2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIndiana Democratic Presidential Primary +13 Clinton
http://www.journalgazette.net/news/local/local-politics/IPFW-poll--Hoosiers-like-Clinton-12787113LexVegas
(6,031 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)(There are more states to go.)
Alerter: It's a boxing term, nobody's being called a dope.
LexVegas
(6,031 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)And isn't that just sad?
Happy Friday, LexVegas!
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Indiana has a huge African American population, and particularly the northwestern part. IN also has a very large building trades unions presence, and they stand with HRC. I'll still call it a win for her by 6%.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Indiana is a state where Sanders should win or come close to winning. If he loses by double digits, it's likely an indication that some of his support has dried up.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)Auto-dialers are outlawed, there is no party registration, and it's an open primary. Since Indys going for Bernie being a huge factor in this contest, it's very difficult to determine what the electorate is going to look like.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)There's no way of knowing if Indy's are going to turn out to support Bernie even though the race has all but been called, or if they will go vote either to support or stop Trump. I suspect the latter might be the case, which would be a huge hit for Bernie.
LiberalFighter
(50,793 posts)Because the calls are not made to specific people. It is random. They do ask questions related to how the person polled self identifies related to party affiliation. They plug those numbers in that fits the ratio for the universe they are polling. Basically, if they need 120 Republicans, 110 Democrats, and 70 unaffiliated they gather that much data.
BootinUp
(47,087 posts)NewsCenter28
(1,835 posts)Never thought of it that way!
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I have felt that the state would go for Bernie. But I admit that I have not considered the effect of Gary and Chicagoland. I still think he might win the state.