2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum#BlackLives protesters disrupt Hillary Clinton in Philadelphia
Notice the mainstream media blackout of this and other recent disruptions of Clinton events.
Clinton staffer tries to block reporter's video camera
Link: https://www.facebook.com/tattletotphl/videos/1694373214146131/
Philadelphia Protesters: Hillary Clinton is Killing Black People
Enraged Hillary Bro turns violent against protesters
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Love BLM and what they have done to this primary season.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511518764
No rest, no backing down, no fear.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I don't mince my words here when it comes to institutional racism. I support the protests, I believe Clinton is the one they should be protesting, and I support the "riots" that have occurred.
On the other hand, your "uh huh" makes it pretty clear you are in it for the political points. That is an area I would not venture into with this topic. I will with many other topics.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)To most of us this topic deserves a little more than "uh huh."
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)It's pretty obvious which one you're dealing with there. I'll leave it at that instead of having another post hidden. But I think you probably understand what I'm getting at.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Not even sure what you are arguing at this point. You are making no points. I have been extremely clear. I have more to say on the issue than "uh huh".
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)I just said uh huh. You don't like that.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Why not elaborate on your "uh huh"?
I know why.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)To be completely blunt, I couldn't think of anything good to say and just wanted to kick the thread.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)This is a progressive board, or it was. We should all have something to say on this topic. I do now get you struggled to "think of anything good to say."
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Maybe you deserved a better response than Uh huh.
You're not really giving me responses. You're just posting a photo of John Lewis. That's about as deep as "uh huh".
My first thought is I want to know more about this particular protest, and why there's no mainstream media coverage of it.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Look at what your first "uh huh" was in response to. It had nothing to do with Lewis as you are now claiming.
Then look at your second "uh huh". What did that have to do with Lewis as you are now claiming that is all I posted.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)as breaking news, though not that footage.
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)She's liberal on women's issues, but that alone does not cover the scope of Progressivism.
Progressives support the following by definition:
Fracking Bans
Ending Privatized Prisons
Legalization of Marijuana
Staying out of and not provoking right-wing coups in Central America
Breaking up the 2 big 2 fail banks
Staying out of wars
Disclosing secret speeches for hundreds of thousands of dollars to Goldman-Sachs
No bosom buddy friendships with Henry Kissinger and the Bush Crime Family
No inclinations to make deals with Republicans on Social Security
For these lapses and more, Hillary Clinton's progressive score is "D". The only reason it's not an "F" is women's issues, but I read where she's open to negotiations with the Republicans on late term abortions. So ... perhaps a "D-".
PyaarRevolution
(814 posts)This goes along with the fracking ban but it can't be said enough she wants "Natural Gas" for a bridge fuel. That's code for "let's transition to Natural Gas and scrap this green thing".
We need to go Green everywhere, come hell or high water, especially considering all these oil spills in addition to those cargo freighters and the disgusting sludge they're burning for fuel.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)He simply said "uh huh"?
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)What are you trying to say by posting a picture of John Lewis?
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)WTF?????
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)I just thought it was a cool picture. NCT posted a photo of John Lewis for no apparent reason so I just posted a pic of Nat Turner for no reason.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)You really seem to just want to oppose my support of BLM. Actually, not "seem", it all you are doing.
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)Not used for cheap primary coinage.
I know #BLM isn't fond of Hillary or Sanders.
I still stand with #BLM
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)BLM took over the verbiage of this primary very early on. They did it pretty brilliantly and courageously.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)You are the winner of this exchange.
You're right.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Becuase I have... posting photos is not as significant as actual real support
?w=1000&h=&crop=1
And by the way, #justiceforsd33 has to do with CPC 182.5
?w=700&h=
The echos to the 1960s in this Black and White is not accidental
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)links are in the news story to the whole context, Before you say some of us don't support it
Oh and before you read it, think Freddie Gray...
https://reportingsandiego.com/2016/04/20/state-of-mind-during-the-confrontation-between-branch-and-detective-ward/
More to come on Tuesday.
By the way, these kinds of hearings do not last this long usually.
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)shanti
(21,675 posts)haven't missed much, lol
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)I bet Prncess Weathervane's Ostrich Army are losing their shit over this.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)I only saw 8 posts before yours, too.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)No matter WHO they are protesting.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)I say good on them.
I stand with BLM.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I supported them when they disrupted Bernie Sander's event, too. I have not once seen Hillary Clinton treat them with same respect Bernie has.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)But I am on the fence of if they gain more from interrupting as forceful as the do. I am not sure if the press they gain offsets the negative image that some people get. With Bernie they were yelling in the old guy's face...it was a bit painful to watch...but they did get their message out. I always like the loud group protests that are less close, like in the first video because they show strength, but is is far easier to just ignore them...which as I said leaves me back on the fence.
Has anyone read studies on the effects of a more aggressive vs passive protest?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)"Has anyone read studies on the effects of a more aggressive vs passive protest? "
I say this very respectfully as I believe many ask that same exact question. I'm not sure we need to go to research.
The Seattle protest you are talking about is one of the smallest yet most impactful protest we have seen in the last couple of years. No one denies that the very next day Sanders changed his stump speech and came out with different proposals addressing social justice. Literally the day after the protest you mention. They completely changed the direction of the campaign. That was huge. While Clinton was already addressing social justice, she also increased the amount of time she dedicated to the issue on the trail.
