2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumShed no tears for independent voters who didn't get to mess up the NY primary.
Let remember what an independent voter is - NOT A DEMOCRAT.
Usually a faux hipster that's too cool to be in a real party. So sit this one out at the Starbuck's, dood. We don't care.
LexVegas
(6,959 posts)stonecutter357
(13,045 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)DebDoo
(319 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)makes us all wait forever because you can't pick out the food you want. The rest of us have our order ready before we left the house.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)would be helping Dems....don't you people understand. You keep putting down the Independents and they will put down the candidate in the GE.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)I've been in enough abusive relationships that "you'll miss me if I leave!!" is pretty much an instant red flag for me. The Democratic party is a flawed institution and all of the candidates this cycle are imperfect, but it's still my political home and it will probably still be so long after your consistently rude behavior is nothing more than a bad memory. You don't speak for all independents or all Bernie Sanders voters and frankly I don't care if you personally sit at home sulking on election day or vote for some fascist candidate to punish the centrists/moderates you seem to hate so much.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)...have a problem with hipsters? Seems like it, and not very progressive.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)brush
(61,033 posts)No fair making people burst out laughing this early in the morning.
LonePirate
(14,367 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)A problem with hipsters equates to a lack of progressiveness? What brand of primary-season toilet-paper packaging did that particular bit of "wisdom" get ripped from?
Or is that simply some bit of emotional absolutism, convenient for the here and now, ready to be discarded as soon as ethically convenient?
(I'm going with the second... but I'd doubt anyone admit as much, instead rationalizing it as some new form of progressive puritanism)
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Without movie quotes for the mentally undisciplined to rely on, many people's pretense at cleverness would be much more silent, and they would be compelled to address the subject rather than exemplify grade school petulance.
Not that you would ever do that...
jmg257
(11,996 posts)But yes - let us pretend to argue about this statement: "Didn't stop Bernie from trashing Hillary for the past year."
because THAT will be productive.
QC
(26,371 posts)are allowed to vote in the general election?
jmg257
(11,996 posts)be so inclined to turn out with gusto with support for the Democrat nominee in the GE.
I would also suggest that publicly personally insulting & demeaning such people who are already pissed off:
Shed no tears for independent voters who didn't get to mess up the NY primary. [View all]
Let remember what an independent voter is - NOT A DEMOCRAT.
Usually a faux hipster...
will likely enhance that affect.
QC
(26,371 posts)I was thinking of the way Camp Rightward Red Arrow has been acting all along as though getting the nomination is the whole game.
Alienating nearly half the party might work in the primary, but it will present a serious problem in the general. She thinks she can go schorched earth now and "unify the party later" but I'm not so sure about that.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)And yes, Camp Hillary is similar, but Sanders supporters have done their fair share of mud-slinging as well.
Cheers!
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Everybody calm down and realize this is not a winning strategy.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)the real Democrats voted for Hillary and god knows who voted for Bernie.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)would govern the same and get the same things accomplished with a GOP congress???
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)LisaM
(29,633 posts)Everyone is welcome to belong or not to a political party but there are good reasons for having a closed primary - one of which is, if one party has chosen its candidate, there is nothing stopping voters in successive primaries from crossing over to cause trouble for the other party. That's also part of the reason for having party mainstays as super delegates.
Caucuses are far more disenfranchising than closed primaries yet I don't see anyone doubling down and trying to sue to make them more fair and open. What if you're a caregiver? How do you make it to a caucus? What if you don't have a car (not having a car, BTW, is not a valid reason in Washington for not attending a caucus).
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)An open primary can be a great way bring people into the party and make them active organizers.
I do not think a significant portion of voters are crossing over from Republicans to vote Sanders just to make the election easier for them. That would take a lot of organization which they are just not showing.
You make a good case against caucuses. They are from a time with less technology and it was the only way for voters to actually come together to talk about candidates and their platform.
With social media and the internet becoming more in use, there is no need for caucuses. They should be done away with by the next election.
LisaM
(29,633 posts)I don't think it does. They are identifying as Democrats for one election only and, as we saw in Wisconsin, sometimes for one candidate only. New York's rules are a little stricter than most, but over all, I think it's fair that you should belong to the party of the candidate you're voting for in the primary.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Good people but they are old and tired. Something has to be done.
