2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTwo cents on the way out the door.
The revolution is only beginning. It will continue to grow due to relentless economic repression from the oligarchs who control the political structure and economy of the USA. How it will evolve, I have no idea, but I hope to see the day when the people re-take control of the American government.
The Democratic Party is now controlled by an alliance of Third Way elites.
This was facilitated by the Koch brothers who partially funded the DLC and staffed its board.
Voter suppression by both parties is not a bug, it is a feature.
Democracys last stand for restoration in this cycle is either a landslide in California or a leaked FBI recommendation for indictment of Hillary based on her private email server. We need to phone bank in California, donate and hope for the best, imo.
A DU purge seems likely if Hillary gets the nomination. I dont want to wait around for that, so I probably wont post on DU for the foreseeable future. To paraphrase George Harrison, All Things Must Pass Gas. I will probably still lurk here because it remains a treasure trove of information not available via Corporate Media. I think most people here are great. Every open cycle we have had full-contact debate and thats OK, perfectly understandable. But I feel that the number of people who are either unaware or only mildly concerned about our accelerating ecological crisis, is disturbing. So, best wishes to all. I hope we make it as a species and as a biosphere, but the odds get longer every day.
As a lifelong Democrat (prior to this week), I will keep an open mind about changing my registration back. But my standard for belonging to a political party from now on is that it must realistically address the conservation of the biosphere. Not gonna happen this cycle without Bernie as standard barrier, imo. So, assuming Bernie is not the nominee, I will work for progressive candidates in my region and cultivate my garden. Good luck. #Bernieorbust
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)ecstatic
(32,685 posts)The Democratic Party knows this, the Republican Party knows this, the Ruling Class knows this- and they've been astonishingly successful at making sure the Working Class never learns this.
The status quo was rolling along just fine, until Bernie Sanders came along and mucked it up with his crazy ideas about democracy, equality and justice." ~ Anonymous
vintx
(1,748 posts)haikugal
(6,476 posts)puffy socks
(1,473 posts)s crazy ideas about democracy, equality and justice." ~ Anonymous
That is so arrogant. Bernie did not pop out of nowhere and start a new discussion. Democrats have tried to get these changes for a long time. Bernie did not start this. Bernie's revolutionary ideas aren't new.
The discussion on income inequality has been going on for years.
There are days when I swear that this is really the crux of the issue. The need to get credit for a revolution when an evolution has been slowly taking place anyway.
Then when its all in place decades from now we'll get to hear all about how it was all because of Bernie from these folks. What nonsense.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)status quo days are over!!! It's like an Independence day,if you will.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)The corruption is obvious, just ignored or overcome by the propaganda for many! Fox Bots are not the only ones falling for the MSM propaganda. There is also a lot of willful ignorance because people fear change.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)People here are a little sensitive right now. Doesn't change the bottom line that more and more of Americans are joining this movement, many because of Bernie's tireless efforts! He is a GREAT AMERICAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)That's just nasty behavior on your part.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)and leaving it to
who?
It is clear to me now, after yesterday, that posting positive stuff about Democrats here is dangerous, and pointing out Trump voters or anti Democratic candidates will get you censored.
Now, if that doesnt change after the nomination is made, then I dont know who will be left here at Democratic Underground.
But more important than this place is America.
How many more would have died if the anti war effort ceased the day Nixon was elected or reelected?
Did liberals give up when W and the GOP clearly and openly stole the 2000 election in a variety of ways including having his brother's people disenfranchise 90,000 black voters?
Or did they organize and put Obama in the WH?
Why is NOW the time to quit and give up? Explain that to me please.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)NOW. A candidate must start on Day 1 to muscularly lead on this issue.
Electing Hillary dooms the planet as certainly as electing a climate change denier.
From the Admiral's OP
As a lifelong Democrat (prior to this week), I will keep an open mind about changing my registration back. But my standard for belonging to a political party from now on is that it must realistically address the conservation of the biosphere.
Within 5 years, the leading edge of severe weather and environmental events will be snowballing.
