2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFor one brief shining moment, I thought the Dem party had really moved left
with Bernie Sanders.
Oh well.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)Yes, you are right. The Democratic Party is now the moderate on some social issues, center right on economic & foreign policy issues party.
The DLC take-over is complete.
Broward
(1,976 posts)dragonfly301
(399 posts)because it will be grand bargained away by those smiling moderate Dems faster than you can say chained CPI.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)dragonfly301
(399 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)KPN
(15,637 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)When it comes to being a "moderate" I take my cues from William Lloyd Garrison:
Assenting to the "self-evident truth" maintained in the American Declaration of Independence, "that all men are created equal, and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights -- among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," I shall strenuously contend for the immediate enfranchisement of our slave population. In Park-street Church, on the Fourth of July, 1829, in an address on slavery, I unreflectingly assented to the popluar but pernicious doctrine of gradual abolition. I seize this opportunity to make a full and unequivocal recantation, and thus publicly to ask pardon of my God, of my country, and of my brethren the poor slaves, for having uttered a sentiment so full of timidity, injustice and absurdity. A similar recantation, from my pen, was published in the Genius of Universal Emancipation at Baltimore, in September, 1829. My consicence in now satisfied.
I am aware, that many object to the severity of my language; but is there not cause for severity? I will be as harsh as truth, and as uncompromising as justice. On this subject, I do not wish to think, or speak, or write, with moderation. No! no! Tell a man whose house is on fire, to give a moderate alarm; tell him to moderately rescue his wife from the hand of the ravisher; tell the mother to gradually extricate her babe from the fire into which it has fallen; -- but urge me not to use moderation in a cause like the present. I am in earnest -- I will not equivocate -- I will not excuse -- I will not retreat a single inch -- AND I WILL BE HEARD. The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal, and to hasten the resurrection of the dead.
It is pretended, that I am retarding the cause of emancipation by the coarseness of my invective, and the precipitancy of my measures. The charge is not true. On this question my influence, -- humble as it is, -- is felt at this moment to a considerable extent, and shall be felt in coming years -- not perniciously, but beneficially -- not as a curse, but as a blessing; and posterity will bear testimony that I was right. I desire to thank God, that he enables me to disregard "the fear of man which bringeth a snare," and to speak his truth in its simplicity and power.
tl;dr
Screw moderates and moderation.
Thirties Child
(543 posts)A vacuum on the left that WILL be filled.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)Certainly applies to Hillary and her fascist neocon foreign policies.
We can do better than "only halfway batshit rightwing crazy".
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)"only halfway batshit rightwing crazy".
pacalo
(24,721 posts)except love, of course.
Bodhi BloodWave
(2,346 posts)sorry, its just a saying i love and couldn't resist finishing with slightly differed wording
Fingers crossed that things will actually improve in some ways
pacalo
(24,721 posts)but my true weakness is seafood.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)No way would Bernie have done so well 20 years ago. I'm stunned by how well he did. And it's going to keep moving left.
woolldog
(8,791 posts)Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)I just hope Hillary doesn't take their idealism and turn it sour.
Svafa
(594 posts)movement to the left, not just a political "oddball" year. The powers that be will do what they can to make us think the latter. We need to stay motivated.
liberal from boston
(856 posts)Bernie is still in this race. Susan Sarandon was on Stephen Colbert tonight. Stephen showed a photo of Susan & Hillary then asked you were good friends what happened--Susan jokingly replied " I had to break up with her". Susan pointed out that Bernie does well in open primaries- (the remaining primaries are all open). http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017362988
2banon
(7,321 posts)that's why we're in this passionately contested campaign.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)I don't expect it ever will. And so, I'm done. Permanently.
votesparks
(1,288 posts)And you'll be amazed at what we can do. All politics is local.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Got a drawer full of those t-shirts. Hasn't done jack. ALL politics is more corrupt than ever.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Exactly. And people are falling all over themselves to defend the corrupt politicians.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Not since Bobby Kennedy have I had the kind of hope that we might yet straighten it out that Bernie generates. But apparently, Democrats prefer lies, cheating, wars, terminal global climate change and corruption.
So be it.
I'm done.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)It's like in their DNA to vote GOP.
On the state level, it's a bit better though. We do elect both Dems and Repubs, depending on the candidate.
seekthetruth
(504 posts)....lots of people happy to support the status quo, but a large minority is actually awake and understands that our democracy is being taken from us little by little.
