2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (CompanyFirstSergeant) on Sat Apr 23, 2016, 09:40 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Or maybe the Axis of Idiocy.
I can go either way
Sid
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)Beacool
(30,518 posts)Does someone actually pay them to write their wet dreams? Everything they write is drivel based on wishful thinking and not reality. Two nut jobs.
Unicorn
(424 posts)that post. And, progressive is out of the question since you just attacked a regarded progressive voice with normal progressive values. Are you a strong moderate?
Beacool
(30,518 posts)I don't disdain liberals, but at some point reality will hit Sanders' supporters. Even if he won every single primary that's left in the calendar, Hillary would still be ahead in pledged delegates. Hillary will more likely than not win PA, MD and CT. Not sure about RI and DE, as there hasn't been any recent polling. She'll easily win my state (NJ) and she's up in the polls in CA. What realistic path does Sanders have to surpass her lead in pledged delegates?
Unicorn
(424 posts)I will support him until the end of the primary because he reflects my values.
Beacool
(30,518 posts)I do have a huge problem with his staffers (Weaver and Devine) suggesting that they would subvert democracy and fight on the convention floor to try to convince super delegates to switch to Sanders, even if he lags in pledged delegates and the popular vote. That's undemocratic and will never happen. It's beyond offensive that they would even suggest that the nominee should be the losing candidate. In 2008 Hillary had the support of most super delegates, but once Obama was ahead in the pledged delegate count, they did the right thing and switched to Obama. This year won't be any different. BTW, in 2008 Obama was ahead by a tad over 100 delegates. Hillary is currently ahead by 277 pledged delegates and her delegate count is probably going to increase after next Tuesday.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Response to CompanyFirstSergeant (Original post)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)right wing voters from only getting their information from FOX and not listening to information they don't want to hear.
It is exactly what they are doing, . . they don't want to know about it, so they pretend it isn't real, won't even listen to it. Just as ignorant as those they have criticized.
TimeToEvolve
(303 posts)whose corporate logo is... a.. filthy......FOX.... hmmm
bjo59
(1,166 posts)I find it mind blowing that this sort of "campaign" can be kept up for so long. Nothing but high school level put downs of anyone who writes anything supporting Sanders or anything critiquing Clinton's very well known record. You would think they would bore themselves to tears. The strategy is obvious (keep responding to nuanced, varied and researched critique with the same vapid put downs over and over and over again. It's a tried and true argumentation strategy for folks who got nothin'). The longer Clinton stays in the race the more party election board "shenanigans" comes to light, the more replay of Clinton's scandal ridden career appears in the press, and so forth. Her campaign needs him out like yesterday and it must be nerve inducing and infuriating for them to realize that, because he's beholden to no one but the citizens who support him, he can't be threatened to drop out of the race. Tough luck!
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(135,713 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Maybe then they would get some of that sweet, sweet 'Not Hillary' Party cash and not be so totally broke.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)How undemocratic, though.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)
RandySF
(84,284 posts)Writing nothing but fiction to give false hope to Bernie's supporters. I wish someone would ask whether he is getting paid, under the table, by Jeff Weaver.
Response to RandySF (Reply #11)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
RandySF
(84,284 posts)Response to RandySF (Reply #38)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Response to CompanyFirstSergeant (Original post)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to CompanyFirstSergeant (Original post)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to LexVegas (Reply #44)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
LexVegas
(6,959 posts)Response to LexVegas (Reply #50)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)disconnect here.
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)Response to Bobbie Jo (Reply #15)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Response to CompanyFirstSergeant (Original post)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
think
(11,641 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)the germaine question: is Hillary still viable as a candidate if the FBI Report reflects that facts that have already been reported? Even if Comey takes a sort of middle road and merely finds she violated the terms of her signed Classified Information Agreement (which is essentially the same as a finding she violated specific federal laws), I don't see how the DNC and White House and the Convention Rules Committee can put her back together sufficiently to run as the Democratic Party's candidate. It just doesn't seem plausible that she's going to be President, or even make it to the November Ballot.
I do understand however the perceived need for the Kabuki Theater that she is still the Democratic front-runner. That is to keep the cats herded in the right direction, as the party elites see it, and to prevent panic by her supporters and rebellion by the base, particularly the Bernie wing of the party. It's like there's an incoming asteroid and nothing that can really be done to prevent it. Do you tell the public, or not, until it's visible to the naked eye? Probably not.
Sham? Hmmm . . . more like an expeditious illusion.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Response to think (Reply #20)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Adlai Stevenson because he had been divorced. Today we are able to vote for someone who is being investigated by the FBI.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Baobab
(4,667 posts)This is insanity
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Thank you for posting this.
People who are proud Democrats do not dismiss the FBI's investigation. They fear the conclusion, yes, but they value truth more than blind allegiance to a cult of personality.
Response to grasswire (Reply #25)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)It is only the uninformed here who are dismissive.
Response to CompanyFirstSergeant (Original post)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Shouldn't be this easy for someone like him.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)by RICHARD W. BEHAN
CounterPunch, FEBRUARY 26, 2016
EXCERPT...
President Clinton appointed Robert Rubin, the Co-chairman of Goldman-Sachs, as his Treasury Secretary in January of 1995. Mr. Rubin went to work fashioning two laws of stupendous value to the New York banks, but President Clintons first term of office ended before they could be enacted.
Perhaps sensing the need to assure Clintons re-election, Wall Street saw fit nearly to triple its campaign contributionsfrom $11.17 million in 1992 to $28.37 million in 1996.