LisaM
(29,633 posts)I think there are a number of things at play - we're dealing with younger people that have learned, for whatever reason, to reject labels (case in point, millennial women rejecting the label "feminist' without really understanding how it was a badge of honor for people in earlier generations). The parties are both in a state of flux. Voting systems vary wildly. People identify with the candidate far more than with the party. I mentioned this a lot in 2008, mostly because I remember Obama's 2004 speech at the convention where he said that America wasn't blue and it wasn't red, it was purple. I remember thinking at the time that his identification with the Democratic party probably wasn't as deep as it had been for previous party stars.
I think in one sense he was wrong - instead of becoming purple, we've become more blue and more red with a big divide in the middle (as far as voting goes). Ideologically, he was probably right. What I think we're slowing moving towards is the creation of a permanent third party, and then forming coalitions the way they do in Canada or in the UK. The two party system functioned when the parties were stronger and had coalitions within themselves that could caucus together (Democrats and Southern Democrats, Republicans and moderate Republicans) but that model got split apart a long time ago.
It's no surprise to me that the number of registered Democrats in Brooklyn has plummeted. Typical Democratic voters, particularly lower-incomes ones, are being systematically evicted from areas that are undergoing gentrification. The people replacing them are liberal in some ways (gay rights being a major example), but not in others - they clearly don't favor protecting small businesses or finding ways to keep previous residents in their homes, and they are pretty affluent. They don't register as Democrats or Republicans. Now they have a candidate who fires them up for whatever reason, but lo, the primaries are closed to them if they didn't figure out last October that they might want to vote in the Democratic or Republican primary. Anyone could have predicted this.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)because of the time between those primaries and being able to re-register. Strategic voting to help their preferred candidate, and help their preferred opposing candidate.
But generally speaking, open Primaries are a disaster in that voters are too easily encouraged to vote as part of a strategy rather than 100% of the time who they would like to win (as the rules general require, but how is it enforceable?)
angrychair
(12,278 posts)They are cheap to do. We don't get money from the DNC and we don't make the taxpayers of Washington pay for it like republicans do.
So unless you want to pay to cover a primary for the Washington Democratic Party, it will be a caucus next time too.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,270 posts)Shhhh!
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Last edited Tue Apr 19, 2016, 02:20 PM - Edit history (1)
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)shows you were into Bernie before it was cool
LonePirate
(14,367 posts)We won't be changing our registration regardless if he wins or loses.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)or Carlos Danger being the next mayor. Not sure how progressive and activisty they really are.
Also they didn't register to oppose Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic primary in 2014, and don't participate in any of our Assembly, State Senate, or Congressional Primaries.
Low attention span indies are not the guiding light of our party.
All in it together
(275 posts)And I accept Indies into the party without awful restrictions. I reject bumping people off the Dem roles. Big tent is not a good thing for Hillary.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)the party, they don't join the party.
lostnfound
(17,520 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)Stallion
(6,642 posts)"What word best describes Hillary Clinton". Excuse me if I've lost patience with the non-Democratic bomb-throwers amongst us.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1764004
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,270 posts)There must be 900 or more purged by now.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)but don't answer back or they won't vote for her in the general election.
You might hurt their fee fees.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I always get the feeling that they have this vanity about themselves over the fact that they're "independent" ... as if such a label makes them smarter than everyone else.
Well, I'm not in a position to judge their actual IQ score, some may indeed be pretty smart. But when it comes right down to it, even with all that intelligence going for them, they've OUTFOXED THEMSELVES.
Some may have felt they were "sending a message" to the party by not joining the party (because it wasn't perfect enough??) but in so doing, they've locked themselves out and prevented any sort of meaningful participation in shaping and guiding the party.
Lessons learned, I guess. (Or not ... we'll see what happens next time.)

azurnoir
(45,850 posts)I like it thanks
TowneshipRebellion
(92 posts)nt.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,270 posts)You'll be begging for indy support.
brush
(61,033 posts)Stallion
(6,642 posts)...the Democratic Socialist Sandernistas telling us how to win a General Election when they haven't won one in almost Century, if ever.
LonePirate
(14,367 posts)It also calls into question their support for Sanders' agenda given the miles and miles of daylight between Sanders' views on health care, education, civil rights, income inequality, the environment, etc, otherwise known as Sanders' entire platform.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)SheenaR
(2,052 posts)is exactly why we will have President Kasich. Independents are faux-hipsters now... Got it.
You will be crying for these Independent votes in a few months.
