2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMaybe a ticket of Jill Stein and Bernie Sanders. All Bernie Sanders followers and Jill Stein will
Allow the Independents will have a place to put their votes
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)"NADERITE! NADERITE~!"
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Why don't so many Sanders supporters believe what he says either?
I find it to be a strange phenomenon.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)If it wouldn't influence the national election, I'd support this, just to get most of Sanders's sheep to understand what a bubble they're in.
FSogol
(47,623 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)And I doubt Bernie would want to play 2nd fiddle to her. Not on your life!
Recursion
(56,582 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Good point.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Bernie has promised he won't run 3rd party and I believe him
MADem
(135,425 posts)auntpurl
(4,311 posts)Or are you advocating a 3rd party run?
Seeinghope
(786 posts)Screwing up the process so horribly. A true revolution will have to take some very bold moves.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Let's hope the man has more decency than his supporters and keeps his word not to do that after using our party for money and media.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)legacy and reputation.
MADem
(135,425 posts)If you look up "asshole" in the dictionary, there's Ralphie!
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)Sanders is looking at the budget committee chairmanship if he doesn't piss off senate democrats too much if they retake the senate.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Bernie said he wouldn't go third party and I am gonna hold him and us to that. If we are going to choose a third party person it has to be someone else. Jill Stein will have to choose someone who isn't a Democrat or on the Democrat ticket as far as I am concerned. Also if this was to happen despite my objection the only thing that would soften my objection is if Jill was at the top of the ticket.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Bernie did say that but that was a very long time ago and you have to remember, he is suing the DNC. His comments were before all the shenanigans started.
jeepers
(314 posts)is only allowed to run in 21 states. Takes quite a bit to get a political party on the ballot and it is a state by state exercise. Was one of Naders bigger obstacles.
Best option is as a write in where he doesn't even need a party affiliation and could easily get on all 43 that allow write ins.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Registrars.
Domain Name: 3RDPARTYUNDERGROUND.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1734995223_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Update Date: 2012-07-21T06:12:51Z
Creation Date: 2012-07-21T06:12:51Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2017-07-21T06:12:51Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@godaddy.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4806242505
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: Not Available From Registry
Registrant Name: Asif Khan
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: 815 Sandpiper Dr
Registrant City: Sugar Land
Registrant State/Province: Texas
Registrant Postal Code: 77478
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.4242980858
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: productive.citizen@gmail.com
Registry Admin ID: Not Available From Registry
Admin Name: Asif Khan
Admin Organization:
Admin Street: 815 Sandpiper Dr
Admin City: Sugar Land
Admin State/Province: Texas
Admin Postal Code: 77478
Admin Country: US
Admin Phone: +1.4242980858
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: productive.citizen@gmail.com
Registry Tech ID: Not Available From Registry
Tech Name: Asif Khan
Tech Organization:
Tech Street: 815 Sandpiper Dr
Tech City: Sugar Land
Tech State/Province: Texas
Tech Postal Code: 77478
Tech Country: US
Tech Phone: +1.4242980858
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: productive.citizen@gmail.com
Name Server: NS11.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS12.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2016-04-21T16:00:00Z <<<
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)I thought that Jack rabbit site was third-party underground
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)They're so unhappy here.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)Is there such a thing as an Internet U-Haul service
We could always help them pack and move
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)dlwickham
(3,316 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Right here on "Democratic" Underground. SMH
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)experiment- always shocked there are rules to a contest. Whut?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Actually a candidate can accept the nomination of both the Green and Democratic parties simultaneously, were he or she to seek it, though in 49 states that candidate would only appear on the ballot once.
Retrograde
(11,419 posts)Won't he be on the ballot anyway in New York, a state that allows someone to be on multiple party lines (do any other states do this? I don't recall ever seeing it in California).
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I expect Jill will pick up more than a few Democratic votes in the GE.
Response to Seeinghope (Original post)
SaschaHM This message was self-deleted by its author.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)I can't stand Hillary but it it is incredibly selfish not to vote for her if she's the nominee.. A friggin ego trip by people.
grntuscarora
(1,249 posts)He will not do anything post-convention that might help the Repukes win.
That said, I hope he stays in til convention. Damn it, the party needs to be pulled left, and progressive voices must be heard.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)Such a ticket would demolish any Republican ticket in November.
It would carry all demographic groups except the corporate and Wall Street billionaire communities.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)enough to do something so fucking stupid.
He isn't.
still_one
(98,883 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)isn't that against the rules?
Curious
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Third party advocates need to fuck right off, but apparently the rules don't apply to the Bernie fan crowd.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)why are you advocating what none who is serious has said they will do
Codeine
(25,586 posts)People are advocating it and juries are allowing it. I think they should all be permabanned for third party advocacy, including the jurors who allowed it to stand.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)while hosts are closing serious issue discussions. Whatever I learn more and more about the new and improved democratic party.
Glad I am not a member of this club
oberliner
(58,724 posts)STATEMENT FROM GPNY:
We are not surprised by reports of would-be voters in tomorrow's presidential primary discovering that they do not, in fact, belong to the party to which they registered. Many of our members experienced similar frustrations when attempting to register Green.
But the solution to this and other threats to democracy in New York is not so-called "open" primaries, as proposed in a newly-announced lawsuit , but comprehensive voting reforms to support multiparty democracy and a board of elections that operates free from partisan control.
"Open" primaries funnel unaffiliated voters into the corrupt, undemocratic duopoly parties instead of building the grassroots parties we so desperately need. And in a "fusion" voting state like New York, with the odious "Opportunity to Ballot" provision that can force parties to cross-endorse non-members, "open" primaries could obliterate the progress of third parties by flooding them with non-members intent on backing duopoly candidates.
"Open" primaries only serve the short-term interests of unaffiliated voters at the expense of party members who spend time and energy building a fighting organization with a coherent platform and agenda. Should someone who is not a member of a union be allowed to vote for who will be the president of that union? Of course not: a fundamental element of the right to freely assemble is the ability to set reasonable criteria to establish who is a member and who is not.
http://www.gp.org/statement_from_the_green_party_of_ny_on_open_primaries_lawsuit_and_need_for_democratic_reform
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)snowy owl
(2,145 posts)And to look like he's still in the US boundaries.
jeepers
(314 posts)He can run as a write in without party affiliation.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)First off, Jill Stein is simply not a credible candidate. Yeah, I know she's the Green Party one, but they are not a credible party.
And Bernie is NOT going to make a third party run. Period. End of discussion. I wish threads like this would get locked every time they get started, because it's a bit hard to believe that anyone here would promote anything like this.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)He's smarter than the Bernie or Bust idiots.
OhZone
(3,216 posts)Trump can start WW3 and destroy most life on the planet - then in a few million or hundred million years, when a new intelligent species evolves, MAYBE THEY CAN BE SOCIALIST! YAY!