Continued nicely in office, Secretary Rubin triumphed with the passage of the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, which repealed the Glass-Steagall legislation of 1933. Now it was legal once more for financial institutions to mix commercial and investment banking; in essence, to use depositors funds for trading the banks own account in the stock market.
A year later President Clinton signed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act. This law ended the regulation of derivatives, freeing Wall Street to manufacture mortgage-backed securities and sell them without restriction; these complex derivatives would power the subprime swindle soon to commence.
Meanwhile, in Clintons Justice Department a deputy Attorney General named Eric Holder in 1999 authored a memo entitled Bringing Criminal Charges Against Corporations. It became the Holder Doctrine, and after the financial crisis of 2008 it would be of incalculable value to the Wall Street banks. On leaving the Administration Mr. Holder joined Covington Burling, the largest law firm in Washington, D.C.. Among its clients were Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, UBS, Bank of New York Mellon, Deutsche Bank, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America.
CONTINUED...
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/02/26/the-clintons-and-wall-street-24-years-of-enriching-each-other/
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)He never gets anything right. I can't imagine why anyone seriously posts anything he writes on DU.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)and their whole life gets put on hold till they are cleared huh?
Even if it takes decades??
Fuck off Goodman. I don't want to live in your fascist world!
oberliner
(58,724 posts)From the same author.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)they say in the future matters?
Is that the BS you're trying to push?
Man that is one of the stupidest things I've read today.
And if that is the case, you certainly can't believe anything the Clinton campaign says. They said Bernie wouldn't win any states, or maybe only Vermont. Oops! Everything they say from then on must be dismissed, right?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)All of his articles are like that.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)He's still predicting Clinton will come in third!
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)But this OP is a very clear statement of the way things are.
Did you know they have 2 emails from Hillary instructing one of her staff to remove the classified markings from a message and to send it through non-secure fax.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)
Response to MrWendel (Reply #54)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)to the White house. So I guess her response would be....

Don't take my word for it. Ask Trey Gowdy.
Response to MrWendel (Reply #56)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)the right substance so the shit people are desperately throwing isn't sticking.
Response to MrWendel (Reply #59)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
all american girl
(1,788 posts)Tarc
(10,601 posts)INDICTMENT FAIRY!
INDICTMENT FAIRY!
INDICTMENT FAIRY!

Response to Tarc (Reply #60)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Tarc
(10,601 posts)and a handful of Camp Sanders followers who, realizing they have no viable path to the nomination, are carrying the GOP's water as a last resort.
Response to Tarc (Reply #67)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tarc
(10,601 posts)If you watch the actual exchange, Jake Tapper make him look like an idiot, repeatedly asking if he had any evidence of the wrongdoing that Flynn alleged.
The guy was a moron, but if you wanna suck up tho his ilk, be my guest...
Response to Tarc (Reply #72)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tarc
(10,601 posts)Btw, I just found out he is now an adviser to Donald Trump, so, triple
Michael Flynn is a moron, and now an enabler of a vile, xenophobic racist canidate in Trump. These are some seriously new lows that the Sanders camp has sunk to.
Response to Tarc (Reply #74)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tarc
(10,601 posts)That expresses my utter contempt and derision for someone who cites a Donald Trump acolyte to attack Clinton.
Response to Tarc (Reply #77)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Tarc (Reply #74)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)ETA: these are the posts of those calling out Goodman? Yikes already.
Response to libdem4life (Reply #64)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)I ijust can't get over the Group Think of about 10 posts within 5-10 minutes over some writer. To me, that says there is definitely a itchy spot needing a scratch.
And whenever one asks What Information Was Wrong...crickets. But the one-liner childish retorts cause one to wonder about the level of the, uh, communication.
Tarc
(10,601 posts)That pretty much says it all.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)payroll?
Judging by all the horseshit that's getting shoveled in DU today I'd guess a whole bunch!
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Response to libdem4life (Reply #79)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)
JSup
(740 posts)...let them blow off their steam.
All we're doing with this back and forth is turning each other into reactionaries.
Response to JSup (Reply #69)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)None of this affects the Real World. Nobody with a healthy mind is allowing GD-P to impact their actual thought processes.
Beacool
(30,518 posts)But, Abramson and Goodman are just plain delusional and nuts.
Gothmog
(179,869 posts)asuhornets
(2,427 posts)Ain't nobody tell me nothin'.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)If it was a success, she would have improved her numbers over time.
She is a failure. A David v Goliath fight where Goliath only wins because by making it 15 rounds.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)Should be soon. I almost feel sorry for them.
Almost.
Beacool
(30,518 posts)The guy is delusional.
reddread
(6,896 posts)you know, the ones he supposedly wasnt in?
now there is some delusional activity
Beacool
(30,518 posts)Besides, I didn't question Sanders' bona fides when it came to his activist years in Chicago.
reddread
(6,896 posts)no comparison
The Velveteen Ocelot
(130,533 posts)I don't like irrational partisans of either stripe. He's just as ridiculous for Bernie as Amanda Marcotte is for Hillary.
Botany
(77,323 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Goodman again. The delusion runs strong through this clown. Sounds like he's at the bargaining stage.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)This is a thing based in reality.
So go ahead, mock away and deny what's happening. America sees through it.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/fbi-director-democratic-convention-not-deadline-clinton-email-investigation-n560026
Response to CompanyFirstSergeant (Original post)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... to them at all, perhaps because the policy positions match up so well.
Response to Scuba (Reply #111)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.