Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:29 AM Apr 2016

Vanity Fair: Sanders was granted an audience with the Pope.

...As schedules continued to shift and Sanders bounced from meeting to meeting around the Vatican, the certainty of the Pope’s availability became increasingly cloudy. But while seated at dinner with foreign policy advisor Jeffrey Sachs and their wives Jane and Sonia, respectively, Sanders received the news he had been hopefully awaiting. His time with the Pope would be informal and brief, a quick meet-and-greet in the foyer of the Casa Santa Marta at 6 A.M. the next morning, but he had been granted an audience...


http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/04/bernie-sanders-meets-pope

So much for the ambush theory.

I would say these details should put the matter to bed.
49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vanity Fair: Sanders was granted an audience with the Pope. (Original Post) Barack_America Apr 2016 OP
you have to be kidding? reddread Apr 2016 #1
It's Vanity Fair, they are way more honest than you. Schema Thing Apr 2016 #5
you know the Hilbots will freak out over this FreakinDJ Apr 2016 #9
Let's review: Bernie invited himself, wasn't going to talk or see Pope, then ambushed him. CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #17
Hold on now.. .99center Apr 2016 #44
I don't think so, I think they'll simply ignore it and continue their preprogrammed narrative. n/t lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #19
I hope so, but SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #30
Pope Francis: "..I greeted him, I shook his hand and nothing more..." direct quote uponit7771 Apr 2016 #2
lol, thank you. The Pope, himself, has spoken up, so this retro spin is R B Garr Apr 2016 #4
Sanders was granted an interview the night before. Barack_America Apr 2016 #6
Yep. Jeffrey Sachs says it happened so COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #13
Maybe because he one of the most respected economists in the world Armstead Apr 2016 #27
I also am sure he'd lie about it. He stuck his foot in this mess COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #35
It's not a mess. He went to the Vatican. Made a speech. met the Pope. End of story Armstead Apr 2016 #36
I'm not the person who started the thread. Direct COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #37
I saw the Pope speak about it. His own words. R B Garr Apr 2016 #14
You mean you saw the ENTIRE video, unedited, AND you speak fluent Italian? CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #20
Oh nOeZ! A conspiracy theory about the Pope's translators! R B Garr Apr 2016 #23
So, I guess that's a "No" on your part. Video spliced at the 33 second mark, somethings edited out. CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #24
Yes, do write the Vatican about your conspiracy theories that the Pope's R B Garr Apr 2016 #25
Calm down there. It's common for media to edit for length, that's all this is. CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #26
Calm down yourself. You are the one trying to attack me because I said R B Garr Apr 2016 #31
So the video backs up Sanders basselope Apr 2016 #47
Yup. nt CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #48
The Pope is from Argentina, not Italy AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #40
I am still perplexed that anyone cares about this. Adrahil Apr 2016 #3
its worse than that reddread Apr 2016 #7
That's great and all.... Adrahil Apr 2016 #10
you care to contrast this Pope to the last one? reddread Apr 2016 #16
Did you post that on any of the scores of threads last week started by Hillary supporters? merrily Apr 2016 #11
Nope. except one. Adrahil Apr 2016 #15
But you never complained that people "cared" about the subject until this thread. merrily Apr 2016 #21
I'm not complaining. I'm perplexed. Adrahil Apr 2016 #46
I'll take an Opportunity to call out Hillary's ACTUAL DEFENSE for a RAPIST PEDOPHILE Joob Apr 2016 #39
Maybe you should be saying this to your own camp passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #42
This is not about the truth. djean111 Apr 2016 #8
problem being Clooney is Catholic reddread Apr 2016 #18
SANDERSVATICANPOPEGATE!!11!! Parte Unus. merrily Apr 2016 #12
Catholic Church sexual abuse cases. stonecutter357 Apr 2016 #22
H has some of those,in house even. wendylaroux Apr 2016 #28
Bernie is determined to call the pope a liar. Is that a good ecstatic Apr 2016 #29
Exactly! Either the Pope or his translators are being called liars here. R B Garr Apr 2016 #32
It's you who refuse to see the truth passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #43
Why would progressives be so proud that Bernie met with the leader of the Catholic church? ... salinsky Apr 2016 #33
knr snagglepuss Apr 2016 #34
There is a thread by one of the worst pope offenders about the damn hot sauce. Punkingal Apr 2016 #38
I would say these details should put the matter to bed. passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #41
So the truth is revealed and it backs up my claim passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #45
Recommend! KoKo Apr 2016 #49
 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
1. you have to be kidding?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:32 AM
Apr 2016

they have barely begun to keep lying about that.
no end in sight.
it is not about the truth

 

CentralCoaster

(1,163 posts)
17. Let's review: Bernie invited himself, wasn't going to talk or see Pope, then ambushed him.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:34 AM
Apr 2016

.
...and when it turned out that the Pope and Bernie were both in the Vatican AND in the same building....

