Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:03 PM Apr 2016

When a web forum's members are overwhelmingly for Sanders, but the posts are about 50-50

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by one_voice (a host of the 2016 Postmortem forum).

or even slanted toward Clinton...

How to explain that? What accounts for that?

Do Hillary supporters just post 5 times as much for some reason?

66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When a web forum's members are overwhelmingly for Sanders, but the posts are about 50-50 (Original Post) Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 OP
Or maybe some of that $1million dollars from Clinton's campaign is at work here. nm floriduck Apr 2016 #1
As much as I wish I had a milion dollars... moriah Apr 2016 #54
It could be a sudden mass influx of new Hillary supporters joining DU. Zorra Apr 2016 #2
It's a movement allright Autumn Apr 2016 #14
... Zorra Apr 2016 #19
Here the new registration page... Still very pro sanders. Agschmid Apr 2016 #62
Yes, 50% pro-Bernie, 50% anti-Hillary. JaneyVee Apr 2016 #3
Nice! Codeine Apr 2016 #4
.... sufrommich Apr 2016 #9
I absolutely adore you! NurseJackie Apr 2016 #11
Miss Fisher!!!!!! all american girl Apr 2016 #42
I love that show!!! Beacool Apr 2016 #43
Win. Close the thread. nt LexVegas Apr 2016 #16
HA! It sure looks close to that to me! NT Adrahil Apr 2016 #22
*snickersnort* nolawarlock Apr 2016 #29
Yup. ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #35
Bam. Bobbie Jo Apr 2016 #38
hahahahaha obamanut2012 Apr 2016 #40
BOOM! Good one. betsuni Apr 2016 #44
Oh snap. n/t JTFrog Apr 2016 #57
What a load of crap. nt onehandle Apr 2016 #5
.. Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #32
Another #AssPulledStatistic OilemFirchen Apr 2016 #6
Nope. Agschmid Apr 2016 #63
Maybe we should show our check stubs BootinUp Apr 2016 #7
Show your work. nt sufrommich Apr 2016 #8
I must ask why are so very many new Hillary supporters some even showing their transparency page azurnoir Apr 2016 #10
you noticed that, too. interesting, idn't it. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #12
yep I noticed azurnoir Apr 2016 #13
bless you, my child Hiraeth Apr 2016 #18
well it helps if azurnoir Apr 2016 #27
You have inside information and you at still totally making it up. Agschmid Apr 2016 #64
When you consider the ones who have been flagged Autumn Apr 2016 #21
for every hillary supporter you can name I can give you four new bernie bots snooper2 Apr 2016 #36
I can't believe I'm agreeing with a post of yours, but you speak the truth here. n/t JTFrog Apr 2016 #58
That's called 'Papering the House', it's suspension of attendance rules to enhance the Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #48
Dirty trick and lies. Her entire candidacy's foundation. vintx Apr 2016 #60
Um. just a guess 72DejaVu Apr 2016 #53
This is a forum for Democrats. It's actually in the name of the site. Bleacher Creature Apr 2016 #15
so people that voted for Bernie are not Democrats I take it? azurnoir Apr 2016 #24
Is there actual data to support "but the posts are about 50-50" ? Tarc Apr 2016 #17
If there was, it would come from someone with 1200 Bernie fans on their "ignore list". NurseJackie Apr 2016 #30
There isn't. Agschmid Apr 2016 #65
They are paid. It's a job. kgnu_fan Apr 2016 #20
Please make sure my check gets to me... Adrahil Apr 2016 #25
Try here: Downwinder Apr 2016 #34
Is this the outfit you went with in your research? NCTraveler Apr 2016 #23
Maybe they're posting from 'work'. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #26
Can you provide the objective source for the 50/50 allegation? LanternWaste Apr 2016 #28
Where did you get the 50-50 figure? athena Apr 2016 #31
so exactly how many posts are for each candidate according to your investigation? just curious msongs Apr 2016 #33
You need to Andy823 Apr 2016 #37
Credit Clinton supporters with great enthusiasm. Orsino Apr 2016 #39
there are dozens of people here who support Hillary who stay out of GDP for good reasons. bettyellen Apr 2016 #41
What's the matter, can't handle having Hillary supporters on a Democratic site? Beacool Apr 2016 #45
I think Sanders supporters are slowly giving up Onlooker Apr 2016 #46
The West Coast is busy with elections and people are sick of how DU is these days: Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #49
If what you say is true... LostOne4Ever Apr 2016 #47
Or maybe Hillary supporters decided to keep quiet... moriah Apr 2016 #50
Those of us who don't put all our eggs into one basket have more time to post? randome Apr 2016 #51
Wow,I guess some Meta threads are more equal sufrommich Apr 2016 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #55
I don't know how you arrived at the "50-50" figure. thucythucy Apr 2016 #56
When making up numbers, one can argue any which way. seabeyond Apr 2016 #59
Lol, the benie fans dont need to whine so much Logical Apr 2016 #61
Locking... one_voice Apr 2016 #66
 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
1. Or maybe some of that $1million dollars from Clinton's campaign is at work here. nm
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:05 PM
Apr 2016

moriah

(8,311 posts)
54. As much as I wish I had a milion dollars...
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:16 AM
Apr 2016

.. and yes, would still eat Kraft dinner...

