Clock is ticking Hillary supporters

[GoLeft2004]

Emails on Hillary Clinton's secret server matched top secret documents virtually word for word and included details of CIA drone strikes against Islamic radicals.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3462774/Spy-agencies-say-Clinton-emails-closely-matched-secret-documents-sources.html

Napolitano: Indictment or not, Hillary faces catastrophe

&feature=youtu.be

[Skwmom]

1. So explain to me how a SOS would NOT know this information was classified?

[Buzz Clik]

3. It's great that you ask the same question every day,

... and still find it funny.

[Skwmom]

6. I don't ask it everyday. I just can't wait to hear the spin on this one. It should be a doozy!

[rock]

8. Some people are

easily amused.

[Buzz Clik]

9. Out of respect to you, I am going to pay homage after tomorrow night.

Because you love the <rofl> so very much, I'm going to add up the total percent from each state. If HRC takes PA by 5, DE by 3, and MD by 10 but loses RI by 3 and CT by 2, the total net for HRC would be 5+3+10-3-2=13. That's 13 <rofl> smilies I will put in place every time I respond to you. It will be me saying to you, "Hey, Bernie lost by an accumulative 13% -- isn't that the funniest damned thing ever?!"

[Dem2]

13. .

[Buzz Clik]

14. ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch

[Dem2]

16. 17 ouch's, is that a prediction?

[Buzz Clik]

27. +1

Well played.

[Skwmom]

44. Feel free, but it won't bother me.

[pnwmom]

128. The so-called "classified" info was taken from MEDIA REPORTS about drone strikes

that the whole world could have read before anyone mentioned it in a classified report. And that public story got repeated in an email.

[egalitegirl]

70. It is possible

In case of Hillary, she is not an intelligent person and others probably ran the Department. She actually believed that the Benghazi violence was the result of Muslims becoming mad at a youtube video. She does not even realize that such a characterization of Muslims is racist.

If you have seen her emails, you will see that she seems uncomfortable with technology and gives directions to her staff to please print the email. She also does not tweet herself. This is clear because tweets were appearing when she was in the debate. Somewhere it says that if the tweet is directly from her, it will be indicated. My guess is that she orally dictates the tweets and someone else has to tweet it for her while she is awestruck by the idea that technology can do things like sending out tweets.

[puffy socks]

89. Myth No. 2: The Attack Had Nothing to do With the anti-Islam Video

While it has since proven true that there was not a protest outside the facility precipitating the attack, the notion that the attack had absolutely nothing to do with the YouTube video (a clip showing an excerpt from the anti-Islam film “The Innocence of Muslims” that sparked protests and riots in dozens of countries, many of which outside U.S. diplomatic missions) is simply not supported by the facts. In reality, many witnesses who were interviewed shortly after the attack said that the militants from the Ansar al-Sharia brigade were chanting about the video during the assault on the facility.

As reported in the L.A. Times, “Witnesses said members of the group that raided the U.S. mission specifically mentioned the video, which denigrated the prophet Muhammad.”

The Associated Press reported, “There was no sign of a spontaneous protest against an American-made movie denigrating Islam’s Prophet Muhammad. But a lawyer passing by the scene said he saw the militants gathering around 20 youths from nearby to chant against the film. Within an hour or so, the assault began, guns blazing as the militants blasted into the compound.”

The New York Times reported the month after the attack: “To Libyans who witnessed the assault and know the attackers, there is little doubt what occurred: a well-known group of local Islamist militants struck the United States Mission without any warning or protest, and they did it in retaliation for the video. That is what the fighters said at the time, speaking emotionally of their anger at the video without mentioning Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden or the terrorist strikes of 11 years earlier.”

This doesn’t mean that the video served as the only reason for the attack. There is some evidence to suggest that perhaps the attack also served as retaliation for the death of Libyan militant and al-Qaeda associate Abu Yahya al-Libi who was killed in a U.S. drone strike three month earlier. But the claims that the attack had nothing whatsoever to do with the video do not comport with the evidence.

http://heavy.com/news/2013/05/myths-benghazi-attack-coverup-factcheck/

[WheelWalker]

104. Actually, it is utterly believable to me that someone of HRC's age still speaks to a Dictaphone

that uses cassette tapes which are transcribed and then routed to an assistant to send as an email. I know several attorneys who practice that way one of whom is laughingly known as "The Great Dictator". Those attorneys are not particularly effective, however, and I do believe it would be difficult to run a cabinet department that way and get anything done in a timely manner.