What a ass-backwards way of thinking
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)in a party is the ability to vote in that party's primaries.
they realize they're giving that up when they decide against registering with a party.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)Many here in RI are unaffiliated because they do not want to be harassed by state and local mailings. And when it's time (semi-closed) for Primary, they come back to do their duty and follow suit in November.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)in November.
In New York City, it's very, very well understood that all the local races are decided in the Democratic primaries, and that if you want to play a part in that process, you need to register as a D. If you don't register as a D, you're opting out of that process.
Mayor de Blasio's biggest hurdle was not Joe Lhota it was the Democratic party primary that involved Carlos Danger and Mike Bloomberg's Mini Me, Christine Quinn.
Same thing for State Assembly, City Council, etc etc.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)SheenaR
(2,052 posts)Lifelong Democrat. Worked on two Presidential Campaigns. You know exactly what you can do with that latte.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)SheenaR
(2,052 posts)He's going exactly nowhere right now. His only hope is a floor fight at the RNC that, some how, leaves him holding the bag. He'll look like that Minion that swallowed the ruby in the scrum in the Minions move, wearing a "WTF just happened face"
The odds of that happening are pretty slim.
But beyond that if independents who like Bernie go for Kasish in November, then they've clearly not been paying attention to anything going on right now.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)they are letting Trump get the nom? Or Cruz?
All signs point to Kasich
apnu
(8,790 posts)And both Ryan and Romney have been making all the right waves, including the 'aw-shucks, I don't want to run' denials so common in Presidential election politics.
It could be anybody. But even if it is Kasich, he'd be screwed. He doesn't have the staff or much of anything else to wage a national election after the RNC. Anybody who's the last man standing there is going to have that problem.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)They did it to themselves. They have nobody to blame but themselves.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)who dont switch to Bernie.
1. That isnt exactly a charm offensive.
2. These are the people who sat out the last two mid-terms - letting the tea party gain power.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)primarying an incumbent requires more than clicky-clicky and street puppets.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)
ibegurpard
(17,081 posts)Good luck getting their votes in the GE
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)Stallion
(6,642 posts)Last edited Tue Apr 19, 2016, 01:31 PM - Edit history (1)
nm
astrophuss42
(290 posts)My points of view haven't changed much but my party has.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)I fear the pain and sorrow will be universal and profound among Democrats after enormous numbers of these Independents who you insult stay home or vote third party on Nov. 8.
Marr
(20,317 posts)floriduck
(2,262 posts)what an ignorant and uninformed statement you just made. Your mother must be so proud.
questionseverything
(11,836 posts)to have to re register 6 months before the actual primary is ridiculous...it just screams disenfranchisement
dem states should be inclusive not models of corporate party big wigs and high rollers deciding for the little people
but evidently ny has been taken over by wall street and the big banks and they run the show
throw in the disappearing democratic voter registrations and ny seems to be running a 3rd world election process
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)DebDoo
(319 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)stop winning by voter suppression and we'll stop saying you can only win by voter suppression
99Forever
(14,524 posts)...the Demcratic Party if they nominate the wrong candidate and we end up with President Clowncar.
But what the fuck, right? You get to disenfranchise lots of potential future Democrats for a chance at a dirty "win" for your dirty candidate. Hope you enjoy your petty little victory dance today. You can't lock those same awful independents out come November. Anyone who thinks they won't remember who fucked them over today, has their head up their ass.
intheflow
(30,178 posts)The Democratic party as represented by the DNC aren't Democrats - or more precisely, they've hijacked the party of Roosevelt to turn it into Republican-lite, where they are more into pandering to corporate interests to get money than they are to addressing MY needs as a liberal citizen-voter.
I always identified as Democratic growing up, the party of Roosevelt, Kennedy, Johnson. I registered independent for many years feeling that the Democratic party leadership didn't represent my interests as a progressive voter, but I still voted straight Democratic party ticket for decades. I switched registration status to vote for Obama in 2008, but you can't tell me I wasn't a good and faithful Democrat all those years I voted straight-ticket. And FINALLY there's someone running as a Democrat who I really feels represents the Democratic "me" all those years I registered Independent. I'll bet you 90% of those Independents are other iterations of me, of the progressive wing of the party that the DNC has worked for decades to shut down, shut up, and destroy. Sorry! We're not going away! And I will shed tears for my progressive brothers and sisters who are denied voting for Sanders because of some bullshit assumption you and the rest of the DNC-Democrats make about the purity of Democratic Party.