You may be ok with that.
Many Bernie supporters are not and don't want that on their conscience.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)the reigns.
glowing
(12,233 posts)Unless you are upset about the poster not voting for Hillary? The reality is she will probably be worse off because she will lose congress. She all but promised to amp up the wars in the ME. She certainly think fracking must continue when science says quit this crap. What isn't it that people think they are going to get under her "leadership"?
The main thing I see is the reliable older block in the Dem party deciding it's "her time" and a lot of women her age excited about one of them in the White House. And while I'd be love for a woman to represent us, I don't prefer for, essentially a republican with mild ideas on social issues, to sit there. The issues are too critical. But most that age won't really see the trauma their generation is leaving behind on our earth.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Now I was censored yesterday for pointing something like this out...
Worse off surely means we are better off with anybody but Clinton, right?
Isnt that what you mean?
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)best we can do.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)I vote for ideas, not against people.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)But I get it, you didnt get what you wanted, so what the hell.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)And it has nothing to do with 'getting what I wanted'. As i have said MANY times, Bernie is not my first, second or third choice. It's just that Hillary is so far from what the party should be, and my own beliefs, that I can not vote for her.
No amount of hyperbole will change that.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)will decide who to bomb next year, who to appoint to the SC, etc.
You know that and are choosing not to participate.
The truth is the propaganda machine of Karl Rove and the GOP has worked and worked brilliantly.
Convincing people that Hillary is to be held to a standard NO Politician OTHER than Bernie can live up to.
Really amazing stuff, actually.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)See, talk issues, not fear.
What has Hillary said that makes you think she's going to release the doves of peace? Quote her if you'd like.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)spread democracy, and make a shitload of money for her friend Lloyd Blankfein.
glowing
(12,233 posts)Hillary or Trump? Plus, he will actually have a lot of opposition to insanity from everyone; whereas criticizing her policies will be "sexist".
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)If they aren't for immediate, aggressive action, we're all going to be fucked.
I have friends and family and a whole planet I love. I'll be able to live with myself.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)You are very wrong.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)You're not obviously.
Quelle surprise.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Fucked.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)lines us up and shoots us?
Dead either way!
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)and ignore is our friend.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Post count doesn't dictate time. The OP has been here since 2002.
I have a low post count but have been here since 2012.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Response to Bluenorthwest (Reply #6)
rbrnmw This message was self-deleted by its author.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I've noticed several in that category.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)*click*
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)Not. One. Ounce.
Ever.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)....and you look ridiculous as hell.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)On Thu Apr 28, 2016, 12:13 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Don't let the door hit ya in the ass on the way out the door then.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1857529
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
unnecessary attack from a guy who's been here a week
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Apr 28, 2016, 12:32 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: When you submit Goodbye Cruel World posts, you open yourself to snark.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: That's less than nothing. Someone makes a GBCW post then they have to anticipate this sort of response. Leaving it.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Common expression used many times as a response when former DU'ers have issued their GBCW missive.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If anyone wants to leave in a little temper tantrum over Back Bench Bernie losing, than I say "AMF!"
This post WILL be hidden, because that's what's become of "BernieUnderground", but it WON'T be hidden with MY help!
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Number23
(24,544 posts)think
(11,641 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)It's not like there's a history of continuous contribution, there.
This is a poster who shows up during the elections to do a little arguing, and when his team loses, he folds his tent and marches off. This time, he provided us with a formal announcement. Unless he does what real "GBCW"-ers do, he'll be back in two to four years.
Amaril
(1,267 posts)Mr. 81 posts condescending to a long-term member with close to 4k.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)That post was so very witty! A person that is a long time supporter of the party leaves and we tell them to not let the door hit them. So very deep! I am not sure if I have the education compete this this level of wit! When they drag Hillary from her mansion I will most likely hold the door open for the FBI because I am not as good at humor as many here. I am sorry, plus it is polite, even if she is getting arrested for breaking several laws from security to fraud, it would be rude to let the door hit her. But I am sure people here understand, and I understand a persons's anger at watching others voting in line with their moral conscious and not on some vague party dogma.