And what I mean by the term "awake" is that they don't want to rock the boat, so to speak, and they're scared of the s-word (socialism).
But, take heart, brothers and sisters, the younger generation is coming up quickly.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)with politics.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)and, as they move into the real world and get jobs, start families and accept new responsibilities will understand that the Democratic Party reflects their real values.
How are they supposed to get decent jobs, afford a mortgage or kids?
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Because a you could find was a ten buck an hour job?
Ladies and gents this is part of the disconnect
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)I have been connected with several universities for years now and I see that virtually all of their graduates are securing employment within a year of graduating- many long before that. No disconnect here.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)yes.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/07/30/2381031/census-bureau-high-poverty-among-college-students/
https://higheredtoday.org/2015/06/29/fighting-food-insecurity-on-campus/
http://www.epi.org/publication/the-class-of-2015/
You may not see it, but ALL STUDENTS. That is impressive. I do not think that even Phoenix U would claim that.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)pursuing college degrees for the sake of pursuing college degrees, although a 7.2% unemployment rate among recent college grads does not strike me as being addramatically excessive (2% higher than the national average). The reported high 'poverty' rate among college students living off campus is not a new phenomenon. Many of us, and probably most of us who lived off campus during our college years met the government's definition of 'poverty' during that time. It is however a temporary situation and should not be confused with families living in poverty with little possibility of the situation improving. Likewise, the phenomenon of college students skipping meals to use their money otherwise is nothing new. Again, many of us have done it with no lasting ill effects. It''s good that some universities are making funds available to ameliorate this in the case of students who are literally forced to choose between food and books but I don't think that admits of any further generalization. There does need to be alternative career tracks for technical and vocational education as in Europe, rather than just pushing everybody through a B.A. program and hoping to get a job on that basis. Finally, as all the articles point out, we are still in a period of recovery from the Bush-induced recession that hammered our economy badly. As the economy continues to improve we should continue to see these metrics decrease accordingly.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Than their parents generation and the ahem...sharing economy.
You got a good job and obviously no worries. Many of the kids don't share that outlook.
In fact, they are expected to do worst than their parents for the first time in US history. I will once repeat, sleep walking through history.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)'far less than their parents' generation'???
KPN
(15,637 posts)Young people in general are not starting families for a couple of reasons, one being they can't find and get jobs that provide a sense of financial security. They will not see the Democratic Party in a positive light if it does not meaningfully change that -- and frankly, I'm not holding my breath.
Hillary is a corporate shill -- always was and likely always will be. She is progressive on social, but a neo-lib on economic issues. She won't win the young people over. She doesn't have what's needed in her to do that.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)cluster bombs, reductions in social security, and constitutional restrictions on a woman's right to choose. Thanks for sharing.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Those I know don't believe they will ever have Social Security so likewise it isn't an issue. And, as far as a woman's right to choose, you do understand that there are and always have been constitutional restrictions on abortion. Roe v Wade was based on constititional restrictions. There are no unlimited rights.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)I grew up in a very military family, am engaged to someone in a very military family, and am active duty military myself.
A lot of us, even those on the outside who either couldn't or wouldn't enlist are incredibly concerned about what even on the inside, looks like neo-colonial sentiment towards the Middle East.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)TrueDemVA
(250 posts)This primary has shown people what is possible. A generation of people are waking up and hopefully will continue to fight. I am with many of our brothers and sisters that are tired of the establishment.
No more DINOs. BERNIE OR BUST!!!
Oh, and I wasn't paid to say that.
KPN
(15,637 posts)Bernie or Bust!!!
tom-servo
(185 posts)...the largest liberal party in the US is going to let the opportunity to field a strong, popular, genuinely progressive candidate pass them by. It's painful to watch.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)tom-servo
(185 posts)...sorry for the late response.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)But the Democratic party is now liberal in name only. We're just not a conservative as the republicans.
And it is indeed painful.
Peregrine Took
(7,412 posts)God Forbid she wins the nomination - we are dead ducks.
War forever and ever thank to our Queen Hawk.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)The truth about Bernie's revolution is the emergence of a liberal generation, while a more conservative, some would say, "me" generation, dies out.
You want to talk about the real math, look no further than the average human lifespan.
Only question is whether the boomers will yield the Democratic Party gracefully, or kill it on their way out.
