Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
Sun May 1, 2016, 08:16 AM May 2016

Sanders Calls for 50-State Strategy to 'Revitalize American Democracy'

Bemoaning a failing democratic process that leaves too many people left out, Bernie Sanders on Thursday said his campaign would continue to bring disenfranchised people into the political process and said the Democratic Party as a whole must forge a 50-state strategy in order to restore civic vibrancy and fuel meaningful outcomes on the key issues people care about in every community nationwide.

Describing the Republican Party's platform as a "fringe agenda," Sanders said that problem of recent years is not that the GOP is "winning elections," but rather that the "Democratic Party is losing" them.

"In November of 2014," Sanders explained, "63 percent of people did not vote. Eighty percent of young people and low-income people did not vote. And I think the reason for that is that the Democratic Party up to now has not been clear about which side they are on on the major issues facing this country."



"The Democratic Party has to reach a fundamental conclusion: Are we on the side working people or big money interests? Do we stand with the elderly, the children, and the sick and the poor, or do we stand with Wall Street speculators and the drug companies and the insurance companies?" —Bernie Sanders



http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/04/28/sanders-calls-50-state-strategy-revitalize-american-democracy
56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders Calls for 50-State Strategy to 'Revitalize American Democracy' (Original Post) FreakinDJ May 2016 OP
There goes Bernie again...bashing young folks and poor people... Human101948 May 2016 #1
In the Fall of 2018, Sanders should do rallies Eric J in MN May 2016 #2
Former Bernie Sanders Staffers Seek To Elect A ‘Brand New Congress’ FreakinDJ May 2016 #8
I am a staunch Hillary supporter. I LOVE this idea and will work for it. Good for him! Squinch May 2016 #10
It wouldn't be awesome if Hill would take some time to do that! peace13 May 2016 #27
Sadly, if Hillary is the nominee, the answer to this is all too clear - djean111 May 2016 #3
Hillary has done very well with low-income voters oberliner May 2016 #5
That does not mean she will do good things for them. djean111 May 2016 #6
Presumably they voted for her because they think that she will oberliner May 2016 #7
Not questioning that at all. djean111 May 2016 #9
Clinton (TM) is very good at political marketing and branding Armstead May 2016 #12
Look at the Clinton record. She has a past with actions. peace13 May 2016 #26
The SCHIP program expanded health coverage to millions of lower-income children oberliner May 2016 #28
Well....there have been some pretty horrible things along the way. peace13 May 2016 #29
Black Lives Matters don't think very highly of her. rhett o rick May 2016 #14
Bernie Sanders voted in favor of the 1994 Crime Bill oberliner May 2016 #35
Not worth very much to BLM. They know, as you do, that he reluctantly voted for the rhett o rick May 2016 #36
That's not true oberliner May 2016 #39
I think that's called using chaff as a counter measure. You forgot to mention what I said that rhett o rick May 2016 #40
That paragraph is about Bill Clinton oberliner May 2016 #42
So? What's your point? BLM seems to think that Hillary shared his feelings. rhett o rick May 2016 #45
BLM is not a monolith. Ashley Williams is one person oberliner May 2016 #56
Clinton supported being tough on VIOLENT criminals- the states did the damage regarding smaller bettyellen May 2016 #43
Yes, and...? Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #34
Democrats have to acknowledge their own culpability in the actions of the Democratic party in Squinch May 2016 #11
Maybe he should have run a 50 state strategy himself, rather than insult the entire South. CrowCityDem May 2016 #4
Wow, another low poster attack. Where are we getting so many new Clinton rhett o rick May 2016 #15
Bernie Sanders did rallies in SC, TX, VA, and NC. (NT) Eric J in MN May 2016 #22
Sanders advisor says mythology May 2016 #23
so he lied when he said he "did not compete"? bettyellen May 2016 #44
Tad Devine said that, not Sanders. NT Eric J in MN May 2016 #47
so, his campaign lied. got it. bettyellen May 2016 #48
Where has he been over his 30 years in Congress? Haven't seen Surya Gayatri May 2016 #25
Did most Democrats in Congress publicly advocate a 50 state strategy? NT Eric J in MN May 2016 #49
I hope they take a step back and look at some electoral realities before doing this... SaschaHM May 2016 #13
And I assume your "purity" test is looking to see if they have a (D) behind their name. rhett o rick May 2016 #16
Wah Wah Wah Daddy isn't winning and he's going to be too old to ever run again. SaschaHM May 2016 #20
Welcome to MY ignore list. Ugh. djean111 May 2016 #30
If the point is to move to a more Progressive government, Maedhros May 2016 #52
Does this include those conservative states that apparently don't really count? Zynx May 2016 #17
Conservative States will cease to be conservative SaschaHM May 2016 #21
As he fires staff that could do that ... baldguy May 2016 #18
But but... If we do that, the status quo cannot be upheld. Betty Karlson May 2016 #19
Guaranteed the Democratic Party machinery will sabotage that. They always do. Triana May 2016 #24
I can see, down here in Florida, how Debbie DINO will not back progressives and/or liberals, and djean111 May 2016 #31
At one time Demsrule86 May 2016 #32
Compared to HRC and her 3rd Way Democrats FreakinDJ May 2016 #33
He is now accusing her of money laundering Demsrule86 May 2016 #53
Those 50 States will be on their own as far as fundraising, right? brooklynite May 2016 #37
Tell that to the South MadBadger May 2016 #38
excellent, Bernie's doing exactly the right thing here 0rganism May 2016 #41
This would have been more impressive last winter anigbrowl May 2016 #46
Like South Carolina, I'm sure. Maru Kitteh May 2016 #50
Maybe the next job for Bernie is chairman of the DNC WhiteTara May 2016 #51
No way Demsrule86 May 2016 #54
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #55
 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
1. There goes Bernie again...bashing young folks and poor people...
Sun May 1, 2016, 08:20 AM
May 2016