[IdaBriggs]

125. Under the Clinton Plan, every government employee can evade FOIA

and keep government emails on their private accounts -- "classified" is just a suggestion!

The precedent if they DON'T indict her is staggering.

[pnwmom]

130. Not true. The Federal law changed after Hillary left office and she doesn't support changing the law

[pnwmom]

151. She's never said she was above it. It didn't exist when she was in office. n/t

[Buzz Clik]

2. Yep! ANY. DAY. NOW!!!!!1111one

[sheshe2]

39. Member since 2003.

Total posts 28.

19 in the last 90 days.

Hmmmm~

[Chasstev365]

4. They don't care!

You're just being a hater.........

[KingFlorez]

5. The only chance for Sanders

Sad.

[nolawarlock]

20. I know right? nt

[RobertEarl]

23. She should just quit

How embarrassing it is that your leader can't even keep state secrets.

[nolawarlock]

26. My leader?

I have only one person I call my leader, and that's myself.

At best, they weren't state secrets when she got them and if there was ever a danger of them becoming retroactively secret, then these security agencies should have stopped her from having the server. If this actually is an issue—and I do not believe that it is—they're as at fault as she is since they were in this game longer than her and they must have known that it was always possible that items would be retroactively classified.

Moreover, what the heck is retroactively classified anyway? That's like trying to put toothpaste back in a tube.

[RobertEarl]

28. Your Leading candidate, right

I have to laugh at your: It's the agencies fault for her breaking the law. That is a funny one.

[nolawarlock]

30. Given that each of these Secretaries of State need to be trained ...

... I imagine there are IT people and security people saying what you can and cannot do and clearly she did this with someone's approval. If they knew the potential for this existed, why was it allowed?

Either way, it's such a tempest in a teacup. Even your leader doesn't care about these emails and he's had plenty of horrible things to say about Hillary.

[RobertEarl]

32. You are a laugh a minute

The FBI is investigating. Have been for sometime.

Your new funny is like blaming cops for robberies. They knew robberies were gonna happen, why didn't they stop it?

Given who your leader is, I am not surprised to find you so funny.

[nolawarlock]

43. This is hardly the same.

These are people that would have instructed her specifically on what to do and what not to do.

But thank you for giving me another name to add to my jury block.

[nolawarlock]

46. And the fact that we're resorting to Right Wing punditry to make our point doesn't bother you?

Napolitano is not a journalist. That is a right wing opinion show. You don't think this represents a bizarre change of tone here? Moreover, how much of a Ring Winger can Hillary be if the Right Wingers hate her so much?

As for who my leader is, I already stated that: myself.

But some of you here are so condescending, it really tempts me to sit this election out if your guy wins.

Mind you, I won't, but it's tempting.

Not that I need to worry. I probably have a better chance of hitting Powerball than Bernie has at being president at this point.

[RobertEarl]

52. Awwww, we make you mad?

Yes, the FBI is a known right wing org and they are on the trail of someone who, it appears, has spread state secrets around like candy. If it were one of us we'd be in jail already.

When they do get her, Bernie will have run of the field. Now that's gonna leave a Bern mark, isn't it?

[nolawarlock]

55. I'm talking about the OP ...

... but then you knew that already.

As for mad, my sig file should say how much fun I'm having this primary season. It's been years since I've had the right opportunity to use an Exorcist reference in a meme.

And by tomorrow night, I'll be cackling a whole lot more. I actually thought people should be a little nicer this primary season, but then I joined to talk about the vatican visit and was treated so incredibly viciously that schadenfreude does not begin to explain the arrogant joy I will feel when Bernie finally loses. I am probably going to throw a party at the swankiest restaurant in town and treat myself to a staircase of caviar.

[RobertEarl]

60. So you like to cackle?

Isn't that special?

And you expected people to be nice to you? Damn, you ARE a laugh a minute!!! Welcome to DU!!

[nolawarlock]

62. Many people have been nice to me here.

Even some Bernie people. :-D

[RobertEarl]

68. Why were they nice to you?

Was it back when you used to say you were a Bernie lever puller?