BlindTiresias
(1,563 posts)Yeah, this will take the democratic party far for sure.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)LexVegas
(6,059 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Bye
LexVegas
(6,059 posts)DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)In the clip. Very accurate!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)keeping track?
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)from what will cause a revolution according to you.
So I take it you intend to sit on your hands in the coming years.
FSogol
(45,476 posts)floriduck
(2,262 posts)". . .I will work for progressive candidates in my region."
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)The very last line in a post about being a quitter, helpless against social forces, is about personal effort.
That's the kind of help a candidate is looking for.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)After reading your good natured post, full of enthusiasm and encouragement, I really don't understand why...
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)is not quitting? That he or she is lying instead?
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)nt
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)One can work very hard for change without having to subscribe to the Party's bullshit.
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)All the libertarians and Greens for how they've changed the world.
A political party is an instrument for the exercise of power. If you want to control that power then you have to at least try.
If you don't like the bullshit then change it. Make others deal with your bullshit.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)The Democratic Party establishment has made a gargantuan effort to insulate decision-making from the rank-and-file (e.g. the 2016 Primary debate schedule).
Why expend so much effort to try and change a Party that doesn't want to change, especially when a very significant chunk of its members have such fluid morality that they will condone war, torture, and corporate theft? Why not just find a Party that is a better fit, ideologically, and give them the same effort? It's much more likely to pay off.
Why is the Democratic Party so much more important than any other? Simply because it has power? Might makes right?
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)The party is a thing not a person and it will do what ever the people who control it want it to.
By the way the debate schedual was changed was it not? Isn't that evidence of people being able to influence change?
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Why spend my effort trying to get people who don't care about me to change? Why not just join forces with a Party whose leadership agrees with my agenda?
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)I'm trying a new method of raising watermelons this year using heavy gauge wire cattle panels for the vines and supporting the fruit with used panty hose... I'm hoping these folks are right and the revolution lives on...
Orsino
(37,428 posts)If you're no longer gonna be on DU, fine. Hope you'll be lobbying delegates and candidates hard to get the most change we can.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Unless they are going to go ahead and add planks for war and fracking and the TPP and such. That would at least be accurate.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 28, 2016, 12:46 PM - Edit history (1)
...to which enough interested party members might be able to hold a nominee.
I expect disappointments.
demwing
(16,916 posts)That lives outside of her ambition
It doesn't matter what's in the platform if the nominee has no desire to follow the platform.
BlindTiresias
(1,563 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)Except I don't see a "purge" - as gleefully as some HRC supporters are looking forward to that. I see a willing exodus. Really, why waste time reading about Hillary?
YouDig
(2,280 posts)Don't you think that a Trump or a Cruz would be a total disaster on that front, much worse than either Hillary or Bernie?
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)The ecological crisis is too important to ignore... but if my guy doesn't win then fuck the planet I'm taking my ball home despite the fact that one side denies climate change is even real.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Time is running out. Hillarys incrementalism is as bad as climate change deniers doing nothing.
Many don't want this vote to dwell on their conscience when the planet's ecosystem begins to fail.
Personally I won't say I told you so but I'll be thinking it.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)It's just a symbolic protest vote. Voting for Hillary actually can accomplish less carbon emissions versus Trump. Other than the name "Green", there's nothing pro-environment about wasting a vote on Jill Stein.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Scientists give us @ 5 years til the leading edge of severe weather and environmental events snowball irreversibly.
We have the narrowest window remaining to take immediate action.
Hillarys incrementalism dooms the planet. She's said her big priority will be sucking up to war criminal Netanyahu and doing what Israel wants (war with Iran).
http://forward.com/opinion/national/324013/how-i-would-rebuild-ties-to-israel-and-benjamin-neta/
I'll be able to live with myself. I have friends and family and a whole planet I love. I'll know I stayed true to my love for them.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)The "conscience" thing is a form of selfishness, putting personal feelings ahead of the well-being of the environment and the world. People who actually care about the environment vote to make the environment better, not to make themselves feel better.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)That's not Clinton.
