This message was self-deleted by its author

[IHateTheGOP]

This message was self-deleted by its author (IHateTheGOP) on Thu Apr 28, 2016, 07:10 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

[actslikeacarrot]

1. Clintons hawkishness and history of playing...

...fast and loose with the truth is hurting herself. Repubs need no help with that. A sizable group of DU now support wars of aggression.

[thucythucy]

35. For someone who

"as a gun owner" is imploring us "not to stir shit" this sure does seem like a shit-stirring post. "A sizable group of DU now support wars of aggression." Care to post some links in support of that allegation?

[actslikeacarrot]

63. This is DU:P. As soon as Skinner calls it...

...you will hear no more from me. And let me clarify, "either support it or don't give a fuck". Guess most will fall in the latter. Her domestic policy is liberal, her foreign policy is not.
And yes Bernie and Obama both have some negative marks as well. But I guess neither of them are going to be the candidate, right?

P.S. Already given loyalty oath so don't bother asking.

[thucythucy]

96. I have no problems with cogent criticisms of Clinton

(I voted for Bernie in my primary). I just think calling a significant percentage of DUers "supporters of wars of aggression" is over the top. Kind of like smearing all gun owners on DU as Tea Partiers or supporters of mass shootings. If you don't like your own shit stirred, perhaps it's best not to stir others, is all I'm saying.

[NCTraveler]

2. While often promoting Fox News. Truly a sad day. nt.

[RKP5637]

79. That's what I think too, because anyone can join DU. n/t

[frylock]

91. Some have even been planted here for over a decade in anticipation of trashing Hillary.

[Demsrule86]

16. I could not believe the links

And Fox was not the worst either...there were hate sites linked as well. Disgraceful! I do not know how they think Trump with five court picks will help their 'revolution'.

[NCTraveler]

39. One person with five Fox News links literally told me "well no one else is covering it."

Really? No shit. It's batshit absurd. It only works on the Fox News base.

[Bobbie Jo]

54. That's ridiculous

We used to have actual standards here, and anyone who used Faux News as their go-to source was summarily dismissed and publicly humiliated.

Who left the back door open?

[Orsino]

3. No one is paying attention to DU other than DU members.

Calm down, Francis.

[morningfog]

15. Apparently DU is more influential than FOX! Lol.

It's pathetic flame bait.

[frylock]

92. We're either most influential or most irrelevant dependent upon the circumstances.

[PJMcK]

18. Exactly (n/t)

[Demsrule86]

19. It is perfectly clear

that Trump is paying attention to DU and the Democrats for Sanders...he quoted some of their best work using it against Hillary.

[Orsino]

30. So this is not about DU, after all?

Lame.

[B Calm]

4. You meant to say eventual nominees, just an error on your part?

[Demsrule86]

24. Hillary is the nominee

And that is the truth...she has way more delegates. And supers will not switch to Bernie...she will not be indicted or worse as some here have suggested. She will be the first woman president...and a good one.

[B Calm]

42. Wow, when did that happened happen? Last time I checked she was still short

of having the required amount of delegates to actually be considered the winner. She'll probably end up with enough, but until then all you are doing is posting divisive posts and not helping the Hillary campaign unite the party.

[leveymg]

55. Not until the Convention. She may not be after the Convention

if the Comey Report confirms the facts known, the FBI will find she violated her signed classified information agreement. She will be forced to release her delegates. It isn't clear who will be the nominee. Maybe, we should be talking about that?

[morningfog]

5. Oh hey! Preparing to scrub another thread?

[morningfog]

14. And we're off! Tick tock.

[morningfog]

26. Who? Don't hold back. Tell us how you feel.

Then quickly scrub it because you aren't as tough as you act.

[morningfog]

38. All you post is personal attacks. You are a disruptor and

I'm calling you in it. Take your own advise and grow up. It better yet, find somewhere else to disrupt.

[morningfog]

52. You are the scrubber. You self delete every post.

And you sound a little paranoid.

[pinebox]

82. And yet you stick around?

Go figure.

[cherokeeprogressive]

86. Here's the reason posts like yours get "scrubbed".

Juvenile name calling.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1856521

[frylock]

93. Haters.

[JaneyVee]

6. And using FOX News as sources.

[islandmkl]

8. HRC, with her 24/7/365/25 trashing of truth when convenient provides plenty of ammuniton...

Fox (and whoever else) don't need ANY help from an online discussion board...

there is absolutely nothing on this board that is a 'revelation'...

[islandmkl]

73. been a real Democrat longer than you have been peddling your bullshit...

but then again, you wouldn't know a real Democrat because your Third Way/DLC/DNC right-center 'triangulator' version of the Party is what you are all about....

i can see why you wouldn't want things to change...

[morningfog]

74. So anyone who supports Bernie is a republican?

[lagomorph777]

9. Agreed. I wish the Hill Shills would knock it off.

[Art_from_Ark]

64. Then knock it off, already

[actslikeacarrot]

83. I think you might want to re-read the post you are responding to, genius. N/T

[morningfog]

10. PSA: this poster will self delete if they feel the heat!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1854906

A tough guy until called on it.

[morningfog]

21. That's not why. And you aren't.

[morningfog]

29. One easy answer is identifying someone who is here solely

to insult and flame.

[morningfog]

45. There you go. Let it out. Lol.

What else can you pull straight from your ass?

[CoffeeCat]

81. This is a discussion board isn't it?

Not everyone agrees with your opinion.