Just because eighty percent don't vote is no reason to say they don't vote.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
2. In the Fall of 2018, Sanders should do rallies
Sun May 1, 2016, 08:23 AM
May 2016

...across the country encouraging young people to vote.

If he doesn't have the funds for that in 2018 then the DSCC should pay for it.

The reason Democrats usually do badly in midterms is some young people only vote in presidential years.

 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
8. Former Bernie Sanders Staffers Seek To Elect A ‘Brand New Congress’
Sun May 1, 2016, 08:44 AM
May 2016
Brand New Congress, which was launched Monday, is looking ahead to the 2018 midterm elections to “replace Congress all at once” with lawmakers who agree with the Vermont independent’s policy positions. The PAC won’t be able to fully accomplish that goal in 2018, however, since just 468 of the 535 lawmakers in the House and Senate will be up for re-election.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-congress_us_5720e608e4b0b49df6a9c933
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
3. Sadly, if Hillary is the nominee, the answer to this is all too clear -
Sun May 1, 2016, 08:23 AM
May 2016
"The Democratic Party has to reach a fundamental conclusion: Are we on the side working people or big money interests? Do we stand with the elderly, the children, and the sick and the poor, or do we stand with Wall Street speculators and the drug companies and the insurance companies?" —


The (Third Way) Democratic Party stands with big money interests, Wall Street speculators, the drug companies, and the insurance companies. Proudly, IMO. Mission accomplished.
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
5. Hillary has done very well with low-income voters
Sun May 1, 2016, 08:29 AM
May 2016

Especially African-American low-income voters.

They have been voting for her in large numbers.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
6. That does not mean she will do good things for them.
Sun May 1, 2016, 08:38 AM
May 2016

Who votes for Hillary is not the topic - the topic is who does the Third Way-dominated Democratic party stand with. IMO they stand, now, with the 1%, Wall Street, the MIC, and corporations.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
9. Not questioning that at all.
Sun May 1, 2016, 08:48 AM
May 2016

As I said, that is not the topic of this OP. And, yeah, we will find out. I will just be watching, this time around. Neither candidate means well for people, IMO.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
26. Look at the Clinton record. She has a past with actions.
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:24 AM
May 2016

She was big bubba's first line of offense on mass incarceration and more. Watch the videos of her time as tag team Pres. The poor who voted for her should not be surprised when they get nothing. The people who have been watching this endless election cycle have seen that Hill has no issues of her own. She ran the Me Too campaign. If Bernie's gonna do it, me too! Pretty clear what has been happening. If you aren't a bank or corporation....forget it. Big plus, her ears don't open unless you pay her. Oh wait, I don't even know if that's true. She does get paid to 'talk' though.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
28. The SCHIP program expanded health coverage to millions of lower-income children
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:34 AM
May 2016

She played a big role in making that happen.

She also pushed for the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act which helped address the rights of women in the workplace.

She also helped write the Pediatric Research Equity Act which improved drug labeling with respect to medication administered to children.

She co-sponsored the Support for Injured Servicemembers Act which extended benefits provided under the Family and Medical Leave Act.