So far it's been the latter.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Many have been fighting that crap for years...just not enough of them
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)If Hillary wins the Presidency, look for her to give Gillibrand a spot in her adminstration to open the NY Senate seat for Chelsea in 2018.
2banon
(7,321 posts)it's the whirl a berg dynasties machine. Bush daughters might even be in the game eventually.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,325 posts)Her father-in-law had a long and distinguished career in politics.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Bill probably would thrown him in with Marc Rich and the other last minute pardons if they had gotten the application in sooner.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)Do we really need that here?
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Lucy is always, always, always going to snatch away the football.
Come to think of it Hillary has a personality much like Lucy.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)actslikeacarrot
(464 posts)...problem with war and maybe even support it. Makes me think that most "anti war dems" in the early 2000's were only against it due to the "R" behind the presidents name. Go team!!1!!
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)National security state Dems really make me
Pro-NSA spying Dems really make me
Pro-Wall St. banker Dems also make me
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)persistent vomiting you seem to have.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)through this campaign. One day we will have it and all the people who have laughed at our efforts will realize what they've done to impede their own progress
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)We will all see the Bernie light. When is the canonization again?
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)Bernie is just out front during the campaign. It's not about Bernie. While he has been an excellent candidate whose honesty and integrity has helped to get out the message these issues come from all of us and they survive the campaign. Clinton supporters who only focus on personalities just show their ignorance of what's actually happening in this country. I feel sorry for you.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)or less the same thing that happens every four years. Some voters get disaffected and/or are pissed at their economic situation or whatever else disgruntles them at that point and look to those potential candidates who promise them the sun, moon and stars, all without any effort or sacrifice on their part. On the Rethug side there is the Donald, who has already told them that immigrants are responsible for all their troubles and fans the flames of false patriotism by telling them how "we (meaning you, Joe American) aren't respected in the world anymore" and he's going to fix that too. On the other hand we have Bernie, promising all kinds of great free stuff with no plausible explanation as to 1) just how he would pay for it and 2) how he would pass all that through a Congress dominated by troglodyte Republicans. Once again, grandiose promises but with no work or sacrifice required on the voters' part. Fortunately, most voters understand that things promised like this have a way of never coming true, and after hearing all the stirring speeches they wind up voting for the most reasonable candidate.So, no, I don't expect the revolution this year, or next, or the year after, either. We'll hear much thie same in 2019 and 2020 and afterwards.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)?w=700
?w=700&h=&crop=1
?w=300&h=200
but you are correct, this only happens every four years, and yes they are all connected
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)No permament results either
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Movements come and go. Most of them have no lasting long term effect. I suspect Bernie's will be one of those as well.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)And this one is well...global. Nope, I am not being overtly dramatic
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Got it.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Robbins
(5,066 posts)they had to pretend to be anti-war for political reasons since many of democratic base was against war.
jzodda
(2,124 posts)Many of us are not anti war at all times. It was democratic leadership that won WWIi
I was against that war in Iraq because the rational for war, weapons of mass destructiontruction, was a fabrication. I protested and ranted and raved over it. I did support the first Gulf War.
votesparks
(1,288 posts)And we did it in LESS THAN A YEAR. The movement just learned to walk. Just wait for our terrible twos!
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)...voters come of age, while 4 years worth of right-to-center right older voters die off.
The real political math is the average human lifespan.
Clinton is likely the boomer's last gasp. At least for Dems, that is. Republicans are going to end up running 90-year olds soon, lol.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)our first woman president, instead of a strong upstanding progressive.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)is that people tend to skew more moderate as they age. I would have voted for Bernie at 20 - I was not very politically aware, and his policies, however ill thought-out, would have appealed to me. At 40-something, I recognise pie-in-the-sky promises with no legitimate plan for implementation when I see them. Hillary all the way.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Seen the cycle too many times. So called "centrist" Dems sound good when campaigning, but when they get in...it's a whole different kettle of fish
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)And I look forward to Hillary continuing their legacy with progress of her own.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)With the perspective of history Clinton was a disaster. Life seemed happy, happy at the time but the temporrary "boom" was a like a cocaine fueled binge. Meanwhile he presided over policies that have undermined the middle class, further marginalized the poor, and gave Monopolistic Corporations and Immoral Wall St. banksters the power to take over the economy, siphon money from the productive sectors into their overstuffed pockets and almost crash the economy in 2008 and extort their repayment from us....That's all just for starters.... We like to Blame Bush, but Bush only finished the job Clinton started.