You seem to have a hard time accepting that the entire world doesn't share your views about Hillary Clinton.

Have you seen the consistent polling on her negatives? 54%--the majority in this country--view her unfavorably. 63% find her untrustworthy.

[JustABozoOnThisBus]

11. Yeah, because without DU, the Republicans would have nothing!

Republicans wouldn't know how she voted on wars. Or how she feels about chained CPI and means-testing for Social Security. Or her claim of ducking sniper fire in Bosnia. Or her treatment of classified documents.

Without those, Republican could only longingly say, "We'll always have Benghazi".

[TheBlackAdder]

69. Don't you love the FREELOADERS without a star next to their Username who complain about the site?

.


Websites aren't free, and the guys who abuse the services the most, contribute the least financially!


It's like a party crasher who mooches off the food and entertainment and then complains about the host and guests!


They are nothing but disruptive and then in the end, one finds that they've also defiled the bathroom before leaving.


There are a shitload of complainers, about this site and its paying guests, on just this one OP alone.


.

[leveymg]

12. Someone has to state facts about her. Don't say we didn't warn you.

Either she's going to be forced to release her delegates after the Comey Report finds she violated her signed classified information agreement, or if she plunges forward into the GE, she's going to be such a vulnerable candidate that she and every Democrat down ballot from her are going to lose. If by some perverse fluke of a corrupted political system, she is elected, she'll plunge the world into another war that we lose. She's a lose-lose.

[LWolf]

22. Then don't nominate such a poor candidate.

Perhaps if so many Democrats didn't try to shove a neo-liberal not worthy of my support down my throat, I wouldn't be pointing out her flaws.

[LWolf]

88. lol

The pathetic attempts of small minds...

If it weren't for DU, I wouldn't even know who "Hannity" is; as it is, I only know his name, never having actually seen nor heard him. Apparently you are enough of a fan to have done so.

[stonecutter357]

28. K&R!

[seabeyond]

31. I am pretty done with it too. And being told not a democrat, progressive, stooge ect. Doesn't feel

Like a comfortable board for Democrats for sure.

[seabeyond]

75. It is just so over the top, one really cannot even bother challenging. Pure hyperbole.

[Kelvin Mace]

34. You keep telling yourself that.

[Buzz Clik]

37. Not really. No one is paying attention to DU but DUers and a couple of RW discussion boards.

[ChisolmTrailDem]

46. You should probably use this...

You have snot running from your nose from crying.

[morningfog]

50. Never seen someone so butt hurt from their candidate winning.

[Buzz Clik]

47. Also, use the IGNORE and TRASH THREAD features with vigor.

With Skinner's decision to allow TOS violators to remain at DU, it's easy to simply put the offenders on ignore.

The ranks of my Ignore list has swollen to 63; roughly 75% have been put there since Tuesday evening.

[Buzz Clik]

66. Three things:

You didn't read the thread (It's your fucking thread, for chrissakes!)

You don't "hate the GOP"

You're really shitty at this.

[morningfog]

70. Lol. For once, you and I are in total agreement.

[beachbum bob]

48. Typical primary season....nothing new here

[NurseJackie]

49. But it's probably bringing in good ad revenue.

[Cobalt Violet]

56. The sky is falling! The sky is falling! Wolf! Wolf!

[PeteSelman]

57. Yeah, because the country really cares what people say on this website.

If we can't be honest with ourselves here in this little bubble, where can we be?

[JackInGreen]

59. You want to nominate an alligator

Then complain when someone makes shoes out of it.

[CrispyQ]

61. Maybe dem leadership should have put up a better candidate. -nt

[CrispyQ]

72. I've been following long enough to know that a D behind a name doesn't mean anything. -nt

[Jester Messiah]

62. That's what happens when you foist repub-lite on us.

Hillary is electoral poison. Thanks for insisting upon her.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

68. DU isn't that big of a deal. I doubt the GOP is getting ideas here.

[winter is coming]

71. Sorry; not everybody does codependent. n/t

[pampango]

76. Trump is skilled at sowing dissension among Democrats but DU has very little to do with it.

Too many passionate Democrats actually seem to believe his rhetoric when we all know he says things for the effect they have, not because he believes what he is saying.

[JoePhilly]

77. Not really. No one will remember what was said here by the perpetually ...

... disgruntled by the time we get to the General Election.

The folks trashing Hillary have an exaggerated sense of their influence.

[workinclasszero]

78. They get the smears from Fox "news" too

[pinebox]

80. Then maybe people should support a candidate everyone can get behind

instead of someone who plays the fiddle at Wall Street fundraisers.

[davidn3600]

84. You are overestimating the reach and infulence of DU

No one really gives a shit what's posted here. This is just another political message board out of many, many. They are all over the internet and this place actually treats Hillary very kindly compared to most other boards. For the most part, the internet hates her.

[Yurovsky]

89. +1000 .... Love the DU but...

I doubt many Indy voters or moderate Republicans visit...

It's a Democrat site. It's a place where centrists and progressives argue about the party. Limited in scope and reach like most political sites. One of the best, but not as far-reaching as MSM outlets.

[morningfog]

85. Let the self-deleting begin!

[marmar]

87. Right, because everyone who will vote in November is a DU reader.

[frylock]

90. Right, because Republicans are completely unaware of these issue we're discussing.

Deeerp.

[artislife]

94. Her words, her actions are hurting her. nt

[jman0war]

95. Nothing but an attempt to silence legitmate criticism /nt