Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
85 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Millennials who support Bernie may sit out election (Original Post) MineralMan Apr 2016 OP
Fortunately, there will likely be some millenials who realize how fucking frightening... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2016 #1
One hopes... MineralMan Apr 2016 #8
I think you guys have used that kind of emotional blackmail a few too many times. Betty Karlson May 2016 #48
+1,000 Pretty much the way I am seeing it also. Bohunk68 May 2016 #54
emotional blackmail ! stonecutter357 May 2016 #57
laugh all you want. Betty Karlson May 2016 #66
emails and stuff. stonecutter357 May 2016 #68
Callosity rather. That is enough to never trust her. Betty Karlson May 2016 #70
Most Admired Woman in World, Record 20th Time Gallup, December 2015. stonecutter357 May 2016 #73
Time is another establishment mouthpiece. Betty Karlson May 2016 #74
chicken , mashed potatoes and broccoli broccoli broccoli broccoli. stonecutter357 May 2016 #81
Yes, that makes about as much sense as: "I support Clinton" Betty Karlson May 2016 #82
"Fear Trump" - the #1 Answer to "I don't like Hillary." IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #18
Yeah. NewImproved Deal Apr 2016 #29
What I want to know is, if Trump is so AWFUL - a misogynistic racist crazy guy -- IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #30
I don't think they're tremendously picky about where the money comes from. Buns_of_Fire May 2016 #53
And if Trump is so awful, why risk a weak candidate like Clinton, when you can go with Bernie - Betty Karlson May 2016 #69
If Hillary is so weak what does that make Bernie? redstateblues May 2016 #79
If Sanders gets over 64 % of the remaining pledged delegates, he WILL overtake her. Betty Karlson May 2016 #80
She is propped up by the safety mechanisms built into the process Amishman May 2016 #85
If you want to sit home and hold your breath its your right ProudToBeBlueInRhody May 2016 #32
She certainly likes to hang out with them a lot. IdaBriggs May 2016 #34
this one is even more disgusting . stonecutter357 May 2016 #58
FYI SunSeeker May 2016 #61
trying to insult , it was a insult! stonecutter357 May 2016 #62
Triangulation appears to have been their only strategy from jump. We are about to silvershadow May 2016 #52
I do find him frightening but. Although, I can see some of the justifications many would use. Xyzse May 2016 #36
Please clarify. Fla Dem May 2016 #83
What I mean by that is that we have to have a conversation why some people might vote for him. Xyzse May 2016 #84
I never sit out elections Duckhunter935 Apr 2016 #2
Or are they just waiting until they're old enough to vote? n/t Democratic Divo Apr 2016 #3
Okay by me if they would just shut the hell up about it. oasis Apr 2016 #4
Even with all the passion, Bernie had trouble getting them to vote NWCorona Apr 2016 #5
They're fickle, it seems. MineralMan Apr 2016 #11
To be fair, many didn't realize till too late that they had to register as a Democrat. Xyzse May 2016 #37
When high levels of financial contributions, rally attendance and activism don't appear IdaBriggs May 2016 #60
It's their vote, it isn't owed to anyone. Candidates need to earn it. nt Joe the Revelator Apr 2016 #6
Indeed. If they're there, their vote will count. MineralMan Apr 2016 #9
Not true... Not voting is also a choice, not voting can be considered a vote of no confidence. Xyzse May 2016 #38