If you do the math on how many people that could pay, it's an awfully small budget for a massive troll brigade.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
2. It could be a sudden mass influx of new Hillary supporters joining DU.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:06 PM
Apr 2016

Maybe it's a movement!

Autumn

(45,016 posts)
14. It's a movement allright
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:21 PM
Apr 2016

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
19. ...
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:24 PM
Apr 2016

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
62. Here the new registration page... Still very pro sanders.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:36 AM
Apr 2016
 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
3. Yes, 50% pro-Bernie, 50% anti-Hillary.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:06 PM
Apr 2016
 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
4. Nice!
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:08 PM
Apr 2016

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
9. ....
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:14 PM
Apr 2016

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
11. I absolutely adore you!
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:16 PM
Apr 2016

all american girl

(1,788 posts)
42. Miss Fisher!!!!!!
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:20 AM
Apr 2016

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
43. I love that show!!!
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 04:23 AM
Apr 2016

LexVegas

(6,043 posts)
16. Win. Close the thread. nt
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:21 PM
Apr 2016
 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
22. HA! It sure looks close to that to me! NT
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:25 PM
Apr 2016

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
29. *snickersnort*
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:31 PM
Apr 2016

Now there's some poll numbers we can trust!

ismnotwasm

(41,971 posts)
35. Yup.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 02:47 PM
Apr 2016

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
38. Bam.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 02:52 PM
Apr 2016

Done here.

obamanut2012

(26,050 posts)
40. hahahahaha
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 03:06 PM
Apr 2016

betsuni

(25,442 posts)
44. BOOM! Good one.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 04:25 AM
Apr 2016
 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
57. Oh snap. n/t
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:30 AM
Apr 2016

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
5. What a load of crap. nt
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:08 PM
Apr 2016
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
32. ..
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 02:11 PM
Apr 2016

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
6. Another #AssPulledStatistic
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:11 PM
Apr 2016

Can you show us your work?

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
63. Nope.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:37 AM
Apr 2016

BootinUp

(47,135 posts)
7. Maybe we should show our check stubs
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:12 PM
Apr 2016

they are printed on very pretty paper.



Because it couldn't be explained by the fact that the primary is essentially over.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
8. Show your work. nt
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:13 PM
Apr 2016

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
10. I must ask why are so very many new Hillary supporters some even showing their transparency page
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:15 PM
Apr 2016

after less than a month, but yet are still active members however very few new Bernie supporters make it past their first hide if they even get that far?

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
12. you noticed that, too. interesting, idn't it.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:17 PM
Apr 2016

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
13. yep I noticed
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:19 PM
Apr 2016

but ya could say I have 'inside' info too

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10135783

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
18. bless you, my child
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:22 PM
Apr 2016

you must have the patience of a saint

congrats!!

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
27. well it helps if
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:29 PM
Apr 2016

A you have a really weird sense of 'humor'

and

B you smoke a lot of well something

sort of

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
64. You have inside information and you at still totally making it up.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:38 AM
Apr 2016

Autumn

(45,016 posts)
21. When you consider the ones who have been flagged
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:25 PM
Apr 2016
forever that are obviously posting here under new names it gets clear.
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
36. for every hillary supporter you can name I can give you four new bernie bots
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 02:49 PM
Apr 2016

Want to have a go at it?

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
58. I can't believe I'm agreeing with a post of yours, but you speak the truth here. n/t
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:32 AM
Apr 2016
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
48. That's called 'Papering the House', it's suspension of attendance rules to enhance the
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:00 AM
Apr 2016

appearance of popularity. Very old trick from a very old book.

 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
60. Dirty trick and lies. Her entire candidacy's foundation.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:35 AM
Apr 2016

72DejaVu

(1,545 posts)
53. Um. just a guess
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:15 AM
Apr 2016

She's winning?

Bleacher Creature

(11,256 posts)
15. This is a forum for Democrats. It's actually in the name of the site.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:21 PM
Apr 2016

People who have voted in Democratic primaries have solidly gone in Hillary's direction, and when you isolate the numbers to actual Democrats, it's overwhelming.

