2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumLatest Polls April 29th Show Sanders Doing Better Than Clinton Against Republicans
Latest Polls
Friday
April 29, 2016
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton IBD/TIPP Clinton 47, Trump 40 Clinton +7
General Election: Trump vs. Sanders IBD/TIPP Sanders 50, Trump 38 Sanders +12
General Election: Cruz vs. Clinton IBD/TIPP Clinton 47, Cruz 40 Clinton +7
General Election: Cruz vs. Sanders IBD/TIPP Sanders 49, Cruz 38 Sanders +11
General Election: Kasich vs. Clinton IBD/TIPP Kasich 45, Clinton 41 Kasich +4
General Election: Kasich vs. Sanders IBD/TIPP Sanders 46, Kasich 42 Sanders +4
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)And after the Republican scorched Earth smear machine was through with him ... do you really think he would be polling so well?
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)general election predictions.
Hillary will not have enough elected delegates to clinch the nomination before the convention.
You didn't know that?
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)Albertoo
(2,016 posts)And that's even before Trump skewers Sanders on 'Socialism' and 'revolution'
The polls sound far more convincing when it comes to Hillary who is a stateswoman.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)Albertoo
(2,016 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Just sayin'...
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)GW still would be called a statesman, and that's about as bad as it gets.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)Do I need the tag?
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)TDale313
(7,820 posts)We're making a mistake if we nominate Hillary.
How many will notice or care?
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)which is why I don't buy the polls so far from election time
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)Albertoo
(2,016 posts)come election time
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)brooklynite
(94,495 posts)...the General Election voter profile is larger and more centrist.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)I'd assume you think that those right leaning Limbaugh independents are the ones that will put her over the top seeing as you (although improperly imply more independents are right wing) are going to be the Independents she will win if she hopes to win the GE.
I only assume this because you don't think it is a problem that Democratic leaning Independents do not like or favor her. This implies more about her on the right left scale than you realize, if your assumptions are correct.
TM99
(8,352 posts)That is ridiculous.
Right leaning independents when able vote in the GOP primary. Left leaning independents when able vote in the Dem primary.
They don't all suddenly morph into this magical fucking centrist bullshit you neoliberals have spouted since the 1990's.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)And even some Republicans. In an antiestablishment year we're about to nominate the ultimate status quo establishment politician while they nominate Trump who has spent the primaries swallowing establishment politicians whole. It's a bad matchup for us. She may still win- I hope she would. But she is not our best choice on policy or pragmatically in beating Trump.
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)Trump is a good orator; my guess is he'd make minced meat of the word and the idea.
Which is why I think Hillary is a much safer bet.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)Honestly. They think of European countries that actually know how to take care of their people. Republicans have spent a decade calling Obama a Socialist to very little effect.
I realize that older people vote more- but I think older people are also overestimating how effective that particular line of attack would be. Red baiting is so 5 decades ago.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Two of the government's most important and valued programs to people.
The socialism scare is a Cold War mentality. Even many of us old people are over it.
brooklynite
(94,495 posts)Albertoo
(2,016 posts)Check it out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_socialism
Qutzupalotl
(14,300 posts)If anyone can define and defend the concept to the country, it's him. Bernie has had years debating in the Senate, defending his ideas from smarter people than Trump. He is a fighter and will not back down or cower.
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)Baobab
(4,667 posts)Democrats are divided over her.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)ideas. Tragic thing is how many people end up believing that crap, even Democrats.
The American public, as shown by poll after poll and by Bernie Sanders' campaign, is way to the Left of what people think. So courting that rightward "swing center" is a fucking delusion which hopefully will not be pursued by any Democratic candidate.
If they do, then truly we are lost.
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)Detailed study here: https://lanekenworthy.net/political-polarization/
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)If you ask them about their beliefs, there are a great many more Progressive minded people out there than believe they are actually Progressive.
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)progressive/conservative is a continuum: take ten items: some will score 10/10 progressive, then others 8/10 -> 7/10 .. 5/10 -> .. 2/10 .. >0/10. Probably a flat W curve.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)that anyone who is not a young person probably thinks they are much more "moderate" or "conservative" than they actually are. If you ask them about Social Security or Medicare or any of a whole range of social services (those that a Social Democratic state for instance would support) they will be all in favor of them.
The Democratic Party has bought into this bullshit, particularly popular in the days of Reagan as true. Polls show that it is not. America is essentially in its beliefs a relatively Progressive nation. Just not in its policies. When renegades from either party, like Trump, mainline into the Liberal or Progressive or Populist voice (for instance around trade deals), they do very, very well.
And that is the danger in this election. Trump advocates plenty of rightwing b.s., but on financial matters goes to the Left of Clinton and appeals to this very sentiment.
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)Take Progressive: it covers all walks of beliefs, some being un-progressive like fundamentalist Greens who want de-growth. Same for conservative: it covers both atheist Libertarians like Penn Gillette and religious fundamentalists. Labels can be tricky. Which is why I'm not quite sure a Progressive/Conservative scale even works.
annavictorious
(934 posts)w4rma
(31,700 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Clinton will show her anger and look weak. That's how this will go.
Desert805
(392 posts)and ask him to cut it out.
She lost her cool over and over at "enough about the damn emails" Sanders. I can't even imagine how she'll react to Trump, but it won't be a good look, I'm sure.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)and shows her temper?
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)imagine2015
(2,054 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,951 posts)...not being demonized. Every cloud has a silver lining!
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)HRC will win in November.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)for the last month after it was clear that Sanders couldn't win is now arguing that votes don't matter and we should look to polls to pick our nominee.
The fact that the Sanders campaign is even peddling in such desperation shows that they know his campaign is dead in the water. I almost want to throw them some sympathy $27s so that they can buy back some of their dignity when they finally confront the fact that he is done already.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)No one on the Sanders side is seriously making argument that votes don't matter. That's such bizarre nonsense, I have to wonder if I am writing to a poorly programmed response CMS.
SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)off of match-up polls, you are arguing that votes don't matter.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Alas, that is probably half a brain more than they have.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)floppyboo
(2,461 posts)I don't understand what your point is
MFM008
(19,804 posts)IF she wins by 7 or he wins by 12?
She still WINS.
We have a Bush presidency thanks to just over 500 votes.
I dont care if she wins by 3 votes.
Response to imagine2015 (Original post)
Demsrule86 This message was self-deleted by its author.
hack89
(39,171 posts)why not pick candidates based on polls alone?