Then ensure that Bernie is the nominee if you want the millennial vote. cui bono May 2016 #46
They would have sat out the election anyways calguy Apr 2016 #7
Yep..we can do it...eom asuhornets Apr 2016 #10
Yup. I'll be there for sure. MineralMan Apr 2016 #12
I think a fair number of Republicans will sit out over Trump as well Algernon Moncrieff Apr 2016 #13
I don't think they'll sit out the election at all. In fact, I bet their numbers NorthCarolina Apr 2016 #14
Yup, Karma13612 May 2016 #67
One thing I am sure of... NorthCarolina May 2016 #71
only in the la la land is this substantially true nt msongs Apr 2016 #15
Those Millenial Women - They'll only vote the way boyfriends do. Freeloaders who want free stuff! TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #16
If millenials Demnorth Apr 2016 #17
It's "establishment business as usual" versus "throw the bums out!" IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #19
That's a big Demnorth May 2016 #41
I'm thinking much what you are thinking. Bohunk68 May 2016 #56
The Brat Effect... Chicago1980 Apr 2016 #20
Aren't you a sweetheart? Were you never 21? jillan Apr 2016 #22
My idiocy was expressed in other ways that had nothing to do with screwing a nation. Chicago1980 Apr 2016 #24
I was 21 when I first voted ProudToBeBlueInRhody May 2016 #33
That's not it at all. I just posted about this so I'll just copy/paste that here: cui bono May 2016 #49
+1 DLevine May 2016 #55
Many of them are only interested in this election because of Bernie. eom jillan Apr 2016 #21
How shortsighted. Chicago1980 Apr 2016 #25
No, it's the exact opposite. They're in it for the long run. cui bono May 2016 #50
"The Democratic Party doesn't want or need your vote." cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #23
The Republican Nominee will more than motivate us to vote blue. nt LostOne4Ever Apr 2016 #26
If Trump is the GOP nominee, they will vote in droves. Purveyor Apr 2016 #27
Lol... northernsouthern Apr 2016 #28
If Millennials Think Their Cute Little Lives Are Hard Now........... JudgeX Apr 2016 #31
The youth turned out big time for Obama...and Democrats did absolutely nothing!! davidn3600 May 2016 #39
Youth turnout in 2008 was below 50% and only a little higher than it was in 2004. Garrett78 May 2016 #40
There's no way you are a lifetime liberal with that attitude. cui bono May 2016 #44
There's no way you are a lifetime liberal with that attitude. stonecutter357 May 2016 #64
Wow, I am so happy that I do not think like you do. nt NorthCarolina May 2016 #76
49% turnout in 2008 and that's considered good. Garrett78 May 2016 #35
It will be the fault of the establishment and Hillary supporters for shoving a flawed and corrupt cui bono May 2016 #42
Then it will be a massacre like 2014. Come up with another plan. Ash_F May 2016 #43
This isn't just about Millennials, younger people of previous generations also had low turnout JI7 May 2016 #45
Ânother great win for Debbie! Betty Karlson May 2016 #47
Some may. elleng May 2016 #51
here is the voting by age in 2012 - the last presidential election DrDan May 2016 #59
Young people don't vote that often runaway hero May 2016 #63
K&R! stonecutter357 May 2016 #65
don't they do that every election? wyldwolf May 2016 #72
They think they're "sending a message" ... only ... NurseJackie May 2016 #77
... and the message is... wyldwolf May 2016 #78
Anybody who sits out any election is a frigging idiot. apnu May 2016 #75