It's only fair to look at her whole record, not just the aspects of it that you don't like.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
29. Well....there have been some pretty horrible things along the way.
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:56 AM
May 2016

Thanks for your list. While it appeared that she helped children, I believe the record shows that other 'programs' were less than that! Have a good one. I would love to look at the whole record...unfortunately much of that is concealed from us. Yet another problem.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
14. Black Lives Matters don't think very highly of her.
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:11 AM
May 2016

Here are some important points made by Black Lives Matter Activist Ashley Williams:

“Here's the truth: the Clinton legacy has left our prisons bursting at the seams. Real lives have been destroyed as a result. It is an indisputable fact that millions of Black people were locked up for drug crimes and provided the bodies for the expansion of the prison industry.

The 1994 Crime Bill that she so vigorously defended not only expanded incarceration, but stripped funding for college education from prisoners. The Clinton legacy allowed for policies that prevented anyone convicted of a felony drug offense from receiving food stamps or income assistance. Clinton-led welfare reform fundamentally ripped apart the social safety net.”


“Make no mistake, Hillary Clinton's efforts to push these policies resulted in the continued destruction of Black communities and the swift growth of our mass incarceration crisis.”
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
36. Not worth very much to BLM. They know, as you do, that he reluctantly voted for the
Mon May 2, 2016, 10:21 AM
May 2016

bill but spoke out against the part that locked up minorities. The very part that Clinton supported as mentioned by BLM. She is tough, I'll give you that. Tough on people on welfare, tough on marijuana crimes. Fills those Prisons For Profits that support her campaign.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
39. That's not true
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:36 PM
May 2016

Many members of the BLM movement are not supporting Sanders either.

Reluctant votes count just as much as enthusiastic ones.

64 Democrats voted against the bill in the House - there was no reason he couldn't join them if he wanted to. It would have passed regardless.

Incidentally 188 Democrats in the House voted in favor of the bill, along with 54 out of 56 Democrats in the Senate, including Paul Wellstone, one of the leading progressive voices in the Senate at the time.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
40. I think that's called using chaff as a counter measure. You forgot to mention what I said that
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:54 PM
May 2016

isn't true. Sen Sanders spoke out passionately against those parts of the bill that included tough sentencing that Clinton supported. He voted because the bill had parts he though were important.

The important point is that he does not favor the tough (Clinton tough) sentencing for minor drug offenses that are filling Clinton's Prisons For Profits.

If you didn't like the BLM quote maybe you will like this quote:

“Far from resisting the emergence of the new caste system, Clinton escalated the drug war beyond what conservatives had imagined possible a decade earlier. As the Justice Policy Institute has observed, “the Clinton Administration’s ‘tough on crime’ policies resulted in the largest increases in federal and state prison inmates of any president in American history.”99 Clinton eventually moved beyond crime and capitulated to the conservative racial agenda on welfare. This move, like his “get tough” rhetoric and policies, was part of a grand strategy articulated by the “new Democrats” to appeal to the elusive white swing voters. In so doing, Clinton—more than any other president—created the current racial undercaste. He signed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, which “ended welfare as we know it,” replacing Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) with a block grant to states called Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF). TANF imposed a five-year lifetime limit on welfare assistance, as well as a permanent, lifetime ban on eligibility for welfare and food stamps for anyone convicted of a felony drug offense—including simple possession of marijuana.”
― Michelle Alexander, The New Jim Crow

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
42. That paragraph is about Bill Clinton
Mon May 2, 2016, 02:40 PM
May 2016

He's not running for office.

Bernie Sanders voted for the 1994 Crime Bill.

What were the parts of the bill that Sanders thought were important enough to override his passionate opposition to the parts of the bill that included tough sentencing?

What was in the bill that Sanders supported so strongly that he decided to vote for it in spite of his other objections?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
45. So? What's your point? BLM seems to think that Hillary shared his feelings.
Mon May 2, 2016, 03:57 PM
May 2016

See my signature statement.

As far as Sanders signing the Crime Bill, there is tons of info at your fingertips on the internets if you reallly are interested. But I am always glad to accommodate.

In Sanders’ statement at the time, he criticized the mass incarceration and death penalty provisions in the bill, saying:

“…it is also my view that through the neglect of our Government and through a grossly irrational set of priorities, we are dooming tens of millions of young people to a future of bitterness, misery, hopelessness, drugs, crime, and violence.

And Mr. Speaker, all the jails in the world, and we already imprison more people per capita than any other country, and all of the executions in the world, will not make that situation right. We can either educate or electrocute. We can create meaningful jobs, rebuilding our society, or we can build more jails.

Mr. Speaker, let us create a society of hope and compassion, not one of hate and vengeance.”

During consideration of the bill, Sanders voted six times to weaken or eliminate the death penalty provisions and voted separately against creating new mandatory minimums. Then-First Lady Hillary Clinton spoke strongly in favor of increased incarceration, labeling at risk youth as “super-predators” who had to be “brought to heel.”