....Bernie stalked the Pope and then popped out and surprised him!

.99center

(1,237 posts)
44. Hold on now..
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 04:35 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie stalked the Pope and then popped out of a bathroom and surprised him!
I'm sure were missing the full story, anyone have any other news from the Clinton camp on this vicious attack on the pope perpetrated by Bernie?

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
19. I don't think so, I think they'll simply ignore it and continue their preprogrammed narrative. n/t
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:36 AM
Apr 2016

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
30. I hope so, but
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:02 PM
Apr 2016

They don't seem to be capable of ignoring much. I'd bet they try to spin even this.

R B Garr

(17,984 posts)
4. lol, thank you. The Pope, himself, has spoken up, so this retro spin is
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:36 AM
Apr 2016

really ridiculous. Sanders put him in an awkward position, and the Pope had to explain himself to the Press. Not cool.

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
6. Sanders was granted an interview the night before.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:43 AM
Apr 2016

Did you not read the one paragraph I quoted?

COLGATE4

(14,886 posts)
13. Yep. Jeffrey Sachs says it happened so
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:13 AM
Apr 2016

it must be true. Why would I believe Jeffrey Sachs, seeing as he is the one who probably engineered the non-invitation 'invitation' for Bernie in the first place???

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
27. Maybe because he one of the most respected economists in the world
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:55 AM
Apr 2016

I'm sure he'd lie about it

COLGATE4

(14,886 posts)
35. I also am sure he'd lie about it. He stuck his foot in this mess
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:36 PM
Apr 2016

when he finagled Bernie an 'invite' to the conference. Then he kept on going. I prefer to take the Pope at his word rather than Sach's 'interpretation' of what transpired.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
36. It's not a mess. He went to the Vatican. Made a speech. met the Pope. End of story
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 03:32 PM
Apr 2016

The world has not ended. And it didn't advance or detract from Sanders efforts.


Get

the

fuck

over

it

R B Garr

(17,984 posts)
23. Oh nOeZ! A conspiracy theory about the Pope's translators!
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:28 AM
Apr 2016

Who made them deliberately misquote the Pope......Satan???

 

CentralCoaster

(1,163 posts)
24. So, I guess that's a "No" on your part. Video spliced at the 33 second mark, somethings edited out.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:43 AM
Apr 2016

I would like to know what bits of context are missing.

I'm confident that what comes before "needs to see a psychiatrist" would do more harm to Sanders-haters than to Bernie.

Missing bits, one needs the missing part to draw conclusions about what was said.

R B Garr

(17,984 posts)
25. Yes, do write the Vatican about your conspiracy theories that the Pope's
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:49 AM
Apr 2016

translators are misquoting him. I'm sure they will be very interested to learn that only Sanders supporters have discovered this terrible lapse of competence. I'm sure the missing bits you're looking for say, "I love Bernie; I hate Hillary". Yeah.

 

CentralCoaster

(1,163 posts)
26. Calm down there. It's common for media to edit for length, that's all this is.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:53 AM
Apr 2016

But for me, as a research engineer I don't like to draw conclusions from incomplete sets of data.

If you want to spin this in a different direction, that's cool.

Me, I'm past due for my walk on the beach so need to let this conversation go for now.

R B Garr

(17,984 posts)
31. Calm down yourself. You are the one trying to attack me because I said
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:02 PM
Apr 2016

I listened to the Pope in his own words, and you insinuated either the Pope or his translators were lying if they didn't match your own biased theories about what was actually said. WTF.

I can see his body language and his obvious distress and embarrassment at having to explain himself and read his own translator's words and come to the conclusion that Bernie put him in an awkward situation.

So, LMAO, at YOU spinning this in the direction of questioning the POPE HIMSELF. And I have to laugh at your cutesy little psychological comment ("calm down&quot that Bernie supporters always attack people with when the spin doesn't go your way. All of a sudden, the armchair psychologists spring to life to "evaluate" anyone not supporting Bernie. Thank you.....

