2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumVoter SUPPRESSION Screwed Bernie Sanders and Will Screw Dems in November if Left Unchecked
.
Segami
(14,923 posts)but of course they are.....
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Bernie just came up short- he made a good run. Maybe next time
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)sheshe2
(83,730 posts)Califonz
(465 posts)if Hillary is nominated. It will be like kicking a giant nest full of millions of Trump voting fire ants.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)It's okay, we all get a little scared sometimes. Maybe these can help...
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)that are justifying, even gloating, that there was no election fraud every time someone points out how bizarre the events and the NUMBER of them that have taken place in so many states during this Primary.
If the Primary is as bad as the GE, you can be sure the same things are going to happen all over again.
creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)Sanders supporters believe Hillary steals elections. They also say we need to nominate Bernie because Hillary will lose. If Hillary can steal elections, how can she lose?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Chew on that for a minute and look at history. Which party is favored by voter suppression, election fraud, and the myriad examples of each in nearly every state so far?
creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)But you seem to think Hillary is great at stealing elections. Do you think the Republicans will out steal her?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Historical facts back up my supposition.
creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)They would really outsteal Bernie. So we have a better chance with Hillary. At least she'll be in there stealing what she can.
senz
(11,945 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)He never would've had a chance.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)a politician must win with over a 7 percent margin. Bernie can do that; Hillary cannot.
Sam
senz
(11,945 posts)But thanks for posting it.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I've seen it in a lot of sig lines and have no idea what it means
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Kinda cute but annoying
senz
(11,945 posts)who went by the user name "beam me up scottie." Some of us are using it as we used LO0niX's bug.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280177542
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280178020
BMUS was a polite but ferocious fighter for Bernie who had an almost encyclopedic collection of links to either make her point or remind her opponent of their own hypocrisy. Hill supporters would visibly collapse under her unyielding persistent logic. It was an amazing thing to see. I also considered her a friend and miss her on a personal level.
Her profile shows her as "Active," but she never came back. Knowing how central DU was to her, I find it hard to believe that she would stay away by choice. Another commenter in this situation is cali -- again, I cannot imagine her staying way, especially lately, by choice.
Here's what I'm thinking:
1) Some popular "on review" DUers are never allowed back on but their status is changed to "active" to mollify their unhappy friends/fans/supporters
OR
2) They are put back to active status with some sort of threatening proviso that prevents them from ever posting again.
BMUS and cali were extremely effective online campaigners. Let us not forget which campaign is supporting administrator's family.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)It would suck if her absence is involuntary....
senz
(11,945 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)YouDig
(2,280 posts)The only format where he did better than Hillary was voter-suppressing caucuses. Without caucuses, it would have been even more of a blowout than it already was.
It's a good thing he didn't get the nomination, because the general election won't be a caucus.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)voter suppression only hurts Sanders. Cause all suppressed voters have to be Sanders supporters, right? None of them would actually support Clinton, right?
Response to Segami (Original post)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Did I miss any?
Response to COLGATE4 (Reply #27)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Me either. But first, let's just get this damned primary over so we can lose 98% of all the low post count sages who keep telling us that "it's not over yet- you just wait". Tiring beyond belief.
Response to COLGATE4 (Reply #29)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)I am so sick of the "Hillary won't have enough votes and I'll tell you why". Then they launch into the most ridiculous stuff.
doc03
(35,325 posts)The voter suppression is supposedly aimed at suppressing the black vote. If that is the case how did Hillary get all those votes from blacks and where the hell did all those Republican, Independent and white votes that should have voted for Sanders go to?
Response to doc03 (Reply #30)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.