Sanders reluctantly voted for it because:
The House version of the bill included a ban on semi-automatic assault weapons. Sanders had supported the ban since 1988. The conference committee version included not only the assault weapons ban but also the Violence Against Women Act provisions. Sanders supported these efforts to protect women.


So let's review. Sanders was against the mass incarceration of millions esp of minorities while Clinton:
“Make no mistake, Hillary Clinton's efforts to push these policies resulted in the continued destruction of Black communities and the swift growth of our mass incarceration crisis.” BLM

Clinton's Prisons For Profits have been very grateful to the Clintons for their profit margin. So grateful they have supported the election of Clinton as President. It's all about greed for the Conservative Wing of our Party.
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
56. BLM is not a monolith. Ashley Williams is one person
Mon May 2, 2016, 06:34 PM
May 2016

The quote in your signature statement is from her, not speaking on behalf of the entire Black Lives Movement. You provide another quote from her in the body of your message and ascribe it to "BLM" but it is her opinion only, not a statement from the movement itself. Ashley Williams is not the only voice of significance within the African-American community. The Congressional Black Caucus, for example, overwhelmingly supports Hillary Clinton's candidacy. As former President Clinton noted, a lot of African-American leaders supported the 1994 crime bill at the time, including said caucus. Hillary Clinton clearly has been able to convey a message that has won her widespread support in the African-American community. She has carried that demographic in state after state throughout this process, in many cases by very large margins. Presumably the people who vote for her in this community know what they are doing.

Incidentally, the House version of the bill that Bernie Sanders voted for did not include a ban on semi-automatic assault weapons.

Here's Politifact on that subject:

Our ruling

Sanders says he voted for the 1994 crime bill because "there is a ban on assault weapons in that bill."

There were many votes surrounding the crime bill. The trouble with Sanders’ claim is that his contention that he voted for the crime bill because of the assault weapons ban is at odds with votes for the bill that include no such ban.

As often with congressional votes, there is a lot of gray area to determining a legislator’s motivations.

We rate Sanders’ claim Half True.
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
43. Clinton supported being tough on VIOLENT criminals- the states did the damage regarding smaller
Mon May 2, 2016, 02:45 PM
May 2016

drug crimes. Honestly, you'd be throwing Wellstone under the bus with 95% of the other Dems now. Good luck getting anything done except pointing fingers.

Squinch

(50,897 posts)
11. Democrats have to acknowledge their own culpability in the actions of the Democratic party in
Sun May 1, 2016, 08:51 AM
May 2016

recent years. We have not had the Congress or the state legislatures to do much to counteract the Republicans and the tea party movement. That is because we don't vote well in off years or down ticket.

I am a vocal and strong supporter of Hillary. I love this idea of Sanders's. It is something that acknowledges how things realistically happen. I will work for this effort.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
15. Wow, another low poster attack. Where are we getting so many new Clinton
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:13 AM
May 2016

fans? In any case "Full Ignore" for you.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
23. Sanders advisor says
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:51 AM
May 2016

“[Hillary Clinton’s] grasp now on the nomination is almost entirely on the basis of victories where Bernie Sanders did not compete,” said senior strategist Tad Devine. “Where we compete with Clinton, where this competition is real, we have a very good chance of beating her in every place that we compete with her.”

Devine named eight states where he said the Sanders campaign did not compete with a big presence on the ground or much on-air advertising: Texas, Alabama, Virginia, Louisiana, Tennessee, Mississippi, Georgia, and Arkansas.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/bernie-sanders-campaign-offers-awkward-take-state-the-race

So per his own campaign, they didn't run a 50 state campaign.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
25. Where has he been over his 30 years in Congress? Haven't seen
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:12 AM
May 2016

him in the Dem ranks advocating for such a 50 state strategy.

Johnny-come-lately in the last few months. What a crass opportunist.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
13. I hope they take a step back and look at some electoral realities before doing this...
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:03 AM
May 2016

A 50 state solution can not be a one-size-fix-all solution. If the senator and his staffers look at the map and choose candidates that can best serve

and win
in their district, fine. Tell me where to send my $27 dollars. If however, this becomes an exercise of who passes this year's XYZ national progressive purity test, it will be dead in the water before it even begins.
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
16. And I assume your "purity" test is looking to see if they have a (D) behind their name.
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:16 AM
May 2016

Well that doesn't take much effort. The Democratic Party has been coopted by Big Money and we must kick the DINO's out.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
20. Wah Wah Wah Daddy isn't winning and he's going to be too old to ever run again.
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:21 AM
May 2016