Walks on the beach on Monday morning?! Must be nice......

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
47. So the video backs up Sanders
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:29 PM
Apr 2016

Sanders never claimed an endorsement. He claimed he met him.

The Pope agrees.

The Clinton campaigned claimed the meeting would NEVER happen and then tried to claim it was an "ambush".

The Pope never said what they CLAIMED he said.

Thanks for the video proof that the Clinton camp lied.. AGAIN.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
3. I am still perplexed that anyone cares about this.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:35 AM
Apr 2016

Bernie met the Pope? Good for him. I hope he took the opportunity to call out the church on its homophobia, sexism and protection of pedophiles.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
7. its worse than that
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:50 AM
Apr 2016

he called the world out for allowing inequity and greed to rule.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
10. That's great and all....
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:10 AM
Apr 2016

But let's not forget in our fanboyishness that the Church still perpetuates homophobia and sexism. And the Pope, as the leader of the Church, is part of that.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
16. you care to contrast this Pope to the last one?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:31 AM
Apr 2016

I know what you want to do to him.
Let us start with that.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
11. Did you post that on any of the scores of threads last week started by Hillary supporters?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:11 AM
Apr 2016
 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
15. Nope. except one.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:16 AM
Apr 2016

Where I posted I have no issue with Sen. Sanders visiting the Vatican.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
46. I'm not complaining. I'm perplexed.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:25 PM
Apr 2016

I don't see why it is a big deal he went, either for Hillary supporters, or Bernie supporters.

Joob

(1,065 posts)
39. I'll take an Opportunity to call out Hillary's ACTUAL DEFENSE for a RAPIST PEDOPHILE
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 04:28 PM
Apr 2016

AS a FAVOR, she did it AS a FAVOR.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
42. Maybe you should be saying this to your own camp
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 04:33 PM
Apr 2016

supporters who will not let this "Bernie Lied" crap stop. It doesn't matter what proof is in front of them. They only care about one thing. Trashing Bernie.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
8. This is not about the truth.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:51 AM
Apr 2016

And, I tell ya, if the Vatican thing had not happened, we would have been showered with pictures of Hillary and Clooney - as if Clooney were as important as the Pope.

R B Garr

(17,984 posts)
32. Exactly! Either the Pope or his translators are being called liars here.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:04 PM
Apr 2016

Unbelievable.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
43. It's you who refuse to see the truth
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 04:35 PM
Apr 2016

who insist on calling the Pope and Sachs a liar.

How is that a good strategy?

salinsky

(1,065 posts)
33. Why would progressives be so proud that Bernie met with the leader of the Catholic church? ...
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:06 PM
Apr 2016

... I would be more impressed if he declined due to the plethora of issues on which the church is regressive, corrupt, and criminal.

A conference on income inequality at the Vatican?

That's pretty rich!

If the church were to divest itself of even half it's assets and properties held around the globe and donated the proceeds to the poor, poverty would be cured for a generation.

And, the Vatican Bank? ...

... holy shit, there may not be a more evil institution on the planet.



Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
38. There is a thread by one of the worst pope offenders about the damn hot sauce.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 04:25 PM
Apr 2016

It is incredibly important to prove she carries hot sauce, as if anyone cares.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
41. I would say these details should put the matter to bed.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 04:31 PM
Apr 2016

You're kidding right? How would that work to Hillary's advantage?

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
45. So the truth is revealed and it backs up my claim
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 04:49 PM
Apr 2016

The Pope's words (and nothing more) that so many are twisting to say meant he never spoke with Sanders have been explained...just as I said...they were taken out of context and it was obvious to me from watching the clip, that he did not mean what so many are claiming. Now it is written in Vanity Fair and I am vindicated (as is Bernie).

Francis, meanwhile, wanted to ensure that his encounter with Sanders would not be construed as a partisan gesture of support. He had a characteristically candid remark for the press inquiring about whether the Pope might back a Sanders candidacy:

“I shook his hand and nothing more,” he said. “If someone thinks that greeting someone means getting involved in politics, I recommend that he find a psychiatrist!”


His words (and nothing more) were in response to this endorsement issue, not his "greeting" with Sanders. Everything I've been saying about what he said to the reporter and why has been corroborated here. Thank you!



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Vanity Fair: Sanders was ...