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
1. Fortunately, there will likely be some millenials who realize how fucking frightening...
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:35 PM
Apr 2016

....Donald Trump is, who didn't even vote or pay attention in the primary.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
48. I think you guys have used that kind of emotional blackmail a few too many times.
Sun May 1, 2016, 03:19 AM
May 2016

The 20th century is over, and Clinton is camaigning as if 1999 never ended. Don't blame the millennials when they get the message and VOTE like it's 1999: not at all.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
66. laugh all you want.
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:09 AM
May 2016

I have long known about the widespread callosity in camp Weathervane.

"A lot of you may not know this, but back in those days, it was very difficult to talk about HIV and AIDS. And it was really the leadership of Nancy and Ronald Reagan that started the national conversation on AIDS."

"Oopsie, here are two flimsy twitterlines to say I'm sorry. Are you happy? Now back to me me me."

"OK, I will admit that the Reagans never started the conversation about AIDS. In fact, they deadpanned it, but let's glance over that slightly embarrassing distinction of theirs (embarrassing to me that is). You see: I lost people too. And this is still about me. Let's talk about what my foundation has done in Africa, funding treatment in homophobic countries. That makes it all right then. OK? OK? Now back to me me me me me!"

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
70. Callosity rather. That is enough to never trust her.
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:14 AM
May 2016

But indeed: other parts of her record are disqualifying too.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
18. "Fear Trump" - the #1 Answer to "I don't like Hillary."
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 11:07 PM
Apr 2016

I am ready to start counting the number of times this "inspirational leadership" ( ) is touted.

 

NewImproved Deal

(534 posts)
29. Yeah.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 11:39 PM
Apr 2016

The Trump Boogeyman is the Clinton Machine's "trump" card. 'It's Her Turn!' never quite caught on...

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
30. What I want to know is, if Trump is so AWFUL - a misogynistic racist crazy guy --
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 11:50 PM
Apr 2016

Why were the Clintons at his wedding? And why were they taking his money?

https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=&w=480

Buns_of_Fire

(17,172 posts)
53. I don't think they're tremendously picky about where the money comes from.
Sun May 1, 2016, 04:26 AM
May 2016

A million dollars from George Soros, a million dollars from Chuck Koch, a million dollars from Lloyd Blankfein, a million dollars from Beelzebub -- it's all money, right? So long as the check clears, just shovel it our way, boys. Gotta pay the bills, you know.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
69. And if Trump is so awful, why risk a weak candidate like Clinton, when you can go with Bernie -
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:11 AM
May 2016

who would bury Trump in the mother of all landslides?

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
79. If Hillary is so weak what does that make Bernie?
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:36 AM
May 2016

Who she is beating like a drum. He can't even win the nomination of his own party!

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
80. If Sanders gets over 64 % of the remaining pledged delegates, he WILL overtake her.
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:38 AM
May 2016

And that sounds doable, given California's tilt.

Hillary is a weak GE candidate. Sanders is just hated by the Democratic Party elite. But who cares about a couple of stuck-in-the-20th-century one-percenters?

Amishman

(5,554 posts)
85. She is propped up by the safety mechanisms built into the process
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:59 AM
May 2016

Voter suppression via closed primaries and distant registration/party change cutoffs

insider fundraising connections

friendly media connections


I think this would be a different race if the house edge was removed.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
32. If you want to sit home and hold your breath its your right
Sun May 1, 2016, 12:29 AM
May 2016

I have no problem voting for Hillary Clinton. I don't think she's worse than Republicans like you do.

Have a nice evening.

SunSeeker

(51,545 posts)
61. FYI
Sun May 1, 2016, 08:30 AM
May 2016
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

On Sun May 1, 2016, 07:59 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

this one is even more disgusting .
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1874518

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Not sure which candidate the poster is trying to insult, but putting up a photo of the two of them and labeling it "disgusting" is more Free Republican than Democrat. Please hide.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun May 1, 2016, 08:07 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: There's this little thing called "context". The post is fair comment on what came before it.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Deserves a hide, disgusting.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: In context it is obvious what the poster is doing here.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Turnabout is fair play. 
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
52. Triangulation appears to have been their only strategy from jump. We are about to
Sun May 1, 2016, 03:46 AM
May 2016

see just how far that dog hunts I suppose. "I'm not as bad as him" has never been much of a winning message, but it has worked I suppose

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
36. I do find him frightening but. Although, I can see some of the justifications many would use.
Sun May 1, 2016, 01:15 AM
May 2016

I can enumerate them, but I'd rather not, as it risks getting hidden.

However, if he does become the nominee, I believe it will be an important conversation to have around here.