Thanks for the laughs.....

[nolawarlock]

71. I was never a Bernie supporter.

I would almost certainly pull the lever for him if he's the nominee, in spite of how his acolytes make him look, but I'd definitely prefer he not be the candidate.

[RobertEarl]

75. So you'll vote for Trump?

[nolawarlock]

79. Where did I ever say that? LOL

Worst case scenario is I would stay home, but no, I'm not Hillary or Bust. I will definitely be voting Dem in November, and, specifically, for Hillary.

[nolawarlock]

83. The best part of your post about thinking I'm for Trump

is that you're posting on a thread fueled by Right Wing punditry on Fox.

The second best part is it gives more play to my sig file.

[RobertEarl]

85. I don't see your sig line

You know you can get banned for saying you won't vote for Bernie if he is the nominee?

[nolawarlock]

86. Really? Nice try.

People say they're Bernie or Bust on here constantly and there are whole threads dedicated to how folks will never vote for Hillary.

That said, I will vote for Bernie if he is the nominee. I won't like it, but I'll do it. Maybe he'll surprise me like Obama did. But either way, this is moot. He's not going to win.

[RobertEarl]

91. He probaly will win

Given the situations developing he looks like he will be the president. Lets hope so. Gawd, can you imagine the problems we'd have with another republican as POTUS?

[nolawarlock]

93. So if you consider Hillary such a Republican ...

... why do you support all the Right Wing punditry posted here lately?

Oh, and he won't win. You can take that to the bank.

[nolawarlock]

92. Oh, and you must be on a phone or something...

... but the sig line is spectacular.

[RobertEarl]

94. I'm sure it is

I mean you are funny as heck. You must be awful proud of it. You should print it out and show it to your waiter when you eat your caviar? Maybe they would be interested?

[nolawarlock]

96. It fascinates me that you use Lincoln as your avatar ...

... yet you keep trying to paint me as a Republican.

And no, I save the giggles for the internet. When I'm caviar mode, there's nothing else but caviar going on.

[metroins]

7. You're posting that video?

You've done more to hurt yourself than Hillary with this post

[GoLeft2004]

19. Yes.

The truth hurts.

[Unicorn]

45. how?

The video link is dead for me by the way.

[metroins]

51. Judge Napolitano is not credible.

[Unicorn]

58. Thank you, I will start googling him.

Update, on further reading, I will concede that you are correct. He is a Republican source so shouldn't be cited. Especially with today's Republicans... He comes off as absolutely one of them.

[metroins]

74. Have a good night!

[Unicorn]

77. You too!

[pdsimdars]

135. I don't know who he is but I have seen him on some shows and he gives very clear

explanations of the situation. I don't think I'd agree with his politics but he does one hell of a job clarifying the law.

People really need to get over this "kill the messenger" thing, it's not how smart people operate.

[nolawarlock]

66. They already knew that.

That's what makes this so farcical. I'm waiting for Ron Brown's plane to come flying into GDP.

[pdsimdars]

134. It only hurts people who don't want to deal with the truth . . they have to do more mental

gymnastics to rationalize it.

[ronnykmarshall]

10. This shit was alerted and allowed to stay?

Pathetic!

[RobertEarl]

25. Poster on DU should go down

But the person who spread state secrets around like candy should stay? WTF!!!

[Unicorn]

48. +1

[Scurrilous]

122. Spreading State secrets was oh, so grand and heroic and statue worthy when Snowden did it.

Now an alleged errant email is occasion for burning at the stake. The hilarity...

[BirdieSanders]

132. The hilarity and utter scurrilousness of your comparison of Snowden (all things public, common good)

to HRC (cloistered, elitist, repulsed by the masses in their pathetic attempt to know her, fondness for coups in states which do not fawn over her transnational besties, need we go on?)

[treestar]

146. The comparison is between how it was great and transparent when Snowden

revealed it. The demands then were for total transparency. There were to be no state secrets, according to some posters. It was authoritarian to argue there should be any.

Now suddenly there is an acknowledgment that there is such a thing as national security and some things ought not to be revealed and it was too dangerous for Hillary to have that information on another server. From basically the same posters.