Obama is much better. If he could run for a third term I'd be happy to vote for him.....But his liberal side is his good side. Unfortunately he too has been too closely aligned with the wrong people and institutions. The TPP is bad, for example.....And, although he finally learned, he was willing to compromise too much with the GOP, who have managed to limit his actual accomplishments.
KPN
(15,637 posts)Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)I just hope our corrupt system can hold on until they get of age.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)This country is going to be fucked beyond all recognition by the time this current generation of 0.1%ers and the politicians they own are finished.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Onlooker
(5,636 posts)Now, it's up to Bernie and his supporters to lock in whatever gains they can. Bernie needs leverage in his negotiations with the Clinton campaign, and only his supporters can give him that.
hatrack
(59,578 posts).
mvd
(65,161 posts)While tonight was disappointing because Bernie speaks to me in ways Clinton couldn't dream of, this has not happened in a long time. Liked Kucinich, but he went nowhere. Nader had very little support. Kennedy in 1980 didn't catch fire like Bernie. The youth will be more of the voters next time. The future looks bright.
LiberalFighter
(50,787 posts)And the Republicans are a fringe party in a different way. The crazy Republicans are becoming the majority of their party with those to the left trying to figure out where they belong.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)What is causing tectonic shifts in the views of the electorate is Millennials, basically, and mark my words- that shit has just started.
Ive said it before- this century truly belongs to those born in it. The rest of us are just here on an extended layover.
The creaky cranks will creak and crank, predictably (they dont vote! Get off my lawn!), but the wheel is turning.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)haikugal
(6,476 posts)Response to Fast Walker 52 (Original post)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Response to Fast Walker 52 (Reply #42)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
KPN
(15,637 posts)Nonsense. Look beyond your nose for crying out loud. The reason he hasn't delivered yet is because you and folks like you won't let him. But in the long run, he will. Bernie has recharged a movement that began in Seattle in 2000 during the WTO convention. The movement has been growing in fits and starts since. It isn't going away so get used to it ... and get used to being in the minority if you don't climb on board.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)in my mind it started in 2009, but I might have to do some reading and expand my horizons. Unlike the cranks I can do that.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)and say wtf.
vintx
(1,748 posts)They have left us and we need to stop being held hostage with cries of "SCOTUS!"
That's exactly what I've been saying. My three kids have convinced me that it's gotta be Bernie or Bust because the future of the world as we know it is at risk. Of course, the DINOs here at DU will poo-paw that by making trite comments about "chicken little" etc. That's to be expected.
The point my kids make is that social issues don't and won't matter 20 years from now if we don't deal with global warming NOW and/or we don't avoid the eruption of World War III NOW.
Millennials are right about that. I'm with them 100%!
Time for the revolution! Bernie or Bust!
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)But I do have to say, there are more positives to Hillary just SCOTUS.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)We have a Democratic President that describes his own economic policies as "mainstream 1980's Republican" and admits that "in many ways, Nixon was more liberal than I am".
And Hillary is to the right of Obama.
Vinca
(50,237 posts)Hillary is now in a comfortable position to go back to her right-leaning roots. Dems duped again.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)The big question is do more liberal Dems take this bait and switch again, or gasp, vote third party?
Vinca
(50,237 posts)eShirl
(18,479 posts)John Edwards had just imploded.
But at least there was still a candidate I could vote for, even though he wasn't left enough for my tastes.
This time, not so much.
le sigh.
Nanjeanne
(4,915 posts)they move center right. And the media has misinformed at every turn. The Dems in power will continue their populist talk as they give us chained CPI, raise retirement and Medicare age, lip service to gun control as they and their friends get rich off of selling arms to other countries and outsourcing military jobs as they find another war to engage in. We will head more into low wage service jobs so the powerful can stash more money in tax havens and we will continue to slide lower on the chart for childhood poverty and infant mortality as the Congress and the new President hand more money to the insurance and pharmaceutical industry.
The media gave us George Bush and sold us the Iraq War. They have given us a choice between Trump and Clinton. Their power structure will stay intact. They did their job and don't give a damn if the country loses. Net neutrality? It's going to be on the goodbye list. Consolidation of media companies? You betcha.