And frankly, anyone who isn't thinking similarly is the selfish one.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)I asked you what you thought it would accomplish, and all you could come up with was your "conscience". Well, OK, good for you, but it's no different than writing in "Elvis" because you think it would be funny, and it helps the environment exactly the same amount.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)The planet needs a candidate who will be a leading force on aggressive climate change action.
That's Bernie or Jill Stein. Hillarys incrementalism snd Republican climate change denial fuck us over equally.
When/if Bernie is out of the race, then yes, there's only Elvis or Jill Stein or write in Bernie for those of us who care. We're @ at that point.
I will vote my conscience oh newbie here less than 2 weeks. You don't know anything about my own personal initiatives or what I do at the local and state level.
I do though (as do others here).
Carry on
YouDig
(2,280 posts)Hillary, because she will be much much better on that and other issues than Trump. They are very far from equal.
Go ahead, vote for Elvis, that's your right, but don't expect me or any other thinking person to believe that you're doing it because you care about the environment. You have the opportunity to actually do something helpful for the environment, and you are passing it up to throw your vote away.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Is not better for the environment.
Madame TPP President will approve corporations allowed to pollute across the planet.
Madame Warhawk President will rage across the ME, destroying that region with toxic warfare causing starvation and drought.
The majority of climate scientists believe the leading edge of severe weather and environmental events will be snowballing within 5 years. There's a very narrow window left to do something.
Unfortunately Madame President has decided that her big priority will be sucking up to war criminal Netanyahu and servicing Israel's needs (war with Iran).
http://forward.com/opinion/national/324013/how-i-would-rebuild-ties-to-israel-and-benjamin-neta/
You'll own that.
Madame Incrementalism President fucks the planet as much as Republican climate change deniers.
On your head. Not mine.
YouDig
(2,280 posts)although she does have a pretty strong climate agenda, but compared to any Republican, there's a huge difference.
Not perfect, but easily better than Trump or Cruz.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)No thanks.
AnotherDreamWeaver
(2,850 posts)I share much of your thinking.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Glad you are leaving.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)William769
(55,145 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)57 % of the voters distrust her, and no candidate from either party has ever won with such dismal numbers. Should I now lose all respect for you because you absolutely insist on such a risky candidate?
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)casperthegm
(643 posts)I too am disturbed by the apparent lack of awareness or concern from many Democrats when it comes to the issues that the party has come to embrace, such as fracking, no fly zones in Syria, regime change, Wall Street influence, while opposing Glass Steagall, college for all, and health insurance for all.
How did this happen and why is it ok to embrace what were formerly Republican platform issues?
Jennylynn
(696 posts)And escalated from there.
casperthegm
(643 posts)The Democratic Party continues to shrink (down to 29% now) and they think that adopting these issues, along with excluding independent voters from many primaries, is going to keep the party vibrant and help it grow?
Jennylynn
(696 posts)And deservedly so.
BlindTiresias
(1,563 posts)Take a history book of any serious depth and point to a page. You will likely find an event in which an elite chose to preserve power rather than take measures to guarantee the collective survival of their people, and in the end lost it all.
JudyM
(29,233 posts)My own take: lack of time/energy to read up. The combo of a known candidate (though not known in enough depth) and the fear of being perceived as foolish for not wanting the "pragmatist" to win... Not seeing what a con artist she is because of ear blocking to any conflicting/damning info about her.
thebeautifulstruggle
(95 posts)....
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)By driving a lot of voters out of her party, apparently. I guess that's supposed to help somehow.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)1. The United States will have more than half a billion solar panels installed across the country by the end of Hillary Clinton's first term.
2.The United States will generate enough clean renewable energy to power every home in America within ten years of Hillary Clinton taking office.
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/briefing/factsheets/2015/07/26/renewable-power-vision/
We'll take care of this!
You enjoy your garden!
Haveadream
(1,630 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Many scientists predict the leading edge of severe weather and environmental events will be snowballing within the next 5 years.