They should not care, because it makes it all transparent.

[treestar]

145. +1

[pdsimdars]

138. ^^^^^^^^^^^ Amen! ^^^^^^^^^^^

[1StrongBlackMan]

56. I wouldn't call the person vile ...

just woofully, un and/or mis, informed ...and I blame the internets.

[nolawarlock]

31. I'm pretty sure they can start posting stuff about Vince Foster and it would be allowed to stay

Oh wait, in spite of a few DU'ers saying no Bernie people have gone there with Vince Foster, they actually did. A post was [thankfully] hidden the other day that linked to a site so Right Wing, it was covered with the worst kind of conspiracy theories, anti-abortion hate, and anti-gay rage.

Since they control the jury system and the admins don't care, I think nothing is off limits in terms of what they can and will say about Hillary and her supporters.

[IdaBriggs]

123. Hillary supporter mentions Vince Foster - drink!

[nolawarlock]

139. A Bernie supporter already posted a site where Vince Foster was among the conspiracy theories ...

... and terrible anti-abortion and anti-gay rhetoric were also plastered all over it.

And, with your completely unjust hide of me the other day, you were posting Fox news, which I still think is inappropriate. I keep expecting Ron Brown's plane to fly through GDP at any moment.

Either way, I plan to celebrate tonight. What are your plans?

[IdaBriggs]

148. Conference call about lowering infant mortality and helping special needs

children. I didn't alert on you, but did send the admins the PM you sent me since you were on a timeout. I've seen worse/not sure why your post was hidden. Good luck to both of our candidates!

[nolawarlock]

149. Fox journalism is right wing spin enough ...

... but posting it set the precedent that saw later posts of Napolitano hate.

I was not on a time-out when I messaged you. It was the hide right after that that timed me out. If I were on a time-out, I would not have been able to message you because the system wouldn't allow it.

But whatever. It was a lame hide as are most of them here and it's the abuse of the system here that makes me cheer whatever happened on Facebook. I'm sure it was only a glitch, but if a bunch of Hillary supporters exploited the flaws in Facebook's system, I'm glad because it's done here every day.

[pdsimdars]

137. Facts are not pathetic, what is pathetic is ignoring facts.

[Firebrand Gary]

12. Disgusting! Does anyone have the Enemies Within piece on Sander's? Repost on this thread!

[CentralCoaster]

21. You've seen it but you don't have it?

Or do you have it but not want to post it?

[pdsimdars]

141. So you probably think that a friend who won't let you driver yourself home when you are drunk

is not being your friend.

That is exactly paraphrasing your logic there. Someone warning you of some danger is an enemy just because it may not be what you want to hear?

Puh-leeeeeze! It's called rationality

[Dem2]

15. Fox news trollery is allowed to be posted here?

Freepers are happy!

[Kalidurga]

37. So documents don't match word for word?

Is that the defense it was on FOX so it must be a lie?

[Dem2]

38. No reasonable person defends the troll in the video

Legitimate source or it's shameless slander of the worst right-wing kind.

[Kalidurga]

40. A source can be illegitimate yet still factual

So either the facts are correct or they are not. So if those docs are word for word copies this is troubling whether the person reporting it is a RW hack or just someone who leans conservative. Or even if they are a LWer who is idiotic most the time, but happens to sometimes report things factually. So, unless he is saying something that is not factual I will take his word for what he is saying and that he knows something as a judge that we might not.

[Dem2]

41. Legitimate source, or else

Why is this so difficult?

[Kalidurga]

42. Facts or else

why is that so difficult?

[Dem2]

47. OMG, I've read about this logical fallacy! I didn't know people still tried this one.

Now I have to prove that a Fox news story isn't true?




Thanks for the laugh.

[Kalidurga]

59. Yes you have to have a reason other than it's FOX to say it's not true

And you are the one with the logical fallacy going on. Attacking a person's argument because you think they are in an out group is some kind of ad hominem attack. Argue the point you want to make instead of screaming FOX SNOOZE FOX SNOOZE. You know use a fact instead of just saying the source is bad. I agree I wouldn't use FOX as a first, second, or third source. But, I would see if they are basing a story on facts or not.

