Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:13 AM Apr 2016

What IS THIS? Bernie's Votes Going Down... CAUGHT LIVE! Screen Shots In Article!

https://electionfraud2016.wordpress.com/2016/04/26/election-live-results-observers-catch-sanders-votes-going-down-screen-shot/

Election "shenanigans" have been going on for a long time... THIS would appear to be one more example... Counting is merely ADDING to in this case TWO columns. Votes are either added to one candidate or the other. There is no other mathematical function involved... PERIOD! Yet time and again we witness this CRAP! Check out the screen shots provided in this article.


As a candidate for congress in 2006, I witnessed the same sort of thing going on LIVE in returns in my election. We did not screen shot it though.

THIS IS NOT DEMOCRACY! Can someone please copy and paste the screen shots into the comments. THIS IS IMPORTANT!
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What IS THIS? Bernie's Votes Going Down... CAUGHT LIVE! Screen Shots In Article! (Original Post) CorporatistNation Apr 2016 OP
Saw this last night fresh after her stolen "victory" speech... MrMickeysMom Apr 2016 #1
Just a tabulation error, I've done the math for you... Dem2 Apr 2016 #20
That's not the question. The question isn't the %, the question is the # of votes cast and where jillan Apr 2016 #28
The Wasington Post is in on it!!!!!!!!1!!!11!! firebrand80 Apr 2016 #2
THIS IS NOTTTTTTT Democracy! CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #3
You understand that it is a news site, right? Adrahil Apr 2016 #4
Every typo is not a conspiracy. You can go back and count the ballots. Jitter65 Apr 2016 #5
The Ballots Are NEVER COUNTED And You Cannot Go Back And Count Them Except Under VERYYYY... CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #23
Also, In One Circumstance Illustrated "112%"of Precincts Reporting%$@#$&*! CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #24
Like clockwork ... NurseJackie Apr 2016 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #7
Quick! Anyone know how to contact James O'Keefe?? randome Apr 2016 #8
OMG, wordpress blogger breaks the biggest story in history!!!! JoePhilly Apr 2016 #9
lol auntpurl Apr 2016 #16
Not to worry; Bernie Sanders will be filing a complaint... brooklynite Apr 2016 #10
Or a lawsuit. riversedge Apr 2016 #11
And they would have gotten away with it too jcgoldie Apr 2016 #12
For me, Hillary will always be a lying cheater. Not legitimate. djean111 Apr 2016 #13
"A lying cheater" JaneyVee Apr 2016 #15
Donald Trump thanks you. Adrahil Apr 2016 #18
What does Clinton have to do with this? Nt NCTraveler Apr 2016 #21
Yes, because in the history of televised news, no one has ever made a mistake Tarc Apr 2016 #14
Yes, typos in all of these states, and IA books closed for counting. Enough! Media is in on this. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #17
Just a tabulation error, I've done the math for you... Dem2 Apr 2016 #19
ABSOLUTELY NOT! Counting Vote Is Nothing Other Than ADDITION! Bernie Has 6800 Votes then 2800? CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #22
Lol Dem2 Apr 2016 #25
Faux outrage? It's in black and white. There is nothing faux about that. jillan Apr 2016 #29
Relax a bit. The manipulations started sadoldgirl Apr 2016 #27
there has never in the history of the world been errors on television Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #26
Hillary + Election glitches = I WIN I WIN I WIN FlatBaroque Apr 2016 #30
Looks like people do know what is happening FlatBaroque Apr 2016 #31
A bit obvious, don't you think? okasha Apr 2016 #33
Amazingly brazen RobertEarl Apr 2016 #32

jillan

(39,451 posts)
28. That's not the question. The question isn't the %, the question is the # of votes cast and where
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:31 PM
Apr 2016

they went.

How did Bernie have 6247 votes in Sussex county and a little bit later had 2383?
Where did his 3,864 votes go?

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
4. You understand that it is a news site, right?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:22 AM
Apr 2016

Last edited Wed Apr 27, 2016, 11:12 AM - Edit history (1)

Somebody is taking data in and it gets fed into their system. You don't think they make mistakes? That results are accidentally sent to the wrong precinct, or that the person doing the data entry fat-fingeed it?

what exactly are you asserting? Any evidence of problems in the actual official returns?

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
5. Every typo is not a conspiracy. You can go back and count the ballots.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:23 AM
Apr 2016

She was on top all the way and all of a sudden SHE lost votes in one swoop. It was Hillary who suddenly lost votes, I was watching the screen when it happened and couldn't believe it. Then the numbers were restored within the next update. So everyone should take a deep breath. Bernie had nothing taken or stolen from him. But this kind of innuendo helps Trump and I am sure that Bernie supporters will push it all the way. And no explanation will satisfy them.

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
23. The Ballots Are NEVER COUNTED And You Cannot Go Back And Count Them Except Under VERYYYY...
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:14 PM
Apr 2016

STRICT CRITERIA that allows review under ONLY the most tight and unreasonable circumstances!

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
24. Also, In One Circumstance Illustrated "112%"of Precincts Reporting%$@#$&*!
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:16 PM
Apr 2016

You cannot go any higher than 100%! The 112% is when the "reallocating" of vote totals is taking place!


Fuck the "Establishment" and their bought and paid for willing candidate!

Response to CorporatistNation (Original post)

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
8. Quick! Anyone know how to contact James O'Keefe??
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:28 AM
Apr 2016

(I bet there are quite a few here and that would be sad.)
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]

brooklynite

(94,571 posts)
10. Not to worry; Bernie Sanders will be filing a complaint...
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:30 AM
Apr 2016

...like he did in every other State where his supporters claimed voter fraud.

Won't he?

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
14. Yes, because in the history of televised news, no one has ever made a mistake
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:52 AM
Apr 2016

With a graphic, with a caption, with data or so on. Sweet fucking jesus on a pogo stick, do you really think the tv channel there is being hacked real-time by Hillary supporters? Are they "stealing" the votes bite by bit...or byte by byte in this case...as you watch live?

 

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)
17. Yes, typos in all of these states, and IA books closed for counting. Enough! Media is in on this.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 10:29 AM
Apr 2016

They did this shit in 2002,2004, 2006, 2008-2012 the local races got maneuvered. On and on. This thread should be jumping!

This is the same activity reported and screen shot in the NY primary on TV. Typos again?

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
22. ABSOLUTELY NOT! Counting Vote Is Nothing Other Than ADDITION! Bernie Has 6800 Votes then 2800?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:12 PM
Apr 2016

NOT ACCEPTABLE! I'm from Florida... THIS IS Better Known As... VOTE FLIPPING!

NO DEMOCRACY PERIOD!!!!

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
27. Relax a bit. The manipulations started
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:31 PM
Apr 2016

already with the 1st debate setting, continued with the
"computer glitch" in August + October.(no investigation),
The raw counts in IA were never published, etc., etc.

This whole primary has been a sham from the beginning
on, and the party establishment has been doing it, imo.

They just wanted us to believe that we had a choice.

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
26. there has never in the history of the world been errors on television
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 07:29 PM
Apr 2016

for example the 112% reporting example isn't an error it proves your case.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
33. A bit obvious, don't you think?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:18 PM
Apr 2016

Five views of one sign, onr possibly but not probably genuine, a testament to very limited capabilities with Photoshop.

Your post is a smear, but not an artful one. Downright clumsy, but apparently the best you have.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
32. Amazingly brazen
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:02 PM
Apr 2016

they know they can get away with it and there is no one gonna stop them. They must be laughing their asses off.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What IS THIS? Bernie's V...