Welcome to the ignore list. Bernie couldn't get elected dogcatcher in my state. If you want a 50 state party, you have to confront the reality that there isn't a wellspring of young white progressives that will be ready to show and toss whatever parental surrogate that they are salivating our across the finish line. You have to tailor candidates for specific states/regions and that does not work when the purity test now contains xyz issue because there was a really engaging documentary on it. You can stick to riding unicorns with Daddy, some of us want to get democrats elected. Have fun rooting for the losing team.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
30. Welcome to MY ignore list. Ugh.
Mon May 2, 2016, 08:07 AM
May 2016

And if we referred to Hillary as "granny" we would get alerted on. So we won't refer to Hillary as granny.

And "daddy"? You seem to have some real issues, I hope you get some help for that. You remind me of another Hillary supporter who said if we don't support Hillary, we have "mommy" issues. Y'all need some professional help. Soon.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
52. If the point is to move to a more Progressive government,
Mon May 2, 2016, 05:13 PM
May 2016

We should definitely support more Progressive candidates.

If the point is to simply count coup against Republicans, we should stick to our partisan identity politics.

Zynx

(21,328 posts)
17. Does this include those conservative states that apparently don't really count?
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:16 AM
May 2016

I am wondering if he's the right person to make this pitch.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
21. Conservative States will cease to be conservative
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:24 AM
May 2016

There is a hidden spring of young white progressives voters that will put Berniecrats everywhere over the finish line that just needs to be tapped.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
19. But but... If we do that, the status quo cannot be upheld.
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:19 AM
May 2016

I know everyone (except a couple of obstinate bubble-dwellers) are clamoring that the status quo is untenable, but surely that doesn't mean we should get our collective head out of our collective ass actually start ... serving the people? Representing them? Abandoning the exclusive interests of the very richest Americans?

That would be... Democratic. We can't have that! Third Way or the Highway, even if it is a dead end!

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
24. Guaranteed the Democratic Party machinery will sabotage that. They always do.
Sun May 1, 2016, 10:21 AM
May 2016

Establishment Dem party don't need no stinkin' 50-state strategy. Just look how good they did without it in 2010 an 2012, eh Debbie Wasserman-Schultz?

Pfffft.


 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
31. I can see, down here in Florida, how Debbie DINO will not back progressives and/or liberals, and
Mon May 2, 2016, 08:12 AM
May 2016

openly supports and campaigns for her GOP cronies.

How many seats has she presided over losing? Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 governors, 69 House seats, 13 Senate seats. Under Obama, while Debbie is running things. Yeah, there is a strategy. But it is to make the Democratic party into a Third Way and MIC run corporate-controlled party. I cannot belong to that, many others will not join, or will quit. Congratulations, Debbie, Hillary, and the Third Way!

Demsrule86

(68,440 posts)
32. At one time
Mon May 2, 2016, 08:30 AM
May 2016

I might have supported this sort of thing from Bernie...but no more...his behavior has made it impossible for me to support anything he does.

Demsrule86

(68,440 posts)
53. He is now accusing her of money laundering
Mon May 2, 2016, 06:18 PM
May 2016

He makes me sick. I turn off the TV when he comes on...I am in it to win the general...and this guy has no chance and is helping Trump...he is losing ugly.

brooklynite

(94,266 posts)
37. Those 50 States will be on their own as far as fundraising, right?
Mon May 2, 2016, 10:26 AM
May 2016

No money from Sanders, or his supporters.

0rganism

(23,912 posts)
41. excellent, Bernie's doing exactly the right thing here
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:58 PM
May 2016

strengthening the economic justice movement within the Democratic party and tying it to off-year voting malaise
Bravo Bernie!

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
46. This would have been more impressive last winter
Mon May 2, 2016, 04:10 PM
May 2016

Articulating a new vision when the wheels are starting to come off your campaign is not very persuasive or impressive. I've never been able to get enthused about the idea of Sanders as President, I feel he'd be extremely reactive to circumstances rather than able to push his agenda through. OK that's a problem for politicians in general but I would have been much impressed if he had started talking strategy earlier instead of peddling revolution.

WhiteTara

(29,692 posts)
51. Maybe the next job for Bernie is chairman of the DNC
Mon May 2, 2016, 04:41 PM
May 2016

and he can take up the mantle of Howard Dean and work on our 50 state strategy.

Demsrule86

(68,440 posts)
54. No way
Mon May 2, 2016, 06:20 PM
May 2016

You have to live in the real world and not be a purist to run the DNC...I shudder to think of the races Bernie would lose. Also, no one likes him well enough.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders Calls for 50-Stat...