[Dem2]

61. Nobody is buying what you're selling.

Look around - nearly every post is complimenting Free Republic's ability to infiltrate DU. Don't be a tool of the right please

[Kalidurga]

98. It's the RWers who put party before principle

And still you have no facts you haven't addressed is it true or not that the emails match word for word. If they do it's a problem no matter who is saying it. And handing the GE to the Republicans because you can't figure out if a thing is a fact or not is being a tool.

[Logical]

76. Fucking alert it or quit whining. Nt

[Dem2]

80. You are capable.

but http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1833985

[JoePhilly]

126. +1

[DCBob]

17. Garbage right wing crap.

[Freddie Stubbs]

18. The FBI won't indict during the primaries

Worst case scenario, Clinton releases her delegates at the convention and someone like Biden is the nominee.

[GoLeft2004]

22. That is ok.

Not her.

[nolawarlock]

29. Good

If they do actually indict her, I hope they do it in a way that Bernie never benefits.

[Unicorn]

49. I can't see Biden being a warhawk. He would be a great improvement.

[KoKo]

153. How could Biden be the nominee? He isn't running for President

but Bernie is in it through CA and he would be the nominee having the next amount of Delegates. Hillary's delegates would go to him at the convention.

[nolawarlock]

24. How did Fox News become the new normal here?

Though I should probably be careful. The last time I said Fox news wasn't worthy of being posted here, I was hidden and accused of attacking a longtime DU'ers character when I said absolutely nothing about this individual personally and only addressed the issue of using Fox News as a source.

But heck, I will say it again, I think Fox News is unworthy of being posted here. Even if some of their journalism might be factual, it's always heavily spun right and, moreover, these type of pundit shows are not journalism at all. They're right wing opinion pieces.

Of course there is one silver lining to this cloud. All these posts from Right Wing Fox News just go to prove how much of a Right Wing Republican Hillary isn't.

[Thinkingabout]

33. Now truthfully, do you think for a moment Hillary would release her delegates to Sanders?

The answer is NO!!!

[procon]

34. Napolitano? Would that be the same crackpot Judge Andrew Napolitano from Fox?

This is the same guy that spreads Republican propaganda and misinformation against Dems and condemns everything we stand for... and you're holding him out as a credible source to prop up you Hillary Hate?

This is a bad call, yeah? The fact that this trash talk is getting replayed on every rightwing blog and media website been enough to trigger a caution flag befor breathlessly rushing back to DU to help out the GOP.

Bad business, this, posting rightwing disinformation in an acrimonious pique all because Bernie is slipping behind Clinton.

[Unicorn]

50. What do we stand for?

Since it appears you're a Hillary supporter I would like to know what you think we stand for?

Ie. she said she won't allow fracking in "cities" and refuse to go further and say she'd ban fracking. I guess she'll just frack the country - the water the animals and poor have to drink.

Not fracking is just one thing I stand for. Are you pro fracking? Just asking because I don't know what you Hillary supporters are standing for. I am positive what progressives stand for.

[nolawarlock]

64. We shouldn't stand for Right Wing hate from Fox News pundits, that's for sure. nt

[procon]

82. Beyond fracking, I honestly don't know what you stand for.

That said, I'm positive that Democrats don't have the same viewpoints as Republicans.

I'm also certain that Democrats don't repeat the same hateful talking points as Republicans.

I'm convinced that Democrats can actually tell the difference between rightwing conspiracy theories and facts not in evidence.

I think Democrats do not confuse personal opinions with quantifiable facts.

I'm confident that Democrats support the concept of innocent unless proven guilty.

I know that Democrats do not conflate, rumors, innuendo and speculation with actual events.

I know what's important to Bernie Sanders, but beyond chastising Hillary Clinton, I'm not certain I understand what route to victory his supporters have taken.

[Unicorn]

84. I'm against War, the Death penalty, torture, the TPP, The Keystone XL, The corporatocry

running out government, the 1% not buying out our candidates with the corporations,
Fracking, polluters destroying out planet and causing climate change (cars only make up 5% of carbon emissions),
nukes, weapons deals and weapons deal profiteers, etc. etc.

Perhaps you should google your gal on ALL of this and read what she said before she announced she was running for president - ie everything 2014 and back. Start with Libya.