Fla Dem

(23,620 posts)
83. Please clarify.
Sun May 1, 2016, 10:21 AM
May 2016

Are you saying if Trump gets the Republican nomination we should have a conversation on DU on why there is justification to vote for him rather than HRC? I don't think that will happen if that is what you're suggesting.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
84. What I mean by that is that we have to have a conversation why some people might vote for him.
Mon May 2, 2016, 10:44 AM
May 2016

It has to be an honest assessment. I am not suggesting voting for him, since I won't do that(not to mention that is dumb), but I can easily figure out why some would. I generally wouldn't agree with it, but it is something that people have to consider, and know. To blind oneself to those reasons would leave one flat-footed and wondering why things happened.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
2. I never sit out elections
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:36 PM
Apr 2016

I will of course vote in the down ticket races. However, I am not a millennial. I am just a baby boomer.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
5. Even with all the passion, Bernie had trouble getting them to vote
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:42 PM
Apr 2016

This will only be magnified under Clinton.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
37. To be fair, many didn't realize till too late that they had to register as a Democrat.
Sun May 1, 2016, 01:19 AM
May 2016

Most of them are proud to be Unaffiliated.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
60. When high levels of financial contributions, rally attendance and activism don't appear
Sun May 1, 2016, 08:03 AM
May 2016

at the ballot box, maybe you might want to check if there is a problem with either voter suppression or vote counting.

MineralMan

(146,281 posts)
9. Indeed. If they're there, their vote will count.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:50 PM
Apr 2016

If they're not there, their vote doesn't exist. My point.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
38. Not true... Not voting is also a choice, not voting can be considered a vote of no confidence.
Sun May 1, 2016, 01:20 AM
May 2016

That counts.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
46. Then ensure that Bernie is the nominee if you want the millennial vote.
Sun May 1, 2016, 03:15 AM
May 2016

Otherwise you have no reason to complain. Give the people someone they can vote for and they'll come out and do it. Give them someone they can't trust or that's just going to worsen their opportunity at a good life and you can't expect them to vote for that person, not even by threatening them with SCOTUS.

.

calguy

(5,303 posts)
7. They would have sat out the election anyways
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:47 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie or no Bernie, if they can't vote on FaceBook they wouldn't have the commitment to make it to the pills anyway. There'll be plenty of responsible citizens to put HRC in the White House regardless if they vote or not.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
13. I think a fair number of Republicans will sit out over Trump as well
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:58 PM
Apr 2016

I expect two things:

1) Whoever gets elected here will be a one-termer
2) Voter participation will be down compared to the past two election cycles.

Conservatives (especially Evangelicals) are energized, but Latinos will likely show up as if their lives depend on the outcome.

I expect Trump to make Rubio his Veep.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
14. I don't think they'll sit out the election at all. In fact, I bet their numbers
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:58 PM
Apr 2016

will be far higher in the GE when all of the silly rules about party registration and mysteriously changing party affiliations won't be in play anymore.

Oh yes, I think they'll decidedly vote...but I suspect they will NOT vote for Hillary. They have other options available to them.

Karma13612

(4,547 posts)
67. Yup,
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:09 AM
May 2016

that is what I am looking at as well.

If Hillary is the nominee, I might be looking at the Green party with Jill Stein.

There are more Independents now than Democrats.

You can't coerce the Independents to vote as Dems in the general if they aren't allowed to in the Primaries.

And they might just come out in full force this time to vote for Jill. And if enuf Dems join them in support of Jill, this might be a pretty interesting election indeed.

I am not sure yet what I am going to do

But one thing is for certain, I am not a guaranteed Democratic vote for Hillary if my man Bernie is not the nominee.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
71. One thing I am sure of...
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:14 AM
May 2016

there are options available. I don't exclude the prospect of a write-in vote either.

TheBlackAdder

(28,179 posts)
16. Those Millenial Women - They'll only vote the way boyfriends do. Freeloaders who want free stuff!
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:30 PM
Apr 2016

.


It's amazing how shit like that comes back home to roost!


.

Demnorth

(68 posts)
17. If millenials
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 11:02 PM
Apr 2016

or any other group who supports Sanders doesn't exercise their right to vote, if Clinton does become the nominee, then so be it.