Blue_Tires
(57,596 posts)No matter the political stripe, there's no reason to not know the election rules in YOUR OWN FUCKING STATE
peacebird
(14,195 posts)The people who only found out their registration had changed this week, and had never rquested such a change in status? You totally okay with disenfranchising them too?
Retrograde
(11,419 posts)Isn't he already the candidate of New York's Family Workers Party? So whatever happens before Philadelphia, his supporters in New York will still be able to vote for him in the general election. And maybe swing the state so that a real 3rd party gets a chunk of electoral votes. Now that would be a real blow to the established Democratic party.
And if Sanders does well enough to get the Democratic nomination, thanks to another obscure New York election law he can be on the ballot twice, as both a Democratic and Family Workers candidate!
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)Or do you just want to totally fuck them over?
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)ieoeja
(9,748 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)I'd be all for giving you a refund.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)I've voted in all but one Democratic primary since 1980. I was a $100 a month sustaining member of the DNC for years. I donated the maximum to Obama's campaign in 2008. I've been a DUer since its earliest days. And I am not the one tossing out rightwing tropes.
The only people I see use "latte" as an insult are far right-wing nutjobs and Gomez163.
The only people I see claim that "Liberals are just using African-Americans" are far right-wing nutjobs and Hillary supporters on DU.
The only people I see claiming that people only vote for Democrats for "free stuff" are far right-wing nutjobs and Hillary supporters on DU.
The only people I see arguing against healthcare are far right-wing nutbjos and Hillary supporters on DU.
And you have the nerve to try and paint me as not being a Democrat?
Dem2
(8,178 posts)This is a horrible attitude to have.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)us vote fir the candidste of OUR choice.
But thank you for channeling DNC Debbie! How ver proud uou must feel for telling us to fuck off in your own little special way.
And do you believe that we "hipsters" should show up for Hilly?
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)don't expect the great majority of dienfranchised voters to give a shit about you either.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)SDJay
(1,089 posts)I am a family man with a wife, a small child and hopefully another one on the way - we're waiting to find out about that. /fingers crossed/ I will not ever put one dime of my money into a Starbuck's. I am not up on the latest fashion. I like the beer I like, regardless of whether it's cool at the time or not.
On weekends, I mow my lawn, work in my yard and take my dogs to the beach. I barbecue dinner four or five times per week for my family. I live in a residential area.
I am not a hipster.
The point? I'm also not a registered democrat? You know why? I won't support corruption. I won't support a few puppet masters. I won't send my money to a party I no longer recognize.
It's true that it's convenient for me - in California, I don't need to register as a Democrat to vote in the primary. If that was required, I would do so and then go back to proudly unaffiliated as soon as the voting was done.
The other point? Your post is so stupid, so ignorant, so dismissive and so idiotic that it belies any rational thought.
I am still going to vote for HRC in the GE for obvious reasons.
I am not some uninformed scumbag trying to support the flavor of the month.
Simply a shameful, hateful post. Own it.
apcalc
(4,528 posts)For Independents who screwed up and didn't register in time.
I was an Indie and changed my registration LAST SUMMER.
NO EXCUSES! STOP WHINING.
Response to Gomez163 (Original post)
Vilis Veritas This message was self-deleted by its author.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Birds are territorial creatures.
The lyrics to the songbird's melodious trill go something like this:
"Stay out of my territory or I'll PECK YOUR GODDAMNED EYES OUT!"[/center][/font][hr]
Response to Gomez163 (Reply #114)
Vilis Veritas This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)On the other hand, if you check "I DO NOT WISH TO ENROLL IN A PARTY" I think we should respect that choice.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)We're in whatever party we say we are or no party at all. No loyalty oaths, no tests, no check marks, no picture ID.
It's quite liberating.
Fresh_Start
(11,365 posts)I registered as a republican about a month ago...just so I could pick the republican which will cause the most damage to that party.
Not sure yet if Cruz or Trump would be worse...but whichever I think will be worse for the GOP and best of the Democratic party is who will get my primary vote.
Then I will return to my more comfortable 'decline to state' status.
polly7
(20,582 posts)People with previously nothing (no party) to believe in will not be willing to compromise their own principles until they do find what they're looking for. Millions seem to have found it.
Sucks for the status quo, eh?
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)GardeningGal
(2,211 posts)I'll be sure to skip the election in November if Hillary wins. I guess she doesn't need the independent vote in swing states.