Hillarys incrementalism is too little too late...
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)PaulaFarrell
(1,236 posts)Now if BILL Clinton had done this, we'd be in much better shape
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Fare thee well!
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)But I still hate to see you leave. You've been a good DUer for a long time.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Might I suggest that, depending on the rules of your state, if you plan to vote in the 2018 Democratic primaries, you might wish to re-consider your registration status, if only for the state mandated registration deadline period.
Squinch
(50,949 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)villager
(26,001 posts)Everything else is quite literally subsumed to that, and will simply wind up as historical footnotes if we don't tend to this main task.
Odd that even self-styled "Undergrounders" have such a hard time getting that.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)To some, that is apparently enough.
Of course, not a done deal, she still has to win the primary and the general.
villager
(26,001 posts)You'd think they'd have additional concerns.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"It's odd that that's their only demand..."
I'd maintain that pretense as well were I less educated. Bumper-stickers, regardless of how irrational, unsupported or without measure, are all many of us have to offer.
villager
(26,001 posts)How can one person change a lumbering tanker's course toward its eventual sinking?
TM99
(8,352 posts)on the deck as the ship lurches ahead towards destruction. They pat themselves on the back about how good the new ones look, don't they?
emulatorloo
(44,116 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)the same with Clinton if she is president. It's not like we are the official Democratic Party or anything. Plenty of Democrats come here to comment on what our politicians are doing - praise or condemnation - and national and world events whether they are directly linked to partisan politics or not.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)If we can't accomplish that we are lost.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)and I may be with you at the end of July.
I'm sorry that there are so may nasty people who are mean and disrespectful to you, a long time DUer.
I think sometimes the people that we choose to follow influence our own behaviors.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,173 posts)Your exit was about as memorable as your entrance, based solely upon your screen name.
LP2K12
(885 posts)We're all in this together.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Trash bin: Hillary group
Ignore list: Most if not all Hillary supporters
Key word trash: guns, shooting (no tragedy porn for me to push a false meme), Hillary(she is dead to me)
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)shanti
(21,675 posts)the party has left us. too bad more people can't see this.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)Come and join us.
http://jackpineradicals.org/content.php
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)But the most important is biosphere preservation. I recently attended a health care issues round table. Very insightful, leaders in the industry and policy describing the way forward. At the end they fielded the question, "What issue will effect health care the most?" Again, very cogent answers, as long as you ignore anything outside of the health care field and its stakeholders. All of these great minds, a room full of academics, and no one brought up climate change. I thought it, and I am sure others in the audience did as well, but politically it would have been a major faux pas to mention that the queen and her court were wearing non-existing garments.
As I walked out, it occurred to me that HRC's and the DNC are similarly attired.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.
Bernie is so obviously right on so many things that it simply isn't socially acceptable to mention in polite company. He rips the babbling nonsense of the M$M and the Very Serious People apart and the establishment is having the mother of all conniption fits over it, fainting couches and smelling salts all around, stat.
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)Cassandra got a bad reputation for pointing out the obvious.
TBF
(32,047 posts)because of course I have this forum blocked. Re "I will work for progressive candidates in my region and cultivate my garden". Right there w/you. Take care. #BernieOrBust
jack_krass
(1,009 posts)BainsBane
(53,031 posts)is overturning the results of popular elections (through an indictment) to put the guy you want in power.
Who cares what the electorate wants. It's all about you.
You obviously have no idea what democracy means. It doesn't mean the electorate is required to do your bidding. It doesn't mean the only acceptable outcome is your choice. In fact, that view is profoundly anti-democratic.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)For the obvious reason
MFM008
(19,805 posts)Support her and wont be taking our ball and going home.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)You are just not posting.
Hmmm, that op was just weird
Loki
(3,825 posts)Walk away
(9,494 posts)What a Democrat!
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)"You won't see me follow you back home
The empty sidewalks on my block are not the same
You're not to blame"
Tarc
(10,476 posts)felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)I hope not permanently, but I have enjoyed sharing it.