I do find it weird that some say they would vote republican instead, if the choices were Clinton and Trump. Time passes and things happen, who knows? Apparently some republican women would vote for Clinton if that was the match-up. There's a lot of trail ahead.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
19. It's "establishment business as usual" versus "throw the bums out!"
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 11:10 PM
Apr 2016

If Trump starts acting Not-Crazy, he's got a damn good chance.

Demnorth

(68 posts)
41. That's a big
Sun May 1, 2016, 02:47 AM
May 2016

and scary If...!

Yes, I guess that's what it comes down to, for some. Hopefully his acting skills are not up to that gargantuan a task.

Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
56. I'm thinking much what you are thinking.
Sun May 1, 2016, 06:17 AM
May 2016

Seen too many elections over the decades to think that the Rethuglicans are going to break up as a party because of Trump. bullshit. Come November, they will have all of their minions out there voting for their nominee. That's what Rethugs do, time and time again. Failure to see that could cost the Dems the race. It's control of the money and power. Follow the money.

Chicago1980

(1,968 posts)
24. My idiocy was expressed in other ways that had nothing to do with screwing a nation.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 11:30 PM
Apr 2016

I don't remember having temper tantrums when I was 21, though it's possible I did.

And yes, I am a sweetheart

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
49. That's not it at all. I just posted about this so I'll just copy/paste that here:
Sun May 1, 2016, 03:20 AM
May 2016

It pretty much applies though it was written in response to a similar sort of thought so keep that in mind. I don't feel like rewriting this thought out or going through and editing this since it's late...

Your post illustrates exactly what Hillary supporters do not understand about this primary.

It is not about winning or losing to those of us who support Bernie. It's not about Bernie being a winner, as it is with you guys with Hillary. With Bernie supporters it's about the movement, it's about finally having someone who is uncompromised by money, who is fighting to get back to a real democracy where the govt is of, by and for the people, not corporations. It is about getting control of our govt back to the people rather than the corporations. It's about the very soul of our country, our democracy.

You don't realize that if Hillary wins, we all lose. We will all win eventually because this primary has shown people that it is possible to dream again, it is possible to have a candidate with integrity who will represent us and so the movement will continue. It may not be possible with this two party system we have now, but if Hillary wins I'm not sure the Dem Party will survive as she embodies all that is wrong with politics today and simply does not represent the hopes and dreams of the youth. They do not identify as Dems and are registering as Dems solely because of Bernie. Many of them will not vote for Hillary because she is just business as usual and they know that does not work and has given them little promise of a decent life, what we used to call the "American Dream".

And the GOP may not survive Trump or Cruz since they are nuts. Trump is probably acting crazier than he really is in his business dealings, he loves to put on a show and be in the limelight, but Republicans hate him just as much as many Dems hate Hillary.

At a time when the two people with the lowest likeability ratings ever to run (I believe that is correct, if not the bottom two, certainly among the lowest) are the best that we have to choose from, it's pretty clear our country and our system is in a very sad state.

So I don't know what you think you're winning with Hillary when all we're getting is someone with an incredibly low likeability rating, an abysmal trust rating (deservedly so) who alienates the youth, independents, half of the Dem Party and who will never get any crossover Republican votes.

Yay!

.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
50. No, it's the exact opposite. They're in it for the long run.
Sun May 1, 2016, 03:22 AM
May 2016

It's not about Bernie, it's about changing this country. Hillary just isn't going to do what's needed. She is part of the problem.

.

 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
27. If Trump is the GOP nominee, they will vote in droves.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 11:37 PM
Apr 2016

Much water to flow beneath the bridge before election day.

Just as the President said tonight, worried if Cleveland would make it through July. In jest of course but these counter Trump protests will get uglier in the heat of the summer.