That was just with one in your face protest that involved very few people.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)I honestly don't like it when people paint my candidate as the one that was not addressing social injustice, I have always seen it as actions speak louder than words. I grew up with Hillary, and I did not see a person going out of their way to help the black people in my town, I saw a person that took pictures on porches with black families come election time, and a guy that appointed some people for positions to appease the communities. I think he even signed for a black with brain damage to be executed when he was running for office. Don't get me wrong if all you can get is lip service it is better than nothing. It seems that the reason that they actually choose Sanders and his supporters were "sympathetic to racial justice issues", so by going to such a group they stood the chance to gain the largest gain...thus hoping the Sander's support would then cause other groups to fall in. I think this is a logical step. I still wish she would have moved a few inches out of that guy's face (unless she was hoping for an arrest to help publicity), because getting that close and yelling in someone's ear is assault (it loud enough) as you can actually permanently damage someone's ear when you hit 125 for more than 6 seconds...and the louder the more instant. (https://lasermom.wordpress.com/2012/01/08/crying/) I was looking at it from a damage point on that one since I have had to take many hearing tests and I know the second you fire a loud gun with no ear protection you lose your upper range instantly. I was all for the screaming, I wonder if they would have tried to talk to him after they screamed it it would have helped more...but as the article says and I even remember the interview, they didn't want to be part of the system.
But with Bernie Sanders, BLM activists have that 3%. Many of Bernies supporters are already sympathetic to racial justice issues, and it takes comparatively little effort to encourage them to support a specific action plan for racial justice in the candidates platform. And guess what? They got it.
Within days of the confrontation, the Sanders campaign unveiled a racial justice platform. In his next campaign speech in Portland, Ore, attended by over 26,000, he opened with his new platform on racial justice. For the cost of planning the takeover of the stage, BLM activists changed a major Presidential candidates platform.
Read more at http://www.solutions-institute.org/the-three-percent-why-black-lives-matter-seattle-won-when-they-interrupted-bernie-sanders/#7lrj5ycf2u8OlAGK.99
http://www.solutions-institute.org/the-three-percent-why-black-lives-matter-seattle-won-when-they-interrupted-bernie-sanders/
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Sanders did not appear to be in any danger. The protesters were not assaulting nor did they appear to be dangerous to Sanders health. I'm not really going to comment more on that as I viewed it as a peaceful protest. Anything I would say about painting them as assaulting Sanders would simply stop all discussion.
One of BLM's greatest moves was to protest Clinton and Sanders. We fully agree there. Protest where you can have the most impact.
It's common knowledge that Sanders came out of the gate promoting economic solutions to just about everything. That does not mean he has never addressed or care about some of the social aspects. It was simply his message out of the gate and it was a good move on his part. That says nothing about his career. Just that point in time and it's accurate.
There is also no denying that his stump speeches underwent massive changes after Seattle. It had to happen. He also ramped up that aspect of his website the following week.
My comments here and above are not negative on Sanders.
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)I think that's why he emphasized/targeted economic justice first. When economic fairness prevails, everyone benefits socially as well as economically. Nothing like a job and paycheck to give people stability. But I also think it was wise to be explicit about social justice.
Wasn't Seattle one of the first Bernie speeches to actually hear from BLM? I think that's why it was sort of jostling. Now I get it and I think it is important. I was disappointed when the occupy movement seemed to disappear.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Fully agree. Much of that verbiage alone wasn't being used. What he was outlining at the time would lift all at the bottom economic status into a "more comfortable" place while bringing down those with extreme earnings. He was also addressing making government more accountable to everyone. Both great messages. But when you have severely oppressed groups, you directly address them. That is the change he made the day after Seattle. His message is excellent. I'm not knocking it.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)Him...
Again I work with some tools that can cause damage and I have gone trough too many safety and hearing loss courses (I always wear plugs to the movie theater).
She stayed more like 10 inches or so from Bernie's ear, but it was aimed in to the canal which I still was not a fan of.
And here are what I was talking about as fallout, people disgusted by the way they did this. But it may have been worth it.
Also I think it is a bit sad someone as real as Bernie will lose to my ex-governor couple from the south because of brand name recognition.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)I just don't like the fact that they could have actually damaged some nice old guy's hearing. Can't we at least agree that shouting in the the ears of someone is not a good thing to do? I am fine with the protest, but not hurting people especially older people. You can bet if this was Hillary there would have been tons of fake outrage and a little justified over the way she was yelling in to his ear and grabbing him...it is a little double standardish.
Also the people that liked the video and ran with it are some anti-semitic freaks...(look at the title for the video)
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)she considered him a sheepdog for liberals on the Democratic side.
The Seattle protest did not change his stump speech much except to incorporate more BLM specific language.
This is Bernie Sanders doing his stump speech before NN16 and Seattle.
jfern
(5,204 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)The idea that she was ever better than Bernie on social justice is absurd.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)I stand with them above anything else
Response to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)
Post removed
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)Sucks he is not allowed to have an opinion. But it is nice to know he has a job doing dirty work, perhaps he can get a job with Hillary since that sounds like that is right up her avenue.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)snowy owl
(2,145 posts)Nobody has worked harder to create a movement and that is his ultimate goal. Who will take over? Who has the honest and respected reputation to actually keep this going?
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)We essentially ARE in a press pit, and getting out of it, for any reason, can be a problem. This is especially the case when the Secret Service is running the show. With Cruz I was able to get much closer, and get a few photos on the rope line (my bag is much better thank you) because that was not a secret service show.
I am sharing this as insight.