Putting aside the questionable numbers, I'm not sure when anyone should be surprised that there's still a lot of Clinton support here.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
24. so people that voted for Bernie are not Democrats I take it?
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:26 PM
Apr 2016

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
17. Is there actual data to support "but the posts are about 50-50" ?
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:22 PM
Apr 2016

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
30. If there was, it would come from someone with 1200 Bernie fans on their "ignore list".
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:31 PM
Apr 2016

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
65. There isn't.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:38 AM
Apr 2016

kgnu_fan

(3,021 posts)
20. They are paid. It's a job.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:24 PM
Apr 2016
 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
25. Please make sure my check gets to me...
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:26 PM
Apr 2016

I seem to not be getting them.

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
34. Try here:
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 02:42 PM
Apr 2016
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
23. Is this the outfit you went with in your research?
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:26 PM
Apr 2016
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
26. Maybe they're posting from 'work'.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:29 PM
Apr 2016
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
28. Can you provide the objective source for the 50/50 allegation?
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:31 PM
Apr 2016

Can you provide the objective source for the 50/50 allegation?

athena

(4,187 posts)
31. Where did you get the 50-50 figure?
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:42 PM
Apr 2016

You can't just pull numbers out of the air based on your impressions. You have to actually do an unbiased analysis. You have to count every single post that was published in a given time frame, and categorize each post as pro-Bernie, pro-Hillary, or neutral. And you have to do this with enough posts and over a long enough time period to make sure your sample is statistically significant and representative of the overall trend. Ideally, you wouldn't do the measurement yourself but have an unbiased apolitical party do it to make sure you weren't biasing the results.

Quantitative analysis is hard. It's extremely difficult to remove bias from one's results, even when one is looking at something apparently impersonal like elementary particles. With something like politics, it's even more difficult.

msongs

(67,381 posts)
33. so exactly how many posts are for each candidate according to your investigation? just curious
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 02:20 PM
Apr 2016

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
37. You need to
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 02:51 PM
Apr 2016

Change the cheese in your sandwich, it's getting rather moldy and smelly!

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
39. Credit Clinton supporters with great enthusiasm.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 02:55 PM
Apr 2016

That they don't get as much traction here as their candidate does everywhere else isn't their fault.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
41. there are dozens of people here who support Hillary who stay out of GDP for good reasons.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 03:38 PM
Apr 2016

lots of people have taken a break entirely, until things go back to normal.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
45. What's the matter, can't handle having Hillary supporters on a Democratic site?
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 04:26 AM
Apr 2016

Too bad, this is still DU, not Sanders Underground.

Why does everything have to be a conspiracy for some of you? Do you guys even realize how paranoid you sound?

 

Onlooker

(5,636 posts)
46. I think Sanders supporters are slowly giving up
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 05:58 AM
Apr 2016

They're down, Hillary supporters up, so it's no surprise and it's not a reflection on an anyone that the number of pro Hilary posts has increased.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
49. The West Coast is busy with elections and people are sick of how DU is these days:
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:04 AM
Apr 2016

Posts hidden by Jury: 10
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=110836&sub=trans


The Glorious Amnesty made this place into Yahoo Comments level ugly. Between the antisemitic posts, the gay baiting and the simply nasty it has become a very negative space, this DU.

LostOne4Ever

(9,287 posts)
47. If what you say is true...
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:30 AM
Apr 2016

[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#009999]It probably means that there are an equal number of partisans (people personally or emotionally invested in a certain candidate), and the majority of the sites members aren't as invested or as interested in the primary.

It is highly possible that most of the latter, while they may have a majority preference for a certain candidate in particular, they probably don't want to get bogged down with the nasty infighting between the partisans and might even demand a separate forum for the partisans to duke it out.

That is just my opinion assuming that things are the way you describe, though.[/font]

moriah

(8,311 posts)
50. Or maybe Hillary supporters decided to keep quiet...
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:06 AM
Apr 2016

... preparing themselves for another defeat...

And now feel safe to speak.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
51. Those of us who don't put all our eggs into one basket have more time to post?
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:07 AM
Apr 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
52. Wow,I guess some Meta threads are more equal
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:09 AM
Apr 2016

than others.

Response to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)

thucythucy

(8,043 posts)
56. I don't know how you arrived at the "50-50" figure.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:29 AM
Apr 2016

I checked in this morning and from what I can see (as of ten seconds ago) the OPs were still pretty much overwhelmingly pro-Bernie.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
59. When making up numbers, one can argue any which way.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:32 AM
Apr 2016
 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
61. Lol, the benie fans dont need to whine so much
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:35 AM
Apr 2016

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
66. Locking...
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:59 AM
Apr 2016

Disruptive meta is not allowed.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»When a web forum's member...