Obama is opening up more drilling. He said after primary we get TPP. AND some of you think life will be just as great or even better with Hillary? Well good luck to us all.
I'm over 60. My heart goes out to that group of 18-29 who so strongly supported Bernie. They are the future and they lost their opportunity to make a real difference in their lives. I may not have been the over 65 white woman who dashed their dream personally, but I still say I'm Sorry. You deserved better.
I am 42 year old disabled white guy on SSI,food stamps,and medicaid among other government assistance.clinton or trump it
doesn't matter.people on social safety net are going to be screwed.
Social security will eventully go bankrupt since clinton made clear she wouldn't left cap on those who pay into social security.
republicans have been waiting to gut the social safety net especily food stamps and medicaid.The clintons history shows they
would go along with it even if she can beat trump.
with more war where do you think money will come from to pay for it? gutting social safety net is where.
the working class will continue to be hurt by more trade deals.Clintons never saw a trade deal they didn't like.Unions will continue to
disappear since union jobs will with more trade deals and more corporate power.
Clinton has about as much legitimatce as bush did.all this voter fraud they did.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)I want Bernie to continue to get our message out so that all the people who have dropped out of the Democratic Party will hear it and join us. This Political Revolution is just getting started. Donate what you can so we can reclaim our democracy from the special interests and their enablers.
Email48x48 Send an email
Email your friends
Click the button to send an email, or copy and paste the text that will show up below into an email message.
I just gave to Bernie Sanders.
To see details and contribute now please go to: BernieSanders.com or Act Blue
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)for Republicans just like they discount us for voting for Hillary. They just don't care about the political realities in this country.
KPN
(15,637 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Center left. That's a good one!!
Sadly, many Bernie supporters consider themselves center left. That's how different our world views are.
It isn't calling it "right" if its "right". If it look, acts and walks like a duck ....
My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)This has to move beyond which personality is winning because the fight is going to be longer that any one election cycle.
I find that on the issues, democrats are being too silent. There are threads about the recent cable merger, and the TPP, that are languishing in indifference and silence. We have to start spelling out, to ourselves, what our ideas are.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)using young white males on reddit, DU, KOS etc.
You can't have a winning movement that lives and dies on the historically least likely to vote segment of the population.
You can't take control of the democratic party without having PoC on your side.
Bernie's tent was way to small and exclusive.
Better luck next time.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)We'll see how that affects her ability to bring back together the groups she helped to set against each other.
My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)and that does nothing for our platform.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)It was a fail from the very beginning and 99% of you still don't understand why.
So you will keep failing which is a pity really because America needs to move left but the same mistakes keep being made, over and over again.
Bernies side was the exclusive one, that's easy to see.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Please tell me what specifically about Sanders analysis of the present situation you disagree with.
Please tell me what goal you disagree with. Do you think that some form of public coverage (a la medicare) to provide universal and affordable healthcare is not a worthy goal?
Are you happy that a handful of Big Wall St. Banks have such an immense amount of the nation's wealth in their vaultsm, and the power to make or break the economy?
Does it make you feel all warm and fuzzy that a tiny handful of zillionaires at the top are making out like bandits at the public's expense? And that the class structure is ever widening, with most being pushed in a downward direction -- or remaining stagnant if they're lucky?
And please tell me what Bernie Sanders did to deserve the charges that he doesn't care about racism or POC.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I shan't forget.
forjusticethunders
(1,151 posts)Means the affluent white "left" have to stop grandstanding and virtue signaling and get to work instead of blaming everything on conspiracy shit.
Marginalized people don't have fucking time for that shit.
jfern
(5,204 posts)Screw your divisive politics of hate.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)Screw your narrative. A majority of Hillary's voters weren't black, nor a majority of over 30. She one the older crowd of 50+. Bernie won <40, and they split 40-50.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Reached my limit on how much warmongering Third Way corporate Wall Street toadying I can take. Done.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Done
demwing
(16,916 posts)45% of the party are now fine with a Democratic Socialism nominee for President
Consider this:
In 2008, only 39% of Americans favored Gay Marriage.
In 2012, 47% of Americans favored Gay Marriage.
