2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhen a web forum's members are overwhelmingly for Sanders, but the posts are about 50-50
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by one_voice (a host of the 2016 Postmortem forum).
or even slanted toward Clinton...
How to explain that? What accounts for that?
Do Hillary supporters just post 5 times as much for some reason?
floriduck
(2,262 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts).. and yes, would still eat Kraft dinner...
If you do the math on how many people that could pay, it's an awfully small budget for a massive troll brigade.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Maybe it's a movement!
Autumn
(45,016 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)all american girl
(1,788 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)LexVegas
(6,043 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)Now there's some poll numbers we can trust!
Done here.
obamanut2012
(26,050 posts)betsuni
(25,442 posts)JTFrog
(14,274 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Can you show us your work?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)BootinUp
(47,135 posts)they are printed on very pretty paper.
Because it couldn't be explained by the fact that the primary is essentially over.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)after less than a month, but yet are still active members however very few new Bernie supporters make it past their first hide if they even get that far?
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)but ya could say I have 'inside' info too
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10135783
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)you must have the patience of a saint
congrats!!
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)A you have a really weird sense of 'humor'
and
B you smoke a lot of well something
sort of
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Autumn
(45,016 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)Want to have a go at it?
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)appearance of popularity. Very old trick from a very old book.
vintx
(1,748 posts)72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)She's winning?
Bleacher Creature
(11,256 posts)People who have voted in Democratic primaries have solidly gone in Hillary's direction, and when you isolate the numbers to actual Democrats, it's overwhelming.
Putting aside the questionable numbers, I'm not sure when anyone should be surprised that there's still a lot of Clinton support here.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)kgnu_fan
(3,021 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I seem to not be getting them.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Can you provide the objective source for the 50/50 allegation?
athena
(4,187 posts)You can't just pull numbers out of the air based on your impressions. You have to actually do an unbiased analysis. You have to count every single post that was published in a given time frame, and categorize each post as pro-Bernie, pro-Hillary, or neutral. And you have to do this with enough posts and over a long enough time period to make sure your sample is statistically significant and representative of the overall trend. Ideally, you wouldn't do the measurement yourself but have an unbiased apolitical party do it to make sure you weren't biasing the results.
Quantitative analysis is hard. It's extremely difficult to remove bias from one's results, even when one is looking at something apparently impersonal like elementary particles. With something like politics, it's even more difficult.
msongs
(67,381 posts)Andy823
(11,495 posts)Change the cheese in your sandwich, it's getting rather moldy and smelly!
Orsino
(37,428 posts)That they don't get as much traction here as their candidate does everywhere else isn't their fault.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)lots of people have taken a break entirely, until things go back to normal.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Too bad, this is still DU, not Sanders Underground.
Why does everything have to be a conspiracy for some of you? Do you guys even realize how paranoid you sound?
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)They're down, Hillary supporters up, so it's no surprise and it's not a reflection on an anyone that the number of pro Hilary posts has increased.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Posts hidden by Jury: 10
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=110836&sub=trans
The Glorious Amnesty made this place into Yahoo Comments level ugly. Between the antisemitic posts, the gay baiting and the simply nasty it has become a very negative space, this DU.
LostOne4Ever
(9,287 posts)[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#009999]It probably means that there are an equal number of partisans (people personally or emotionally invested in a certain candidate), and the majority of the sites members aren't as invested or as interested in the primary.
It is highly possible that most of the latter, while they may have a majority preference for a certain candidate in particular, they probably don't want to get bogged down with the nasty infighting between the partisans and might even demand a separate forum for the partisans to duke it out.
That is just my opinion assuming that things are the way you describe, though.[/font]
moriah
(8,311 posts)... preparing themselves for another defeat...
And now feel safe to speak.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)than others.
Response to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
thucythucy
(8,043 posts)I checked in this morning and from what I can see (as of ten seconds ago) the OPs were still pretty much overwhelmingly pro-Bernie.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)one_voice
(20,043 posts)Disruptive meta is not allowed.