[procon]

97. It was a rhetorical question.

You know, DU has the option to start your own blog to explain your motives and give vent to your inner muse. But this thread, as I recall, was about the unsubstantiated opinions expressed by a long time Republican apparatchik who is a frequent, paid contributor to many rightwing websites and media stations. That's the topic under discussion. If you have something relevant to add regarding those who come to DU and post Republican propaganda pieces to shore up their ideas, chime in.

[Unicorn]

99. I agree he is not credible. I googled him. Ewww.

[pdsimdars]

142. He does explain the laws very clearly. I've seen him on a number of videos. He's good.

I don't like his politics but he explains it clearly. Much better than the left is dealing with it. . . .

[procon]

147. Why, given the man's track record (facepalm), would anyone believe a word he said is credible?

Knowing that his agenda is to pave the way for electing as many Republicans as possible, which includes eliminating or at least weakening the leading Democratic contender any way he can, why on earth would you allow yourself to believe what he says?

I suspect that you find his "clear explanation" so plausible because he shores up your own acquired views on Clinton. You, like many other Sander's fans, find a shared affinity with so many of these influential Republican propagandists because of your like-minded anti-Hillary rhetoric.

That's very troubling. Democrats are not supposed think like Republicans, let alone hold them up as a trusted source of factual data just because they are glib showmen who understand how to tell the rubes exactly what they want to hear to close the deal.

[NurseJackie]

35. It's over for Bernie!

[Logical]

78. Classy as usual

[asuhornets]

36. you got this video from Freerepublic..

Shame I tell ya

[silvershadow]

53. That's not the only clock ticking, either. Just wait. just as I predicted, she will take the

whole party down with her, for her own personal reasons if we aren't careful. We have to be very careful, folks. This isn't rocket science. But it IS political science.

[pdsimdars]

144. Me, me, me

[northernsouthern]

54. Doesn't matter

She can't win the nomination, she it too far behind.

[COLGATE4]

67. She is too far behind????? I'd love some of

whatever you're smoking!

[northernsouthern]

105. She can't win/

Feel the math.

[COLGATE4]

107. Like I said, you got hold of some

awesome stuff.

[northernsouthern]

111. I got a hold of the Math.

#FeelTheMath

[COLGATE4]

115. If you're not smoking something, then you're

just plain delusional. Seek professional help.

[northernsouthern]

116. I did .

From my math teacher. The magic number to clinch the nomination is 2,383, she will be well under 2100.

[COLGATE4]

117. Counting the super delegates?

[northernsouthern]

118. Why?

Did they vote already? Or are you talking about at the convention that has not happened? I

[COLGATE4]

120. Now I understand 'the math'. OK. If that helps you get through

the night between now and July, go for it. I'm not into enabling fantasies.

[northernsouthern]

140. Oh you are pretending that the delegates have already voted

They did get paid quite a large amount by the Hillary victory fund...but then she took it back.

[COLGATE4]

152. No, but you certainly are if you believe that the SD's are

going to magically shift from supporting Hillary to supporting Bernie. And that if it's even necessary to use them. At the rate she's going she'll reach the total delegates needed without the SD's.

[northernsouthern]

154. No she isn't

But her paid off SDs may help her.

[COLGATE4]

156. It's good to have something to blame when

your dreams don't pan out.

[northernsouthern]

157. Yeah, it was very easy...

Back when the DNC pulled that voter list scam in December...then ran with the racist attacks. But who will the HRC camp blame when Hillary crashes in the GE or is indited. I hope the HRC crew is there for vote for down ticket DNC members that are not indited with her. That is my biggest worry if she does get arrested, the party loyalists that will take the ship down with her.

[Beacool]

106. I think that some people on this board have a problem with reality.

The stuff they write should be in the fiction section of the library.

[grossproffit]

110. Library? What's that?

[northernsouthern]

112. It is a place that people to to get books.

li·brar·y
/ˈlīˌbrərē,ˈlīb(ə rē/
noun
a building or room containing collections of books, periodicals, and sometimes films and recorded music for people to read, borrow, or refer to.
"a school library"
a collection of books and periodicals held in a library.
"the Institute houses an outstanding library of 35,000 volumes on the fine arts"
a collection of films, recorded music, genetic material, etc., organized systematically and kept for research or borrowing.
"a record library"

[northernsouthern]

113. Agreed

Right beside the HRC section that is cross filed under Propaganda, Orwellian, and Machiavellian.