Today we have legal Gay Marriage, despite a Red Congress and SCOTUS
http://www.people-press.org/2012/04/25/more-support-for-gun-rights-gay-marriage-than-in-2008-or-2004/
Don't miss the forest because a few trees are in the way.
djean111
(14,255 posts)The Party has not moved left, it has moved right. They figure that the voters will just dutifully vote for the D, no matter what.
When Debbie DINO can sneer for the camera, and say the super delegates are there to protect the Party from us grubby out-of-line grassroots - that, really, is all you need to know about the Party moving left. And Debbie has a say in EVERY race that needs support from the DNC. We see that in Florida. She would rather let the GOP run unopposed than support a liberal. She campaigns for GOP buddies, against "fellow" Dems.
The whole system is rotten.
demwing
(16,916 posts)but I think the voters - not the bosses - are the real party, just like the workers - not the bosses - are the real unions.
djean111
(14,255 posts)make the deals with management. We have been told outright that Party members who have worked within the party for years of course have more say in who the candidates will be. The actual voters are presented with a pre-selected and narrow choice, much like the union members are presented with whatever their leaders agreed to with management. This is why we saw union leaders endorse Hillary, and rank and file get angry because they support Bernie.
I don't know what the answer is, but I do know that I cannot belong to a party that espouses the things Hillary stands for, like war and fracking and the Third Way and the TPP. Those are all Conservative things.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Democrats are just as vulnerable to it as Republicans are - just look at how ubiquitous the "lesser of two evils" rationale has become. That is propaganda directly from the Party, designed to keep us voting for economically-conservative policies.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)DWS can't seem to figure out where they lost everyone(along with the House and Senate). Maybe she is only concerned with her own self promotion. DWS appearing on Fox, is not doing the party any favors. She just sits there in Bachmann mode reading her script and ignoring the questions.
Bayard
(22,011 posts)Who gets appointed next after 8 years for Hillary? Chelsea Clinton?
Yeah, for one brief shining moment, I thought my vote might matter. Silly me. Hillary will "win" because its her turn. Anyone who thinks The Powers That Be don't pull the strings for every presidential election are naive (Google, the Rothschild family). They let the population go thru their little voting charade so there is no overt revolution.
Expect to be in another war in the next few years. Its good for business. I think that's one of the main reasons Trump won't get it is that he pretty much says, let the rest of the world take care of themselves. He doesn't get a turn.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)number one!!
procon
(15,805 posts)By incremental degrees instead of a revolution, and patiently convincing and reassuring skeptical voters. Its happening at a calm and steady pace, ushering the long time Democratic base voters into the leftward tilting party's changing framework that Bernie Sander's inspired. It won't happen overnight, but it takes time to build that all important solid foundation that is necessary to install a permanent change.
KPN
(15,637 posts)40-45% of D Party voters support Bernie right now! That's huge!
This movement has only just begun. Bernie has already won by taking us all the way to the convention -- in force.
At this point, we should all be saying BERNIE OR BUST!
Time for a real revolution!
w0nderer
(1,937 posts)Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)On balance, Clinton will be one of the most liberal candidates ever (only McGovern and arguably Obama are further left).
It's just that left-wingers tend to ignore and take for granted liberal positions that would have been unthinkable a few decades ago, and focus on the issues where the party hasn't moved left.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)economic policies as "mainstream 1980's Republican" and said that "in many ways Nixon was more liberal than I am" is one of our most liberal candidates ever.
You guys could give Rush Limbaugh a run for his money.
intheflow
(28,443 posts)of his campaign. If they had given him the same coverage they gave Trump, and ignored Trump like they did Sanders, this would be a very different election cycle.
Nanjeanne
(4,915 posts)consolidate their power - no way. The Party is hanging onto their money and their chance to become lobbyists a la Howard Dean - they aren't giving it up easily - as this primary so ably demonstrated.
basselope
(2,565 posts)They will be learning a very hard lesson in 2016.
They will have another shot in 2020.
Response to Fast Walker 52 (Original post)
CobaltBlue This message was self-deleted by its author.
CanadaexPat
(496 posts)and learned it was bigger and more effective than anyone thought. This is the start, not the end.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)That's not nothing. We're still here and we will help this party to function more in accordance with reality.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)on this election
w4rma
(31,700 posts)The Democratic Party HAS moved left. Hillary's front runner status is only based on her name recognition and unreciprocated loyalty from African-Americans.
Hillary's voters tend to live in old folks homes and more progressive voters, activists and Democratic Party insiders will replace them.