 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
28. Lol...
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 11:39 PM
Apr 2016

...for a campaign that talks about math...you sure seem to throw it out the window when it is not in your favor. With out the youth vote you lose the election unless the other side sits out too. You only have 29% of the US is Dem, you toss the independents and the youth vote you have lost...or is that saying divided we stand?

JudgeX

(1 post)
31. If Millennials Think Their Cute Little Lives Are Hard Now...........
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 11:56 PM
Apr 2016

If the Millennials sit out this election because they didn't get their way, as a lifetime liberal I strongly suggest nothing be done to advance their interests. No free tuition, no free health care. Elections have consequences and if Hillary has to win without them then the hell with them. Juvenile, you say? Hardly. Playing to your constituents is the first rule of politics and if they aren't there for her, then she would be a fool to reward them. And the opposite, of course, applies as well. But since their DeFacto President Trump won't be addressing their needs anyway my point is moot.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
39. The youth turned out big time for Obama...and Democrats did absolutely nothing!!
Sun May 1, 2016, 01:52 AM
May 2016

What's the old saying?
"Fool me once, shame on you....fool me twice, shame on me."

The youth does not trust the Democratic party.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
40. Youth turnout in 2008 was below 50% and only a little higher than it was in 2004.
Sun May 1, 2016, 02:02 AM
May 2016

It'll likely be about the same this year.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
44. There's no way you are a lifetime liberal with that attitude.
Sun May 1, 2016, 03:12 AM
May 2016

Why should anyone want a choice between center-right and extreme right? Why did the Dem Party move to the center? It's the party's fault for going DLC/Third Way and selling out to corporate money. Now they might have to reap the consequences of their decision to do that. The millennials had nothing to do with that decision. To blame them for bad leadership that began decades ago is ridiculous.

Most of your post reeks of Republican attitude. The president should only enact policies that benefit the people who voted for them? That is fucked up. Is that how you think this country is supposed to operate? Reward those who vote for you and punish those who don't?

Do you not understand that an educated public is good for the country? The GOP and corporations want people to be uneducated because if people are not informed they will not rebel against TPTB.

Your backwards thinking is astounding. I'm quite sure you got lost on these internet tubes.

.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
35. 49% turnout in 2008 and that's considered good.
Sun May 1, 2016, 01:01 AM
May 2016

So, yeah, a lot of young folks won't vote. Nothing new. Overall turnout was about 63% in '08 and about 58% in '12. '04 turnout was about 60%. Yet someone started another thread about how 24% of voters say they won't participate in a Clinton vs. Trump contest. It'll be a lot more than 24% regardless of who the nominees are.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
42. It will be the fault of the establishment and Hillary supporters for shoving a flawed and corrupt
Sun May 1, 2016, 03:05 AM
May 2016

candidate down everyone's throats.

It's not the millennials fault that The Dem Party is center-right and refuses to go back to it's roots. It's not the millennials' fault the Dem Party chose to go the DLC/Third Way route and go after corporate money.

Millennials are not stupid. They know we need to get money out of politics and they know who is doing that. The Dem Party leadership is stupid for not seeing that.

.

JI7

(89,244 posts)
45. This isn't just about Millennials, younger people of previous generations also had low turnout
Sun May 1, 2016, 03:12 AM
May 2016

when it comes to voting.

this is just how it's usually been.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
59. here is the voting by age in 2012 - the last presidential election
Sun May 1, 2016, 07:58 AM
May 2016


If Hillary puts effort in to getting folks to vote for her, he efforts will certainly pay off better with older voters - they vote. Look at white males 24 and under - around 38% - less than 4 in 10 vote.

wyldwolf

(43,867 posts)
72. don't they do that every election?
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:15 AM
May 2016


With all the hype about the youth vote, what is often overlooked is they're notoriously unreliable voters.

apnu

(8,749 posts)
75. Anybody who sits out any election is a frigging idiot.
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:27 AM
May 2016

Age and political preference doen't enter into it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Millennials who support B...