[Agnosticsherbet]

57. So now we post Free Republic stuff from a Rightwing Liar at Fox?

[nolawarlock]

63. It's the new normal.

And they aren't even trying to be credible anymore.

[Agnosticsherbet]

65. I guess this is what happens when hopelessness breeds

[nolawarlock]

73. hah!

I loved reading your post with that pic next to it. Cthulhu 2016!

[COLGATE4]

69. Yep. That's apparently what passes for anti-Hillary

'research' by Bernie acolytes.

[revmclaren]

81. After tomorrow

I believe the Hillary haters from Bernie's Slander Group will start disappearing. Skinner will have NO excuse not to call it.

[desmiller]

72. off topic: I'm not too fond of Fox News, but...

That music is kinda badass!

[840high]

87. The other networks are just

as bad as Fox.

[desmiller]

90. No doubt.

[kerry-is-my-prez]

88. Someone is quoting Napolitano here with a straight face? He's a whackjob. Why not just find a

quote from Drudge or Fox News?

[GoLeft2004]

95. Fox ?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3462774/Spy-agencies-say-Clinton-emails-closely-matched-secret-documents-sources.html

[procon]

101. Don't play the pollyanna.

You also linked to a video lifted straight from Fox featuring the musing of Judge Andrew Napolitano, a notorious nut job who is a regular on every Republican station, website and blog. If you weren't aware of this, then do a little fact checking before dropping off another Hillary hate thread.

[nolawarlock]

121. If Fox is the National Enquirer ...

The Daily Mail is the Weekly World News. Heck, I'm surprised none of the Bernie supporters have posted this yet ...

[ContinentalOp]

100. The Daily Mail is basically Fox News UK, right?

[840high]

102. Not sure. They hate Trump. Love Obama.

[ContinentalOp]

103. Well the latest word on DU these days

from Sanders supporters is that Obama is a conservative right?

[wendylaroux]

131. he's not? he said he was himself,more than raygun even.

was he jiving our turkeys?

[Capt. Obvious]

136. Cut Rip Van Winkle some slack

Napolitano probably wasn't well known back then.

[brooklynite]

108. If Fox News commentators say so...

[Blue_Tires]

109. your concern is noted...

[Orsino]

114. Another goddamned "supporters" thread. n/t

[Beacool]

119. Wait, am I on Free Republic?

Damn, I thought I turned right by mistake. Same crap here as over there.

[pnwmom]

124. Yes, you are. That's where they love to post 3 month old, long discredited stories.nt

[randome]

127. Ironic username, no? GoLeft is trying to take DU further right by making the abominable 'normal'.

smh
[hr][font color="blue"][center]All things in moderation, including moderation.[/center][/font][hr]

[MFM008]

129. GoLeft2004

She will NOT be indicted for anything.
Just like the WhiteWater garbage
and all the rest.
Isnt there a Trump rally somewhere you can catch?

[pdsimdars]

133. Many seem to be just as bubble headed as those who actually watch FOX.

I see that all the time, as soon as someone says anything that may be unflattering about Hillary's past or present, they immediately attack the messenger. Don't seem to have any perspective at all.

When the right wing don't responds to some scientist who is explaining climate change, they say, "He's a democrat who's been on lots of shows." They make that excuse and no they can ignore what he is saying.

This is exactly like what many are doing here.

This may not be his best video, but can you counter any of his facts?

I have seen a number of former high ranking intelligence professionals speak on this and they say the same thing he did. That is, that diverting those classified emails to her private server is a crime. So, just because someone you may not like is saying it, you think somehow that makes it untrue? There is something inherently wrong with that kind of thinking.

Get real!

[Faux pas]

143. Kickin' with gusto!

[Justice]

155. Article is from February - why is it not on CNN and NBC every night if true?

Love this from the article --

"That campaign has been widely reported by Reuters and other media outlets, but it officially is classified as a 'Top Secret/Special Access Program' (SAP), meaning only a limited number of people whose names are on a special list are allowed to learn details about it."

Love also the statement that the reports cannot be discussed publicly but there are leaks everywhere as 4 sources talk about it.

Seems highly suspect to me.