell of what they're slinging toward Hillary? (Mostly lies I must add.) Do you think that people that don't like her maybe believe that sort of garbage? (OK, so they are uninformed thinkers.)
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)I've been living on the same planet as the Clinton's for all my life. The one positive vibe I ever felt for Hillary died a long time ago.