2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe choice for Democrats: Incremental Change vs Stagnation
Even Hillary's opponents suggest that Hillary offers "incremental change." She can move the gears of government.
Bernie offers a dream with no plan to make it come true. In the choice between progress and stagnation, Democrats are better served with achievable progress.
navarth
(5,927 posts)game over.
not
creon
(1,183 posts)Good luck to you.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)initiatives forward. And his refusal to assist down-ticket candidates guarantees a continued lack of support.
Look at how many Senate colleagues have endorsed him - 1 (I think that is still accurate - not looking it up)
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)creon
(1,183 posts)That is all that it is.
You are hyperventilating.
creon
(1,183 posts)This is not a revolutionary situation.
None of the factors showing that it is exist.
It is a choice between incremental change vs stagnation.
hereforthevoting
(241 posts)Personally.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)That presumes he wins. He's not winning, I'm not deluded, but I argue that if he won at the rates he needed to win, there would be a significant number switching the Senate and Congress. For better or worse, we're looking like another safe, establishment nominee. And Sanders, because he's a man of good character, will support her.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)Things have gotten better. It's been slow but it's been steady.
President Obama has had to compromise and just keep pushing the rock.
Hillary will continue to make steady if slow prgress.
Bernie will be the same idealistic all or nothing and end up with nothing.
The perpetually disgruntled are always great about pointing out what they hate.