2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBill Clinton can’t stop screwing up: Why his latest broadside against millennials reveals an
underlying problem.
If the Clinton campaign is hoping to get young people out to vote for Hillary in November, it may want to start thinking about sidelining one of its most well-known surrogates: her husband.
Though still charming and well-liked after all these years, Bill Clinton has not been very helpful to his wifes campaign thus far; if anything, he has caused more harm than good, with several ill-advised remarks that have alienated voters whom Hillary will be vying for in the months to come. The former president has recently gone on a defensive rant about his notorious crime bill, claiming that BLM protesters are defending the people who kill the lives [they] say matter, and has condescendingly joked that Bernie Sanders supporters think you can shoot every third person on Wall Street and everything will be fine.
On Thursday, he once again put his foot in his mouth, this time blaming young voters, who tend to support Sanders over Hillary, for current economic disparities. The reason that theres so much anxiety, intensity, anger, blame in this election is that 80 percent of the American people have not gotten a pay raise since the crash eight years ago, after inflation, said Clinton, at a rally in Pennsylvania. A valid observation, but Bill just couldnt help taking a swipe at all of those young voters who overwhelmingly support his wifes opponent: If all the young people who claim to be disillusioned now had voted in 2010, we wouldnt have lost the Congress, and wed probably have our incomes back.
Thatll win over millennials!
Of course, it should be noted that a large percentage of todays youth vote was not even eligible to vote in 2010, and many other groups also failed to turnout in large numbers. Moreover, the independent vote, which shifted to the right that year, was the most important contributor to the Republican rout.
http://www.salon.com/2016/04/25/bill_clinton_cant_stop_screwing_up_why_his_latest_broadside_against_millennials_reveals_an_underlying_problem/
doc03
(37,114 posts)zazen
(2,978 posts)That's the vibe I get. I think he's subconsciously ambivalent about her success and really misses calling the shots, so he somehow manages to make himself the center of things over and over and over again.
Does it help my candidate? I guess. But I still wish he'd shut up because I don't like to see a smart woman (even one with whom I disagree vehemently) undermined by her husband.
doc03
(37,114 posts)Seeinghope
(786 posts)What can he do and what will he do? He knows a lot and is a smart man, maybe too smart of he is losing it. It really is a scary situation and nobody really seems to want to address it head on.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)More candidates that can pass the Clinton/Wasserman-Scultz litmus tests would not improve our situation meaningfully.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)GreatGazoo
(4,025 posts)the biggest disaster in Democratic party history. Was that the fault of Millennials too?
http://www.britannica.com/topic/1994-midterm-Elections-616578
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)GreatGazoo
(4,025 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,220 posts)I think the Big Dawg is on the same path. Sad.